Christopher Reeves

Anti-vaxxers start coughing on Kansas legislators they disagree with

Kansas House and Senate Republicans today introduced legislation that demands that the state reject any vaccine mandate, saying that individuals cannot be fired, and if they are fired they are allowed to receive back pay, as well as potential fines that can go to the state of Kansas.

The legislation is a series of mandates on employers telling them they must recognize religious or moral exemptions, but the employer is not allowed to ask if the employee actually has a real religious belief or not. Republican Sen. John Doll asked how far this policy goes:

Republicans asking about the exemptions from other Republicans? Even they don't understand what is going on.

Republicans now face a divide. Several companies, especially those receiving Medicare and Medicaid funding—long-term care facilities, mostly—would struggle. The legislation would fine noncompliant businesses up to $50,000 per day, but losing federal funds for noncompliance might bankrupt them.

This exact problem has led to the Kansas Chamber of Commerce chiming in that the legislation as proposed has problems.

If you can't get your way? Just start coughing on people and yell out. Because that is how we get things done.

Well, as the day goes on, Republicans start debating other conspiracies. You know, let's talk about JFK's assassination.

Florida's board of education destroyed opportunities for disabled students in just 6 minutes

Just when you think the state of Florida can't possibly do more harm to their own residents, we find that new rules instituted for this school year—rules that took all of six minutes to pass—are wrecking the lives and opportunities of students with severe disabilities.

Gov. Ron DeSantis took up a considerable amount of time this summer demanding changes to educational tools to stop teaching about racism. The governor contended that legislators know better, and therefore, stopping critical race theory—a subject educators aren't teaching at these levels, though they do teach history—was of high priority. What wasn't a priority in the state board of education meeting was special need students. After a lengthy debate on critical race theory, it took only six minutes, with only one public speaker, to permanently change the way disability education works in Florida, an act that disability advocates believe was as harmful as stripping people of access to their wheelchairs.

The policy Florida enacted can only be summarized in one word: cruel. Florida faced a problem where just over 1% of their students fell into the category of special education, which is a cap that the federal government has set under the Every Student Succeeds Act. So how do you fix this problem?

DeSantis and Florida's board of education had an idea: Kick the students out of special education, make them get IQ tests, and then see if after two grading periods they can succeed in mainstream education.

Matthew Cooley was a student with most of the common problems that come with autism. Like most parents of autistic children (myself included), we know how beautiful and thoughtful our own children can be, and that they can accomplish great things if given a chance. What is needed will be a different kind of opportunity for what comes next after education. Instead of being offered that chance to start sooner, Cooley found that under the new Florida policy, he would have to be mainstreamed for two grading periods before he could go back into special education.

Children with autism who are mainstreamed often suffer bullying and an erosion of confidence in their own ability to succeed. They don't move forward—they regress instead.

Six minutes was all it took to change the lives of families across Florida. Six minutes to demand IQ tests and the humiliation of putting a child through a test designed to prove to them that they are "less than." Six minutes to think about subjecting students to bullying. Six minutes to deprive classrooms of students of fair and free access to a public education—unless the goal is to mainstream students to drive more wealthy families to go to private schools. Six minutes to take away months of learning you can't get back.

Students ask for our love, our care, and our compassion. Six minutes was all the time they were afforded. Don't worry: Fighting back against masks or teaching the history of racism? I'm sure days and days were spent on those matters.

Republicans are rooting against America. That perfectly sums up their party right now

Sports are something that can draw in fans and make rivalries. You can be a fan of one team, and root against another. They were professionals being paid significant sums of money — even in my youth — and rooting for the game was entertaining. US Olympians were in that rarified air of representing America. They were the best at what they did and ambassadors of our country. Carl Lewis. Jumping up and down waiting as Florence Griffith Joyner came down the line to break records in track, a record that stood until a few days ago. There were letdowns. Moments where the US effort fell short. There would always be heartbreak at some athlete who gave supreme effort and just found they were outmatched by their competition. A few moments, like Lochte-gate made me grit my teeth.

One thing I never found myself doing, really, was rooting with absolute glee against America. Last night, after a 1-0 loss to Canada, the US Women's Soccer Team was eliminated from gold medal contention. The way in which Republicans celebrate shows exactly the problem we face: a group of people with absolutely no accomplishments pointing and giggling in glee for sheer spite and disagreement over their rights.

The content is never-ending on Twitter, and not worth my time to go down that rabbit hole, but this comment is representative of the Republican urge to root against America.


As Simone Biles withdrew herself from Olympic events citing twisties, too many also began bashing her. The reality of what she faced was real — and the injury could have been devestating. They simply didn't care.



The idea was something that stuck from the beginning.


In 1984, Mary Lou Retton won 2 bronze medals, and she was called "America's Sweetheart". People understood the level of dedication and work she put in.

Rooting for Americans to fail is where the Republican party is right now. They don't want to just have a disagreement, they want that disagreement to be one where they view it as damning and deserving of personal destruction and mockery. Who benefits from this, and what mentally drives this attitude?

I go back to thinking about the pro teams I followed, and the players I rooted for — even after they left my home town. Alex Smith was someone who was known in the Kansas City community for supporting good causes and working to help change social discussions. He made that more clear last year.


This was no surprise to anyone who knew about Smith's charitable giving and support for foster children and the community. When Smith was subject to one of the worst injuries in the NFL, a spiral fracture of his leg, both sides took to one knee, held hands, and rooted for him to be OK. Whether they were a fan of his team or rooting against them did not matter. We are a nation built on kindness, caring, and concern.

Rooting against America and our freedoms including freedom of expression? Schadenfreude for America? Miss me with all of that.

Laura Ingraham learns some rights are not in the Constitution

There are many great stories about the constitution, our amendments, and the rights that come from these documents and the laws of our country. Through good and bad, we have had an open debate on how we become a better nation. Our preamble states: "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Not a place where we are a perfect union already, but the goal of forming a more perfect one—a government that improves every day. Throughout the constitution, rights are established and detailed, and through amendments, those rights have been expanded.

I may not be a Harvard-educated attorney—admittedly, neither is Laura Ingraham—but I can look through the constitution and realize that certain "rights" never appear. There is no right to infect someone else with a deadly disease. That isn't a right you have. I don't see a right you have to board an air flight and contaminate others, either. There are no rights to poison the environment or commit acts of violence against the government—in fact, I think that last one may have specific clauses which have been interpreted against that point—but listening to Fox News conservatives, you would think all of these items were protected by the constitution. They rely on saying this because, I suppose, many of their audience has never actually read the constitution, or maybe they don't understand it.


Republicans for quite some time have gone out of their way to explain rights that you have—but these are rights that appear absolutely nowhere in the U.S. Constitution.

Alan Dershowitz has long switched to making ridiculous commentary and I generally put no stock in his efforts. Even this media attention seeker, however, can recognize the fact that Fox personalities clearly don't understand what rights you actually have.


Damn, I hate it when someone I dislike makes a point I agree with at times. This truth is so obvious, however, that the fact Laura Ingraham doesn't understand it is not just baffling, but proof of intent to whip up an audience to a fury over a point with no merit. It would be like me arguing I have every right to bring a child infected with chickenpox to your house today because exposure is good for them, I've decided that, and you just have to tough it out.

Sorry, the constitution doesn't give me that right. You can swing a baseball bat all you want, Laura, but the moment you swing it at my body, you've lost your right to swing the bat because you are using it to take away my rights.

Republicans hate this word — but it's the truth

During Donald J. Trump's impeachment trial, Rep. Jamie Raskin made a clear case about what had happened under Donald J. Trump's presidency. The acts Trump condoned on Jan. 6 were the acts of traitors. They were calling for the violent overthrow of the government. They refused the results of an election. They denied reality, and they attacked fellow Americans.

The phrase the insurrectionists yelled at police officers indicated the police were traitors. The police, though, made no move to overthrow the government. They did not attack or attempt to harm others. They did not work to intimidate the election process. They stood in defense of their country.


This is the defense of the United States government. How would it feel knowing you have family at home, that you have represented your nation for years, and that every day you put your life at risk to protect the people, not a party? The officers knew the mob could go inside the building and that the staffers therein didn't have clear signs over their heads that read "Republican" or "Democrat"—these young individuals' lives were at risk. Even elected officials don't wear giant billboards reading "Republican" and "Democrat," and unless they're your representative, you might not know who they are, which means they were also at risk. The officers put their lives on the line. They did so against traitors. Traitors. Traitors. Raw Story posted video of Marjorie Taylor Greene talking about where the traitors are, including in Congress, and her fear of penalties.



She also says something that I firmly believe in and lecture about: that so much power is in the hands of voters. What she doesn't say is that it's this power Republicans are scared of, and it's exactly why the Republicans are engaged in a massive plan to suppress votes. Greene begins this video talking about local elections, and I urge every single Democrat who reads this site to start paying attention. Your city council or county officer can help put polling places in locations that are more friendly or more intimidating to voters.

The committee that begins today boils down to one word: traitors. The Jan. 6 rioters are traitors. Those who want to deny American voters the right to vote are traitors against our beliefs. When you spend your time working against the pillars of our nation, there is only one word for that: traitor.

Republican speechwriter slammed for promoting alternate history to criticize critical race theory

Remember this guy? In the stream of the QAnon loving Republicans today, you'd think they have just forgotten him. He denounced Trump (far too late), and got onboard with vaccines (too soon for the Qanon conspirators). If you want to know a lot about where the Republican party is right now, take a look at the people who go to work in the Republican infrastructure. They know what the base wants, and they will say whatever it takes to continue to be relevant. Enter Ned Ryun, former Bush speechwriter, son of Kansas congressman Jim Ryun, who was defeated by Democratic candidate Nancy Boyda in a bit of an upset, and now, a ridiculous puppet for outright bonkers ideas.


Too bad he isn't here to answer that, right Ned? Care to answer how that came about? The response to Ned's comments highlights exactly the problem.

Others join in:



Even I couldn't resist a response.


Bernice King, daughter of Martin Luther King delivers the knockout blow:


It is a terrible thing, Ned when you forget that this is recent history and there are still people alive who remember what happened. It may be before me, but it wasn't before my parents — and that should tell you there are a whole lot of Americans alive who were here, and would wildly disagree with your weird 100% take.

Brian Williams roasts Matt Gaetz in hilarious comparison

We all have to deal with them. Some member of our extended family, or a co-worker, or someone we at a store who is just so incredibly wrong that at a certain point you want to throw up your hands and say, "Really? Really?" Enter Matt Gaetz. After testimony yesterday, Gaetz decided to go on the attack. Boy, did it go badly for him:


The response? Well, let's say a retired general had a few choice words:



It was Brian Williams on MSNBC who took the information and finally went in for the kill.


Brian Williams: "To be fair, Gaetz—the same Matt Gaetz who faces sexual trafficking charges he denies—did also tweet today to Free Britney Spears, which kind of makes him a freedom fighter."

Mic drop.

Pro-Trump 'Redneck Rave' descends into chaos as mass arrests follow weekend of throat slashing and strangulation

If you were to ask me how I wanted to spend my week, I can think of few things I would enjoy less than spending it among people who tried to sell the former guy a "campaign theme song" and spend a lot of time celebrating the idea of mixing "mudding" (which is actually somewhat enjoyable) with drunk driving, combined with assaulting women and maybe slashing a throat here and there. If you ask me, that sounds far more like the plot in a horror movie than anything I want to join in on. But in Kentucky's Blue Holler Offroad Park, that's exactly the kind of action attendees were welcome to enjoy. Welcome home, Mitch McConnell!

What more could you ask for, reallly? There are certainly attendees who were not on a Biden-hating bring-back-the-confederacy tilt, but a quick search of Facebook and YouTube turned up mostly images of vehicles with Confederate flags, pro-Trump memorabilia, or anti-Biden and anti-Harris statements. Well, hey, if you're going to roll around in the mud, I guess you might as well show who you are, really. The details are grizzly.

From The Daily Beast:

By the end of the five-day bash, dubbed the "Redneck Rave," one man had been impaled, one woman had been strangled to the point of unconsciousness, and one throat had been slit. In all, Edmonson authorities arrested 14 people, and charged four dozen people from five states.

Oh my! I really want that! That sounds so entertaining! The opportunity to listen to terrible music, get yelled at by drunks, and then impaled. Awesome.

Yahoo News goes into depth:

A five-day party in Kentucky ended in 14 arrests and 48 people charged with drug and alcohol, traffic, and assault-related offenses over their participation in what was billed as an occasion of "mud, music, and mayhem."
Numerous others were cited by police, and some were injured after partygoers descended on Blue Holler Offroad Park in Edmonson County from June 16-20 for the "Redneck Rave," an event that reportedly was held twice last year and during which one person died.

"The first vehicle that came through, we found meth, marijuana, and an open alcohol container," Sheriff Shane Doyle, who set up checkpoints in anticipation of trouble, said, according to the Lexington Herald-Leader. "And then one of the occupants had two active warrants ... We were like, 'Well, this doesn't bode well for the weekend.'"

Doesn't bode well for the weekend? Just the weekend? I worry it doesn't bode well for the hometowns where the attendees will be returning if they aren't still locked up or in recovery programs.

I guess only one sentiment sums up my reaction:


Here are the damaging policies Betsy Devos left behind

George W. Bush promised he would change American education with the No Child Left Behind Act. There are certainly significant problems with a system geared toward "teaching the test," as national educators pointed out from the beginning. Betsy DeVos, the former school board member and national vouchers advocate, had her opportunity to usher in new changes to national education policy. As you can imagine, many of them were devastating to the communities who seek opportunity through education.

One of those moments came about with changes in disciplinary guidance offered to states in order to change outcomes for students. DeVos used her office to build policy based on questionable research. As a result of these changes removing restorative justice, discipline, and opportunity, disabled students and students of color suffered. The Biden administration is asking for some feedback about what to do about these DeVos changes. The answer is simple: They have to go.

In making decisions about how to handle in-school discipline, DeVos turned to John Paul Wright, a professor at the University of Cincinnati. From US News:

"Themes of injustice, oppression, disparity, marginalization, economic and social justice, racial discrimination, and state-sanctioned violence dominate criminological teaching and scholarship," he wrote in 2017. "When it comes to disciplinary biases, however, none is so strong or as corrupting as liberal views on race."

Wright is credited with reigniting interest in using genetics and biology to explain criminal behavior and has written at length about the pushback he gets for it.

"Those who pursue this line of research get branded as racists or even eugenicists," Wright wrote. "We have personally experienced hostile receptions when presenting our work in these areas at professional conferences and have been excoriated in the anonymous-review process when attempting to publish our papers."

Wright starts with an interesting point: Students who come from disadvantaged homes are more likely to have issues, but he fails to address in any way whether or not interference by the school could help mitigate those problems or worsen them. Moreso, when it comes to issues had by disabled students, Wright makes no real assessment at all. In sweeping changes, though, DeVos just moved ahead on policy changes and pushed them out nationally.

From Disability Scoop:

The most recent federal data — from the 2017-2018 school year — indicates that students with disabilities accounted for a quarter of those who were suspended and 15% of expulsions even though they represent just 13% of all students.
Similarly, 38% of students who were suspended were Black though they account for only 15% of enrollment across the country.

The impact of these changes will be far-reaching, with students pulled away from educational opportunities, and disabled students given less of a chance to succeed. The part Betsy didn't want you to know is contained in this paragraph in American Progress:

Many of the state voucher programs, particularly those that target students with disabilities, require parents or guardians to sign away their rights under the IDEA and 504, and sometimes the ADA. Other states are silent on whether participating private schools have to meet federal requirements.26 Under the Succeed Scholarship Program for Students with Disabilities in Arkansas, for example, parents must "sign waivers that release the State of Arkansas and the student's resident school district from any legal obligation to provide services or education to the student participating in the Program" and "sign an acknowledgement that, by enrolling a child in a private school, the parent/guardian, acting on behalf of the child, waives the procedural safeguards granted by the IDEA."27 In Georgia's Special Needs Scholarship Program, accepting a voucher has the same legal effect as refusing special education services.28

Now, the Biden administration is asking for your feedback. DeVos took away 72 guidelines for schools. There is an opportunity here for us to make positive changes nationally. Prepared to submit a formal comment and bring back some sanity back to public schools? Leaving the Trump administration's damaging policies behind is a great place to start.

You can leave your feedback at this link.

Joe Manchin shows us why the tyranny of the Senate continues

Nowhere near the beginning, the Filibuster was created. This has made a lot of people very angry, and has been widely regarded as a bad move. Pardon my theft, Mr. Adams, Douglas not either president Adams. You see, despite Manchin's ridiculous editorial issued today, neither John Adams or his son were ever around to see an actual filibuster. Due to a rules change originally suggested by Aaron Burr, you know, the Vice President who murdered Alexander Hamilton in a duel, the first time the filibuster ever came up was in 1837. The rules were revised several times, with Mitch McConnell revising them several times.

Senator Manchin's editorial is full of hand wringing and false equivalencies. There is one truth that is universal, understood in every single language and does not change. Numbers. When the constitution was first ratified, the founders did not write a perfect document — and they knew it and opened it up for amendments, of which there have been 27 ratified. What didn't happen from the beginning was the ability of the founders to see how a filibuster would be used to derail governing. What they might have envisioned, however, came out of the 3/5 compromise, a mathematical agreement meant to give white southern states that held slaves a seat at the table while ignoring the problem of slavery.

The US Senate, today, has become an undemocratic dividing line where senators representing lower population states are dismantling democracy in favor of representing only the few. Welcome to the four house district club, Senator Manchin's West Virginia. Sending my regards from Kansas. And while your electoral vote count may go down thanks to that loss of a US House seat you still have exactly the same power you have always had in the US Senate — that is, West Virginia is the equal to New York, California, Michigan, Texas.

Because of this breakdown, a huge population of the United States is held hostage to the wills of those in states unreflective of the nation as a whole.

But what about Manchin's claims about the founder's belief? Apparently, he doesn't well understand what the founders themselves meant when they worded the document. From Princeton Legal Journal:

When considering the filibuster as a supermajority requirement for regular legislation, it is clearly unconstitutional.2 As a textual matter, the Constitution appoints the Vice President as the tie-breaking vote in the Senate, providing that they "shall have no Vote unless [the Senators] be equally divided." This provision implies that the Senate must pass regular legislation by a majority vote. The Framers of the Constitution, while concerned with tyranny of the majority, generally favored majority rule except for certain cases. In fact, the specification of supermajority requirements in the Senate elsewhere in the Constitution, like for the ratification of treaties, indicates that the Framers never envisioned a supermajority rule for regular legislation.1
The Framers, famously wary of tyranny of the majority, devised a system of governance to protect minority rights and promote deliberation without a filibuster. The Federalist Papers outline how checks and balances, federalism, and other structural mechanisms prevent abuses of power, suppression of minority interests, and rash government action. The Framers clearly feared tyrannical majorities and an overly powerful legislature. However, even they deemed a supermajority cloture requirement unnecessary, undermining the argument that the filibuster enhances the Senate's intended function.

Senator points out his "both sides" argument, but fails, frankly, to ever really offer any details. From his editorial:

It has been said by much wiser people than me that absolute power corrupts absolutely. Well, what I've seen during my time in Washington is that every party in power will always want to exercise absolute power, absolutely. Our founders were wise to see the temptation of absolute power and built in specific checks and balances to force compromise that serves to preserve our fragile democracy

I can think of several moments Republicans have tried — and succeeded — to move with absolute power. See, the US Supreme Court justice nomination process and three seats. Republicans have used similar measures to change the rules when needed.

Democratic elected? Not so much. In 2009, the Democratic elected struggled around the ACA, trying repeatedly to negotiate with Republicans. Again, with the current infrastructure bill, we keep going back to the table to negotiate. Republicans, when they had power over all three bodies did no such fair bargaining. While Senator Manchin talks about bipartisanship, Republicans have acted for quite a while as if they have never heard of it — in 2017, the Trump tax plan was negotiated between.. Republicans. Democratic feedback wasn't welcome or even really considered.

There is a simple problem with the West Virginian's solution of bipartisanship, and that is how you define it. I've spoken at a lot of meetings, and I always use this as an example. A husband and wife go to a marriage counselor. They are having a dispute. The husband has decided he wants to burn the house down. The wife is opposed, and says loudly: "How about we just burn down the garage?"

Either way, the house is destroyed.

Bipartisanship requires good faith results. You can't really negotiate in a way where your home is destroyed at the end of the talks.

With Republicans putting a stranglehold on low population red states they have developed a hard wall that guarantees them a large number of senators before they start.

Sorry, Senator, you can save your excuses for something else. If you really wanted HR4 instead, you have just handed Republicans exactly the tool they needed until midterms by telling them they can count on your vote to stop absolutely everything and anything that President Biden proposes. Good for you, bad for America.

Why does the tyranny of the senate continue? Because when given the opportunity to change it, the people who could help the situation sit on their hands; and those who benefit from the tyranny work harder and harder to prevent others from voting to change the situation.

Watch: Mitt Romney heckled as Utah Republican convention turns into Trump party

It shouldn't surprise anyone that Republican state conventions this year are more out of control than ever. Bitter about losing the White House, control of the Senate and House, Republicans are up in arms, and they are eager to not blame President Donald J. Trump, who lost them the US House in 2018, and who's defeat cost them the US Senate. Instead, Republican state conventions, convinced it is all a setup, have decided to turn on Republicans that they don't feel are conservative enough.

When Mitt Romney took to the stage in Salt Lake City, despite being the 2012 Republican Presidential Nominee, he heard all about how he was an apparent traitor and a communist. Romney had quick responses, though, boiling down to: "Do you know who my dad is?"

I cannot speak for every man I know over 40, but somewhere in my life I decided that I really couldn't play the card that says: "stop picking on me, do you know who my dad is?" It, well, seems fairly weak. For Mitt Romney, facing down boos, though, it was the off-the-cuff response that hit home. From the Salt Lake Tribune:

"Aren't you embarrassed?" said Romney trying to deflect the chorus of catcalls that greeted him as he took the stage.
"I'm a man who says what he means, and you know I was not a fan of our last president's character issues," said Romney as delegates attempted to shout him down. Accusations that Romney was a "traitor" or "communist" flew from the crowd like so many poison darts.

"You can boo all you like," said Romney. "I've been a Republican all of my life. My dad was the governor of Michigan and I was the Republican nominee for president in 2012."

The booing, however, did not easily abate.


Sen. Mitt Romney speaks at the 2021 Utah GOP Convention www.youtube.com

It's OK, though, the Republican state convention in Utah did have some good news. According to Congressman Owen Burgess, racism is nearly non-existent in Utah, and, that is in comparison to America, which is the least racist country in the world.

Congressman Burgess Owens offered deep gratitude for Utah's focus on family, sense of volunteerism and respect for racial diversity. "We're the least racist state in the country and the least racist country in the world," he said.

The Netherlands, New Zealand, Canada and several others have so far declined to comment.

Kansas GOP calls Sen. Joe Manchin their bipartisan hero

he Kansas GOP has a history of being seen as credible brokers of moderate proposals. After all, Sen. Roger Marshall was one of only six senators to refuse to certify President Joe Biden, and their state legislature has just spent months debating anti-transgender legislation and anti-science COVID-19 legislation as high priority.

Kansas Republicans chose Kris Kobach to serve as secretary of state and then as their nominee for governor. Now he may be seeking a position as state attorney general. When you're looking for a party that knows something about bipartisanship, why, the Kansas GOP is a beacon held high, guiding troubled ships to shore.

From the Kansas Reflector:

U.S. Rep. Ron Estes, the Republican 4th District representative, said the Democratic takeover was accompanied by a couple months of "hatefulness" that has somewhat subsided.

He expressed optimism Republicans would retake the House in 2022 after redrawing of congressional district maps and with Democrats taking the historically inevitable mid-term election hit. In the meantime, he said, U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, a conservative Democrat from West Virginia, was the GOP's backstop in the divided Senate.
"The most powerful person in Washington, D.C., is a man named Joe. And it's Manchin, not Biden," Estes said.

You can spend all the time you want reading about the Democratic senator from West Virginia at Vox, but the short story is simple: He's not going to support big senate reforms, will likely stop a great deal of infrastructure work, and stands against voting rights reforms. That's enough to garner some Republican praise and catch some support for being bipartisan.

There's something great about finding a bipartisan compromise. In a recent argument, a friend and I argued about a house. They wanted to burn it down. I proposed we not burn it down. We were unable to reach a bipartisan compromise as their counterproposal was that we just burn down the garage. While that was certainly a compromise between the two positions, I just couldn't accept it. I recognizing the house would still be rendered permanently damaged and, well, we would be committing arson.

Oh well. Maybe Joe Manchin has a plan that just agrees to disenfranchise only the people Republicans want to disenfranchise and can call it bipartisan.

Or something.

Republican Party reduced to sniveling hypocrites hoping for Caligula Trump's blessing

Four years ago, Republicans couldn't believe that a reality TV star would end up their nominee. They were sickened at the possibility. They said they would never let it happen to their party. Now, without a doubt, the Republican Party is entirely the party of Donald J. Trump, and the people who were against him just a few years ago are now his strongest sycophants.

We look back at history for incredible leaders who put their stamp on the generations that followed. Some have left positive marks on a nation or empire that are still being felt—FDR is an example. Others, like Caligula, Nero, or Andrew Johnson aren't necessarily the leaders you would imagine people lining up to make sure they were aligned with. As for the modern Republican Party: Oh no, call them the party of Trump now. They are so desperate to get Trump's blessing that they are throwing themselves on the ground and begging at his mansion in Florida.

Politico reported on the madhouse event:

The scene illustrated what has become a central dynamic in the nascent 2022 race. In virtually every Republican primary, candidates are jockeying, auditioning and fighting for the former president's backing. Trump has received overtures from a multitude of candidates desperate for his endorsement, something that top Republicans say gives him all-encompassing power to make-or-break the outcome of primaries.

Four candidates from Ohio flew down and begged, groveled, and patted the back of Trump, believing that his blessing would give them the inside track to the nomination in 2022.

This is an interesting dynamic change from where the Republican Party was just a few years ago, in case we forget:


Ted Cruz: Donald Trump Is a 'Pathological Liar' www.youtube.com

Some things are the same, though. The best political motive to serve the country and get things done is always revenge, right? Oh wait, that probably isn't a good reason to serve the public. From ABC NY:

Trump has yet to formally endorse the whole group of former administration officials, but he's already offering his support to some 2022 candidates to keep a grip on the GOP and deliver a dose of retribution to Republicans who he believes have wronged him, experts say.
"It's more about trying to push out those who he feels weren't nice to him," said Doug Heye, a former spokesman for the Republican National Committee. Heye boiled Trump's 2022 ambitions down to just a few personal goals: grabbing attention, seeking revenge, and ensuring his grip on the Republican Party.

For many candidates, the path into the 2022 campaign begins at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, where fledgling candidates are courting his support while also spending hefty sums of campaign money to host lavish fundraisers at his property.

Don't worry, folks. If Trump couldn't grift off of you before, now he'll make sure your donations to other candidates' funds end up in his pockets by forcing that money to be spent at his resorts.

I'm sure they can explain how this will economically help your state somehow.

DNC Chair Jaime Harrison demolishes RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel's fake outrage

Ronna McDaniel is worried about the world. Mostly, as chair of the RNC, she's worried about the fact that Google is, based on her theory, suppressing right-wing voices. While there hasn't been a lot of actual proof of that—it's mostly anecdotal conspiracy theories—it doesn't stop the RNC chair from screaming it loudly and calling for the tech giant to be called to task.

Don't get me wrong: I find it interesting and useful to have Republicans so interested in regulations, and, potentially, in breaking up monopolies. It would be an interesting discussion to have. While most of this boils down to programming and data modeling to show consumers in markets what they think will generate the most clicks, Republicans love the talking point. When the talking point meets a real, actual problem, however, they have absolutely no answer.


When studied, The Washington Post pointed out that many conservative-leaning websites get more promotion and spread over liberal/progressive websites, so conservative complaints are a bit of a tiny violin problem. In one tweet, however, Chair Jaime Harrison points out a real, defined problem that one party is directly causing: voter suppression.

Don't worry, Ronna. You can keep at this for the next few years—maybe you'll improve. Heads up: Next time, don't use the search term "DNC." You'll come up with DNC as a result.

Kansas Republican admits to voter fraud, agrees to diversion

If you ask Republicans, voter fraud is rampant and is quickly destroying the viability of elections. They argued that so many of these illegal votes are swaying elections that elections should be questioned. So far, however, the cases seem to show that voter fraud is extremely rare, and, whoops, often committed by Republicans.

In Kansas, the case of Steve Watkins, former US Congressman reached a conclusion last night with the former congressman admitting he had, in fact, committed voter fraud and that he didn't live at a UPS Store. Watkins, who lost to Jake Laturner, Republican State Treasurer, argued that the case was being brought up only for political reasons, as the relevant information was known for months beforehand and was related to a 2019 case. The voter fraud case marks another moment in the strange, strange tale of a former congressman who no one was ever sure of where he came from — and where he plans to go.

Steve Watkins appeared on the Kansas election scene in 2018 from out of nowhere. Republicans in the statehouse denounced Watkins, mostly on the grounds no one had ever heard of him, his claims seemed to be over the top, and his credentials simply didn't exist. From the Kansas City Star:

"Clearly, this is the way the affluent get their middle-aged kids out of the basement," said state Sen. Steve Fitzgerald, a retired Army lieutenant colonel and one of Watkins' primary foes. Later, he added, "He's a charlatan, a fraud and an opportunist."

But Fitzgerald also said the newcomer probably is leading. The GOP field has seven candidates and because Kansas doesn't hold runoff elections, it's possible to be nominated with less than 30 percent of the vote.

State Senator Fitzgerald and others kept pointing out what could at best be called inconsistencies in Watkin's stories. One of those tall tales finally caught up to him, however, and now, the former Representative admits guilt. The Associated Press offers this take:

Former Congressman Steve Watkins of Kansas has entered a diversion program to avoid trial over allegations that he voted illegally in a 2019 municipal election.

Watkins, a Republican from Topeka who served only one term in the U.S. House, was facing three felony charges. He was accused of listing a postal box at a UPS store as his home on a state registration form when he was living temporarily at his parents' home. He was also charged with lying to a detective who investigated the case.

While the congressman admits to voter fraud, it appears his penalty will be very minor, a $250 fine and an agreement to not possess firearms for 6 months. Watkins refers to the matter as a "mistake," others who have made similar honest mistakes, however, find themselves facing up to 5 years in prison. I guess it pays off to be a wealthy white Republican facing voter fraud charges.

Kansas Republicans spent a decade attacking social assistance. Now they are shocked at the results

Republican governors waged a decade-long attack on social services provided to families and those who are needy. The Republican playbook remained the same: setting up guidelines requiring that recipients return to work in set timeframes, that work requirements be built into the programs, and that they heckled those who didn't agree.

In Kansas we can see the results: Grift is at record levels in Republican businesses. Meanwhile, the Republicans were so concerned about how these funds could be misused that they pushed through legislation about how and where the money could be spent—like on cruise ships and casinos. When Republican states focused on how to make sure people couldn't get access to social services, they set themselves up for an outright disaster. When COVID-19 hit, states under Republican leadership that focused on these issues were completely unprepared to reverse course on their strategy and get assistance to the people. Now the results are devastating. The Republican response, in essence, is: 'Let's put forward more ideas about making it difficult for families in need to get help.'

The latest Kansas Republican push is "tie the length of time you can receive unemployment benefits to the statewide unemployment rate." There are of course, major problems with this, as the Kansas Reflector points out:

"Tying unemployment benefits to the unemployment rate is problematic," explains Donna Ginther, a University of Kansas professor who has been giving me (and others) a crash course on economics.

The unemployment rate, Ginther says, is a bad measure of the economy overall.

"When the economy is bad, people get discouraged," she says. "They may want to work but they stop looking. And so the narrowly defined unemployment rate does not capture those discouraged workers."

Why? Because Kansas Republicans are prepared to say that unemployment benefits should be stopped or cut because the state is actually at full employment, according to the state Chamber of Commerce.

Former Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback reduced the time that you could be on unemployment in the state in 2013, from 26 weeks to 16 weeks. Worse, if you fail to report 1099 or part-time income, even accidentally, you may find yourself banned from receiving any unemployment under any circumstances for five years. So Kansans struggling under COVID-19? Tough. If you're under that penalty, go suffer. And if you take on some work that you aren't turning in while you wait for any help, then boo to you, too.

Oh, wait—why aren't the unemployed in Kansas getting meaningful help right now? In another shot at the services to the unemployed, the former Brownback administration refused to fund system upgrades that made tracking claims and responses easier. Put more simply: He wanted to end unemployment, so he underfunded it to starve it and now the frail entity that is left groans under the weight it's tackling. From KVOE:

During this time, Governor Kelly stated that prior to COVID-19, updating the department's 44-year-old IT system was a major priority. However; that priority had to be shifted at the onset of the pandemic as the state had to "respond, process and deliver" thousands of claims on a daily basis while also trying to answer hundreds of thousands of calls at the same time.

Kelly says both unemployment and staffing within KDOL were at an all-time low at the onset of coronavirus. She added that the state also faced challenges due to "curveballs" that were thrown into the mix at the federal level.

Republicans spent decades working to destroy all means of public assistance. Now, Republicans are screaming about why the system doesn't work. While blaming the Democratic elected official in office may seem convenient, the truth is that Republicans in the statehouse were content with people facing draconian rules that cut off their unemployment and ended their benefits. They just assumed it wouldn't happen in their district. They also assumed it wouldn't happen all at once. So now the blame game happens.

Actor Edward Norton breaks down Trump's poker 'endgame' in epic Twitter thread: 'Call. His. Bluff'

The boss of a casino should know a few things about the cards they hold. They also know what the players in the house hold. They make sure drinks keep coming to hold off how long it is before someone leaves the table to try and get as much money out of a patron as is possible. The business model works for almost everyone — OK, well, Trump failed at this — however, the strategy remains to not worry about the immediate outcome of winning a hand or to bust the player. The goal is to string the situation out long enough that you find a way to get what you want anyway.

Edward Norton, an actor often associated with his fantastic performances in American History X and Fight Club, took to Twitter and gave his perspective as someone who grew up the son of a federal prosecutor about the "game" that Donald J. Trump is playing with democracy.














GOP's Josh Hawley doesn't even live in the state he represents

It was 2014, running for his re-election when the Washington Post had to point out something about Kansas Senator Pat Roberts: he didn't live in Kansas. In fact, Roberts made a joke that he had "full access to a recliner" he could use when he wanted. Now, Missouri Senator Josh Hawley seems to be following his lead, in a report by the Kansas City Star.

Hawley, it seems, has been using a $1.3 million dollar home in Virginia as his residence while claiming his sister's home address to vote from in the state of Missouri. Oh, Josh. Instead, when asked about the issue, the Senator's office became indignant, and brushed aside any information about it — after all, this is par for the course.

Hawley's shifting address to maintain registration isn't new. The Kansas City star notes how his family traveled, without, you know, traveling in household registration.

Hawley lived in Columbia during his stint as a professor at the University of Missouri Law School and two years as Missouri attorney general. But in March of 2019 the couple sold the Columbia home, according to the Boone County Recorder of Deeds.

That same month Hawley and his wife were added as co-owners to his parents' home in Springfield, according to the Greene County Recorder's Office. That property was sold in June.

A little more than a month after the sale of the Springfield property, Hawley changed his voter registration address to his sister's home in Ozark. He is also using the Ozark address for his registration with the Missouri Bar.

Don't worry. Hawley has an answer. Of course, it is to go on another conspiracy theory led tirade, saying that George Soros is apparently hiding in the bushes waiting for him. Or, something like that I guess.


From Your Site Articles

Man arrested in plot to kidnap and murder Wichita, Kansas mayor over COVID-19 protections

Brandon Whipple, a former statehouse Democrat elected in Wichita, Kansas, was subject to a kidnapping and murder plot. In texts sent to another member of the Wichita city government, the suspect, Meredith Dowry, asked for Whipple's address and then made clear his intentions.

Wichita implemented policies aimed at protecting citizens from spread of COVID-19, but some members of the community have backed conspiracy theories instead of science.

Speaking to The Wichita Eagle:

The apparent motive was the suspect's opposition to "masks and tyranny," Whipple said.
"He said he was going to kidnap me and slash my throat and he needed my address because I needed to see the hangman — me and everyone who, something about tyranny," Whipple said.

The suspect remains in custody while the Wichita Police Department further investigates the matter.

In a multi-hour meeting, many members of the Wichita community spoke out against the mandate and backed conspiracies. The mandate held, however..


Wichita City Council Meeting July 3, 2020 youtu.be

Trump campaign attacks Biden for going to church and his son's grave

Over the last week, one of the biggest stories in the country has focused on President Donald J. Trump’s demeaning of veterans. With multiple confirmations, CNN, Fox News, and NBC News, along with the originator of the story, the Atlantic, confirmed that Trump had made just those references during a trip to Paris, France during 2018.

Keep reading... Show less

White House adviser Dan Scavino shares faked Biden video

White House director of social media and assistant to the president Dan Scavino Jr. sure loves his iPhone. You can see how much he loves it in the photo above, showing it to all of his friends with those cool tools. With Rep. Steve Scalise in trouble for sharing a faked video of activist Ady Barkan, you’d think that the White House would try to avoid the completely faked video market right now. Well, Scavino is aiming to prove that theory wrong.

Keep reading... Show less

Watch: Joe Biden mocks Fox News reporter to his face during morning bike ride

Yesterday morning, on a bike ride—one of those physical activities I have yet to see the world’s healthiest orange president do—Joe Biden was asked a question by Fox News’ Peter Doocy: “Mr. Vice President, have you picked a running mate yet?” Biden, in response, answered “Yeah, I have.” Doocy, believing he had a scoop, asked: “You have? Who is it?” Biden responded: “It’s you,” and continued to ride away.

Keep reading... Show less

Kansas's three-party system died this week as moderate Republicans faced devastating losses

For more than a decade, the state of Kansas has operated under a unique system. There were, effectively, three parties. The Democratic Party, The Republican Party (Conservative), and the Moderate Republican party. Moderate Republicans worked to form their own organizations geared at “taking back their own party”, and frequently advised Democratic registered voters to “switch registration before primary day” in order to avoid crazy conservatives winning seats. The pitch was simple: if more moderate Republicans would win seats, they could take back their party and elect leadership that was less conservative. The reality, however, was that moderate Republicans found themselves feeling as though they had been sent to outer Siberia once they appeared in the state house, as the conservative majority boxed them out.

Keep reading... Show less

Inside the impact of rural voters on the Democratic Party

It’s another Sunday, so for those who tune in, welcome to a diary discussing the Nuts & Bolts of a Democratic campaign. If you’ve missed out, you can catch up any time: Just visit our group or follow the Nuts & Bolts Guide. Every week I try to tackle issues I’ve been asked about. With the help of other campaign workers and notes, we address how to improve and build better campaigns, or explain issues that impact our party.

Keep reading... Show less

I've taken the cognitive test, too. We need to talk about it

I was reading a community diary story today that you really should read, if you haven’t already, about the writer’s experience taking the cognitive assessment test. I have had difficulty processing Donald Trump’s answer regarding this matter to Fox News in a way that I hadn’t really come to terms with until reading that diary and thinking about how it made me feel.

Keep reading... Show less

Moderates have given up on the Republican party, leaving it to the lunatics

It was 2014. In Kansas, moderate Republicans formed organizations calling for sanity to return to their party.  They asked Democratic registered voters to re-register as Republicans “your primary vote means nothing as a Democrat, but you can save us from crazy Republicans” they noted. The idea was that the moderate middle would save the Republican Party. Over time, however, what the elected moderate middle discovered was that they would never be accepted within their Republican party, and face repeated challenges on their right flank.

Keep reading... Show less
BRAND NEW STORIES
@2022 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.