Belief

Christian nationalists frighten neighbors in rural Appalachia

In rural Appalachian areas of Tennessee and Kentucky, Josh Abbotoy operates a real estate company called Ridgerunner. And he uses socially conservative rhetoric to promote his company, declaring, "Faith, family and freedom — those are the values that we try to celebrate."

According to BBC reporters Ellie House and Mike Wendling, some of Abbotoy's clients are far-right Christian nationalists who openly push extreme ideas like repealing the U.S. Constitution's 19th Amendment — which gave women the right vote — and overturning civil rights legislation of the 1960s.

"Initially, he didn't attract much local attention after setting up shop in Jackson County, (Tennessee)," House and Wendling explain in a late December article. "But in late 2024, a local TV news report broadcast controversial statements made by two of Mr. Abbotoy's first, and most outspoken, customers: Andrew Isker, a pastor and author originally from Minnesota, and C. Jay Engel, a businessman from California. They are self-described 'Christian nationalists' who question modern values, such as whether female suffrage and the civil rights movement were good ideas, and call for mass deportations of legal immigrants far in excess of President Donald Trump's current plan. Another thing they sometimes say: 'Repeal the 20th Century.'"

The BBC reporters note that although "Abbotoy himself does not identify as a Christian nationalist," his tenants' extreme views are worrying their neighbors."

House and Wendling quote Jackson County resident Nan Coons as saying, "You don't know who these people are, or what they're capable of. And so, it's scary."

Engel has even called for deportations of legal non-white immigrants, writing, "Peoples like Indians, or South East Asians or Ecuadorians or immigrated Africans are the least capable of fitting in and should be sent home immediately."

Gainesboro, Tennessee resident Diana Mandli, however, is calling Isker's church out.

Mandli told the BBC, "I believe that they have been attempting to brand our town and our county as a headquarters for their ideology of Christian nationalism."

Read the full BBC article at this link.

Brutal analysis mocks 'prevailing Christian ethos in Donald Trump’s Washington'

Ross Vought is often credited as the architect of Project 2025, and as Donald Trump's director for the Office of Management and Budget, he has helped oversee historically destructive government cuts throughout 2025. In addition to his standing as an "amoral political actor," per a new analysis from The New Republic, what sets him apart from the worst of the White House "hatchet men" is his claim to carry out his actions in the name of his "devout" Christianity.

Writing an extensive breakdown of Vought's tenure as OMB director on Monday, journalist Timothy Noah observed that "conservatives used to think you could be a political hatchet artist or you could serve the Lord." Now, he argued, "they say: Why choose?" This idea is typified by Vought, who has stressed his devout adherence to Christianity throughout his time in politics, suggested that the US is an exclusively Christian nation and written in defense of "Christian nationalism."

"Vought wishes trauma on civil servants and has inflicted same; boasts about turning his think tank into a 'Death Star'; panders to the right’s paranoid streak by claiming Marxists rule America; helps Trump withhold aid to Ukraine illegally after its leader declines to investigate the son of Trump’s 2020 opponent; and impounds congressional appropriations in gleeful defiance of court precedent," Noah wrote. "Pretty sinful, no? Not to Vought. While doing all this Vought proudly declares his deep devotion to the Christian faith."

Vought, he continued, does not practice any form of Christianity devoted to helping the poor or downtrodden, or any sort of "sentimental nonsense about the least among us." Noah highlighted a part of Project 2025 in which Vought decried the US Agency for International Development (USAID) as “a permanent and immiserating feature of the global landscape.”

"That’s a novel way to describe a program to alleviate global poverty," Noah wrote.

According to an October profile of Vought from ProPublica, when it was suggested that the agency's budget be cut in half, he countered that it should be brought as close to zero as possible. An estimate from Boston University estimated that these cuts have been responsible for "640,000 people, 430,000 of them children," with the total deaths estimated later being increased by 38,000.

"... How on earth does the prevailing Christian ethos in Donald Trump’s Washington, as practiced by Russell Vought, align with the Christianity that the goyim have been telling me about my whole life?" Noah wrote in conclusion, suggesting that "Vought would run over his own grandmother to serve his president," and "also do it to please his Creator."

Right-wing influencers get new competition from an unlikely source — thanks to AI

Religion News reports the 2025 year was a year of skepticism and spectacle “with a seemingly endless flood of social media content, creators and AI slop,” but some faith-based influencers managed to cut through the inanity and art-barf with something better.

Rachel Griffin Accurso, 43, who recently hit the cover of Glamour magazine as one of its 2025 Women of the Year, can sometimes be seen in an upcycled dress embroidered with drawings by children in Gaza as a statement of advocacy. Religion news reports Accurso remains grounded in her Christian faith while being named to New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s inaugural committee.

“Her YouTube channel … now has about 18 million subscribers and more than 13 billion views,” reports Religion News.

Meanwhile, TikTok creator Tony Vara, 24, whose family is El Salvadoran, drew nearly a million followers while broadcasting his family’s struggle with President Donald Trup’s immigration policies.

“His emotional posts in the aftermath of his mother’s deportation went viral as he documented caring for his younger siblings and navigating life without her,” reports Religion News. “On Dec. 3, a TikTok showing Vara walking through an airport with his 8-year-old brother as he prepared to send him to be with his mother in Honduras drew 6.2 million views.”

Vara also speaks of his Christian faith and how it shapes his response to grief and activism while putting a human face on one nation’s oppressive policies.

Religion News calls New York City-based Tova Sterling, 28, a “Jewish culinary creator and cultural provocateur giving the faith-sphere an influencer it didn’t know it needed.”

“With more than 300,000 followers and climbing on Instagram, she’s known for sharp, cinematic cooking videos in which she confidently wields a knife while telling bizarre stories from her life as she plates a beautiful meal. Her knife skills, humor and irreverent commentary about relationships and womanhood have kept a growing audience hungry for more.

Sterling has also built a reputation offline as the host of Sinners Shabbat, a Friday-night gathering that “mixes burlesque performance with Shabbat ritual,” according to Religion News. It also elevates Jewish comfort food and draws thousands of self-described “sinners” and the religiously curious.

Read the full Religion News report at this link.

Trump admin's 'eerie' holiday posts 'may have violated the Constitution': analysis

New Republic Associate Writer Edith Olmstead argues President Donald Trump's administration violated the Constitution while it was haunting the internet with holiday images invoking Christian nationalism.

“The Department of Homeland Security’s tasteless holiday sh——posting may have just violated the United States Constitution,” Olmstead said, citing the federal agency’s official X account publishing multiple Thursday posts that appeared to violate the Establishment Clause, which prohibits government actions that favor one religion over another.

“Rejoice America, Christ is born!” read one post.

“Merry Christmas, America. We are blessed to share a nation and a Savior,” said another.

Olmstead said the second post was likely meant to evoke nostalgia, but mostly stirred nervousness with footage of President Donald Trump spliced into clips of popular holiday movies.

“It even included a photograph of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem holding a Christmas tree in Chicago, where she launched a deadly large-scale immigration operation, to really put the eerie in cheery,” said Olmstead, adding that the Trump administration now views the separation between church and state as a suggestion.

“It’s fitting that DHS would be the source of this blatant violation, as Noem’s ethnic cleansing approach to homeland security is transparently rooted in xenophobia and Christian nationalism. And the president has continually leaned into Christian nationalist rhetoric in order to please his conservative base,” Olmstead wrote.

Similarly, critics like Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, complain that the posts are “one more example of the Christian Nationalist rhetoric the Trump administration has disseminated since Day One in office.”

“People of all religions and none should not have to sift through proselytizing messages to access government information,” said Laser. “It’s divisive and un-American.”

Read the New Republic report at this link.

Conservatives mock Trump’s spiritual advisor

When President Donald Trump announced the creation of the White House Faith Office on February 7, he appointed far-right evangelical pastor and televangelist Paula White as its leader. Rev. White is a longtime spiritual adviser to Trump, giving an inaugural invocation during his first presidential inauguration on January 20, 2017. And she claimed the 2020 election was stolen from Trump by "demonic forces."

White once equated defying Trump with defying God, and she is the target of brutal mockery in a video posted on X, formerly Twitter, on Friday, December 26 by Republicans Against Trump — not to be confused with the conservative Never Trump group formerly known as Republican Voters Against Trump. Organizers for that group, now called Republican Accountability (RA), have included Bill Kristol, Sarah Longwell, Tim Miller and other well-known conservative Trump opponents associated with The Bulwark.

The video shows a collage of White making over-the-top comments, including "Wherever I go, God rules. When I walk on White House grounds, God walks on White House grounds….. I had every right to declare the White House holy ground because I was standing there. And where I stand is holy."

One of the clips shows White saying, "To say no to President Trump would be saying no to God, and I won't do that." And White, in another clip, describes Trump's opponents as "demonic."

"Let every demonic network that has aligned itself against the purpose — against the calling of President Trump — let it be broken," White declares in that clips. "Let it be torn down in the name of Jesus."

US 'unchurching' marks the 'fastest religious shift in modern history'

Far-right Christian nationalists are feeling empowered during Donald Trump's second presidency. Idaho-based evangelical Christ Church, led by pastor Doug Wilson — who believes that women never should have been given the right to vote — is openly embraced by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. And Vice President JD Vance, speaking at Turning Point USA's recent AmericaFest 2025 convention in Phoenix, told the MAGA crowd that the United States "always will be a Christian nation."

Vance received an aggressive fact-check from MS NOW's Steve Benen, who attacked his statement as "offensive, ahistorical nonsense" and reminded him that President Thomas Jefferson described the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment as "a wall of separation between church and state" back in 1802.

But as much support as Christian nationalism is receiving within the MAGA movement, reporting by Axios' Russell Contreras describes a pattern of "unchurching" in the U.S.—with many Americans having either a secular outlook or embracing a milder version of Christianity.

"The U.S. is undergoing its fastest religious shift in modern history, marked by a rapid increase in the religiously unaffiliated and numerous church closures nationwide," Contreras explains in a post-Christmas article published on December 26. "Why it matters: The great unchurching of America comes as identity and reality are increasingly shaped by non-institutional spiritual sources — YouTube mystics, TikTok tarot, digital skeptics, folk saints and AI-generated prayer bots. It's a tectonic transformation that has profound implications for race, civic identity, political persuasion and the ability to govern a fracturing moral landscape."

Contreras continues, "By the numbers: Nearly three in 10 American adults today identify as religiously unaffiliated — a 33 percent jump since 2013, according to the nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI). That's quicker than almost any major religious shift in modern U.S. history, and it's happening across racial groups, an Axios analysis found…. The shift in religious activity also is leaving behind a trail of 'church graveyards,' or empty buildings that are now difficult to sell or have been abandoned."

The Axios reporter notes that according to Gallup, roughly 57 percent of Americans seldom or never attend religious services — an increase from 40 percent in 2000 — and that an "unprecedented 15,000 churches are expected to shut their doors this year" compared to only a "few thousand expected to open."

PRRI CEO Melissa Deckman told Axios that there is no evidence of a widespread religious revival.

"Despite anecdotal and media reports about Gen Z men returning to church," Contreras notes, "there's little evidence it's happening beyond scattered examples to reverse the overall decline, she said. The bottom line: The old religious map is disappearing."

Read Russell Contreras' full article for Axios at this link.


Pope Leo XIV has 'his work cut out for him' in battling Catholic antisemitism: analysis

Author Lev Golinkin recently described an old-timey minstrel show at a Ukrainian Catholic church in Orlando, Florida, complete with hateful caricatures of a minority target, only now paraded before a modern audience and couched in Christmas celebration.

“The pageant isn’t short on spectacle,” Golinkin writes in the Washington Post. “The Holy Family, richly robed wise men, armored Roman soldiers and peasants dressed in bright Ukrainian embroidery all catch the eye. But even amid that explosion of color, the Jew is easy to spot. He appears on stage as a caricature of a Hasidic innkeep, including payot sidelocks. The character’s name is Moshko the zhyd — a slur for 'Jew' — and he is there to remind audience members of the evil in their midst.”

He parades about with promises to lend money and antics to distract revelry away from baby Jesus laying in his crib. And if he fails to catch your attention, he’ll call up a bunch of Roma (the slur name is “Gypsies”) to cavort and distract. He’ll even summon Satan himself to pull eyes away from the little marvel in a manger. Both pledge to keep the peasants ignorant of Jesus and wallowing in sin.

“This vestige of medieval antisemitism was just publicly live-streamed by St. Mary Protectress Ukrainian Catholic Church in Orlando, Florida, whose Facebook page invites viewers to ‘immerse yourselves in the magic of Christmas.’ But I don’t mean to single out this church; its pageant is not unusual,” said Golinkin. “Every winter, hundreds of Moshkos don the Jewish equivalent of blackface and scuffle onto stages in churches and community centers from New York to Chicago, Connecticut to Ohio, Dublin to Dubai. And many of the pageants, called verteps, are propagated by a branch of the Roman Catholic Church.”

The most jarring aspect of some of these spectacles, said Golinkin, is seeing children scream for the zhyd to ‘get out,’ or dress up as Moshko and his wife, “Sarah,” themselves, proclaiming their wickedness to the encouragement of parents, teachers and priests in the audience.

The scene is unnerving to Golinkin, who fled Russia with his family when the Russians similarly ordered them to “get out.”

“I’m certainly not the first immigrant to discover Old World darkness lurking in the U.S. But there was something obscenely mesmerizing about scrolling through social media and coming across little children — kids for whom Hasidic innkeeps might as well be Ottoman padishahs — being coaxed into shouting an antisemitic slur in churches and credit unions tucked amid strip malls,” said Golinkin. “Old hatreds have been lovingly packed and replanted. My nightmare was another’s nostalgia.”

At the end of the show, after King Herod is thwarted and Jesus manages to survives, Moshko comes out to collect donations from the audience.

“You could teach a course on antisemitism based on vertep tropes,” said Golinkin. And while Pope Leo XIV recently proclaimed in a speech that “The Church does not tolerate antisemitism,” the pontiff clearly has “his work cut out for him” with Antisemitic pageants legitimized at Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, and splashed across Facebook pages.

“The reality is that right now bishops and priests across the globe, including in Pope Leo’s hometown of Chicago, are carrying out an annual tradition of teaching children to hate Jews and Roma,” Golinkin said.

The question with whether the church will continue to tolerate it.

Read Golinkin's Washington Post report at this link.

Red state university removes teacher over failing grade for Bible-based essay

A decision from the University of Oklahoma on Monday left some asking whether the research university can still be seen as having “academic standards” after an instructor was removed from teaching duties for giving a failing grade to a student who focused on her own religious beliefs about gender in a paper for a psychology course.

The university released a statement saying the graduate teaching assistant in the course, Mel Curth, had been “arbitrary” in the grading of a paper by student Samantha Fulnecky, who wrote an assigned essay about an article the class read about gender, peer relations, sterotyping, and mental health for the course.

Fulnecky’s paper cited the Bible and focused heavily on her beliefs that “God made male and female and made us differently from each other on purpose and for a purpose.”

“Women naturally want to do womanly things because God created us with those womanly desires in our hearts. The same goes for men,” she wrote in the essay, adding that “society pushing the lie that there are multiple genders and everyone should be whatever they want to be is demonic and severely harms American youth.”

Curth, who is transgender, gave Fulnecky a zero for the essay and emphasized in her response that she was “not deducting points because you have certain beliefs,” but because the paper “does not answer the questions for the assignment, contradicts itself, heavily uses personal ideology over empirical evidence in a scientific class, and is at times offensive.”

“Using your own personal beliefs to argue against the findings of not only this article, but the findings of countless articles across psychology, biology, sociology, etc. is not best practice,” Curth wrote.

Another instructor concurred with Curth on the grade, telling Fulnecky that “everyone has different ways in which they see the world, but in an academic course such as this you are being asked to support your ideas with empirical evidence and higher-level reasoning.”

On Monday, the university suggested Curth’s explanation for the grade was not satisfactory.

“What is there to say other than that the University of Oklahoma has no academic standards?” asked journalist Peter Sterne in response to the university’s statement.

One civil rights advocate, Brian Tashman, added that the school’s decision opens up numerous questions about how academic papers that focus on a student’s religious beliefs will be graded in the future.

“So if a geology student at the University of Oklahoma says in class the earth is 6,000 years young because that’s what they believe, a geology teacher can’t say squat?” asked Tashman. “What if their religion teaches the earth is flat? Or that all of mankind’s problems can be traced back to Xenu?”

Curth had initially been placed on administrative leave earlier this month when Fulnecky filed a religious discrimination complaint with the school.

Fulnecky’s allegations drew the attention of the school’s chapter of Turning Point USA, the right-wing group that advocates for conservative political views on college and high school campuses. The group is closely aligned with the Trump administration. Vice President JD Vance spoke at Turning Point’s AmericaFest last weekend—and used the appearance to tell young conservatives that their movement should not root out antisemitism with “purity tests”—and the assassination of its founder, Charlie Kirk, earlier this year, was followed by the White House’s efforts to crack down on what it called left-wing extremism, with President Donald Trump directly blaming the “radical left” for Kirk’s killing before a suspect was identified.

While Fulnecky garnered support from the Turning Point chapter, hundreds of her fellow students rallied in support of Curth in recent weeks, chanting, “Protect Our Professors!” at a recent protest.

A lawyer for Curth said Monday that she is “considering all of her legal remedies, including appealing this decision by the university.”

“Ms. Curth continues to deny that she engaged in any arbitrary behavior regarding the student’s work,” Brittany M. Stewart told the Washington Post.

The university did not release its findings of the religious discrimination investigation it opened into Fulnecky’s case.

The school’s decision to remove Curth from teaching duties, said author Hemant Mehta, “is what academic cowardice looks like.”

Pastor responds to MAGA's 'keep Christ in Christmas' message by calling out its hypocrisy

The Rev. Jonathan B. Hall has a quick retort to people who demand we “Keep Christ in Christmas.”

“There is a quieter, graver danger that does not wait for December and does not end when the lights come down: Taking the Christ out of Christian,” Hall wrote for Religion News Services. “That happens whenever we subtract empathy from discipleship, whenever the self narrows our field of vision until we can no longer see the plight of our neighbor.”

Empathy is the pulse of the Christian, argued Hall. And to call it a sin is to “confuse the selfishness of self with the self-giving love of Jesus.”

“Many in Jesus’ day grew angry precisely because his heart was too open,” Hall said. “He touched those deemed untouchable, ate with those labeled unworthy, healed on days deemed inconvenient and noticed people that others learned not to see. The complaint then — even from his own disciples — was that he was too near to the wrong people.

“The complaint now in some corners,” Hall continued, “is that Christians are ‘sinfully empathetic.’

Hall cited Hans Christian Andersen’s “The Little Match Girl,” as a winter parable about “our capacity to look away.”

“It asks each of us, softly but insistently: Would I have stopped? Would I have knelt? Or would I have tightened my scarf and quickened my step? These questions are not meant to shame; they are meant to awaken,” aid Hall. “Empathy is the discipline of pausing long enough to imagine, ‘What if that were me? What if that were my child?’ It is not agreement with every choice; it is the willingness to feel another’s ache long enough to ask what love requires.”

“Such empathy is not weakness,” said Hall. “It is holiness with hands.”

“There is, to be sure, a temptation in every age to harvest the political or social capital of Christianity without undertaking its cruciform work. In subtle ways, we can turn ‘Jesus is Lord’ into ‘Jesus is useful,’ wearing the mantle of faith as a veneer for our own authority.”

But empathy can be costly, said Hall.

“It unsettles our schedules; it tugs at our resources; it asks us to carry one another’s burden. But the answer to compassion fatigue is not compassion famine,” Hall said.

Read Hall's Religion News Service essay at this link.

Religious scholar explains how Christian nationalists use and abuse the Bible

Like Islam, Christianity is incredibly diverse, ranging from severe fundamentalists to people who are devout but have a more nuanced and complex view of their faith.

President Donald Trump is not a Christian fundamentalist; he was raised Presbyterian in Queens and comes from a Mainline Protestant background. But some of his most ardent supporters in the MAGA movement are white evangelical fundamentalists and far-right Christian nationalists, who embrace a much more severe form of Christianity than the Presbyterian churches Trump's mother, a Scottish immigrant, attended in Queens and Scotland.

Trump's Christian nationalist supporters have very strong views on scripture. But during an appearance on Mother Jones' "More to the Story" podcast posted on Christmas Eve Day 2025, author/religious scholar Dan McClellan stressed that New Testament scripture doesn't necessarily mean what Chrisitan nationalists claim it does.

McClellan, author of the book "The Bible Says So: What We Get Right (and Wrong) About Scripture's Most Controversial Issues," told host Al Letson, "The hot new thing right now is to be a Christian nationalist. And I think a lot of people are jumping at the opportunity to get on board this attempt to take over the government on the part of Christians. And unfortunately, it means hurting an awful lot of people along the way."

McClellan noted that Christian nationalists are demonizing the word "empathy" and railing against "the sin of empathy." Claiming that "empathy" is inherently bad, according to McClellan, is a distortion of scripture.

McClellan told Letson, "Those are the people who are overwhelmingly trying to defend precisely parochial empathy because they're trying to convince others it's bad for us to empathize with undocumented immigrants. It's bad for us to empathize with people from other nations. It's bad for us to empathize with either conservatives or liberals. I think empathy that is outward looking is good."

During the interview, McClellan emphasized that Christian nationalists are "interpreting" the Bible in a way that fits with their political worldview.

McClellan told Letson, "Like everywhere else in the gospels, Jesus says, 'You cannot serve God and mammon.' And Jesus says, 'Blessed are the poor.' And you can look in the sermon on the Mount and in Matthew 5, and it says, 'Blessed are the poor in spirit.' And so, people say, 'Aha. It doesn't say…. That's not about economic poverty, that's about humility.' But you can then go to the sermon on the plain in the Gospel of Luke and it just says, 'Blessed are the poor' — which very clearly is referring to economic poverty."

The author/scholar continued, "As I said before, the Bible is a text. It has no inherent meaning. We create meaning in negotiation with the text, which means we're bringing our experiences and our understanding to the text, and that's generating the meaning."

The full Mother Jones podcast is available at this link.

'You're wrong': Fox host slammed for saying America is a 'Christian nation'

A Fox News host is under fire over her unique take on whether or not America is s Christian nation.

Carley Shimkus, co-host of “Fox & Friends First,” came to the defense of Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Tuesday. The Arkansas Republican had declared Friday, the day after Christmas, a holiday, “in order that state employees may spend this holiday with their families giving thanks for Christ’s birth.”

Huckabee Sanders went even further.

“More than two millennia ago in the little town of Bethlehem,” she wrote in an official state email last week, according to the Arkansas Times, “far from the centers of power in first-century Rome, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, was born in a humble manger.”

“Jesus was the Messiah and became a teacher and leader, and He would be crucified, suffer for the sins of all mankind, die and be buried, and rise again on the third day to sit at the right hand of the Father.”

The governor was admonished by the Freedom From Religion Foundation, which called her declaration an “abuse of power.”

“State offices are not churches, and gubernatorial proclamations are not sermons,” Chris Line, an attorney with the group wrote in a press release, the Arkansas Times also reported. “The governor is free to practice her religion privately, but she may not use the authority of the state to promote Christian doctrine as official government speech.”

On Tuesday, on Fox News’ “Outnumbered,” Shimkus told viewers, “the bottom line here is that, yes, we are a secular republic when it comes to our government, but we are a Christian nation.”

Shimkus had also declared that the governor received the letter criticizing her message, “as she was leaving a menorah lighting ceremony, like, that’s the irony of the timing of that.”

“Also,” she said, continuing to defend the governor, “she’s the daughter of … the ambassador to Israel.”

The Freedom From Religion Foundation responded to Shimkus’ remarks on social media.

“We’re a secular nation where you’re free to believe whatever you want,” the organization wrote. “So you can believe that we’re a Christian nation… But you’re wrong.”


Religion is causing 'yet another crack' in MAGA movement

Donald Trump's MAGA movement has pushed policies that conflict with "simple human decency," while claiming to stand for Christian values. According to a new analysis from Salon, this is creating "yet another crack in the MAGA coalition," as actual religious leaders and groups push back against Trump's agenda, and as the party risks alienating a significantly growing evangelical demographic.

Writing in a piece published Tuesday, Salon columnist Hannah Digby Parton extensively broke down the religious pushback Trump's second term has received, despite claiming to represent Christian values. The most notable has come from the Roman Catholic Church, as the newly elected Pope Leo XIV, the first American pontiff, has spoken out strongly against Trump's inhumane treatment of immigrants. This, in turn, has prompted broader pushback from other Catholic leaders.

"Leo... has called the treatment of undocumented immigrants extremely disrespectful and implored that they be treated humanely," Parton wrote. "The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a 'special message' condemning the policy, saying 'we oppose the indiscriminate mass deportation of people. We pray for an end to dehumanizing rhetoric and violence, whether directed at immigrants or at law enforcement.' The pope’s decision to replace the retiring Timothy Dolan, the pro-Trump Archbishop of New York, with Ronald Hicks, a pro-migrant bishop from Illinois, underscores his intentions."

Parton suggested that Trump's relentless targeting of Latin American individuals as part of his immigration crackdowns represents a "crack in the MAGA coalition," given that Latinos are the fastest-growing evangelical demographic and broke for Trump in 2024 by huge margins. Targeting them so heavily now might directly conflict with the MAGA movement's "self-preservation."

"... This represents yet another crack in the MAGA coalition, even if they don’t acknowledge it," Parton continued. "As a matter of self-preservation, one might have assumed that the Southern Baptists would be supportive of Latino immigrants, especially since they are the fastest-growing group of American evangelicals, the majority of whom voted for Trump in 2024. Evangelical communities are also expanding rapidly in Latin America. Only four percent of that population identified as evangelical 40 years ago; today about 20% do. It seems short-sighted to be so hostile to a group that represents the future of the church. The Southern Baptist leadership’s unwillingness to even engage the question shows that the fault line is present and they don’t know how to deal with it."

Above all, aside from any religious affiliations, Parton argued that "the real schism" in the US currently is between those who understand "simple human decency" and those who do not.

"It’s between the people who understand that and those who gleefully indulge in an orgy of cruelty and inhumanity, even while they display the trappings of Christianity and brag about their piety," Parton concluded.

Why Trump's depiction is included this year in Nativity scenes in Italy

Via San Gregorio Armeno, a street in Naples, Italy, is known for shops that, around Christmastime, sell carvings of Nativity scenes. Some of them incorporate secular figures. And according to New York Times reporter Motoko Rich, that may include U.S. President Donald Trump this year.

In an article published on December 23, Rich explains, "For years, figures of Diego Maradona, the Argentine soccer star who played for the city's leading team, have been perennial top sellers, as have statuettes of Silvio Berlusconi, the media tycoon and four-time Italian prime minister. This Christmas, models of Mr. Trump are the new frontrunners."

According to Rich — the Times' bureau chief in Rome — "Three rows of Trump figures, wearing dark suits with red ties and crowned with bright yellow helmets of hair, stood on a table in a workshop at the back of" a Via San Gregorio Armeno studio that Naples resident Michele Buonincontro founded in the early 1990s.

Rich reports, "Some of Mr. Buonincontro's clients insert figurines of Mr. Trump into Nativity scenes as one of the three wise kings who brought gifts for the newborn Jesus, he said."

Buonincontro told the Times, "I am not saying he is a saint, but he is connected to religion, to religiosity."

Federico Battaglia, secretary to the archbishop of Naples, told the Times that having figures of Trump on Via San Gregorio Armeno makes sense. Battaglia noted that Jesus Christ was born "under the Empire of Augustus," adding, "Augustus was the most powerful man of his time, as Trump is of ours."

Read Motoko Rich's full New York Times article at this link (subscription required).

This MAGA talking point is at odds with America’s 'most basic principles'

During his speech at AmericaFest 2025 — Turning Point USA's first convention since the fatal shooting of co-founder Charlie Kirk on September 10 — Vice President JD Vance declared that the United States "always will be a Christian nation." And he is far from the only MAGA Republican who is making that claim. Christian nationalists and the Religious Right have long claimed that the Founding Fathers meant for the U.S. to be a Christian theocracy.

The U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, however, promises freedom of religion but doesn't give Christianity preferential treatment over any other religion.

According to the First Amendment, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

In a December 22 column, MS NOW's Steve Benen argues that Vance and others are dead-wrong when they claim that the U.S. is a "Christian nation." And he notes what the Founder Fathers actually had to say on the subject, including the second U.S. president, John Adams, and the third, Thomas Jefferson.

"Indeed, Vance received an exceedingly warm welcome from the far-right crowd," Benen observes, "but his 'Christian nation' comment appeared to be the rhetoric the audience liked the most. The obvious problem with the Ohio Republican's assertion, which is popular within the Republican Party's theocratic wing, is that the claim is offensive, ahistorical nonsense. The United States is based on a secular Constitution — the nation's actual 'anchor' — which in turn created a secular government. Thomas Jefferson wrote, in 1802, that our First Amendment built 'a wall of separation between church and state.' In 1797, John Adams agreed: 'The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion.'"

When Vance and others claim the U.S. is a "Christian nation," Benen emphasizes, they are not only ignoring the First Amendment — they are also promoting unconstitutional discrimination against other religions.

"Americans unsure what to believe have a straightforward choice: They can listen to Vance, or they can read the Constitution and honor the declarations of actual Founding Fathers," Benen writes. "This doesn't seem like an especially tough call. But just as notable is the unsubtle message behind the rhetoric: Those who espouse the idea that the United States is a 'Christian nation' appear eager to tell those of minority faiths, as well as those who've chosen no religious path, 'You'll be tolerated, but you're still The Other, relegated to second-class status."

Benen adds, "That sentiment, rooted in the idea that those who think as Vance does are entitled to dominance over those who do not, is at odds with our most basic principles."

Steve Benen's full column for MS NOW is available at this link.

Ex-Army commander slams MAGA’s push to force Christian fundamentalism on the military

Ever since the religious right made its presence felt in Ronald Reagan's 1980 presidential campaign, far-right white Christian fundamentalist evangelicals and their opponents have been having an intense debate over the role of religion in government.

The religious right claims that the United States was founded on fundamentalist Christianity, while their opponents — who have ranged from People For the American Way to the late conservative Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-Arizona) — counter that the U.S. Constitution promises freedom of religion but forbids government to favor one religion over another.

In 2025 — 45 years after Reagan's 1980 campaign — that debate rages on. And retired Gen. Mark Hertling, who served as commander of U.S. Army Europe during Barack Obama's presidency, offers scathing criticism of MAGA Republicans' efforts to impose Christian nationalism on the military in an article published by the conservative website The Bulwark on December 22.

"Last Week, Secretary Of Defense Pete Hegseth released a video on social media asserting that 'a real problem facing our nation's military' is 'the weakening of our chaplain corps,'" Hertling explains. "In the clip, he cited parts of the Army's newly published Spiritual Fitness Guide — the online version of which has since been un-published — as evidence of the decline, arguing that the religious role of chaplains had 'degraded' into what he characterized as 'self-help and self-care' with too much attention toward 'feelings.' In doing so, he made two fundamental mistakes: One about the chaplain corps and the Army document he attacked, and the other about the composition and needs of the force he is tasked with leading."

The U.S. Constitution's First Amendment states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Herling notes that military chaplains aren't necessarily Christians. For example, Muslim chaplains offer spiritual support to Muslims serving in the U.S. military.

"If Hegseth's objective is to strengthen moral grounding and spiritual resilience in the Army," Hertling argues, "the answer is not to misread guidance documents or narrow a role that has never been narrow…. About one in five Americans doesn't believe in God. Less than two thirds are sure God exists. The purpose of a chaplain isn't to preach a particular faith to the force, but to look after their spiritual needs at the extreme of human stress and experience, up to and including death. That goes as much for the atheists or the soldiers who believe in many gods as for those who share the secretary's religion."

Mark Hertling's full article for The Bulwark is available at this link.

Pastors deliver scathing critique of 'self-serving' Trump’s MAGA Christianity

Within Christianity, President Donald Trump is drawing everything from adulation to intense disdain.

The adulation is mostly coming from a specific demographic: far-right white evangelicals. Among fundamentalist white evangelicals, Trump's approval in recent months has ranged from 78 percent (Pew Research Center) to 83 percent (Public Opinion Strategies).

But not all Christians are associated with the evangelical Religious Right.

Pew Research found that Trump's support among non-evangelical white Christians is 51 percent. Among Catholics, Pew found only 42 percent support for Trump. And Trump's support among Black Protestants, according to Pew, was a mere 10 percent.

In an op-ed published by The Guardian on December 21, two Mainline Protestant ministers — the Revs. Doug Pagitt and Lori Walke — offer a scathing critique of Trump's second presidency and "MAGA Christianity."

"MAGA Christianity represents a self-serving, commercialized version of the Christian faith — putting power over service and empathy — and it is everywhere in our federal government," Pagitt and Walke explain. "In February, Trump announced a task force led by (U.S. Attorney General) Pam Bondi with the goal of rooting out 'anti-Christian' bias. In September, Trump announced his plans to protect prayer in schools. Later that month, he issued a memorandum identifying anti-Christianity as a potential driver of terrorism."

The reverends continue, "These are not just one-off incidents. This is a national effort to push the MAGA Christianity agenda on Americans, and we’re already seeing the consequences.

Pagitt and Walke lay out a variety of ways in which "MAGA Christianity" and "Christian nationalism," they argue, are unchristian.

"Despite the Bible's clear call to 'love thy neighbor,'" the pastors lament, "the MAGA movement has used its version of the Christian faith to oppress immigrants, oppose the rights of women and condemn the LGBTQ+ community. At the same time, we've seen shootings at places of worship and arrests of faith leaders at peaceful protests."

Pagitt and Walke continue, "As faith leaders, our greatest strength during Trump 2.0 and the rise of Christian nationalism is our local congregations. It's our ability to physically come together in our communities, communicate with one another, support our neighbors in need and elevate our own Christian values that set us apart. Faith leaders have a powerful role to play, especially as the Trump Administration continues to use religion to divide us."

Rev. Doug Pagitt and Rev. Lori Walke's full op-ed for The Guardian is available at this link.

Flag linked to Christian Nationalism and Jan. 6 hung at Education Dept

The union for US Department of Education workers has raised alarm about a top department official’s display of a flag with Christian nationalist associations that was flown during the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol building.

The flag was spotted outside the Washington, DC, office of Murray Bessette, the principal deputy assistant secretary in the Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, according to a report on Monday from USA Today. However, it’s not clear how long it’s been displayed there.

The stark white banner, emblazoned with a pine tree and the phrase “An Appeal to Heaven”—a reference to John Locke’s “Second Treatise on Government”—was first used during the American Revolution and flown by six schooner privateers known as “Washington’s Cruisers” for naval operations and supply capture missions.

The flag was flown sporadically throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, most prominently in New England. But it remained relatively obscure until recently.

As the Southern Poverty Law Center explained in November, it has undergone a revival among proponents of Christian nationalism over the past decade:

Its affiliation with Christian supremacist politicians largely began in 2013 after being reintroduced as a symbol of supremacy by Dutch Sheets, a highly influential leader in the New Apostolic Reformation, today’s most powerful Christian supremacist movement.The NAR is an anti-democratic Christian supremacist movement that seeks to control all areas of national life, from the halls of Congress to one’s living room, compelling all Americans to align their lives with NAR’s worldview. According to NAR leaders, those who oppose them are not just wrong but under the control of the demonic, and are even possibly demonic entities themselves.

Sheets, a prominent supporter of President Donald Trump, helped to mobilize thousands of Christian followers to the Capitol leading up to the January 6 riot, where supporters of the president sought to violently overturn the electoral victory of his opponent, former President Joe Biden. The pastor referred to the recognition of Biden’s election as “an evil attempt to overthrow the government of the United States of America.”

The “Appeal to Heaven” flag was spotted on multiple occasions at the Capitol on that day and at other “Stop the Steal” events protesting Trump’s 2020 election loss. It has continued to cause controversy in the years since.

In 2023, the right-wing Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was seen flying the flag outside his New Jersey beach house. Alito blamed his wife for the flag flying outside their property just weeks before a documentarian published a secret recording of him expressing his desire to return the country to “a place of godliness,” and agreeing with radical right-wing groups who he said refuse to “negotiate with the left.”

The flag has also been displayed by several Republicans in Congress, including House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who has expressed many Christian nationalist viewpoints, including a distaste for the idea that the Constitution requires the separation of church and state.

Its appearance outside Bessette’s office is not the first time a government agency has displayed the flag during the second Trump presidency. In June, the Small Business Administration also displayed it during a ceremony, though only for about a day, according to Wired.

Rachel Gittleman, the president of the union for Education Department workers nationwide, said in a statement that the agency “has no place for symbols that were carried by insurrectionists.”

“Since January, hardworking public servants at the US Department of Education have been subjected to threats, harassment, and sustained demoralization,” she added. “Now, they are being asked to work in an environment where a senior leader is prominently displaying an offensive flag—one that, regardless of its origins in the American Revolution, has come to represent intolerance, hatred, and extremism.”

The use of a flag with Christian nationalist affiliations is especially noteworthy at the Education Department, which has been at the center of Trump’s push to “bring back religion in America” and promote “Judeo‑Christian principles.”

Trump has endorsed state-level policies requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in classrooms, which he called a “major step in the revival of religion.” In September, he also said that he would soon roll out a policy to provide “total protection” for prayer in public schools, which has long been considered unconstitutional when sponsored by school or state officials.

An evangelical pastor known for very extreme views is gaining prominence with MAGA

For most of his life, Doug Wilson — the 72-year-old pastor of Christ Church in Moscow, Idaho — was a fringe figure even on the Religious Right. Wilson's Christian nationalist views were so extreme that he gained a reputation for being to the right of familiar evangelical fundamentalists like Liberty University's Rev. Jerry Falwell Sr., the Christian Broadcasting Network's Rev. Pat Robertson, and Pentecostal televangelist Jimmy Swaggart.

But during Donald Trump's second presidency, Wilson has become increasingly visible. Trump's allies, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, openly embrace Christ Church.

Religion News Service (RNS) reporter Tracy Simmons examines Wilson's growing prominence in the MAGA movement in an article published on December 12.

"Critics say that Christ Church's renown has less to do with the Almighty than with Wilson's dedication to Christian nationalism and his ties to like-minded officials in the Trump Administration and among its allies," Simmons explains. "Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has attended a Christ Church-affiliated congregation in Tennessee and has amplified Wilson's most controversial views, including his argument that women should not be allowed to vote. In the space of a month in April 2024, Wilson was interviewed by Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk on their respective podcasts."

Wilson, who believes that Christ Church is now "punching about our weight," started out as a Baptist but later moved to a severe form of Calvinism.

"Wilson came to national attention in 2003, when he organized a conference at the University of Idaho at Moscow about revolutions throughout U.S. history," Simmons explains. "Some in the community picked up on a booklet titled 'Southern Slavery, As It Was' that Wilson had co-authored some years earlier arguing that slavery, besides being allowed for in the Bible, was not as harsh in the antebellum South as is commonly portrayed. Soon, the campus and Downtown Moscow were plastered with flyers referring to Wilson’s university event as a 'slavery conference'…. To maximize his footprint in Washington, Wilson planted a church there this year, introducing what Wilson critic Kevin DeYoung called 'the Moscow mood' — cultural engagement 'with a spirit of … having fun while you’re doing it.'"

Read Tracy Simmons' full Religion News Service (RNS) article at this link.

Supreme Court may allow religious right to undermine First Amendment

When the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment was adopted in 1791, the Founding Fathers were clear about two things: (1) freedom of religion would a Constitutional right, and (2) government would not favor one religion over another. The First Amendment states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

The First Amendment is at the heart of Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond, a case that finds the Religious Right at odds with a combination of liberals, progressives, and right-wing libertarians.

At issue in the case is whether or not religious charter schools can, under the Constitution, receive taxpayer dollars. The Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled "no," but when the case went to the U.S. Supreme Court in May 2025, it was a 4-4 split decision. Right-wing Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Donald Trump appointee, could have been a tie-breaking vote but recused herself.

But according to The New Republic's Steve Kennedy, the justices may revisit the matter.

In an article published on December 11, Kennedy notes that the High Court "left intact a ruling from the Oklahoma Supreme Court that denied what would have been the nation's first publicly funded religious charter school, St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School."

"Because the Court did not reach the underlying constitutional questions," Kennedy explains, "the door remains ajar. And as news has emerged that the same legal apparatus that set up and represented St. Isidore is now organizing a Jewish charter school in Oklahoma, many observers see it as an attempt to push the same issue — this time with a majority of conservatives ready to strike down religious public funding bans across the country."

Kennedy continues, "At issue in Drummond were two significant constitutional questions. First: Are privately run charter schools state actors if they are publicly approved and funded? And second: If they are public, does the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause prohibit a state from excluding religious schools from its charter school program — or does the Establishment Clause require it to exclude them?"

Kennedy notes that in Drummond, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor was clear about the need to protect the separation of church and state. During oral arguments, the Barack Obama appointee said, "The essence of the Establishment Clause was: we're not going to pay religious leaders to teach their religion."

"However, the St. Isidore attorneys argued that excluding schools solely because of their religious natures violated the Free Exercise Clause," Kennedy notes. "Drawing on recent U.S. Supreme Court cases like Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue and Carson v. Makin, they argued that once a state offers a generally available public benefit, it cannot flatly exclude religious applicants on the basis of religion, and they contended that charter school status was such a public benefit. The Oklahoma Supreme Court rejected that argument in 2024, and because the U.S. Supreme Court split evenly on the issue, that ruling remains in place."

Read Steve Kennedy's full article for The New Republic at this link.

'Lobster Jesus walks on water': Crustacean Nativity scene makes splash on 'Catholic Twitter'

A Cape Cod artist crafted a Nativity set perfect for New England: Mary, Joseph, baby Jesus and others are depicted by lobsters. It certainly isn't the first time a Nativty has been swapped out with other creatures, but it's causing some debate on so-called "Catholic Twitter."

Leviticus 11:9-12 and Deuteronomy 14:9-10 ban the consumption of sea creatures that lack both fins and scales, granting Old Testament protection to crustaceans like lobsters.

Still, that wasn't the inspiration behind Rosemary Quantick's Lobster Nativity, which has been for sale for a few years but has recently gained notoriety online.

Speaking to the Cape Cod Times last year, Quantick, an English immigrant, explained that her motivation was her adopted home of the Cape and the New England love of lobsters.

The Nativity set is encased in a lobster trap, rather than the manger and baby Jesus rests in a clam shell on a bed of seaweed.

Agnostic Faine Greenwood, a civilian drone mapping technology and GIS/spatial data consultant, said on BlueSky that she bought the Nativity set, prompting both chuckles and questions from followers.

"King of the Crustaceans," celebrated Kenneth Freeman.

One follower called it "Christaceans."

"With all due respect to you and your faith traditions ... what the f——?" asked author Sarah Day.

Greenwood explained she is agnostic, and was raised by other agnostics, "which probably explains a lot."

However, Christopher Roberts, a self-described "Christian raised by (sadly) Christian nationalists," also fell in love with the lobster Nativity.

Assistant Professor Brittany Sutherland, who teaches at George Mason University, wondered how something like that would play in the "deeply Catholic parts of Louisiana."

"On the one hand," she continued, "lobsters are pretty close to crawfish and Cajuns know their edible aquatic bugs. On the other hand, eating Crustacean Jesus seems pretty significant in the sin department."

That said, Transubstantiation is the Catholic belief that during the Eucharist, the bread and wine change into the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ. Holy communion is a sacrament in most Christian churches and symbolizes the sacrifice Jesus made for the sins of man.

Real estate lawyer Maggie Hooman asked "Catholic Twitter" whether they found the Nativity offensive and got some mixed answers. Most who indicated they were Catholic found it funny or acceptable but "tacky."

John Grondelski, conservative foreign policy specialist and Catholic theologian, answered, "Yes, because the Christian message of the Nativity is Incarnation — God became man, not Sebastian the Lobster. Maybe 50 years ago, as a kid, it might have been cute in a kitschy/tacky sort of way, but human embodiment is under such attack that diluting the Incarnation is wrong."

He later added, "we have an Incarnation problem today — and since religious scenes shape minds, I do not want the Savior to be thought of as a shape-shifter."

A few folks on X asked about whether it was considered offensive. Gabriel Said Reynolds, a Crowley Professor of Islamic Studies and Theology at Notre Dame, polled his following. The majority agreed it was "blasphemy."

In its report, the news and culture site Denison Forum commented, "A 'Lobster nativity scene' on Cape Cod challenges perceptions of Christmas. Consider the profound humility of Jesus, who chose to become human and sacrifice his own 'life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.'"

An Israeli resident questioned, "Can lobster Jesus walk on water?"

Dan Turrentine, co-host of The Huddle, said he planned on getting the lobster Nativity for former White House press secretary Sean Spicer, a devout Catholic.

Several remembered the Nativity scene in the film "Love Actually," which featured a Christmas play in which the daughter of one character, played by Emma Thompson, was "First Lobster."

"There was more than one lobster present at the birth of Jesus?" she questioned.

Meanwhile, the Church of Lorb, has embraced the lobster Nativity. The faith describes itself as "conscientious creators with plans to create and worship our Leviathan Lobster God. Lobsters don't die of old age and typically can't keep up with their gigantic size as they continue to grow and molt their shells. Together we can make a difference. The faith's mission is to help save the planet."

The lobster Nativity is available online for $114.90.

How Jimmy Swaggart’s rise and fall shaped the landscape of American televangelism

Jimmy Swaggart, one of the most popular and enduring of the 1980s televangelists, died on July 1, 2025, but his legacy lives.

Along with Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, he drew an audience in the millions, amassed a personal fortune and introduced a new generation of Americans to a potent mix of religion and politics.

Swaggart was an old-time evangelist whose focus was “saving souls.” But he also preached on conservative social issues, warning followers about the evils of abortion, homosexuality and godless communism.

Swaggart also denounced what he called “false cults,” including Catholicism, Judaism and Mormonism. In fact, his denunciations of other religions, as well as his attacks on rival preachers, made him a more polarizing figure than his politicized brethren.

As a reporter, I covered Swaggart in the 1980s. Now, as a scholar of American religion, I argue that while Swaggart did not build institutions like Falwell’s Moral Majority or Robertson’s 700 Club, he helped to spread right-wing positions on social issues, such as sexual orientation and abortion, and to shape the image of televangelists in popular culture.

Swaggart’s cousins

Born into a hardscrabble life in a small Louisiana town, Swaggart grew up alongside his cousins Jerry Lee Lewis, the future rockabilly pioneer, and future country singer Mickey Gilley.

All three loved music and singing. They polished their playing on an uncle’s piano and sneaked into African American nightclubs to hear the jazz and blues forbidden by their parents.

While Gilley and Lewis turned their musical talent into recording and performing careers, Swaggart felt called to the ministry. He dropped out of high school, married at 17, began preaching at 20 and was ordained at 26.

He was licensed by the Assemblies of God, a Pentecostal denomination that believes the Holy Spirit endows believers with spiritual gifts that include speaking in tongues and faith healing.

The glory years

Pentecostals were nicknamed Holy Rollers because of their tendency to shake, quake and roll on the floor when feeling the Holy Spirit. Their preachers excelled at rousing audiences’ ardor, and Swaggart commanded the stage better than most. He paced, pounced and poured forth sweat while begging listeners to turn from sin and accept Jesus.

Starting small, he drew crowds while preaching on a flatbed trailer throughout the South. His following grew, and in 1969 he opened the Family Worship Center in Baton Rouge.

At capacity, the church held 10,000 worshippers, who represented a broad swath of America: young girls and grannies, white and Black, bankers and farmers. His sermons began calmly but built to a fever pitch. CBS newsman Dan Rather once called him the “country’s greatest speaker.”

During services, Swaggart also sang and played piano. In 1982, Newsweek magazine noted his musical chops, naming him the “King of Honky Tonk Heaven.” His music crossed gospel, country and honky-tonk – songs with a strong rhythmic beat – and he sold 17 million albums over his lifetime.

By 1975, Swaggart’s on-stage charisma powered the launch of a television ministry that would reach millions within a decade. Viewers were captivated by his soulful tunes and fire-and-brimstone sermons. At its height, Swaggart’s show was televised in 140 countries, including Peru, the Philippines and South Africa.

His ministry also became the largest mail-order business in Louisiana, selling books, tapes, T-shirts and biblical memorabilia. Thanks to the US$150 million raised annually from donations and sales, Swaggart lived in an opulent mansion, possessed a private jet previously owned by the Rockefellers, sported a yellow gold vintage Rolex and drove a Jaguar.

The downfall

Swaggart disliked competition and had a history of humiliating rival preachers. Wary of the Rev. Marvin Gorman, a Pentecostal minister whose church also was in Louisiana, Swaggart accused the man of adultery. Gorman admitted his infidelity and was defrocked.

Gorman had heard rumors about Swaggart’s own indiscretions, and he and his son decided to tail the famed evangelist. In 1988, they caught Swaggart at a motel with a prostitute, and Gorman reported the incident to Swaggart’s denomination. He also gave news outlets photos of Swaggart and the prostitute. In a tearful, televised apology, Swaggart pleaded for a second chance.

While his fans were willing, the Assemblies of God had conditions: Swaggart received the standard two-year suspension for sexual immorality. Defying the ruling, Swaggart went back to work after three months, and the denomination defrocked him.

Swaggart might have succeeded as an independent minister, but in 1991 the police stopped his car for driving on the wrong side of the road. Inside they found the preacher with a prostitute. This time, Swaggart did not ask for forgiveness. Instead, he informed his congregation, “The Lord told me it’s flat none of your business.”

Afterward, Swaggart never regained his former standing. His mail-order business dried up, donations fell, and attendance at services cratered. But up until his death, he kept on, in his own words, as an “old-fashioned, Holy Ghost-filled, shouting, weeping, soul-winning, Gospel-preaching preacher.”

Swaggart’s legacy

Swaggart, like other 1980s televangelists, brought right-wing politics into American homes. But unlike Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, Swaggart was less interested in winning elections than saving souls. In fact, when Robertson considered a presidential run in 1988, Swaggart initially tried to dissuade him – then changed his mind and supported him.

Swaggart’s calls for a return to conservative Christian norms live on – not just in Sunday sermons but also in today’s world of tradwives, abortion restrictions and calls to repeal gay marriage. His music lives on, too. The day before he died, the Southern Gospel Music Association Hall of Fame inducted him as a member.

But his legacy also survives in popular culture. In recent years, both reality television and scripted series have starred preachers shaped in the image of Swaggart and his peers. Most exaggerate his worst characteristics for shock and comedic effect.

Preachers of L.A.,” a 2013 reality show that profiled six Los Angeles pastors, featured blinged-out ministers whose sermons mixed hip-hop with the Bible. The fictional “Greenleaf” followed the scandals of an extended family’s Memphis megachurch, while “The Righteous Gemstones,” a dark spoof of Southern preachers, turned a family ministry into a site for sex, murder and moneymaking.

But these imitations can’t match the reality. Swaggart was a larger-than-life minister whose story – from small-town wannabe to disgraced pastor, to preaching to those who would listen – had it all: sex, politics, music and religion.

For those who want a taste of the real thing, The King of Honky Tonk Heaven lives on. You can see his old services and Bible studies streaming daily on his network.The Conversation

Diane Winston, Professor and Knight Center Chair in Media & Religion, USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.