Peter Navarro's contempt trial — what you need to know

Peter Navarro's contempt trial — what you need to know
Peter Navarro (White House image)
Bank

While former President Donald Trump faces four criminal indictments along with civil lawsuits, his former economic adviser,

Peter Navarro, is battling legal problems of his own.

Navarro, a major promoter of Trump's Big Lie, has been on trial for contempt of Congress after openly defying a subpoena from the January 6 Select Committee in 2022. The defense and prosecutors rested their cases on Wednesday, September 6 and are awaiting a verdict from jurors.

Legal reporter Ella Lee, in a listicle published by The Hill on September 6, lays out five takeaways from the trial.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to hold office again?

They are: (1) "a restless Navarro," (2) "executive privilege takes center stage," (3) "DOJ: Navarro acted 'above the law'," (4) the "defense disputes Navarro 'willfully' failed to comply," and (5) "The January 6 problem."

During the trial, Navarro's defense argued that because Trump had enjoyed executive privilege as president, Navarro was not allowed to comply with the January 6 Select Committee's subpoena. But Judge Amit Mehta disagreed, telling the court, "There was no formal invocation of executive privilege by (Trump) after personal consideration nor authorization to Mr. Navarro to invoke privilege on his behalf."

That ruling, Lee writes, was "a major blow" to Navarro's defense.

"The Justice Department began its opening arguments by referencing the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol," Lee notes. "Crabb, the assistant U.S. attorney, noted the 'cherished tradition' of peaceful transitions of power he said were nearly broken by a 'violent mob' who attempted to stop Congress' certification of the 2020 election results."

READ MORE:'Bro, you're already facing charges': Protestor mocks Peter Navarro

Lee adds, "In the attack's aftermath, the House established a select committee to investigate the attack, a panel primarily comprising Democrats. Prosecutors attempted to show the jury of nine men and five women that Navarro hindered the committee's work by refusing to comply with its subpoena."

READ MORE:Trump advisor smacked down by appeals court over demand to keep hundreds of government documents

Read Ella Lee's full listicle for The Hill at this link.

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}
@2023 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.