Jamie Raskin throws Jim Jordan's words from Benghazi back in his face as he dodges the Jan. 6 probe

Jamie Raskin throws Jim Jordan's words from Benghazi back in his face as he dodges the Jan. 6 probe
Rep. Jim Jordan
Jim Jordan actually tries to blame Democrats for the Jan. 6 attack

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) was complying with requests from the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack until former President Donald Trump told him to stop, Punchbowl News reported Monday.

But Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), a member of the committee, told Jordan that he should refer back to his own words during one of the many Benghazi hearings his party held last decade.

Speaking to MSNBC's John Heilemann, Raskin quoted from a statement Jordan made about the Benghazi probe

"To answer Jim Jordan, I would quote Jim Jordan from the views that he expressed in the final Benghazi report, where he said that all of the truth must come out," said Raskin. "Everybody needs to testify, and nobody's got the right to hide anything from Congress. So, I think he had it right then. Jim Jordan, more than anybody else, knows what dogged, aggressive investigation is about, even when he's on a wild goose chase, he demands all the information he wants, and we're not on that. We are on the central investigative mission certainly of this decade, if not this century, to get to the bottom of this terrible political crime that was incited and to a substantial extent organized by Donald Trump."

He went on to say that the committee hasn't discussed what the next steps are for Jordan, whether he'll be referred to the Justice Department or be subpoenaed by the committee to turn over information.

"Article I of the Constitution gives each House of Congress the right to set the rules of its own proceedings," Raskin explained. "We are also -- have disciplinary power over members, including the power of censure, admonishment, all the way to expulsion from the body and the speech and debate clause says members of Congress should not be questioned for their legislative work and judgments outside of congress, clearly implying they can be questioned inside of Congress. And, of course, that's a habitual occurrence with the Ethics Committee where we call people all the time so there's nothing remotely extraordinary about the idea that we can call and demand the presence of members."

He went on to say that the implication that the investigation isn't legitimate "was soundly, thoroughly repudiated by the D.C. Circuit." If Congress doesn't have the power to research the attack on Congress "then there are no legitimate legislative purposes. So, we've got to put that lie to bed immediately."

See the discussion below:

Jamie Raskin throws Jim Jordan's words from Benghazi back in his face for Jan. 6 investigation www.youtube.com

#story_page_post_article

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}