Sarah K. Burris

Brutal fact-check reminds Trump he lost Minnesota — 3 times

President Donald Trump on Monday was once again reminded that he lost Minnesota — three times.

Trump spoke to his former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino Monday morning on the latter's online streaming show, which Bongino launched after hastily leaving the bureau in January. Trump was Bongino's first guest.

Speaking with Bongino, Trump mused about his desire to federalize elections in blue states.

“These people were brought to our country to vote, and they vote illegally,” Trump said to Bongino. “And it’s amazing the Republicans aren’t tougher on it. The Republicans should say, ‘We want to take over, we should take over the voting in at least 15 places.'”

The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting," Trump added.

The comment came after the president and Bongino discussed Minnesota, where Trump has targeted immigrants for the past month and killing two protesters.

“There’s something in the water up there,” Trump told Bongino. “I love the state. I won the state three times, but got no credit for it.”

CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale explained on X that the reason "he doesn't get credit for winning three times because he lost it three times."

Trump lost Minnesota in 2016, 2020 and again in 2024. The state hasn't voted for a Republican for president since Richard Nixon in 1972.

CNN host calls out pro-Trump prosecutor for talking in circles about weaponized DOJ

CNN host Boris Sanchez clashed with one of President Donald Trump's former government attorneys on Monday, who was quick on allegations but thin on evidence.

Chad Mizelle, former acting general counsel to the Department of Homeland Security, alleged that the Trump Justice Department would begin acting on findings from its "working group" investigating President Joe Biden's administration.

CNN reporter Paula Reid said that Trump recently "admonished Justice Department officials for not delivering on more of these kinds of investigations."

Mizelle rattled off some of the "findings" he said have been uncovered, including matters related to former special counsel Jack Smith and allegations about John Bolton's book published during the first Trump term.

Mizelle also argued that the Trump administration would not "weaponize the Justice Department" as was done previously. Yet Sanchez asked how that could be when the president has publicly ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to weaponize the DOJ against his political foes.

Sanchez asked Mizelle whether there was any evidence for his allegations.

"It sounds like you're insinuating that there's something there and perhaps hiding under the cover of there being something in an investigation. Why don't you just say it right now?" Sanchez asked. "Have you seen any evidence that Joe Biden directed the search of Mar-a-Lago for classified documents? Joe Biden, by the way, had his own documents at his property that he had his lawyers come out and say, 'Hey, we have this stuff, come look for more stuff from the federal government.' A very different posture than President Trump took."

"Here's what I am able to speak to," Mizelle said. He went on to attack former President Barack Obama's administration for "weaponizing" the intelligence community.

Sanchez called him out on it.

"I appreciate you not directly answering the question and going back to 2016, when there was, at the time, credible evidence regarding links between the Trump campaign and agents of a foreign government that were investigated and were looked into," Sanchez said.

- YouTube youtu.be

Damning CNN report unveils real reason Trump opted to close Kennedy Center for renovations

CNN is reporting that the real reason President Donald Trump announced the two-year renovation project for the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts is more about upcoming shows than about the project itself.

Host Dana Bash announced on her show Monday that there wouldn't be much programming to announce for Trump's newly renamed theater.

Several actors, singers, bands, composers, comedians and other performers are withdrawing from show commitments because they don't support Trump. After Trump announced that the center would be closing, he was ridiculed on social media.

"The Kennedy Center does not have a 2026 2027 season," a source told Bash. "There would not have been any programming to announce."

The move comes after Trump made himself the chairman of the Kennedy Center board, fired several others on the board and replaced them with loyalists. Trump then ordered new letters to change the name to the Trump-Kennedy Center and the board voted to affirm the name change.

Democrats note that because Congress established the xenter by law, the name cannot be changed unless it is also by law.

White House Associated Press reporter Michelle Price said closing the center is an interesting move because most of the renovations Trump wanted were not expected to require closing the entire building. Trump even boasted on Truth Social that he could have done all of his renovations without disruption, such as updating the upholstery and redoing the carpet.

"But we got to the point where the list of cancellations was longer than the list of people" performing, she noted.

"And it seems that something has changed in the last few days that he is pushing for this change now to close it for two years," said Price.

Last week, Trump's head of the Kennedy Center quit after just two weeks on the job.

The Kennedy Center audience is typically made up of people who live in the tri-state area of Washington D.C., Virginia and Maryland. Those cities have all rejected Trumpism both in elections and in protests.

'Unusual' move as DNI arranges call with Trump and agents who raided GA elections office

President Donald Trump chatted via speakerphone with the FBI agents who raided a Fulton County elections office in Georgia last week in an "unusual" move, the New York Times reports.

According to Times, the president had questions for the agents once they'd gathered up documents, including ballots and personal information for voters in the Fulton County Election Hub and Operation Center.

"What occurred during the meeting was even further outside the bounds of normal law enforcement procedure. Ms. Gabbard used her cellphone to call Mr. Trump, who did not initially pick up but called back shortly after," the report said, citing those they spoke to.

Trump asked questions and gushed agents with praise for their willingness to enact the search warrant.

"The supervisor of the squad, which investigates allegations of public corruption and civil rights violations and developed the evidence for the search," answered Trump's questions, sources told the Times.

One official dismissed the moment as a "short" call compared to a "pep rally" or the speech a coach gives to players at halftime. There was no "substantive direction" from him once the raid was over.

Trump told the press while at the World Economic Forum “people will soon be prosecuted for what they did” to him in the 2020 election.

In a recorded phone call to top election officials after the 2020 presidential election, Trump demanded that state leaders "find" him 11,780 votes so he could "win" Georgia.

The Times also reported that the raid "is part of a broader effort by the department to obtain voter data. Already, it has sued nearly half the states in the country for access to their voter rolls, including the private information of voters."

Read the full report here.

Trump's lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board backfires with latest subpoenas

In 2022, President Donald Trump sued the Pulitzer Prize Board members, but that is now coming back to haunt him.

Law&Crime reported Monday that the board members' legal counsel is subpoenaing the full, unredacted copy of former special counsel Robert Mueller's report to verify claims Trump made were "defamatory."

Trump has filed several demands for depositions from board members in Okeechobee County, Florida, but the defendants formally sought the report as well as "all documents and communications exchanged between" Trump and Mueller's team.

The request "includes but is not limited to […] any negotiation" with Mueller about Trump's records or his "answers to written questions," the 2016 hack of the DNC by Russians, and the WikiLeaks dump that followed, information on the Trump Tower Moscow project, Trump Jr.'s 2016 Trump Tower meeting, and more, quoted Law&Crime.

According to Trump, the Pulitzer board is responsible for reports by the New York Times and the Washington Post, which won awards for their 2017 coverage of the Russia scandal that the president still disputes. Trump continues to demand that the paper's prizes be rescinded, even nine years later.

Since the Pulitzer Prize is the "pinnacle of American journalistic achievement," Trump claimed that the award "carries very important connotations," and comments from board members "damaged" his "reputation, profession, and business." They allegedly "wrongfully imply criminal" and "un-American conduct" by Trump around what he calls the "Russia Collusion Hoax."

"The Pulitzer Prize Board has an established, formal process by which complaints against winning entries are carefully reviewed," the board told Trump when he first filed the lawsuit.

The board said that it commissioned "two independent reviews of the work submitted by those organizations to our National Reporting competition. Both reviews were conducted by individuals with no connection to the institutions whose work was under examination, nor any connection to each other. The separate reviews converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes."

The Mueller report, made public, never alleges collusion between Trump and Russia. Instead, it highlights "numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign." So, the members requested access to that full, unredacted report.

Read the full report here.

'Going to fight like hell': New rift in MAGA pits Trump's donors against his voters

President Donald Trump has ignited a new battle between his billionaire tech donors and his voters, CNN reported on Monday.

According to senior reporter Steve Contorno, the new Trump allies are using their financial influence to score executive orders and "leeway" for artificial intelligence operations.

All of it came to a head in November when a debate broke out between the chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, David Sacks, and Trump's legal adviser, Mike Davis, a "vocal tech skeptic."

Trump has pressed a federal rule that flies in the face of the Tenth Amendment, which reserves to the states all rights not outlined in the Constitution. The Trump executive order would prevent states from passing any laws or regulations about A.I.

The new power-hungry data centers are prompting state concerns about energy use. California lawmakers proposed a law that would require the centers report their power usage and establish energy efficiency standards. Thus far, however, all efforts to impose mandates on regulation or even monitoring have been defeated by big tech lobbying, CalMatters alleged in a December report.

Other states are concerned that these data centers will dramatically increase energy costs for individual consumers, said States Newsroom.

Davis' efforts to kill legislation that would open the floodgates to AI have worked in some cases.

"And this created a bunch of problems for Sacks and Trump's agenda last year," Contorno said. "And really, it's reflective overall of what we are seeing from the populist right within Trump's movement. People like Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson have been very vocally against how much power Trump is giving to these tech companies, and it's reflective of changing views overall by the general population."

Meanwhile, Republican governors are standing up to the data centers and GOP members of Congress are ready to push back with Bannon and MAGA voters behind them.

"We're going to fight like hell. So, don't think that anybody is placated," Bannon said on his show, "War Room."

- YouTube www.youtube.com

New whistleblower alleges 'grave damage to national security' from Tulsi Gabbard

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is facing a highly classified whistleblower report, and there is concern about how to safely share it with lawmakers.

The Wall Street Journal reported Monday morning that the sensitive report is "said to be locked in a safe." President Donald Trump's administration has avoided telling lawmakers about it, claiming that it involves such secret information.

The information could cause “grave damage to national security" if it becomes public, an official claimed. The information reportedly includes "claims of executive privilege that may involve the White House."

This is an administration, however, that has claimed "national security" liberally, such as the rationale for taking over Greenland and the immigration crackdown.

“If everything can be a national emergency or a threat to national security or a matter of foreign policy, then essentially all constitutional powers are ceded to the president,” said Shirin Sinnar, a law professor at Stanford Law School in an Aug. 2025 report by Paul Blumenthal. “And that can’t be intended by the constitutional design.”

Gabbard's office claims the allegations are “baseless and politically motivated.”

However, the whistleblower's lawyer, Andrew Bakaj, said he was never aware that the inspector general's office had made any determination about the complaint's credibility. However, the inspector general's office decided that some of the allegations weren't credible while others might be.

Bakaj sent a letter to Gabbard that was also sent to the House and Senate in November, which the Journal has viewed.

"Months later, lawmakers still haven’t received the complaint itself. Some Democratic staffers on the intelligence committees have tried to learn more about the complaint in recent weeks, with little success," congressional aides told the reporters.

The month before the complaint, Republicans approved a new inspector general for the intelligence community on a 51 to 47 vote.

The new IG is Christopher Fox, who worked for Gabbard before the new job overseeing her work.

Read the full report here.

Republican crafts wild spin for huge GOP loss in Texas

Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas) has a new spin to explain away the huge GOP loss in a reliably red district outside of Fort Worth.

Speaking to CNN on Monday morning, Sessions said the loss has nothing to do with a huge shift, but with too many Republicans running.

Democrat Taylor Rehmet flipped a seat that has been held by a Republican in the Fort Worth/Tarrant County area for more than 3 decades, CNN said. In a race against Republican Leigh Wambsganss, the Democrat, a pro-union veteran, made a colossal shift for a district Trump won by 17 points in 2024.

While Republican leaders in Texas are seeing it as a wake-up call, Sessions said it's due to something very different.

"Well, John, first of all, the success of the rain dance has a lot to do with timing," Sessions said to CNN host John Berman.

Berman read a post from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who similarly said that a swing like that "can't be dismissed."

"And what happened is there was a huge snowstorm — ice storm, really, that hit North Texas and Central Texas. But let's go back to Gov. DeSantis point. Special elections are special," Sessions explained.

"And what happened is that, as I understand it, there was one Democrat and two Republicans running against each other," he continued. And it was a battle between the two Republicans, and a group of people simply decided they were not going to come participate, because in the end, this Democrat received more than 50 percent of the vote. So it is — it is listening to the music and waking up and finding out we need to be better. We need to understand what we're doing."

However, there were not two Republicans running in the general election. Like many races, this one had a primary election where the GOP had two candidates running against each other. The winner of that election then ran against Rehmet.

In the end, there was one Democrat who ran against one Republican.

"No, that ain't no ice storm," said data analyst Harry Enten later in the show on Monday.

"But this was a miscalculation by the people on the ground," Sessions claimed. "And I don't know any of them. But what I will say is you should not lose any election in North Texas like this."

Berman asked if there was anything larger at play, citing the Wall Street Journal report asking, "How does a Republican lose by 14 points by 14 points? And a safe, conservative Texas Senate seat that President Trump carried by 17 points? Answer. When there's a voter backlash against the Trump administration, notably, its mass deportation debacles. What do you think of that analysis?"

Sessions agreed that Americans were "suffering" after watching the shooting deaths of two people in Minneapolis, leaving "a mess." But, the lawmaker explained that despite having his party control the House, Senate and a conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, "it's harder for the president to be able to have things go his way right now. And is this a sign of what's ahead? It could be. It could be unless we recognize inside our party that we have to be a little bit more thoughtful and balanced about what we do."




The new GOP excuse for Trump is 'a joke': columnist

Columnist Frank Bruni argues that Republicans have settled on a new excuse for President Donald Trump’s latest failures: he’s just getting “bad advice.”

Writing in the New York Times, Bruni notes that when GOP officials like Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt respond to the killing of Alex Jeffrey Pretti in Minneapolis by expressing “deep concerns over federal tactics and accountability” while insisting they still back Trump’s immigration priorities — they're simply being misled. Stitt has said Trump is “getting bad advice right now.”

Bruni points out that other Republicans are suddenly zeroing in on Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, her top aide Corey Lewandowski, and outgoing U.S. Customs and Border Protection commander Greg Bovino as the true culprits of Trump’s actions, treating them as incompetents who “botched the mission” and “debased the president.” The problem, he writes, is that this lets Trump off the hook for decisions that clearly reflect his own instincts and desires.

The columnist wrote that it's nothing but another excuse because Trump does just fine making horrible decisions on his own.

"What a joke," he said. "You can’t dishonor someone who has no honor to begin with. You can’t humiliate someone who so consistently and thoroughly humiliates himself."

Bruni said that it might be a valid excuse if the person in charge had no part in picking the people giving him advice. Instead, Trump intentionally chose "yes men."

Trump has "a wretched crew of Cabinet secretaries and senior administration officials because a wretched crew is what he was after," the column explained.

In the end, Trump has "underlings who owed their lofty titles and fancy perks entirely to him, sycophants who wouldn’t try to saddle him with scruples or tether him to sense, not so much a council for counsel as a font of praise."

Bruni recalled that during the first term, Trump complained that many of his Cabinet secretaries and advisers would tell him "no" when something was clearly illegal. This time around, the columnist noted, Trump "wanted a pep squad."

Saying that Trump is getting "bad advice" also removes the idea that Trump "isn't calling the shots" when "Trump is constantly telling us otherwise." Trump can't be in charge while also not being in charge. It ultimately turns Trump into a "caricature" of former President Joe Biden, who Republicans frequently complained was somehow suffering from dementia while also being a criminal mastermind.

Trump is "omniscient. Omnipotent. Behold him as he summarily imposes tariffs, hastily erases them, orders the bombing of Iranian bunkers, directs the sinking of Venezuelan boats, deposes one autocrat, pardons another, deploys federal troops, ends (or at least claims to end) foreign wars," wrote Bruni. "He’s a presidential superhero the likes of which America has never seen! How do you fit 'bad advice' into that fable?"

He described it as giving Trump his very own "autopen" scandal.

Read the full column here.

'Not all they have': Epstein survivors' lawyer says DOJ didn't release everything

The lawyer representing 11 survivors of trafficker Jeffrey Epstein said that the Justice Department has more documents that they have not released.

At a press conference on Friday, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said that the 3.5 million files released were all the department had. He now believes that the DOJ has completed its review of the Epstein files.

CNN host Boris Sanchez asked lawyer Arick Fudali if the release was, indeed, "everything DOJ has in its possession."

"Absolutely not. No, it's not everything," Fudali answered. "And even what has been produced still has redactions. You know, there are some very alarming statements from the Department of Justice today discussing what they've withheld and what they've redacted."

The lawyer said the "most alarming" was that Blanche cited redacted information, saying it was covered by "attorney-client privilege" and "ongoing investigations." Those documents were left out of the release.

As AlterNet reported earlier this week, Assistant U.S. Attorney Allison Rovner, out of the Southern District of New York, refused to answer questions about whether there was still an "active investigation" going on with the Epstein files. She tried to claim that a possible appeal of the conviction of Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, was one reason for withholding information. The judge mocked the comment.

When Blanche was asked about an open investigation directly by reporters on Friday, he tap-danced around it, refusing to confirm whether there was one. He then said he wouldn't confirm either way.

"The problem with that is there's no oversight," said Fudali. "We just have to trust that everything they're withholding is, in fact, attorney-client privilege. And attorney-client privilege is very nuanced and very difficult, especially when you're dealing with prosecutors who technically don't really have clients other than the government. So again, it's very convoluted."

He also said that the DOJ could claim "anything is an ongoing investigation" in an effort to withhold information.

"That's what's so frustrating and so alarming about this," Fudali complained. "And that's why the congressmen have requested some of the federal judges in New York, who have overseen the Epstein cases, to appoint a special overseer to oversee this production and make sure that it's being done in compliance with the law."

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said there are more than 6 million files, and he doesn't understand why the Justice Department said it has 3.5 million and claimed that was all the office had.

“Failing to release these files only shields the powerful individuals who were involved and hurts the public’s trust in our institutions,” he wrote in a statement released Friday, CNN reported.

Fudali said they're filing briefs with the judges to ask, once again, for some kind of oversight of the DOJ's process for releasing the documents.

Another discovery is that many of the survivors' names are included in the release, despite the DOJ's claims that it had been working to redact everything for months.

"It's really concerning. And really, what's so baffling about this is on one hand it's a cover-up, but on the other hand it's incompetence," said Fudali. "So you have this combination, this sort of like, perfect storm of trying to cover up what they don't want people to see. But then accidentally covering up what they shouldn't allow people to see, or accidentally showing what people — what they shouldn't see. I mean, this is just, I don't know if I've ever seen in the history of this Epstein case or really anything such sheer incompetence and such an obvious and robust effort to cover things up and not and withhold things from the public."

One example he cited was a full driver's license from a survivor.

"I mean, it's just it's incomprehensible. It's incomprehensible how poor a job, how this has been handled," the lawyer said.

He went on to say that he doesn't believe what Blanche said when he claimed the White House had no oversight, purview or influence in the process of the release.


- YouTube youtu.be

Minneapolis unmasked the anti-Trump movement's secret weapon: analysis

The Atlantic's Gale Beckerman wrote on Friday that there has been a debate over what the uprising in Minneapolis is called.

There have been accusations from the right that the "protests" have turned into "riots." There are questions about whether it's activism or resistance. Beckerman took a page from her colleagues calling it “neighborism,” or even “basic decency.” She even cited one elderly couple who decided it is humanism.

She opted for the term "dissidence." She wrote that it isn't a revolution or even political opposition. Dissidence unfolds when "power— usually government power — tramples on the basic conditions of life as people know and value them," Beckerman said.

She remembered the pink knitted hats of the first Donald Trump administration, noting that these actions are far different as people are using their own bodies to protect their neighbors from federal agents.

She compared it to the Argentinian mothers from the 1970s and the Underground Railroad. One dissident she described was the man photographed standing in front of tanks rolling toward Tiananmen Square.

"These people are not looking to replace one governing order or ideology with another. They are fighting an incursion, reacting to a violation of humanity, and deciding to do something about it," Beckerman wrote.

While there have been the "No Kings Day" protests and nationwide boycotts, Beckerman described what is happening in Minneapolis as a next-level effort.

"Compare the grievances of these protests with the issues and stakes that dissidents have revealed in Minneapolis. The assault by federal agents was an attack on something pre-political, on parts of our communal existence that people, in normal times, take for granted," she wrote.

"You should be able to assume that parents, immigrant or not, won’t be ripped away from children. You should assume that people don’t have to hide in their house because their skin is brown or black," she added. "You should assume that filming an interaction with the police won’t end in your death. These are all pre-political assumptions, and we hold them not as Democrats or Republicans, but as individuals who just want to live freely."

She added that it might seem lonely to be a dissident but that the spirit of those who came before them should inspire the movement to grow. While there might be policy disagreements over things like taxes or rent freezes "normal" is a universal idea.

"To be a dissident in this moment means moving beyond scoring points and underscoring differences, and on to recognizing what we are all losing — and blowing a whistle in order to prevent that loss," she urged.

Read the full column here.

Trump’s IRS lawsuit cites agency’s actions during time he was in charge: court docs

President Donald Trump is suing the IRS as part of a $10 billion complain. But, according to court documents, his complaint is with the government's actions during his own tenure.

Lawyer Ed Whelan, at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, who writes for the conservative National Review, posted in a thread on X noting Trump is relying on IRS leaks from May 2019 through Sept. 2020 for his lawsuit. Trump was president during that time.

"Thus [he] had formal responsibility over those agencies," said Whelan, noting that the suit was "ridiculous."

"So, Trump, in personal capacity, is suing agencies now in his charge for their failings when they were previously in his charge," mocked Whelan.

He also noted that Trump's problem is that the statute of limitations has passed for each of the claims.

"The first claim, under 26 USC 7431(a)(1), has to be brought 'within 2 years after the date of discovery by the plaintiff of the unauthorized ... disclosure,'" Whelan explained. "The complaint acknowledges that provision governs. Trump knew of the leaks back in 2020."

The legal complaint tries to get around the problem because it claimed they couldn't bring a lawsuit against an unknowable, indeterminate defendant (i.e., Charles Littlejohn) to vindicate their rights until they were notified of criminal charges against Littlejohn. But Littlejohn isn't the defendant. The Treasury and IRS are. And Trump knew back in 2020 that they had allowed the allegedly unlawful leaks. So that claim is time-barred."

The second claim, in which Trump alleges violations under the Privacy Act, also has a two-year expiration.

"It would be really something if DOJ were to attempt to waive the limitations period," Whelen added.

"Seems to me that it wasn't long ago that conservatives decried vexatious litigants and those who tried to fleece American taxpayers. By the way, the ten billion dollars in damages that Trump seeks to extract from US taxpayers is only for supposed actual damages, and it's just a floor ('at least 10,000,000,000.00'). He also seeks unspecified punitive damages on top of that," he commented.

See the court document here.

Deputy AG’s bizarre reason for Gabbard at FBI raid: 'She happened to be in Atlanta'

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard appeared Wednesday in a large coat and hat as the FBI raided a Fulton County elections office in Georgia.

It piqued the interest of reporters at a Justice Department press conference on Friday as Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche spoke.

"Can you explain Tulsi Gabbard's role in DOJ activity?" the reporter asked.

"What do you mean her role?" Blanche asked.

"It was reported that —" the reporter began before Blanche interrupted her.

"... She happened to be present in Atlanta. I mean, yes, I saw the same photos you did," Blanche said.

"I mean, she's not — she doesn't work for the Department of Justice or the FBI. She's an extraordinarily important part of this administration," Blanche said. "Um, this administration coordinates, um, everything we do [it] as a group. And so I think her presence shouldn't be um — there shouldn't a question, of course. I mean, that's — that's a big part of her, of her job. And so the fact that she was present in Atlanta that day, um, you know, is, it's — it's just something that shouldn't surprise anybody."

Another reporter followed up, asking if he was saying that Gabbard's appearance in Atlanta had nothing to do with the Justice Department actions.

"I definitely did not — I most certainly did not say that," Blanche said. "I said that exactly the opposite. I said this administration works closely together in all kinds of different areas. And so, um, the, the, the, um, I'm not sure if they're surprised ... that the administration is working together on things like election integrity. But if there is surprise, let me unequivocally state we are working together as an administration on election integrity-type issues. Um, that's, that's all I can say about that."

Trump staffer backed into corner after claiming reporters 'intentionally mislead' public

White House deputy chief of staff James Blair on Friday called out media outlets for not posting in their headlines that reporter Don Lemon was arrested as a result of a grand jury indictment. That information, however, remains under seal.

"Any 'news' outlet failing to make clear in their headline that Don Lemon was indicted by a federal grand jury is intentionally misleading the public. Thank you for your attention to this matter," said Blair on X.

Speaking at a press conference about an hour later, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said he couldn't provide any reaction or further information on Lemon's indictment because it was still "under seal."

Blair was quickly questioned by reporters asking for the sealed indictment.

"It would actually be malpractice to report that without an indictment being docketed or announced or confirmed by a participant in the proceedings — unless this is the formal announcement by the White House?" said Politico legal reporter Kyle Cheney.

"Please share the indictment, James, since you seem to know," wrote Politico's senior legal affairs reporter, Josh Gerstein.

Legal commentator and national security expert Marcy Wheeler quipped, "Likewise any 'news' outlet failing to make clear that two judges said there was no probable cause AND ALSO that the [Attorney General Pam Bondi] violated every ethical rule to get this indictment. Gonna be a long headline..."

"Was the grand jury convened in the Cabinet room yesterday?" asked White House correspondent S.V. Dáte from the Huffington Post.

Federal prosecutors in two different states refused to indict journalists: report

MS NOW reporter Carol Leonnig is reporting that federal prosecutors in two different states refused to handle the attempts to indict journalists Don Lemon and Georgia Fort.

"What we've been hearing for really a week and a half has been concern among prosecutors in Minnesota about the way this office has basically been by the deputy attorney general and the attorney general's office," said Leonnig.

The acting U.S. attorney in the Minnesota District is Dan Rosen, who has no experience as a prosecutor, she explained.

That "will sound familiar to a lot of you on the panel, because that was one of the major problems in the Eastern District of Virginia," Leonnig said in passing about attorney Lindsey Halligan, who was forced out by a judge in the district.

"But the new news here is that those prosecutors [had] concerns about the immigration arrests and whether or not those were legal. They are also very concerned and declined to participate in this, because they don't believe the Don Lemon charges will actually stand up," Leonnig said.

Prosecutors are generally advised not to prosecute a case that they know they can't win. That has changed in the era of President Donald Trump, who has used the Justice Department to go after some of his top enemies.

Lemo was arrested in Los Angeles, where he was slated to cover the Grammy Awards. He may have had a grand jury indictment in Minnesota, but all of those documents are under seal and the public and press cannot view them. To get an arrest of Lemon in Los Angeles, however, many prosecutors there were involved, Leonnig said.

They "also registered concern, and some of them declined to participate in this because, again, they have a duty of candor to the court," added Leonnig. "They don't feel comfortable bringing cases and pursuing cases where they do not think the facts line up with the charges."

MS NOW host Ana Cabrera noted that this isn't the first time the public has seen local prosecutors from the Justice Departmen "buck orders" from the Washington office.

Leonnig called it "worrisome" because it reveals that the main Justice Department "is going to continue directing who is targeted" by Trump. They are also willing to "use whatever means that are at their disposal, whether or not convictions are ever achieved."


'The law is breaking down in Minnesota': Legal experts issue stark warnings

Former CNN host Don Lemon and local Minneapolis reporter Georgia Fort were arrested on Thursday night.

Several legal analysts confirmed that Lemon has been charged with a violation of the FACE Act and with interfering with "the right to religious worship.... conspiracy to deprive rights" after he reported on a protest inside a Minnesota church.

The Atlantic's legal reporter‪, Quinta Jurecic, cited the report on the Justice Department's desperate effort to go after Lemon.

"Among the prosecutions of protesters, perhaps the strangest story involves a desperate quest by DOJ to bring criminal charges against the former CNN news personality Don Lemon. On January 18, Lemon documented a demonstration at a Southern Baptist church in St. Paul by a group of activists, who accused a church pastor of also serving as the acting director of the local ICE field office. Just days later, federal law enforcement arrested three of the lead protesters," the report said.

By Monday, The Atlantic said that it appeared that the DOJ dropped the case, but there was a concern that Lemon wasn't in the clear.

“We’re going to pursue this to the ends of the earth,” promised the DOJ's Civil Rights Division leader Harmeet Dhillon.

Former Minnesota U.S. Attorney Doug Kelley told CNN that he saw the complaint in which the judge wrote across it "no probable cause."

"I'm sure Abbe Lowe will have fun with that," Kelley said about Lemon's attorney.

"I'm not surprised because I know how relentlessly Trump goes after his enemies and how much Pam Bondi will follow that. I figured that they probably went to the grand jury and submitted an indictment to them because I don't think they want to go to another magistrate judge to file another criminal complaint," he explained.

"As Joey Jackson said, the law is breaking down here in Minnesota," Kelly noted.

Jackson told CNN's John Berman, "We are in such different and bizarre times. This is heartbreaking to see what's happening here. In the event someone is going to be arrested, there should be some scintilla of law that supports and sponsors the arrest or gives probable cause. Understand what happened here, John. Understand the dynamic of going to a judge and asking the judge to evaluate, to determine whether there's criminality. A judge saying no. You go to an appeals court and the court of appeals denying that, but you're still moving forward. Where are we right now?"

He said that, talking about it from a legal perspective, the First Amendment is foundational to democracy, and it means holding people in power accountable.

"Not about [using] power, trying to intimidate and otherwise coerce journalists from not doing their job. At the end of the day, this case is going to end up with a — yes prediction right now — the same way the James Comey case ended up. Nowhere. The same way that the Letitia James case ended up. Nowhere. And so, look, if you want to say that somebody physically coerced someone in a church not to engage in that practice, of course there's protections for that. But that's not this."

MS NOW's Lisa Rubin told "Morning Joe" that when she looks at the federal docket in Minnesota, "there are still a lot of sealed indictments."

There is no information, she said, including names or what the grand jury has or has not decided in the case, she noted.




'I’m not going to shut my mouth': CNN host sends message to DOJ live on air

CNN morning news host Sara Sidner made it clear that she is not intimidated by the recent arrest of two journalists for covering a Minneapolis protest inside of a church.

Speaking to Brian Stelter about their former colleague and friend Don Lemon, Sidner said she wouldn't be intimidated.

"That is stark. It is reality. There is, as we have spoken about, the potential of a major chilling effect, although I certainly am not going to shut my mouth. I know that you won't either. There are many journalists that will continue to to call a spade a spade," said Sidner.

She noted that it might be easier for large outlets like CNN who have the corporate protection to defend it's staff.

"There is a definite fear here, especially for those who are independent journalists, who are smaller, who don't have an apparatus around them as they are out in the streets, or if they go into, buildings, whether or not they are protected and whether they have the means," Sidner closed.

Stelter read a comment from Lemon ally Jennifer Welch, who told Lemon, "You are a prize for them. An independent, gay, black, happy, successful man. And this is an attempt to intimidate and beat you down."

He added that agents also arrested former NAACP president Nekima Levy Armstrong, a civil rights lawyer.

'Agents at my door right now': Minnesota journalist arrested after filming church protest

Another journalist has been arrested, according to local and national news reports. Georgia Fort, who hosts WCCO Radio's afternoon hours, has been covering the protests and arrests in Minneapolis for the past several weeks. CNN host Don Lemon was also taken into custody on Thursday night while in Los Angeles to cover the Grammy Awards.

KARE 11 news reports Nekima Levy Armstrong, a Minneapolis civil rights attorney and racial justice advocate, was also arrested. All three individuals arrested are Black.

Fort was at home when the FBI came to her door at approximately 6:30 a.m. local time and told her that they had a grand jury warrant for her arrest.

"Agents are at my door right now, they're saying they were able to go before a grand jury ... and they have a warrant for my arrest," Fort said in a video.

"As a member of the press, I filmed the church protest a few weeks ago and now I'm being arrested for that," Fort said in her video message. "It's hard to understand how we have a Constitution, Constitutional rights, when we can just be arrested for being a member of the press."

'You guys are gonna lose': Outrage after stunning Don Lemon arrest

Former CNN host Don Lemon was arrested in Los Angeles on Thursday night and spent the evening in jail before he's expected to be arraigned in court Friday morning.

Lemon was present covering the protest at the church in Minneapolis, Minnesota, where protesters said that a church leader was coordinating with federal agents.

A magistrate judge refused to issue an arrest warrant in Minnesota, saying the Justice Department didn't have a case.

Lemon told former colleague Alisyn Camerota last week for Scripps News that he expected this after an outcry from the far-right demanding that he be arrested.

"He was covering the protest. He said he stayed outside of the church until the protest began and then he went inside," said Camerota when speaking to John Berman on air Friday.

"This is what fascism looks like," said podcaster and influencer Joanne Carducci a.k.a. @JoJoFromJerz.

"Attorney for my colleague and friend Don Lemon has released a statement saying Don was arrested by federal agents in LA last night. This is outrageous and cannot stand. The First Amendment is under attack in America," wrote former CNN colleague Jim Acosta on X.

Legal analyst Katie Phang told Acosta on his show: "He has become unfettered. He is a man on the street guy. All he was doing in Minneapolis was letting people know what was happening."

" Trump is thin-skinned. It's disgusting what is happening," said Acosta.

Jim Acosta later added, "Don is there covering it. He's just covering it, and they're trying to criminalize reporting. It's b——, but it's a way to harass people. It's a way to tell people get in line. It's what Viktor Orban does."

Former Minnesota U.S. Attorney Doug Kelley told CNN in a comment that he saw the paperwork the DOJ submitted and that the judge wrote on it "No probable cause." He thinks that the DOJ likely went to a grand jury to get the arrest warrant.

CNN host Jake Tapper posted the initial complaint on X and added, "DOJ’s original complaint against Don was rejected by Magistrate Judge Douglas Micko who refused to sign the criminal complaint and then the DOJ appealed and that too was rejected. That chief judge, Hon. Patrick J. Schiltz — is a former Scalia clerk and George W. Bush appointee"

"You guys are gonna lose this case faster than you lost my press pass case," Acosta commented to Katie Miller, the spouse of top Donald Trump aide Stephen Miller.

Police leadership furious at feds: 'I’d be embarrassed if he was one of my officers'

President Donald Trump has consistently drawn support from police unions but that appears to be faltering.

The New York Times reported Friday that police chiefs are fuming over the tactics being used by ICE.

Last week, at a press conference with Minnesota police chiefs, the leaders lined up behind a podium before it was revealed that each of them there had one of their own officers detained by ICE exclusively because of their race. In many cases it continued to escalate until the officer informed the agents that they were law enforcement.

The same thing happened in Maine last week where a U.S. citizen who served as a corrections officer was nabbed from his vehicle and taken into custody until they allowed him to show his identification. He was shouting that he was a citizen and an officer but federal agents ignored the claim. They left his unlocked vehicle running on the street as they carted him away.

The furious chief there called it “bush-league policing.”

The top brass also said that they're getting “endless complaints” about the way federal officers behave.

In Illinois, an ICE officer was charged with misdemeanor battery after someone filming a federal agent was attacked by the officer. It's unclear how many other agents could be charged in similar incidents. Such a conviction doesn't necessarily prevent employment with ICE or CBP, however, the website says.

The Times wrote, "The criticism aimed at federal agencies is tinged with the irony that for years, the federal government was the nation’s policing watchdog. But under President Trump, the Justice Department has walked away from efforts to force deeply troubled departments to improve — efforts that some chiefs had called intrusive and heavy handed."

Such a practice has become known as the "Kavanaugh Stop," named after U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh who wrote in an official ruling that federal agents aren't arresting citizens and if by mistake they're detained they're being released quickly.

in 2020 Minnesota began an effort to reform its police department after Officer Derek Chauvin choked and killed George Floyd as a crowd begged him to stop and filmed the incident on video. There have been enormous strides to shift to a community policing model with deescalation training.

Now, all of that is "going down the toilet," said Chief Kelly McCarthy of Mendota Heights. “We do look good by comparison — but that won’t last because people are really frustrated.”

McCarthy said that when off duty, she volunteered to help out as a legal observer outside of a Spanish language Alcoholics Anonymous meeting near her house. She wasn't in uniform. That's when a CBP agent struck.

“He told me to get a job, and that I was a paid agitator,” she said. “I would have been embarrassed if he had been one of my officers.”

“In order for police to be accepted in communities, they have to have permission to police those communities from the people who live there,” said Republican Mayor Jerry P. Dyer of Fresno, Calif.

The federal agents are "not trusted because of the manner in which they operate,” he added.

“It’s impacting our brand as police officers, our brand of how hard we work to build trust,” said Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley.

Behind the scenes, the Times said that departments have decided to distance themselves, showing that the men and women in blue aren't the same as the mask-wearing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and Border Patrol agents.

"The city of St. Paul, Minn., has distributed photos showing what their police, fire and animal services uniforms look like," the Times said.

“St. Paul Police Department does not ask people about their immigration status” and “cannot impede or interfere with federal agents,” one advisory said.

In some communities, problems remain with local police, said DeRay Mckesson, who now serves as the executive director of Campaign Zero, which seeks to reduce police violence.

“ICE has helped people understand that the system is broken, that it’s not just one or two bad officers,” said Mckesson.

“People are for the first time are like, ‘OK, the government’s lying to me,’” McKesson added. “Before, that would have sounded like a conspiracy theory.”

Former police chief, Brandon del Pozo told the Times that it's a unique opportunity for local departments to step up and show a contrast.

“Never before in our lifetime have they had a better foil than they have in ICE,” wrote del Pozo in Vital City, a Columbia Law School journal. “The nation’s attention is rightly focused on flagrant abuses at the federal level that constantly dominate the news and provide a clear moral compass for how police shouldn’t behave."

Read the full report here.

Trump's Greenland envoy is in for a 'rude awakening': diplomat

One of President Donald Trump's ambassadors is trying to downplay his second job, but another former diplomat is issuing a warning.

It's rare for the governor of a state to take on a second job, but that's what Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) did when he agreed to be Trump's "Ambassador to Greenland." There is no official position of ambassador to Greenland, as Greenland is a territory of Denmark. Still, Trump wanted it, and Landry was happy to comply as a special envoy.

Now he's trying to spell out how he can do both jobs at once. Speaking to The Washington Post, he explained that he's not an ambassador, in that he lives and works in Greenland, as others do.

“Look, I think that the titles can somewhat be misleading,” he began. “I look at my job under this as almost like a representative of the United States and the state of Louisiana, to see what kind of economic opportunities there could be with trade in Greenland and Louisiana.”

He said in a December episode of "The Will Cain Show" that since summers in Louisiana are so horrible, Greenland is looking like a great tourist destination for those in his home state.

Thus far, his side hustle has consisted of talking about the U.S. and Greenland on television.

“They tell me they like to hunt, they like to fish, they like to have a good time,” Landry said in a Fox News interview. “I’m like, ‘Y’all belong in Louisiana.’”

“We should go to Greenland and say, ‘Hey, what kind of opportunities would you like? What are we doing? What can we offer you that Europe is not?” he added when speaking on CNBC.

The Post told a story about a Trump fan from Greenland who attended the inauguration and Turning Point USA inaugural ball. The report described him as the type of person that one would imagine the administration reaching out to. No one has.

But neither has Per Berthelsen, a member of Greenland's parliament. Aaja Chemniz, a Greenlandic member of Parliament in Denmark, chairs the Greenland committee. She hasn't heard from Landry either.

"As of last week, Sen. James E. Risch (R-Idaho), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, hadn’t heard from Landry, either. Nor had Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.), his Democratic counterpart. Nor Jesper Moller Sorensen, the Danish ambassador to the United States. Nor Jacob Isbosethsen, the Greenland representative to the United States and Canada."

Landry said he replied to some emails from people in Greenland. But, he told Fox, “I’m not interested in going to an embassy and talking to diplomats."

"I haven’t gotten directly on the phone yet,” he told the Post. “There can be a language barrier, me and the U.S., let alone me and Greenlandic or Danish.”

He also wasn't at the meeting between Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland. During their hour-long conversation, the Post said that Landry's name never came up once.

The day after the meeting, Landry said he went to Washington to meet with Rubio. He also said that he has chatted with the governor of Alaska about going on a trip to Greenland at some point.

When the Post asked whether he was still the special envoy, Landry assumed he was.

“As far as I know, he hasn’t dismissed me,” Landry said.

His plan is to have a kind of “culinary diplomacy,” to win over Greenlanders who have been hostile to the U.S. after Trump's threats.

“They catch a lot of fish there,” he said. “Maybe we can teach them how to make a Greenland version of gumbo.”

“You think gumbo is going to want to make them be purchased?” asked Rufus Gifford, who was President Barack Obama's ambassador to Denmark. “You’re in for a rude awakening.”

Read the full report here.

Republican demands info about Trump official’s bribery scandal and affair with staff

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is demanding answers from Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer.

In a letter sent Wednesday, Bloomberg Law reported that Grassley wanted to know whether the stories by the conservative New York Post are accurate.

In early January an inspector general probe uncovered that shortly after Chavez-DeRemer was confirmed by the U.S. Senate, she allegedly took staff to a strip club in Oregon. She also allegedly had an extramarital affair with one of her security guards.

The senator wanted to know whether she fabricated official work so she could “travel for pleasure, while having the American taxpayer foot the bill."

Grassley is the chair of the influential Senate Judiciary Committee.

It marks just how far Grassley has backed away from the administration. It has been less than a year that Grassley, a huge supporter of whistleblower rights, refused to allow a whistleblower to speak at a confirmation hearing for one of President Donald Trump's top Justice Department officials nominated to become an appeals court judge.

"The Judiciary panel chairman has long been focused on rooting out waste of taxpayer dollars, but has consistently fended off claims of misconduct by officials more squarely in his jurisdiction, including by Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel," said Bloomberg.

The letter demands information by Feb. 11.

Trump sidelines Noem at Cabinet meeting: CNN reporter

President Donald Trump held a Cabinet meeting on Thursday where he went around the room to chat with some of his secretaries about their respective departments.

CNN's Kaitlan Collins reported that while Trump usually shouts out Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, this time he not only didn't call on her for a briefing, she didn't get a nod either.

"He went around the room and called on a handful of Cabinet secretaries, more than a handful, probably, actually, but one that he notably did not call on was standing to my left. And that was the Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who we know has come under intense scrutiny in the last several days," she said.

She recalled that Noem has been side-lined "ever since she came out on Saturday and described the killing of Alex Petti at the hands of federal agents, described him as a domestic terrorist and obviously described something that was not later borne out by the videos of what happened."

Trump has since changed the leadership on the ground in Minneapolis.

What is happening in Minneapolis also never once came up in the meeting. Despite immigration being Trump's flagship issue, there was no mention of it.

"And I just think it speaks to the moment where there have been a ton of headlines generated around Minneapolis," said Collins.

She also noted it was odd that Trump didn't take questions from the media waiting for the 90-minute meeting.

"I'm not sure I've ever been in a Cabinet meeting covering the president, whether in this term, and this was his 10th Cabinet meeting so far in his second term, or in his first term, where he did not take questions from reporters at the end," she said.

'Got me in a blink': Trump tells Cabinet he’s not sleeping at their 'boring' meetings

President Donald Trump once again claimed that he never fell asleep during meetings where he was photographed leaning back in his hair with his eyes closed.

During an interview about his health with Ben Terris, Trump's team insisted that when he appears to be asleep, he's actually taking notes on his lap.

Trump and his team have tried to dismiss photos of him with his eyes closed as evidence of his intense concentration. Critics use such photos when questioning his health.

“It’s not dozing. Sometimes, if he’s thinking about something — and I made that mistake at first too — he adopts a pose. He leans back or leans forward a little bit, and he either closes his eyes or looks down," press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in the New York Magazine interview.

"So, with that, we are going to ask a couple of people to say a few words," Trump said during the Cabinet meeting Thursday. "We're not going to go through the whole table because the last time we had a press conference, it lasted for three hours and some people said, 'he closed his eyes.'"

"Look," Trump continued, "it got pretty boring. I love these people. I love these people. But these are a lot of people. It was a little bit on the boring side, but I didn't sleep. I just closed them because I wanted to get the hell out of here. Some of them. I didn't sleep, by the way. I don't — I don't sleep much, let me tell you."

"But, you know, it's funny, some of them got me in a blink. You know, when you go," Trump said before blinking his eyes. "Like you go," he said blinking many times. "And they took me as — at the closed segment of my cycle."

Trump added that Secretary of State Marco Rubio and others would wake him up if he were sleeping.

"They'd be knocking me. Come on, you gotta wake up, boss," Trump said.

Georgia legal expert reveals end goal of FBI’s Fulton County raid

Georgia lawyer Michael J. Moore fears that the FBI raid on the Atlanta elections office has an end goal of the federal government taking over elections.

Speaking to Moore on Thursday, CNN host Pamela Brown cited President Donald Trump's posting spree in the early hours of Thursday morning during which he repeated the conspiracy theory that the 2020 election was stolen by Democrats.

Moore, who was once the U.S. attorney for the Middle District of Georgia, said that the raid wasn't exclusively about Trump's desperation to change the results of the 2020 election.

"I would tell you that I think this has nothing to do with trying to find out anything about the 2020 election," Moore began. "I think this is really just a big ruse by the administration, both to divert attention away and to really sort of fabricate an excuse for what I see as a fear of more federal involvement. And maybe in some cases, I don't want to call it a federal takeover of the elections, but really sort of an effort by the federal government to control elections. That's been a goal of this administration for some time."

He pointed out that the Justice Department's reasoning concerns the 2020 election, when the statute of limitations for federal crimes is typically about five years. That has expired, Moore said.

"There's really not much they can do unless they're going to allege that this has been some long, ongoing conspiracy or that there's been some reason to stop the statute of limitations," he continued.

"They had already filed a civil lawsuit that's pending in the federal court, asking that the ballots be turned over. They wanted the nonpublic information, which is odd too, because that has nothing to do with the voting. That's for getting people's Social Security numbers and other personal information," he said.

Moore noted there's a very "low bar" to get a search warrant.

"As I understand from the application of the warrant, one of the things that they have said is that the retention of records that they shouldn't have kept, which would be a fairly low, almost like getting a traffic ticket type offense in the federal court," said Moore. "And they can say they're holding ballots."

One thing he doesn't know is whether the Justice Department informed the judge that the ballots had been sealed by a state court judge, or that they targeted Fulton County in December.

"This isn't even ripe for a decision by a judge yet," he added.

Moore also said that there have been three audits and found no widespread fraud, according to a Republican U.S. attorney, the former Republican attorney general, the Republican governor and Republican secretary of state.

"So, basically, all of Trump's people at the time said there was nothing, that he did not win the state. But now he's got a Department of Justice and attorney general who he basically controls like a marionette," said Moore.

Young Trump voters regretful as president focuses on everything but the economy

President Donald Trump continues to hemorrhage support from his young MAGA supporters he relied on for his coalition in 2024.

The Daily Beast cited a new poll from The Wall Street Journal of 18 to 29-year-olds show that in the past year Trump has fallen nearly 12 points with young voters.

The data shows that Trump has fallen to 32.6 percent as of Jan. 16. In March 2025, he was sitting around 44.4 percent. In the November election, 47 percent of voters under 30 cast their ballots for him. It was a huge number for Republicans who haven't had much success with young voters since the 2004 election.

"This is not the party I once signed up for and registered to be in,” Saint Mary’s College junior Elysia Morales, 21, told the Journal.

She wasn't merely a Republican however. Morales was the vice president of her Turning Point USA chapter, the group founded by Charlie Kirk. However, after the shooting death of ICU nurse Alex Jeffrey Pretti in Minneapolis last week.

Support for Trump among youth was ginned up primarily through young male voters who listen to some of the podcasts in the so-called "manosphere."

However, their support is evaporating too, said a poll of young male voters also conducted in the new year. The male support for Trump remains higher (32 percent) than young female voters (26 percent).

The youth that the Journal spoke to also expressed disappointment that Trump is more focused on foreign policy and his grievances than in fixing their problems.

“I love the idea of America First,” said 22-year-old food-service worker Jaden Blomberg. “I don’t think that this particular moment in history, while we have internal problems, we should be fighting on the other side of the world."

Twenty-one-year-old Maellie Lewna, a College Republicans recruitment director agreed.

“A lot of people expected him to address economic issues first,” she said.

Judge tells DOJ to hand over or destroy materials used to score Comey indictment

During President Donald Trump's first term, his government tried to go after an FBI leak and the investigation obtained documents that have ultimately been used to go after former FBI Director James Comey. Late Wednesday night, a judge ordered the Justice Department to either destroy the materials or return them.

Operation "Arctic Haze" was an investigation into a possible leak in 2019–2020. As legal podcaster P. Andrew Torrez noted, Dan Richman, one of Comey's longtime friends and a former lawyer, filed a lawsuit against the Justice Department in December claiming that documents taken from him five years ago included information from his office about Comey. He alleged those documents were then used to file charges against Comey in 2025 in the Eastern District of Virginia.

The first order came in December from the judge, but it was put on hold when Associate Attorney General Stan Woodward, who once served as one of Trump's lawyers, began filing motions to extend the deadline to eliminate the documents.

Former Deputy U.S. Attorney Robert K. McBride was the number two at the Eastern District under Lindsey Halligan. He was fired after refusing to file charges against Comey again after a judge ruled that Halligan's appointment was not legal. It happened the same day a grand jury in the Southern District of Florida was empaneled, wrote national security expert and journalist Marcy Wheeler.

She wondered whether something fishy was going on and whether Woodward's many motions were part of an effort to hold off on destroying the documents and to give them to another U.S. attorney, Jay Reding Quinones, who has a grand jury under the supervision of Judge Aileen Cannon in Florida.

This new demand to destroy materials stops that from happening.

Torrez commented, "As far as I can tell, this notice of compliance would seem to foreclose on Quinones being able to put Arctic Haze evidence in front of a Florida grand jury. The government can keep its notes from that investigation, but none of the files."

Top Trump official digs a deeper legal hole for administration: legal reporter

A top official for President Donald Trump announced that the federal government will remain in Minnesota until it receives cooperation. It's a phrase that could have a very serious bearing on ongoing litigation.

Legal reporter Cristian Farias, who has reported at Vanity Fair, New York Magazine and The New Yorker, pointed to comments from Tom Homan, Trump's executive associate director for Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO).

Reporters asked whether his comments apply only to Minnesota or to other states. The reporter also asked when Homan will decide that it's over.

"The withdrawal of law enforcement resources here is dependent upon cooperation. Like I said, one agent wrestling one bad guy, bad guy in jail, means less agents on the streets. We got more to do — to talk about how we're going to implement this agreement. But as we see that cooperation happens, then the redeployment will happen," Homan said.

The statement is a problem for judges looking into whether the federal agents were sent for political reasons.

"One problem of having people like Tom Homan and other non-lawyers in charge is that they say things that are material to ongoing litigation," said Farias. "All the time. (Pam Bondi, a lawyer, is the exception: She too says things bearing on active litigation all the time)."

"The tone shift is to have Tom Homan recite that the extortionate and coercive demands in [Attorney General] Bondi's letter — turn over your voter rolls, abandon your state policies and give us Medicaid data and we’ll end the occupation and terrorization of a state — are the terms," added Michigan law professor Leah Litman.

On Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Katherine M. Menendez questioned the Justice Department about the purpose of the surge of federal agents and whether it was intended to pressure states and cities to change their policies.

There has been a case about a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) from the agents arresting and detaining lawfully resettled refugees in the state. The judge granted it on Wednesday. The government must also release all refugees, including those who have been shipped out of the state to Texas.

U.S. District Judge Patrick Schiltz said on Wednesday that ICE "violated at least 96 court orders in 74 cases in January, and that is likely a substantial undercount," quoted Fox 9 in Minneapolis.


US officials meet with Canadian secessionists as friction mounts between Trump and Carney

A small contingent of an oil-rich province in Canada that desperately wants to join the United States met with President Donald Trump's administration.

The Financial Times reported on Thursday that Trump aides met with the Alberta Prosperity Project, which is a group of far-right separatists who want to leave Canada. Since last April, Trump's State Department officials have met with the group at least three times in Washington, the report said.

"They are seeking another meeting next month with state and Treasury officials to ask for a $500 billion credit facility to help bankroll the province if an independence referendum — yet to be called — is passed," said the report.

According to the group's attorney, Jeff Rath, who was at the meetings, “The US is extremely enthusiastic about a free and independent Alberta."

He went on to brag that he has a better relationship with the Trump administration than Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney who hammered Trump in a speech at the World Economic Forum.

The State Department downplayed the multiple meetings however, saying, “The department regularly meets with civil society types. As is typical in routine meetings such as these, no commitments were made.”

The White House echoed the statement, adding that there was no commitment of financial support.

Neither Treasury secretary Scott Bessent nor anyone at the Treasury Department knew anything about a "credit facility proposal," said a person familiar when talking to FT. They said they have no intention of engaging.

Canadian conservatives, however, view the group as people who are only looking for attention.

Carlo Dade, at the Canada West Foundation, “The Americans are more than happy to continue to play Canadians off each other."

Indeed, Bessent commented to a white supremacist podcaster that Alberta is a "natural partner" for the U.S. to make given that the province has so much oil.

“The Albertans are very independent people,” the secretary said. “[There is a] rumour that they may have a referendum on whether they want to stay in Canada or not.”

However, Ipsos polling shows that only 3 in 10 residents in Alberta and Quebec would vote to secede from Canada. Still, the separatists are gathering signatures for a petition to deliver to the legislature.

FT added that it's part of deteriorating diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Canada.

Trump goes on early morning Truth Social spree reposting calls for Obama's arrest

President Donald Trump was up early Thursday morning for a Truth Social posting spree that focused largely on his 2020 election loss — but included a dash of claims about 2016's "Russiagate."

The rant included a nearly decade-long conspiracy that Trump was spied on by former President Barack Obama. Trump reposted Fox News commentary from far-right host Jesse Watters who claimed Obama personally ordered a CIA spying operation on Trump.

"ARREST OBAMA NOW," one post read.

According to the "Truths," the Obama administration manufactured evidence to undermine Trump's election in 2016, though none of the information about the Trump campaign's ties to Russia was revealed publicly until after the election. Other reports about the Russian hack of Hillary Clinton's campaign, Russian bots and content farms were reported throughout 2016, a Washington Post timeline shows.

Trump on Thursday morning also posted a series of "Truths" showing he's still focused on his 2020 election loss.

Among the posts was a flood of accusations claiming that the election was "crooked."

Trump appeared to post screenshots of random users from X who agree with his sentiment that he actually won the 2020 election.

Another video Trump posted from CNN appears to show a discussion about Trump winning Georgia in 2024, though Trump doesn't explain how that is relevant to his 2020 conspiracy theories about the election.

Trump also shared another conspiracy cited by former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly about the Chinese government funding leftist groups and the Minnesota Immigration Rights Action Committee.

Georgia 2020 elections raid just a show to appease 'obsessed' Trump: expert

The FBI executed a raid on an elections hub in Fulton County, Georgia on Wednesday, relating to the 2020 election, which President Donald Trump maintains he "won." The move comes the week after the top agent was shoved out.

Speaking about it to CNN after the news broke, former Palm Beach County State Attorney David Aaronberg called it a "Kash Patel attempt to continue to be in the good graces of President [Donald] Trump."

Patel took over as the director of the FBI after Trump fired his own previous appointee, Christopher Wray and Wray was hired after then-FBI Director James Comey refused to swear fidelity to Trump in 2017.

Aaronberg noted that Trump has been "obsessed" with the 2020 election to such a degree that he went through over 60 court rulings across the country where judges refused to allow further attempts by Trump to challenge votes in key Democratic areas or through mail-in voting.

"There's absolutely no evidence of widespread fraud," said Aaronberg. "But before we go down that road, we have to realize that if this seizure took place, if this raid took place, it means that a federal judge or magistrate had to sign off on a warrant, that there was probable cause of a crime, and that evidence of that crime would be at that location."

He said that the prosecutors must have some kind of affidavit that gives them "evidence" to convince a judge to sign off.

"So, it can't be entirely pie in the sky political stuff by Kash Patel," he continued. However, "At the same time, it doesn't mean they have any real evidence, just perhaps an affidavit saying they think that there's something there."

CNN asked Aaronberg where he sees the new investigation going and he said he assumes it will be dismissed like all of the others.

"Oh, I see it going the same way that True the Vote and Kash Patel and a lot of these conspiracy theorists will end up, which is in a court rejecting these claims. Remember when True the Vote and Dinesh D'Souza came up with '2000 Mules' and these ideas of ballot harvesting and election fraud. When they stood up in court — they stood down. They fell apart. They did not last the test in court because it's one thing that you can say anything you want in a court of public opinion, but in front of a judge, you've got to have real evidence," recalled Aaronberg.

Those allegations don't result in actual evidence, however, he said.

"It's all stuff that's fit for right-wing podcasts. Not for courts. So, I think this thing will fall flat. But they're getting what they want now they get to feed the right-wing media base to say that, look, we've got a raid! There must be something there! In the end, when the cameras are turned off, I think that this story will go away," he said.


- YouTube youtu.be




BRAND NEW STORIES
@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.