Trump's latest legal loss may open the door for more broken NDAs and exposed secrets

Trump's latest legal loss may open the door for more broken NDAs and exposed secrets
President Donald Trump pauses during the 9/11 Observance Ceremony at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., Sept. 11, 2017. During the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, 184 people were killed at the Pentagon. To the left is first lady Melania Trump, and to the right are Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford. (DOD photo by Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Dominique A. Pineiro)
Trump throws fit at 'rude, nasty, and totally biased' New York prosecutors as Trump Org indictment looms

Former President Donald Trump may have opened another can of worms with his latest failed attempt to enforce a former White House staffer's nondisclosure agreement (NDA).

Now, Omarosa Manigault Newman's attorney John Phillips is encouraging others to follow suit as his client's case should serve as an example of how an NDA can be broken. Speaking to Law & Crime, he shed light on what his client's victory could mean for others like her.

"People who signed these NDAs should sleep better and speak more freely," Phillips told the publication.

Last week, Trump lost a three-year legal battle he'd been fighting against former top White House aide Omarosa Manigault Newman. Shortly after her departure from the White House, Manigault-Newman released a book titled, "Unhinged: An Insider's Account of the Trump White House." According to Business Insider, the book offered a critical account of Manigault-Newman's time working for the Trump administration from 2017 to 2018.

Although she did break her disclosure agreement with the release of the book, Manigault-Newman still managed to prevail in court. According to Law & Crime, on Friday, September 24, assigned Arbitrator T. Andrew Brown released a ruling on the case. Upon consideration of the parties' submissions, the Arbitrator hereby grants Respondent's Summary Judgment Motion declaring the Agreement invalid under New York contract law," Brown wrote.

Brown also criticized the obligation that came with Trump's NDA describing it as "certainly unreasonable."

"The agreement definitely imposes on [the] respondent an obligation to never say anything remotely critical of Mr. Trump Trump, or his or his family members' interests, for the rest of her life. Such a burden is certainly unreasonable," Brown wrote in the judgment.

The publication also noted that the arbitrator emphasized "fatally for Trump, that while courts can fill in the gaps in certain instances, contract terms must be clear and definite in order for mutual assent (i.e. the creation of a contract) regarding those would-be terms. And here that simply was not the case."

Despite the intimidating tone of Trump's NDA, Manigault-Newman prevailed and Phillips is glad she had the courage to come forward. He said, "Kudos to Omarosa Manigault Newman for coming forward and taking this on."


Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ }}

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.