Frontpage news and politics

Bombshell report details 'dangerous' new allegations against Trump Cabinet nominee

Although some of President-elect Donald Trump's picks for his incoming administration are almost certain to receive bipartisan confirmation in the U.S. Senate — including Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida) for secretary of state and North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum for interior secretary — others are extremely controversial. And one pick that is drawing vehement criticism from both the left and the right is Fox News star Pete Hegseth, Trump's choice for defense secretary.

Hegseth's critics have been arguing that although he is a veteran, he lacks the experience necessary to lead the U.S. Defense Department. Moreover, critics warn, Hegseth has faced a sexual assault allegation (although he hasn't been charged with anything) and embraces dangerous Christian nationalist views.

Now, bombshell reporting by journalist Jane Mayer in The New Yorker gives Hegseth's critics more arguments to use against him.

READ MORE: 'National laughingstock:' Election denialism has staying power even after Trump's win

Mayer, in an article published on December 1, reports that "Hegseth's record before becoming a full-time Fox News TV host, in 2017, raises additional questions about his suitability to run the world's largest and most lethal military force."

"A trail of documents, corroborated by the accounts of former colleagues, indicates that Hegseth was forced to step down by both of the two nonprofit advocacy groups that he ran — Veterans for Freedom and Concerned Veterans for America — in the face of serious allegations of financial mismanagement, sexual impropriety, and personal misconduct," Mayer explains. "A previously undisclosed whistle-blower report on Hegseth's tenure as the president of Concerned Veterans for America, from 2013 until 2016, describes him as being repeatedly intoxicated while acting in his official capacity — to the point of needing to be carried out of the organization's events."

Mayer continues, "The detailed seven-page report — which was compiled by multiple former CVA employees and sent to the organization's senior management in February 2015 — states that, at one point, Hegseth had to be restrained while drunk from joining the dancers on the stage of a Louisiana strip club, where he had brought his team. The report also says that Hegseth, who was married at the time, and other members of his management team sexually pursued the organization's female staffers, whom they divided into two groups — the 'party girls' and the 'not-party girls.'"

According to Mayer, a separate letter of complaint alleges that during a visit to Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio on May 29, 2015, a drunken Hegseth was chanting, "Kill All Muslims! Kill All Muslims!"

READ MORE: Why Kash Patel is Trump's 'scariest hire yet': report

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, discussed the alcohol abuse allegations against Hegseth.

Blumenthal told Mayer, "Much as we might be sympathetic to people with continuing alcohol problems, they shouldn't be at the top of our national-security structure. It's dangerous. The secretary of defense is involved in every issue of national security. He's involved in the use of nuclear weapons. He's the one who approves sending troops into combat. He approves drone strikes that may involve civilian casualties. Literally life-and-death issues are in the hands of the secretary of defense, and entrusting these kinds of issues to someone who might be incapacitated for any reason is a risk we cannot take."

READ MORE: 'Quickly rot from within': Expert reveals 3 traits the US shares with declining empires

Jane Mayer's full report for The New Yorker is available at this link (subscription required).

'Whoa! Now we’re talking!' Expert warns Dr. Oz threatens Trump with 'ethical morass'

Donald Trump’s pick of TV doctor Mehmet Oz threatens to bring an “ethical morass” to an administration already packed with controversial picks, a report warned Monday.

Major financial links tie the heart surgeon’s media company to huge drug companies he would be in charge of monitoring as the incoming president’s head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, the Washington Post reported.

One of those companies is the manufacturer of weight loss drug Ozempic, a product he’s openly praised as far back as 2019.

“Whoa! Now we’re talking!” Oz gushed as he spoke to comedian Billy Gardell on his show about the drug’s effect on his management of diabetes and attempt to shed pounds — a section that was sponsored by the drug’s maker, Novo Nordisk, which Oz called a “trusted partner.”

“If confirmed, Oz would take over two of the largest taxpayer-funded programs just as pharmaceutical companies are lobbying the government to cover the cost of weight-loss drugs,” the Post wrote.

And yet, on his website, Oz continues to promote the drug and even sells a product to treat sagging facial skin known as “Ozempic face,” the Post reported.

“Having ongoing financial ties to a health-care company would create a disincentive to do the job the American people need done by the person in his position,” Walter Shaub Jr., who headed the Office of Government Ethics for more than four years, told the Post.

“The situation could be an ethical morass, unless he is truly willing to alter his finances and business dealings.”

A spokesperson for Novo Nordisk told the Post it does not have a relationship with Oz.

Trump’s transition spokesman Brian Hughes said, “All nominees and appointees will comply with the ethical obligations of their respective agencies.”

But the Post detailed the financial stakes that are in play. Expanding Medicare coverage to weight loss drugs would come with a $35 billion cost in just 8 years, Congressional Budget Office figures show.

And Oz critics say promotions on “The Dr. Oz Show” threaten many more potential conflicts of interest.

“Through various media channels, he has not only pushed “miracle” treatments for fat loss that lack scientific evidence, but also promoted companies in which he has had a vested financial interest, including a “cellular nutrition company” and a biotech company creating bovine colostrum supplements — the powdered or pill version of the first milk a cow releases after giving birth,” the Post reported.

Oz’s spokesman told the Post, “As a world-renowned cardiothoracic surgeon who led the heart institute at New York Presbyterian Medical Center, Dr. Mehmet Oz is eminently qualified to help Make America Healthy Again. Dr. Oz’s knowledge and success in health care, innovation, and communications will be an invaluable asset to the American people in the Trump-Vance Administration, and he appreciates the opportunity President Trump has given him to lead CMS.”

'Legal, physical and political protection' needed for officials who 'stand up to Trump': analysis

During his 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump repeatedly threatened retaliation against his critics — from members of Congress to prosecutors to journalists. And his picks for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), including former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi for U.S. attorney general and Kash Patel for FBI director, have indicated that they are fine with Trump's revenge campaign.

Patel, during a 2023 appearance on Steve Bannon's "War Room" podcast, even called for prosecutions of journalists who pushed back against Trump's false, repeatedly debunked claim that the 2020 election was stolen from him.

In an article published by the conservative website The Bulwark on December 2, journalist Jill Lawrence calls for Trump's opponents to mount a vigorous defense of those have faced "physical threats" or "political threats" for "standing up" to him.

READ MORE: Why Kash Patel is Trump's 'scariest hire yet': report

"Pitching in to protect standing up to Trump would strengthen freedom of speech, thought, and conscience among elected officials, and help protect the civil servants we count on without even realizing it," Lawrence argues. "Violence and coercion are not the American way. We need all the help we can get to make sure they don't prevail."

In the months ahead, Lawrence stresses, the president-elect's foes will need to step up to the plate and offer "legal, physical, and political protection for people who fear breaking with or taking on Trump."

"In their short history in U.S. politics," Lawrence explains, "Trump and his MAGA movement have already demonstrated that all perceived enemies, rivals, and critics of Trump are vulnerable. Targets have ranged from state-level election workers and authorities to senators, representatives, military leaders, the federal workforce, and their high-profile bosses…. When Trump and MAGA take offense, people get death threats. Their spouses and families get death threats."

Lawrence continues, "They get fired and they get primaried. They sue or get sued. Paul Pelosi was beaten and nearly killed by a disturbed person trying to find his wife — then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — interrogate her about the FBI investigation Trump calls 'Russiagate,' and maybe 'break her knees.'"

READ MORE: 'Quickly rot from within': Expert reveals 3 traits the US shares with declining empires

Jill Lawrence's full article for The Bulwark is available at this link.

How 'would-be autocrat' Trump will ramp up revenge campaign against media critics

After Vice President Kamala Harris narrowly lost the United States' 2024 presidential election, MSNBC hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski drew a lot of criticism for meeting with President-elect Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago.

Although Scarborough and Brzezinski have been scathing critics of Trump, they said they went to Mar-a-Lago to reopen communications with him.

Some defenders of the "Morning Joe" hosts have said that their Mar-a-Lago visit was understandable in light of Trump and his followers' threats to retaliate against critics in the media — that they were trying to protect themselves.

READ MORE: Why Kash Patel is Trump's 'scariest hire yet': report

Far-right MAGA conspiracy theorist Kash Patel, Trump's pick for FBI director, has even called for criminal prosecutions of journalists who debunked the false claim that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump. Patel has falsely claimed, without evidence, that Trump defeated now-President Joe Biden in 2020.

In an article published by the New Yorker on November 30, journalist David Remnick warns that Trump is getting ready to ramp up his battle against critics in the media.

"Media lawyers now fear that Trump will ramp up the deployment of subpoenas, specious lawsuits, court orders, and search warrants to seize reporters' notes, devices, and source materials," Remnick explains. "They are gravely concerned that reporters and media institutions will be punished for leaking government secrets. The current Justice Department guidelines mandating extra procedural measures for subpoenas directed at journalists are just that: guidelines. They are likely to be shredded."

Remnick continues, "Nearly every state provides journalists with at least a qualified privilege to withhold the identity of confidential sources. But there is no federal privilege, and Trump has opposed a bipartisan congressional bill that would create one, the so-called PRESS Act…. Retribution is in the air."

READ MORE: 'Quickly rot from within': Expert reveals 3 traits the US shares with declining empires

Remnick notes that Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's blueprint for a second Trump Administration, "calls for ending federal funding to NPR and PBS." And he adds that "a longer-range worry is that the Supreme Court may weaken or even overturn the 1964 landmark decision New York Times v. Sullivan."

"Sullivan limits the ability of public officials to sue journalists for defamation, finding that the Constitution guarantees that, at a minimum, journalists can write freely and critically about public officials, as long as they don't publish statements that they know to be false, or probably so," Remnick explains. "(President Richard) Nixon regarded Sullivan as 'virtually a license to lie.' Trump shares the sentiment."

"All these threats and potential actions are hardly the stuff of legal arcana or the frenzied obsessions of self-involved Podsnapian journalists," Remnick argues. "They are the arsenal of a would-be autocrat who seeks to intimidate his critics, protect himself from scrutiny, and go on wearing away at the liberal democratic order."

READ MORE: Bombshell report details 'dangerous' new allegations against Trump Cabinet nominee

Read David Remnick's full article for The New Yorker at this link (subscription required).



Astronomers have pinpointed the origin of mysterious repeating radio bursts from space

Slowly repeating bursts of intense radio waves from space have puzzled astronomers since they were discovered in 2022.

In new research, we have for the first time tracked one of these pulsating signals back to its source: a common kind of lightweight star called a red dwarf, likely in a binary orbit with a white dwarf, the core of another star that exploded long ago.

A slowly pulsing mystery

In 2022, our team made an amazing discovery: periodic radio pulsations that repeated every 18 minutes, emanating from space. The pulses outshone everything nearby, flashed brilliantly for three months, then disappeared.

We know some repeating radio signals come from a kind of neutron star called a radio pulsar, which spins rapidly (typically once a second or faster), beaming out radio waves like a lighthouse. The trouble is, our current theories say a pulsar spinning only once every 18 minutes should not produce radio waves.

So we thought our 2022 discovery could point to new and exciting physics – or help explain exactly how pulsars emit radiation, which despite 50 years of research is still not understood very well.

More slowly blinking radio sources have been discovered since then. There are now about ten known “long-period radio transients”.

However, just finding more hasn’t been enough to solve the mystery.

Searching the outskirts of the galaxy

Until now, every one of these sources has been found deep in the heart of the Milky Way.

This makes it very hard to figure out what kind of star or object produces the radio waves, because there are thousands of stars in a small area. Any one of them could be responsible for the signal, or none of them.

So, we started a campaign to scan the skies with the Murchison Widefield Array radio telescope in Western Australia, which can observe 1,000 square degrees of the sky every minute. An undergraduate student at Curtin University, Csanád Horváth, processed data covering half of the sky, looking for these elusive signals in more sparsely populated regions of the Milky Way.

A collection of 16 dipole antennas on red outback sands surrounded by shrubs One element of the Murchison Widefield Array, a radio telescope in Western Australia that observes the sky at low radio frequencies. ICRAR / Curtin University

And sure enough, we found a new source! Dubbed GLEAM-X J0704-37, it produces minute-long pulses of radio waves, just like other long-period radio transients. However, these pulses repeat only once every 2.9 hours, making it the slowest long-period radio transient found so far.

Where are the radio waves coming from?

We performed follow-up observations with the MeerKAT telescope in South Africa, the most sensitive radio telescope in the southern hemisphere. These pinpointed the location of the radio waves precisely: they were coming from a red dwarf star. These stars are incredibly common, making up 70% of the stars in the Milky Way, but they are so faint that not a single one is visible to the naked eye.

Greyscale image of six stars, two of which are encircled by a magenta circle, and one of which is pinpointed by a cyan circle. The source of the radio waves, as seen by the MWA at low resolution (magenta circle) and MeerKAT at high resolution (cyan circle). The white circles are all stars in our own Galaxy. Hurley-Walker et al. 2024 / Astrophysical Journal Letters

Combining historical observations from the Murchison Widefield Array and new MeerKAT monitoring data, we found that the pulses arrive a little earlier and a little later in a repeating pattern. This probably indicates that the radio emitter isn’t the red dwarf itself, but rather an unseen object in a binary orbit with it.

Based on previous studies of the evolution of stars, we think this invisible radio emitter is most likely to be a white dwarf, which is the final endpoint of small to medium-sized stars like our own Sun. If it were a neutron star or a black hole, the explosion that created it would have been so large it should have disrupted the orbit.

It takes two to tango

So how do a red dwarf and a white dwarf generate a radio signal?

The red dwarf probably produces a stellar wind of charged particles, just like our Sun does. When the wind hits the white dwarf’s magnetic field, it would be accelerated, producing radio waves.

This could be similar to how the Sun’s stellar wind interacts with Earth’s magnetic field to produce beautiful aurora, and also low-frequency radio waves.

An artist’s impression of the AR Sco system: a binary red dwarf and white dwarf that interact to produce radio emission.

We already know of a few systems like this, such as AR Scorpii, where variations in the brightness of the red dwarf imply that the companion white dwarf is hitting it with a powerful beam of radio waves every two minutes. None of these systems are as bright or as slow as the long-period radio transients, but maybe as we find more examples, we will work out a unifying physical model that explains all of them.

On the other hand, there may be many different kinds of system that can produce long-period radio pulsations.

Either way, we’ve learned the power of expecting the unexpected – and we’ll keep scanning the skies to solve this cosmic mystery.The Conversation

Natasha Hurley-Walker, Radio Astronomer, Curtin University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

'Nice work, John Roberts': Trump's latest move said to be 'middle finger' to Supreme Court

Donald Trump Saturday made a move that is being seen as a middle finger to both the Supreme Court and the intelligence community, experts say.

Trump over the weekend announced his appointment of Kash Patel as the director of FBI, leading critics to lash out and causing a pre-emptive strike against Senate Republicans by a top MAGA lawyer who said he would make their political lives hell if they opposed Patel.

Sophia Cai, senior national politics reporter for Axios, said, "Trump's decision to name hardline loyalist Kash Patel to FBI director amounts to a massive middle finger to the intelligence community."

ALSO READ: A dark mystery from America's past could save us from Trump's tyranny

Conservative commentator Charlie Sykes also weighed in on the big picture of the Patel appointment.

"Underappreciated angle to the appointments of Patel, Gaetz, Bondi, et al. Massive Fuq U to institutions … But also a huge FU to the Supreme Court, because Trump doesn’t think they will be a check on his campaign of lawless retribution," he wrote Saturday. "Nice work, John Roberts."

Trump allies promise revenge as Dems ram through Biden judges

WASHINGTON — Something strange has been happening in the U.S. Senate this month: Senators have been working. And overtime at that.

The 118th Congress isn’t just the least productive in modern history. It’s also the laziest in recent memory. But former President Donald Trump’s win has awoken Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s slumbering Senate, as he’s been ramming through a slate of outstanding, Democrat-approved judicial nominees before Republicans take over Washington in January.

“It's pretty rich that suddenly he's in a hurry,” Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) told Raw Story. “It's very weird. We're not being a deliberative body.”

In the two weeks the Senate was in session between the election and lawmaker’s Thanksgiving recess, Schumer held 40 roll call votes. In September, the Senate only voted 25 times, 30 times last January and a mere 28 in July (including Aug. 1st; their only day in session that month).

Schumer is under pressure from progressives, and he’s now focused on getting President Joe Biden—who’s had 221 of his judicial nominees seated on the federal bench—on par with Trump and the 234 judges he saw confirmed in his first term.

“It’s been a busy week”

Before senators flew home last week, Capitol Police officers complained of 16-hour shifts, while Senate attendants—from those who run the elevators to those who stand watch at the main entrance to the Senate chamber—were putting in 12-plus-hour days babysitting senators as they caught up on their long-neglected homework.

“It’s been a busy week,” Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) told Raw Story before the Senate gaveled out of session last Thursday afternoon.

But Durbin, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, contends the Senate’s breakneck speed of late was always their post-election design.

“We wanted to save the judicial nominations to a point where we could call groupings of them,” Durbin said. “And we achieved that.”

“I've been here 18 years, I think it's the first time I've seen three-day weeks — where you come in Tuesday and then leave Thursday,” Raw Story pressed. “Looking back, would it have maybe been better for some of your candidates if they could show voters they work five-day weeks?”

“The reality of campaigns is something we have to take into consideration,” Durbin said.

And this Senate knows campaigning. The chamber sat empty all of August — Congress’ traditional summer recess because the swamp gets sticky in the summer — and October, which has become the election-year norm in Washington in recent cycles.

But on top of that, senators took seven entire weeks off to mark America’s day-long national holidays — from President’s Day week to Thanksgiving week, with the exception of Juneteenth, which senators just took a day off to commemorate.

The rare times they were in Washington, senators brought their campaigns with them, as Schumer used the Senate floor for partisan show votes — on everything from the border to abortion — instead of bringing up measures with broad bipartisan support, like on artificial intelligence or protecting children’s privacy online.

Throughout the entire 118th session, Congress has only sent 139 measures to President Joe Biden. In context, in the lame duck session following the 2022 midterms, Congress passed 148 measures the president later signed.

Trump allies say retribution is coming

But, in this post-Roe v. Wade world, both parties now prize their side’s preferred judges and are willing to expend political capital, remaking the federal bench in their party’s image.

That’s why Schumer’s newfound speed has Trump and his GOP allies itching for payback in the new year, even as Democrats don’t seem to fear retribution.

“They should,” Cramer of North Dakota said.

While Republicans threw procedural roadblocks up that caused late Senate nights last week, Schumer and GOP leaders ultimately caved to holiday-induced pressure and struck a deal they hope will speed things up in December.

Four Biden appellate court nominees now won’t come to the floor for votes, even as Republicans promised to stop using every delay tactic at their disposal in the waning days of this 118th Congress.

On cue, the deal angered the progressive left and many in the GOP, who were already up in arms after a handful of Senate Republicans didn’t even bother showing up to all the judicial votes.

Watching Biden nominees start to fill most of the federal bench openings hasn’t been lost on Trump himself.

“The Democrats are trying to stack the Courts with Radical Left Judges on their way out the door. Republican Senators need to Show Up and Hold the Line — No more Judges confirmed before Inauguration Day!" Trump tweeted on Truth Social last Wednesday.

But at their weekly Senate Republican Conference lunch last week, outgoing Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell pushed back. He reminded his troops that Trump had so many vacancies to fill in 2017 because Senate Republicans followed his strong-armed lead and blocked many of former President Barack Obama’s final nominees.

“As Mitch reminded us at lunch, one of the reasons we had so many last time we were in the majority in Trump’s first term was because Mitch had held up a bunch of Obama's, and so there were more vacancies,” Cramer said. “So now, they’re in the opposite situation. And don't have, you know, we’re one vote short of holding things up, but at least we're putting them through the exercise.”

With the Senate divided at 51 Democrats and 49 Republicans, there are only so many tools at Republicans’ disposal. That has rank-and-file Republicans itching to turn the table on Democrats when they take over Congress in 2025.

“We just got to remember the same thing when we get in,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) told Raw Story. “Not a lot we can do if they get enough people here because they got us outnumbered.”

“Knowing Trump, isn't this just gonna p— him off?” Raw Story pressed. “Like, aren't you gonna get an equal and opposite reaction?”

“I don’t think the Democrats care, to be honest with you,” Tuberville said.

NOW READ: Trump is taking the mask off after lying to us for more than a year

How Trump’s press secretary went from praising Pence to becoming a 'staunch election denier'

Donald Trump had four different White House press secretaries during his first term as president: Sean Spicer, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Stephanie Grisham (who supported Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential race), and Kayleigh McEnany. And when he returns to the White House on January 20, 2025, that position will be held by 27-year-old Karoline Leavitt.

According to CNN's Andrew Kaczynski, Leavitt will be "the youngest person ever to hold the position of White House press secretary."

Leavitt was 23 after the 2020 election. In an article published by CNN on December 2, Kaczynski details Leavitt's journey into "election denialism" — after having decried, in two tweets, the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol Building.

READ MORE: Why Kash Patel is Trump's 'scariest hire yet': report

In one of the tweets, Leavitt posted video of then-Vice President Mike Pence describing the attack as "a dark day in the history of the United States Capitol." And in the other tweet, she praised one of the police officers who was at the Capitol that day as "a hero."

But Leavitt later deleted those tweets, and when she unsuccessfully ran for a U.S. House seat via New Hampshire in 2022, Leavitt had — according to Kaczynski — become "a staunch election denier."

During an appearance on far-right One America News (OAN), Leavitt told host Natalie Harp, "I'm the only candidate in this race to say that President Trump won in 2020, and I will work my hardest every single day to make sure we get to the bottom of it."

Kaczynski reports, "Leavitt's shift from praising those who defended the democratic process on January 6 to embracing election denialism reflects a broader trend among Republicans who initially distanced themselves from Trump after the riot, only to rally behind him later as his grip on the party tightened. As Leavitt steps into her role in the briefing room, her past statements and actions will likely draw scrutiny over how she balances messaging on behalf of Trump with maintaining credibility in the press briefing room."

READ MORE: 'Quickly rot from within': Expert reveals 3 traits the US shares with declining empires

Read CNN's full report at this link.


'Quickly rot from within': Expert reveals 3 traits the US shares with declining empires

The United States is currently displaying several characteristics that have historically been seen by empires in decline, according to one social scientist.

Peter Turchin is one of the pioneers of "cliodynamics," which is the field of study concerning statistical analysis of historical dynamics of societies around the world. In a recent essay for the Guardian, Turchin wrote that he and his fellow researchers have noticed the U.S. having three key traits in common with past global hegemons just before a period of decline. Those three factors are "popular immiseration, elite overproduction and state breakdown."

Turchin explained that "popular immiseration" describes a breakdown of the social contract between workers, the private sector and the public sector, which he said began after the Republican assault in the New Deal that happened around the time former President Ronald Reagan took power. He noted that as "the power of unions was undermined," taxes on the richest Americans were "cut back," which was followed by stagnating wages and a decline in life expectancy.

READ MORE: 'Not good enough anymore': Union leader explains why Dems lost economic argument to Trump

"With the incomes of workers effectively stuck, the fruits of economic growth were reaped by the elites instead. A perverse 'wealth pump' came into being, siphoning money from the poor and channelling it to the rich," he wrote. "In many ways, the last four decades call to mind what happened in the United States between 1870 and 1900 – the time of railroad fortunes and robber barons. If the postwar period was a golden age of broad-based prosperity, after 1980 we could be said to have entered a Second Gilded Age."

The second trait, which Turchin called "elite overproduction," involves a growing population of the "uber-rich," (which he defined as "those with fortunes greater than $10 million") and their influence in the public sphere. He noted that when adjusting for inflation, this population grew by tenfold over the last four decades. This has led to rich elites either running for office, like President-elect Donald Trump, or funding candidates for office, like many billionaires have done in recent cycles. He also pointed out that "counter-elites" will emerge who oppose the existing political establishment.

"The more members of this elite class there are, the more aspirants for political power a society contains," he wrote. "By the 2010s the social pyramid in the US had grown exceptionally top-heavy: there were too many wannabe leaders and moguls competing for a fixed number of positions in the upper echelons of politics and business."

"As battles between the ruling elites and counter-elites heat up, the norms governing public discourse unravel and trust in institutions declines," he continued. "The result is a loss of civic cohesiveness and sense of national cooperation – without which states quickly rot from within."

READ MORE: Watch: JD Vance booed by room full of firefighters as he calls himself 'pro-worker'

Finally, Turchin opined hat "state breakdown" will inevitably follow popular immiseration and elite overproduction. He argued that Democrats' loss in the November election "represents one battle in an ongoing revolutionary war," but that the goal of the new order is "far from assured" given that "opponents are pretty well entrenched in the bureaucracy and can effectively resist change."

"Popular discontent in the US has been building up for more than four decades. Many years of real prosperity would be needed to persuade the public that the country is back on the right track," he wrote. "So, for now, we can expect a lasting age of discord. Let’s hope that it won’t spill over into a hot civil war."

Click here to read Turchin's full essay in the Guardian.

READ MORE: 'A corporate CEO's dream': Labor unions blast Trump-Vance ticket

Trump nom’s 'radical' Christian nationalism includes gun obsession and 'violent rhetoric': report

The Religious Right has faced numerous sex scandals over the years, going back to televangelists Jim Bakker and Jimmy Swaggart (who admitted to cheating on his wife with prostitutes) during the 1980s. The late Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-Arizona), back then, repeatedly warned that the Religious Right was terrible for the Republican Party and terrible for the conservative movement, yet its stranglehold on the GOP only increased along the way.

Now, in 2024, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for the secretary of defense, Fox News star Pete Hegseth, is someone who holds far-right Christian nationalist views — despite allegations of sexual assault and severe alcohol abuse.

Thomas Lecaque, a history professor at Grand View University in Des Moines, Iowa, examines Hegseth's Christian nationalist views in an article published by the conservative website The Bulwark on December 2 — and warns that he has a history of promoting violence.

READ MORE: Why Kash Patel is Trump's 'scariest hire yet': report

"You don't have to look far to find evidence of Pete Hegseth’s interest in Christian nationalism," Lecaque warns. "Donald Trump's nominee for secretary of defense has it literally inked all over his body, and the books he has written are replete with violent Christian nationalist rhetoric."

Hegseth, Lecaque notes, has encouraged fellow Christian nationalists to be armed.

"Hegseth avidly promotes America's Ammo Company, a small business that sells only through its sister company Palmetto State Armory," according to Lecaque. "Both are owned by the investment firm JJE Capital Holdings…. The AR-15 and Christian nationalists have a long, troubling history together."

Lecaque stresses, however, that "singling out" individual Christian nationalists "risks blinding us to" the fact that "Christian nationalism is much more than a story of scattered individuals with radical beliefs or random weirdos who want to destroy democracy."

READ MORE: 'Quickly rot from within': Expert reveals 3 traits the US shares with declining empires

Lecaque explains, "It is a movement, one backed by think tanks and coffee companies and gun manufacturers, authors and educational projects, churches and media ventures…. There is growing evidence that a disturbingly large number of our fellow citizens have Christian nationalist inclinations."

The history professor adds, "The nomination to a position of immense government authority of Pete Hegseth — someone with deep links to this radical movement —must be an occasion for much more reporting and public debate about Christian nationalism, its tangled networks of churches and businesses and media, and the threat it poses."

READ MORE: Bombshell report details 'dangerous' new allegations against Trump Cabinet nominee

Thomas Lecaque's full article for The Bulwark is available at this link.

'Ideological warriors': 'Defiant' Trump 'deliberately testing' Senate with extreme nominees

President-elect Donald Trump has been drawing vehement criticism from both Democrats and Never Trump conservatives over the more extreme picks for his incoming administration, including former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (Trump's choice for national intelligence director), anti-vaxxer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Trump's pick to head the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) and Fox News star Pete Hegseth (the Christian nationalist Trump is proposing for defense secretary).

Now, Trump is drawing even more criticism for choosing far-right conspiracy theorist Kash Patel to replace Christopher Wray as FBI director.

But the New York Times' Peter Baker, in an article published on December 2, stresses that Trump has responded to this criticism of nominees with angry "defiance."

READ MORE: Why Kash Patel is Trump's 'scariest hire yet': report

"His first selection for attorney general collapsed in spectacular fashion," Baker explains. "His choice for defense secretary is awash in scandal. His picks for intelligence, health and other posts are being panned. But if anyone thought that President-elect Donald J. Trump might be chastened, he has quickly demonstrated otherwise. Even with so many appointees already under fire, Mr. Trump has doubled down on defiance as he assembles his next administration."

Baker adds, "Rather than turning to more credentialed and respected choices with easier paths to Senate confirmation, Mr. Trump, in rapid-fire fashion, keeps naming more ideological warriors, conspiracy theorists and now even family members to senior government positions."

The Times reporter notes that Trump's "persistence in advancing unconventional appointments underscores" his desire to "surround himself this time with loyalists he can trust to carry out his agenda, including 'retribution' against his perceived enemies."

Attorney Gregg Nunziata, who formerly served as nominations counsel for Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, believes that Trump is going out of his way to provoke GOP senators.

READ MORE: 'Quickly rot from within': Expert reveals 3 traits the US shares with declining empires

Nunziata told the Times, "By insisting on highly provocative nominees, short on traditional qualifications but long on personal loyalty and zest for confrontation, he seems to be deliberately testing the Senate's capacity and willingness to play its constitutional role as a check on the president."

Former Deputy National Security Adviser Charles M. Kupperman considers Patel an especially frustrating pick.

Kupperman told the Times, "Kash is totally unqualified for this position. He is the dictionary definition of a sycophant. Appointing Kash as FBI director is Trump's ultimate statement that his second term will be driven by retribution. And it is a gross insult to citizens."

READ MORE: 'Legal, physical and political protection' needed for officials who 'stand up to Trump': analysis

Read Peter Baker's full New York Times article at this link (subscription required).


House GOP facing 'major political hurdles' with party's key political promise

Donald Trump repeatedly promised mass deportations during his 2024 presidential campaign, and now that he is president-elect, Trump is making it clear that he plans to make good on that promise.

Many Republicans serving in the U.S. House of Representatives, especially those with ultra-MAGA views, have voiced their support for Trump's deportation and immigration agenda.

But according to Politico reporters Jordain Carney and Daniella Diaz, their "odds of going as big as conservatives want are looking bleak."

READ MORE: 'Quickly rot from within': Expert reveals 3 traits the US shares with declining empires

"Despite controlling the House and Senate," the journalists explain in an article published on December 1, "the GOP faces major political hurdles down every possible path for enacting the illegal immigration crackdown that was one of their big election promises. Immigration hardliners and those Republicans who have raised concerns about far-reaching restrictions on asylum or deportations are at odds over just how far to go on border security issues."

In 2024, Democrats suffered three major disappointments when Vice President Kamala Harris narrowly lost to Trump and Republicans flipped the U.S. Senate while holding the House.

But Republicans, under Speaker Mike Johnson's (R-Louisiana) leadership, will have only a small majority.

"The GOP will likely have a slim House majority — potentially with no room for error — to pull off immigration changes and will struggle to win over Senate Democrats who could filibuster legislation from the minority," Carney and Diaz report. "Republicans have a potential procedural tool for sidestepping the filibuster — a process known as budget reconciliation — but it appears that rules governing the maneuver may prevent them from including a big revamp of immigration policy."

READ MORE: Why Kash Patel is Trump's 'scariest hire yet': report

Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) notes that in 2025, Republicans in Congress will have a lot to think about where immigration is concerned.

Gonzales told Politico, "We're going to need a little time to figure out what shakes out. What does a conference in the House want? What does the conference in the Senate want? What does President Trump want? And then, that's when we have a short window to be able to jam that all through."

READ MORE: Bombshell report details 'dangerous' new allegations against Trump Cabinet nominee

Read Politico's full report at this link.

'Particularly worrisome:' One of Trump’s Cabinet nominations troubles critics more than others

Although FBI Director Christopher Wray was appointed to a ten-year term in 2017, President-elect Donald Trump has vowed to fire him from that position in 2025. And the far-right MAGA loyalist Trump has in mind for that position is Kash Patel.

Patel's critics, including former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr, have argued that Patel shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). And critics point to Patel's own words as proof of how extreme they consider him to be.

During a 2023 appearance on Steve Bannon's "War Room" podcast, Patel promoted the false, repeatedly debunked claim that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump and argued that journalists who said otherwise should face criminal prosecution.

READ MORE: 'Quickly rot from within': Expert reveals 3 traits the US shares with declining empires

Patel told Bannon, "Yes, we're going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections. We're going to come after you, whether it's criminally or civilly — we'll figure that out."

In a December 1 opinion column, the Washington Post's Ruth Marcus lays out some reasons why Patel is "particularly worrisome."

"It's important to understand that a new president picking the FBI director of his preference is not the norm — it is an aberration, and a dangerous one," Marcus warns. "Presidents are generally entitled to political appointees of their choosing, but the FBI director is supposed to be insulated from politics. That is one reason the director is appointed to a single 10-year term, spanning two administrations."

The Post columnist continues, " A president can fire the FBI director, but until Trump, that had happened only once, when President Bill Clinton removed William S. Sessions in 1993 over ethics lapses. The circumstances of that removal underscore its extraordinary nature: It occurred only after the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility concluded a lengthy report, released at the end of George H.W. Bush's presidency, and only after months of the new administration agonizing over how to deal with Sessions."

READ MORE: Why Kash Patel is Trump's 'scariest hire yet': report

Patel, Marcus argues, isn't Trump's only "worrisome" pick for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

"President-elect Donald Trump's choice of uber-loyalist Kash Patel to be FBI director is a hair-on-fire moment," Marcus stresses. "Trump is poised to install a team of toadies at the Justice Department — a flotilla of his criminal defense lawyers but most ominously an attorney general, Pam Bondi, who has vowed that 'the prosecutors will be prosecuted,' and now, with Patel, an FBI director who would add journalists to that list…. This is not normal."

READ MORE: Bombshell report details 'dangerous' new allegations against Trump Cabinet nominee

Ruth Marcus' full Washington Post column is available at this link (subscription required).

'Traitor to Trump': Outraged MAGA fans warn new nominee about a 'snake' in his circle

Donald Trump sparked outrage among his critics with the appointment of Kash Patel as the head of the FBI, and now some are warning Patel to protect himself.

Patel has been seen as a controversial pick, including because of his reportedly unwavering loyalty to the former and incoming president, and because of his purported ties to QAnon.

Morgan Ortagus, a Trump-endorsed candidate for Congress in Tennessee's fifth congressional election who effectively lost the race in 2022 after being removed from the ballot, posted a photo with Patel Saturday.

ALSO READ: Trump allies promise revenge as Dems ram through Biden judges

"A beautiful Sunday lunch with 45/47 and the next ⁦[FBI] Director my friend [Patel]," Ortagus wrote on her social media.

Far-right activist Laura Loomer, who recently spoke out against a dinner guest Trump had, replied to Ortagus.

"I bet it was beautiful… Remember when you went on MSDNC and said 'you didn’t know' if you could ever support Donald Trump as the GOP nominee for President while you were a campaign surrogate for [Jeb Bush]?" Loomer asked. "Remember when you called Trump 'disgusting.'"

Loomer also felt the need to warn Patel about Ortagus.

"I love Kash Patel. He has always been a big supporter of the J6 patriots and even raised money for them," she wrote. "Morgan Ortagus is a snake who is disliked by all of her colleagues at the State Department and she is a traitor to Trump."

Loomer continued:

"Let’s go down memory lane. Morgan was never with Trump. Her twin sister married a Muslim man, which prompted Morgan to attack Donald Trump over his travel ban from Islamic countries, she divorced her first husband and married a rich, politically connected Jew in DC and had her wedding officiated by the ultra-liberal SCOTUS justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg."

Another X user named Teri McCoy, a self-identified "Trump supporter," also flagged a "Snake Alert on Ortagus!!"

An account on X purportedly about the so-called Trump Derangement Syndrome wrote, "Weren’t you for Jeb Bush in 2016 and Nikki Haley in 2024? What a grifter!"

Another popular MAGA X account, Tammie McDonald, said, "Get out of here" with a snake emoji.

'Above my pay grade': GOP faces obstacles to passing bill that would skirt Dem votes

Ahead of his victory over Vice President Kamala Harris last month, Donald Trump made promises like vowing to cut taxes, carrying out the largest mass deportation operation in history, and ending President Joe Biden administration policies.

Republicans are doing their best to assist the president-elect with these agenda items, by plotting to put forth legislation through a "reconciliation" proceeding, that would "allow them to pass policies involving taxes and spending without the need for any Democratic votes," according to an NBC News Sunday, December 1 report.

"The reconciliation process bypasses the Senate's 60-vote threshold for most bills," NBC reports, "requiring just a majority vote to pass a tax- and spending package once per fiscal year."

READ MORE: 'Act quickly': Expert says there’s still time for Congress to curb Trump’s tariff powers

Per the report, the Republican lawmakers are aiming to ramp "up the process with a budget setting the parameters for the bill in early January, even before Trump takes office, two sources with knowledge of the push said."

Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) told the news outlet, "It’ll be super challenging. And the reason for that is you have razors at margins, and we’re obviously not going to get any Democrat votes. The key is going to be addressing all these coalitions that are likely going to threaten an insufficient number of votes unless they get their priorities. ... It’s infinitely more complex to get a reconciliation outcome in this cycle out of the House than the Senate."

Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH), according to NBC, is focused on passing "'the conservative immigration package known as HR2 'right away' in the new Congress and push through some of those provisions in reconciliation."

But with "party divisions," the GOP lawmakers face "one big question," NBC notes. "How much would the GOP pay for, and how much would it add to the rising deficit?"

READ MORE: Dems 'pushing aggressively' to replace aging leaders with 'combative' reps on key committees

Tillis told NBC, "There’s a lot of things we can claw back. The Democrats shouldn’t be surprised that the American Rescue Plan and the Inflation Reduction Act should be ripe for that."

The Finance Committee member emphasized his concern "that a small group of House Republicans may torpedo the package by demanding that it not add to the deficit," considering "Democrats have 214 votes, and they lead in the one race that remains to be called, in California's 13th District."

The North Carolina lawmaker added, "This is where President Trump is going to have to be a very, very important part of the process. I’ve heard more than three people [in the House] say that they won’t vote for a tax package that’s not fully offset. If so, we’re done. So how do you fix that? That’s above my pay grade, and it’s out of my chamber.”

READ MORE: 'Quickly rot from within': Expert reveals 3 traits the US shares with declining empires

NBC News' full report is available at this link.

'Biggest challenge': Even Republicans are nervous about Trump’s new $4.6 trillion tax cut

Despite Republicans keeping the House of Representatives and flipping control of the Senate, some are acknowledging that extending President-elect Donald Trump's tax cuts in 2025 will be a tall order.

In a recent Politico article, several Republican members of Congress expressed worry that renewing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TJCA) of 2017 could be difficult given its $4.6 trillion price tag. While the initial legislation came with an estimated cost of $1.5 trillion over 10 years, Politico reported that extending the approximately 40 provisions in the law would come in at a cost of $4 trillion over that same time period, with another $600 billion in interest.

The bulk of those tax cuts overwhelmingly benefit the rich. According to CNN, an analysis from July found that if the TJCA was extended next year, the richest 5% of taxpayers would reap almost half the benefits. Those making $450,000 and up would see their incomes increase by 3.2%, while the richest 1% — who make $1 million a year or more – would get an average tax cut of nearly $70,000. And the top 0.1% richest Americans would see a whopping $280,000 average reduction in their own taxes.

READ MORE: Trump's inflation nightmare: How his own policies could backfire and skyrocket prices

Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.), who sits on the House Ways and Means Committee (which oversees tax-related matters) was skeptical that the GOP would be able to easily pass the new tax cuts without a big fight even among members of his own party.

"That’s going to be the biggest challenge for the [House Republican] conference," he said.

Rep. Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), who chairs the House Budget Committee, is also wary of any new tax cuts that will add to the federal deficit. In order to make the new round of tax cuts deficit-neutral, Arrington is pondering pairing them with cuts to Medicaid (the health insurance program for the poorest Americans), repealing green energy tax breaks and increasing taxes on corporate profits booked overseas that get repatriated. But House Ways and Means chairman Jason Smith (R-Mo.) told Politico he was less concerned about paying for a new round of tax cuts.

"“Look at history — were the Bush tax cuts paid for?” He said.

READ MORE: 'America depends on it': Nobel-winning economist reveals key lesson Dems must learn from 2024

Click here to read Politico's article in full.

'Any and all': Trump’s former surgeon general warns Republicans will own disease outbreaks

Dr. Jerome Adams, who served as the U.S. Surgeon General during the first Trump administration, is warning Republicans that they will own any disease outbreaks that occur on their watch. President-elect Donald Trump has made controversial nominations for public health roles, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (HHS), Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (NIH), and Dr. David Weldon (CDC), among others.

“Republicans must understand,” said Dr. Adams, who is a former Vice Admiral in the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps (PHSCC), “they’re gonna own any and all preventable outbreaks / harm moving forward.”

Adams was responding to his fellow former Trump administration official, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who served as the Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but left before the COVID pandemic.

“We face a grim and avoidable resurgence of once vanquished childhood infectious diseases if we follow down a current path now being laid in Washington,” Dr. Gottlieb had warned.

RELATED: ‘Will Cost Lives’: Ex-FDA Chief Warns Trump Picks Could Lead to ‘Grim’ Disease Resurgence

“Good points from Dr. Gottlieb here,” Adams said, referring to Gottlieb’s remarks and his CNBC interview. “I’ve spoken with him, and know both he and I want the next administration to do well- because their failure is America’s failure.”

Gottlieb also warned that actions Trump’s nominee to become U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), RFK Jr. (photo) may take “will cost lives in this country.”

“You’re gonna see, remember, you’re gonna see measles, mumps and rubella vaccination rates go down. And like I said, if we lose another five percent [vaccinated], which could happen in the next year or two, we will see large measles outbreaks,” Gottlieb predicted, referring to the MMR vaccination the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends, one of more than a dozen on the CDC’s schedule.

Adams also said, “My advice to the new administration – focus 100% on improving the nutrition and safety of our food supply. Lean into the chronic disease issue. And just stop talking about vaccinations. Let your legacy be about truly extending life expectancy, and not about measles and pertussis.”

Gottlieb had warned that pertussis, a highly contagious infectious disease commonly known as whooping cough, “is certainly something people need to think about right now. Like I said, there’s outbreaks in multiple states, and that’s only gonna get worse.”

Adams alleged that Democrats “in many cases unfairly placed all the blame for Covid on Trump and Republicans, but now Republicans are setting THEMSELVES up to take blame for a resurgence of vaccine preventable diseases, and every kid who ends up harmed.”

In 2021, The Guardian reported that the U.S. “could have averted 40% of Covid deaths,” according to a “panel examining Trump’s policies.”

At least 1.2 million people in America have died of COVID.

RFK Jr. is seen as an anti-vaxxer despite his opposition to the label.

RELATED: ‘No ObamaCare’: Here’s How Trump, Johnson, RFK Jr. Plan to Destroy Americans’ Health Care

“In speeches spanning 6 years,” NBC News this week reported in published video, “RFK Jr. shares conspiracy theories about vaccines, likens scientists to Nazis.”

“In remarks at AutismOne conferences in 2013, 2017 and 2019, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. likened vaccinating children to putting them in ‘Nazi death camps’ and falsely alleged a cover-up of vaccine injuries similar to the child sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic Church.”

According to The Hill, “Kennedy’s position would give him significant power over the agencies that regulate vaccines, and he could potentially seek to reduce vaccine funding requests, withdraw vaccine recommendations and restrict legal protections for vaccine makers, among other actions.”

He has claimed if confirmed he won’t “take anyone’s vaccines away,” but he could also “delay or revoke vaccine recommendations.”

“Vaccines have helped save the lives of more than 154 million people across the globe over the last 50 years, according to the World Health Organization. But there are a very small number of people who have been injured by some vaccines,” The Hill notes. “As a result, drug companies are cautious when making vaccines, and legal protections have been in place to shield vaccine makers from lawsuits in most cases since the 1986 passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.”

BBC News reports that Kennedy “said at a rally in Arizona earlier this month that he plans to fire and replace 600 employees at the NIH – which oversees vaccine research – as soon as Trump takes the White House.”

“The longtime lawyer also said last month that he intends ‘to have every nutritional scientist’ in the health and agriculture departments fired on day one of a Trump presidency because he alleges they are co-opted by corporate interests.”

READ MORE: ‘Don’t Play Games You Can’t Win’: Gas Analyst Warns Trump Will ‘Lose Miserably’ on Tariffs

'I’ve had conversations': How Trump’s Ex-FDA chief is swaying GOP senators against RFK Jr

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who President-elect Donald Trump's picked to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, may be in for a tougher confirmation battle than previously believed.

According to a Friday article in healthcare publication Stat, former Food & Drug Administration (FDA) commissioner Scott Gottlieb — who served in the role for two years under Trump's first administration — is growing more confident that RFK Jr. won't get the 51 Senate votes he needs next year. Gottlieb said there is an increased level of "skepticism in the Republican caucus [on RFK Jr.’s nomination], more than the press is reporting right now."

"I’ve had conversations, and I’ve raised my concerns and I will continue to raise my concerns,” Gottlieb told CNBC's Squawk Box.

READ MORE: 'Game changer': This new Biden HHS proposal is likely to trigger a huge fight with RFK Jr.

Gottlieb said he's enlisting Republican senators in his cause to sink RFK Jr.'s nomination using three core arguments: Large agricultural interests who could spend big against incumbent Republicans in future elections due to RFK Jr.'s positions on the American food industry, his past support for abortion rights and his opposition to childhood vaccines ruffling the feathers of "public health-minded" senators.

He's also cautioning senators against weighing their confirmation vote against using their position to box RFK Jr. in by threatening to withhold appropriations for HHS. He pointed out that Congress already has immense difficulty in passing government funding bills and doubted that there would political will in a Republican-controlled Congress to deny funding to a Republican executive branch.

"That's not going to be successful," Gottlieb said.

The former FDA commissioner also warned that RFK Jr.'s calls to revamp childhood vaccines could bring back a resurgence of measles and could "cost lives" if he takes the reins of HHS. RFK Jr.'s confirmation hearing will likely take place in the days following Trump's inauguration on January 20, 2025.

READ MORE: 'Grim': Former Trump FDA chief warns new administration 'will cost lives'

Click here to read Stat's report in full.

White supremacist with Nazi tattoos charged with 'truly heinous' axe murder

A man who has been identified as an official member of a white supremacist group has now been charged with the brutal murder of a camper in Montana last month.

CBS News recently reported that 41 year-old Daren Christopher Abbey has pleaded not guilty to deliberate homicide in the death of 35 year-old Dustin Kjersem in October. Abbey is pleading self-defense, claiming that Abbey tried to kill him while the two were in his tent. Abbey led police to the scene of the killing, and his DNA was found on a beer can in Kjersem's tent.

Kjersem was initially thought to have been a victim of a bear attack after his mangled body was found at a campsite in Big Sky, Montana. However, investigators soon discovered that Kjersem's head sustained several blows from an axe with a 26-inch handle, and that he was also stabbed in the neck with a screwdriver. Both the axe and screwdriver had been rinsed off in the creek.

READ MORE: 'White supremacist manifesto': Report unmasks 'history of racist writing' by Project 2025 architects

During the official autopsy last month, medical examiners found that Kjersem's skull showed "multiple chop wounds," ruling out the theory of a bear attack. Prior to Abbey being charged, law enforcement warned residents in the area to be careful if they planned on venturing into the woods. Kjersem's sister, Jillian Price, urged the community to identify her brother's killer and bring that person to justice.

"There is someone in our valley who is capable of truly heinous things," she said.

The Bozeman Daily Chronicle reported that Abbey is originally from California, lists his religion as "odinism," is affiliated with an unnamed white supremacist group and has multiple tattoos including an iron cross, a swastika and "SS lightning bolts." His bail has been set at $1.5 million and if convicted could spend up to 100 years in prison.

"“I want to assure our community that our office is fully committed to pursuing justice in this devastating case,” Gallatin County Attorney Audrey Cromwell stated. “Daren Abbey has been charged with homicide and tampering with evidence, and we will work diligently to present all available evidence and facts to the court.”

READ MORE: Extremists wave Nazi flags outside performance of 'The Diary of Anne Frank' in Michigan

Click here to read CBS' full report. And click here to read the Daily Chronicle's article in full.

'Out of control bro' picked to lead DoD so bad it’s 'head-spinning': expert

Donald Trump's appointee to head the Department of Defense came under criticism from retired Naval War College professor Tom Nichols, as his limited experience in the military and inexperience in leading anything but a weekend Fox News show is causing backlash.

Nichols spoke on Friday in a podcast with The Atlantic about Pete Hegseth's appointment as nothing more than "pure provocation."

While his "scandals and inflammatory rhetoric" are prompting questions, Nichols argued that the biggest danger that Hegseth presents is in recreating the U.S. military the way Donald Trump believes it should be.

"Hegseth’s going to sit at the top of all that, with no experience in any of this—not in budgeting, not in strategy, not in dealing with allies," Nichols told podcast host Hanna Rosin.

"I keep having these just head-spinning moments where I think about the first day in the office, and Pete Hegseth has to make calls to his equivalents, to his opposite numbers, as they do in this job," continued Nichols. "That’s another thing that you don’t do if you’re the secretary of HUD—you don’t call all the housing secretaries on the planet to say hello."

Yet, Hegseth will "be on the phone with the Russian minister of defense. He’s going to be on the phone with the Chinese minister of defense. The people [who] have had these jobs have had exposure to folks like that. This is a guy who’s done none of that— nothing. There’s literally zero background," the column noted.

Rosin read from Hegseth's book, recalling his campaign against diversity, equity, and inclusion, saying it made the U.S. military weak. The comments have been criticized by women in military leadership and officials.

Speaking to "Face the Nation" last Sunday, Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), who lost her legs in combat, called the sentiment "flat-out wrong."

"Our military could not go to war without the women who wear this uniform," Duckworth said. "And frankly, America's daughters are just as capable of defending liberty and freedom as her sons."

According to Nichols, this made-up problem "comes from, like, morning editorial meetings at Fox."

"I worked with senior military officers, including a lot of my students who had just come back from deployments, and you just didn’t hear anybody talk this way about, you know, Marxism rampant in the Pentagon and DEI is destroying us—in part, because a lot of those folks were standing right next to people that Hegseth would say were DEI promotions," he continued.

"This is kind of the out-of-control bro culture that Hegseth came up in, and some of it’s just generational," Nichols said.

Listen or read the whole podcast here.

'Crushing blow to justice': Ex-DOJ prosecutor laments sad fate of Jack Smith’s Trump cases

Special counsel Jack Smith's two federal indictments against President-elect Donald Trump came to an end when he asked for the election interference case to be dismissed without prejudice and motioned to withdraw his appeal of Judge Aileen Cannon's dismissal of the classified documents case.

Smith cited the U.S. Department of Justice's longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president, and Judge Tanya Chutkan — assigned to the election case — granted Smith's request and dismissed the case without prejudice.

In an opinion column published by MSNBC on November 27, former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner describes the fate of Smith's Trump indictments as a "crushing blow to justice."

READ MORE: Putin praises 'real man' Donald Trump but warns 'even now he’s not safe': reports

"These democracy-busting developments make clear that, at least for the four years a president is in office, he is above the law — the functional equivalent of a king," Kirschner laments. "How did we get here?"

The ex-DOJ prosecutor goes on to note that although the charges against Trump were quite serious in both of Smith's cases, the special counsel was "compelled to dismiss Trump's cases" because "the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel is of the opinion that a sitting president cannot be prosecuted."

"Is there any hope for accountability of Trump in the future?" Kirschner writes. "I fear the answer is not much. But there is one point of light amid the darkness."

The MSNBC legal analyst continues, "There are two ways for a judge to dismiss a criminal case: 'with prejudice' or 'without prejudice.' With prejudice means that a case can never be re-brought and prosecuted in the future. Without prejudice means the case can be re-indicted and prosecuted in the future. Smith asked Chutkan to dismiss the case 'without prejudice,' and she did so."

READ MORE: How Don Jr. is making sure Trump picks 'absolute warriors for the movement' to his Cabinet

Trump has faced four criminal indictments, two federal and two in individual states — including Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis' election interference case in Georgia and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg Jr.'s hush money/falsified business records case in New York State. The latter is the only one of the four that went to trial, and Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts he has yet to be sentenced for.

But Kirschner is doubtful that there will be any legal accountability for Trump.

"Assuming Trump also escapes criminal responsibility for the 34 felony guilty verdicts delivered by a New York jury for crimes he committed before he was elected the first time around," Kirschner argues, "that will mean Trump would avoid accountability for crimes he committed before, during and after serving as president. Are we still inclined to recite the hollow mantra that, in America, no man is above the law?"

READ MORE: 'Up to us to stop him': Petition to block Trump Cabinet picks gets 44K signatures in 5 days

Glenn Kirschner's full MSNBC opinion column is available at this link.


@2024 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.