Amy Coney Barrett can't name the 5 freedoms in the First Amendment: ‘What am I missing?’
Wednesday marked the third day in the Senate confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump's far-right nominee to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the U.S. Supreme Court. One of the Republicans who questioned Barrett was Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse, who asked Barrett to discuss the specifics of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution — and she was unable to fully answer his question.
The Nebraska Republican, one of the few GOP senators who hasn't been afraid to criticize Trump at times, asked Barrett, "What the five freedoms of the First Amendment?"—to which Barrett responded, "Speech, religion, press, assembly." But she couldn't remember a fifth one, telling Sasse, "I don't know. What am I missing?"
Sasse helped Barrett out and named "redress or protest." And Sasse asked Barrett, "Why is there one amendment that has these five freedoms clustered? Why do they hang together?" Barrett's response, "Um, I don't know what you're getting at," and he asked her to reflect on the "glories of the First Amendment."
Watch the video below:
Amy Coney Barrett can't name five freedoms in the First Amendment youtu.be
- Ralph Nader breaks down 'travesty' of Barrett's confirmation as Senate ensures 'corporate supremacy' reigns - Alternet.org ›
- ‘Campaign photo-op’ capturing Barrett ‘flaunting allegiance’ to Trump goes viral: 'Far-right political hack' - Alternet.org ›
- Former clerks warn the Supreme Court's legitimacy is at stake with Amy Coney Barrett confirmation ›
- Amy Coney Barrett's husband plans to continue private practice — raising serious ethical concerns - Alternet.org ›
- McConnell pushed Trump to pick Amy Coney Barrett the night of Justice Ginsburg’s death: documentary - Alternet.org ›
- #AmyCovidBarrett trends after SCOTUS blocks NY from limiting church attendance - Alternet.org ›
- Local paper slams Nebraska Republicans who joined a 'dangerous and undemocratic' election lawsuit - Alternet.org ›
- Here's why Trump’s impeachment isn’t a 1st Amendment issue: conservative - Alternet.org ›
- Legal correspondent explains how a party that can't win elections is using the courts to drive a hard-right agenda - Alternet.org ›
- US Supreme Court Justice lands book deal with massive $2M advance - Alternet.org ›
- Here's how Biden can prove he truly is a 'union guy' - Alternet.org ›
- Why Amy Coney Barrett's 'brand of conservatism' has changed the Supreme Court more than Brett Kavanaugh: legal analyst - Alternet.org ›
- The Supreme Court radically altered the meaning of the 1st Amendment — in an unsigned opinion - Alternet.org ›