pete hegseth impeachment

Trump suffers humiliating defeat to Obama in masculinity poll

President Donald Trump has suffered an embarrassing defeat to former President Barack Obama in a new national poll exploring masculinity.

The Bulwark and Pablo Torre Finds Out released a poll, which found that 59 percent of American adults view Obama as a stronger role model for men, while only 37 percent said the same of Trump.

Trump was right at the bottom of the list when respondents were asked whether he represented a positive example of masculinity. 55 percent said the president was not a strong male role model, leaving him with a negative 18-point net rating.

However, Obama earned a positive 28-point net rating, which is a huge 46-point gap between the rival presidents, which puts the spotlight on how the public feels about Trump’s desire to portray himself as a political strongman.

The results were not split across party lines, as 23 percent who voted for Trump identified Obama as a stronger male role model.

Trump finished last among the politicians, athletes and entertainment figures who were included in the survey.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth performed slightly better than the president, but only 28 percent of respondents considered the Pentagon chief a strong role model for American men, while 39 percent disagreed.

With younger adults between the ages of 18 and 29, Hegseth plummeted, with 34 percent rejecting his image as a strong male role model.

The Bulwark report shows a contradiction between Hegseth’s efforts to project masculinity and toughness and how the public views him.

The Pentagon chief has put an emphasis on his masculinity ideals, such as proposing a testosterone replacement program and physical fitness tests, along with his war on beards.

He has also fat-shamed people whom he considered overweight and frequently participates in physical training with military personnel.

Actor Matthew McConaughey had one of the strongest ratings, posting a positive 33-point net score, followed by Obama at 28 points and NBA legend LeBron James at 25 points.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom didn’t fare well with a negative two-point net rating, with 35 percent identifying him as a strong male role model and 37 percent disagreeing.

YouGov carried out the online poll of 1,417 U.S. adults between 10th and 14th October. The results were weighted to reflect the adult population, and the margin of error reported was 3.6 percentage points.

Trump has frequently attacked Obama, describing him as a "weak leader," but has recently complimented his ability to walk down the stairs of the White House as he deals with the physical decline that usually comes with advanced age.

Right-wing freakout exposes GOP’s insidious contempt for their own voters

The latest ridiculous freakout from President Donald Trump and his MAGA followers has once again exposed just how "stupid" they think their voters are, according to the hosts of MS NOW's Morning Joe.

Earlier this week, at a midterm rally in Ohio, former President Barack Obama took a brief aside to mock the overly gold renovations that Trump has done to the White House, and the Oval Office in particular, calling it out with a pointed comedic jab.

"What's with all the gold? He's got the White House looking like Saddam Hussein opened up a Cheesecake Factory," Obama said.

Certain right-wing pundits attempted to spin that remark as Obama making fun of the Cheesecake Factory restaurant chain, arguing that it exposed him as snobbish and out-of-touch with everyday Americans. Other observers countered these criticisms, pointing out that the reference to the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was the actual point of the punchline. Trump himself appeared rattled by the remarks during his own rally appearance, defending his ability to renovate buildings "very good, [and] very beautifully."

During the Tuesday morning broadcast of Morning Joe, co-host and former congressman Joe Scarborough went off on Trump and the other MAGA acolytes for their attacks on Obama's remarks, arguing that it shows how much contempt they have for the intelligence of their voters.

"The fact that they take a very funny Barack Obama joke and go, 'Oh, the guy whose middle name is Hussein has stepped into it,'" Scarborough said. "We can now say he's un-American for making fun — no, not making fun of The Cheesecake Factory, making fun of all the fake gold that Donald Trump has slathered all around the White House. So it's again, time and time again, they think their viewers are so stupid that they're not going to be able to connect things... 'They closed the rural hospitals, my trucking company's out of business, but he made a joke about Donald Trump that had the words "Cheesecake Factory" in it. I'm voting for the Republicans.' Like, do they really think people are that stupid?"

"Well, it's the desperation," co-host Willie Geist said. "As one host said yesterday on Fox News, this is the deplorables moment, just like [with] Hillary [Clinton]. This is it. Again, as Joe just said, no, it wasn't a joke about The Cheesecake Factory. It was a joke about Donald Trump's supergluing pieces of cheap gold all over the White House and making it look as cheap as it does. The other part of this is, do they really want to have a contrast about who the elitist is? If we're comparing Barack Obama to Donald Trump, the guy who is building a ballroom bigger than the white house, the guy who wants to build an arch, who wants to take over the Kennedy Center, the guy who lives in a castle by the sea, the guy who made [$2.3] billion since he took over[.] Do you really want to have that conversation here?"

Trump DOJ’s 'Frankenstein' Comey case ripped apart in humiliating blow

President Donald Trump yet again is attempting to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey, and this latest legal venture is so legally flawed that the Justice Department cannot even arrest him, according to CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig.

Honig tore apart the administration's latest case against Comey during a Tuesday morning CNN appearance, calling the prosecution a bizarre legal construction that could collapse before it reaches a courtroom.

"This thing is basically a Frankenstein monster of criminal procedure. They cobbled it together out of spare parts, and I don't think it's going to work," Honig told anchor Kate Bolduan.

The Justice Department is attempting to prosecute Comey over allegedly leaking classified information to a reporter in October 2016.

Rather than secure a grand jury indictment, prosecutors filed a document known as a criminal information on October 5, 2026, which is ten years after the alleged conduct.

"The Justice Department at this moment does not have a warrant or other basis to go out and even arrest Jim Comey," Honig explained before describing the filing as a “a one-sided unilateral allegation by a prosecutor."

Honig noted that prosecutors generally use such filings when defendants agree to waive the grand jury process, usually because they intend to plead guilty, but Comey has rejected it.

"What they're trying to do, it appears, as you said, is extend the ten-year statute of limitations," Honig said, continuing: "But because I think the information is faulty in the first place, it's not going to work. And if they try to indict him now, today or tomorrow, we're beyond that ten-year statute of limitations."

He then described it as a “creative device” before predicting that it will backfire.

The former federal prosecutor identified another obstacle: previous federal investigations failed to establish grounds to prosecute Comey.

Honig pointed out that special counsel John Durham's investigation resulted in no criminal charges, giving the 2019 Justice Department inspector general investigation as an example.

"DOJ's own in-house nonpartisan inspector general thoroughly investigated this incident," Honig said, explaining that investigators found Comey had violated internal policies but had not disclosed any classified information.

"So even if they didn't have the procedural problems, I don't see where there's a criminal case to be made here against Jim Comey."

Honig suggested Comey could make a compelling legal challenge based on vindictive prosecution.

"If this becomes a full-blown charge, Jim Comey will have one of the strongest vindictive prosecution motions to dismiss that I've ever seen," he said.

"The first one's already been thrown out by a federal judge," he explained. The second one, the seashell case, is on its way to being thrown out. This one, as I laid out before, is infirm."

Honig added that Comey could potentially pursue civil damages against the government.

Intel officials pull back curtain on Trump DOJ’s election 'doomsday' plan

National security reporter Ken Klippenstein is hearing from more sources inside President Donald Trump's administration that his Justice Department is trying to craft a "contingency plan" to possibly intervene in the Nov. 3 election.

Three officials with knowledge of the discussions inside the administration revealed that there is a "doomsday" scenario that some think is "improbable but not impossible."

Recently, Trump has even hinted that Trump might do something major if there are things like foreign interference, claims that noncitizens voted or other chaos at the polls, said Klipperstein.

“Nobody knows what the president might do if the midterms don’t go his way," said one intelligence official who served in the first Trump administration.

Axios reported Monday that Trump's new lawsuit in Alaska is only one of the lawsuits Attorney General Todd Blanche plans to file. So far, he's also attacked California, trying to remove 20,000 voters from the rolls at the last minute. This is happening while the DOJ is also trying to indict Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook; after the FBI raided Rep. Ilhan Omar's (D-Minn.) Washington residence; after the DOJ indicted Virginia state Sen. Louise Lucas (D), a big Trump critic; and as the department is making a third go at indicting former FBI Director James Comey.

Blanche has even admitted openly that he could move to block a state from certifying the election results.

“Yes, of course there’s scenarios that we could all come up with hypothetically, you know, some doomsday scenario, for example, right?” he told reporters.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon told "60 Minutes" that everything would remain normal “absent some shocking contingency that is unexpected."

"These remarks, sources explain to me, are not just rhetoric. There really are contingency plans," said Klippenstein.

Foreign cyberattacks by pro-Trump hackers in Russia, for example, could spark action from the Justice Department.

“If we need to put in federal controls as opposed to state controls,” Trump said way back in February. “If they can’t do it honestly and it can’t be done properly and timely, then something else has to happen."

Trump went on to say that there is a need for federal controls over elections and not leave it up to the states, despite the role of the states being outlined in the U.S. Constitution.

A few weeks after that interview, Trump met with state governors about the possible "doomsday plan." The DOJ began preparing scenarios that would trigger federal action.

"Under the law, the Attorney General may seek a temporary restraining order or injunction when a violation has occurred or there are reasonable grounds to believe that one is imminent," Klippenstein warned. "The Justice Department could also ask a court to delay finalization of a particular election as part of its argument that the law has been broken."

"Reasonable grounds," he noted, is a judgment call that will depend on which court and which judge is overseeing the case.

“There is no general presidential or attorney-general power to suspend elections or veto a state’s results simply by alleging fraud,” one government lawyer says. “The administration would need to identify some statutory violation, present supporting evidence, and justify whatever particular remedy it is requesting.”

Even if the DOJ can come up with something, the lawyer said, “There is no law covering a federal government takeover."

The former Trump intelligence official asked whether Trump could even sign a classified emergency order to justify intervention.

“Could Doomsday involve some continuity of government argument? You just never know with Donald Trump," he said. “If all else fails,” Trump could put “pressure on officials, undertake unsupported litigation, or even issue unlawful executive orders.” That could then provoke a riot like Jan. 6.

Still, the planning inside the DOJ continues, the government lawyer said.

Trump’s 'tangled web' of corruption unravels as eye-watering cost revealed

President Donald Trump and his administration have been linked to an unprecedented $377 billion in alleged corruption and abuses of power, according to a new documentary examining 100 episodes of potential misconduct since he returned to office.

Corruptionland investigates allegations of corruption and details each instance with an interactive map on the website. The documentary is also free to stream.

The documentary is led by Miles Taylor, a former senior Department of Homeland Security official during Trump’s first administration, who said, “For two years, Trump’s scandals have hit one at a time, and each one gets buried under the next.”

Taylor described the findings as “a tangled web of alleged corruption,” which he says amounts to $377 billion and is unprecedented in American history; he continues:

“Even that number undersells it, because you can’t put a price on the president’s revenge agenda and his weaponization of federal power. Every American deserves to see the full picture before they vote, and now they can.”

The $377 billion figure is based on a published methodology that values public funds, private benefits, and transactions involved in the 100 cases examined.

The investigation looks into court filings, government documents, congressional records and published reports. It also covers the actions by Trump’s administration that can’t be measured financially, such as the removal of government watchdogs and allegations of retaliation against political opponents.

In the documentary, Taylor joins Donald Sherman, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, on a tour of the National Mall, using locations around the capital to explain the alleged misconduct.

Other contributors include former Justice Department pardon attorney Liz Oyer, former FBI official Chris O’Leary, journalist Terry Moran and Democratic Rep. Jason Crow.

The filmmakers also examine how Trump has dismantled the traditional guardrails to protect against government misconduct and describe how congressional oversight, inspectors general and ethics attorneys have been either “purged, captured or sidelined.”

Taylor also accuses Trump of using his federal government to come after him personally due to his criticism of the administration. The documentary arrives as polls have shown Americans are concerned about corruption; some surveys have shown those concerns are only eclipsed by concerns over the rising cost of living.

A September Gallup survey found that 89 percent of Americans believe corruption is widespread in government, including 83 percent of Republicans and 91 percent of Democrats.

Democrats have used corruption attacks on the campaign trail to convince voters they can’t trust their GOP officials.

The film comes just a week before the midterms, as voters have expressed their concerns and will likely have corruption on their minds when they vote on November 3.

Donald Trump has awakened a sleeping giant

President Donald Trump went off at Sen. Susan Murkowski (R-Alaska) last weekend, and political experts think it foreshadows what's to come.

The New Republic's Greg Sargent chatted with longtime Democratic strategist Simon Rosenberg for the "Daily Blast" on Tuesday. The two couldn't help but notice Trump has manufactured his own election downfall and is desperately trying to find someone to blame while also trying to salvage whatever he can.

Trump threatened to halt everything he's doing for Alaska if they vote Democratic, which Sargent said is clearly part of the president's freakout over losing the U.S. Senate. If the GOP loses Alaska, Sargent said, he has to believe that it's because the GOP has lost the Senate along with it. Alaska could be one of the last Senate races to be called unless there are recounts or extremely close counts.

"Yeah, look, he's had a really bad few weeks," said Rosenberg of the president's downfall. "The inflation reports were terrible. The job report is terrible. Brent crude is up at $115 a barrel today. The Middle East war is getting worse. I mean, nothing has gone right for him in these final few weeks before the election. And we've seen it play out in the polling."

Every report on the new Trump polling showed the president hit a "new low."

"So, the battlefield underneath him has deteriorated in the last few weeks, and I think they are genuinely now starting to panic," Rosenberg said.

Trump recently offered a $1 million reward for anyone finding voter fraud. If there's widespread fraud, Sargent noted, many people will get $1 million checks.

"He's been erratic on the stump. He looks terrible," Rosenberg said about Trump. "He's bloated, and even the makeup is not helping him. MAGA just got their butts kicked in Serbia and Brazil. And the other thing is that there's been an incredible amount of bad news spinning out of the White House. People fighting. People getting fired. It feels like they're closing with chaos instead of strength. And you're starting to see it in how they're approaching the final ad spend in the race and also what they're doing with his time."

They walked through the high early voting numbers, which are generally a good sign for Democrats. Higher turnout generally bodes well for Democrats, while lower turnout suggests Republicans are likely to do better.

Meanwhile, Trump has lost big with key demographics that made up his coalition in 2024, namely Latino voters. Their voter participation is up 41 percent compared with the last midterm election in 2022, Rosenberg said. Meaning, the share of the early vote as of now is that much higher among Latino voters than it was in 2022.

That surge isn't coming only from Texas and California; it's happening everywhere, Rosenberg said. The raw numbers, he read, show that the Latino vote share is up 35 percent in Texas, 44 percent higher in California, 15 percent in Arizona, 25 percent in New Mexico, 35 percent in Colorado, 51 percent in Illinois, 84 percent in Virginia, 70 percent higher in New York, 45 percent higher in Nevada, 59 percent in New Jersey, 58 percent in Georgia.

"So, all that means is this is a universal trend. It's not surprising, frankly, given how Trump and Stephen Miller have targeted disproportionately Hispanic families and Hispanic communities. His dismal treatment of people in Latin America ... To me this is a very significant event and it's one of the reasons that places like Texas are so competitive. You know, the old line is waking a sleeping giant. Well, Donald Trump sure looks like he's woken a sleeping giant in politics," Rosenberg explained.

Trump’s election conspiracy machine exposed in massive new investigation

President Donald Trump and his allies are already preparing to sow doubt in the upcoming midterm election results and have unleashed a stream of claims seemingly in preparation for a wipeout, according to a new investigation.

The Washington Post has identified more than 7,000 statements sowing the seed of doubt about election integrity from nearly 600 prominent conservative social media accounts, podcasts, and other media outlets this year.

The report found that they are doubling down on accusations of noncitizens on the voter roll and mail ballot fraud. The report found that these claims have doubled since last year, even though both noncitizen voting and mail ballot fraud are rare.

The accusations are coming from influential supporters of the president, including former White House strategist Steve Bannon and MAGA commentators with over a million followers on social media.

Bannon claimed on his podcast, The War Room, that Democrats are cheating with illegal immigrant votes. “Illegal aliens can vote en masse,” he said, adding: “They understand that if you restrict it to American citizens, it’s impossible for them to win. They have to cheat to win.

Per the report, Trump has made over 300 public statements questioning the election integrity during his second term, including continuing his lie that the 2020 election was stolen and allegations of mail ballot and voter registration fraud.

Trump announced Monday that he would offer a $1 million reward for information about election fraud that leads to a conviction.

Despite all the claims, the results tell a different story. For example, in Nevada, the administration claimed that as many as 16,000 noncitizens appeared on voter rolls. They then provided the state with 185 names to investigate, only to find that they were all citizens.

They also took the issue beyond social media and into the courtroom. The Justice Department attempted to block 20,000 ballots in California based on allegations of noncitizen voting; however, the court blocked the attempt on Monday.

Federal lawyers have also asked a court to block certification of the election result in Alaska if the Republican candidate loses, due to the Republican incumbent and an independent sharing the same name, Dan Sullivan.

Former Election Assistance Commission member Ben Hovland warned that post-election litigation could come from Trump's DOJ rather than campaign attorneys. He pointed to Trump and his allies filing lawsuits and attempting to block the result of the 2020 presidential election.

A Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos survey found that just 28 percent of Americans believe Trump would accept the outcome of the election if Republicans lose.

Democrats are already preparing for the possibility of legal battles and attempts to block certifying results. Rep. Pete Aguilar said his party has found 162 potential strategies the Republicans will use to challenge the election.

Intelligence committee Democrats have also prepared for the possibility that Trump could allege foreign interference with the vote count.

The midterm election day is in one week, and all the evidence points to legal court battles and a plethora of social media accounts claiming fraud before any ballots are counted.

WV GOP can't remove House candidate after eye-popping racist posts

A Republican House of Delegates candidate in Berkeley County remains on the ballot after authoring several racist posts on social media that targeted Black women and Muslims. He reportedly called the Confederate flag “beautiful.”

Chris Clagett’s social media activity, first reported by West Virginia Watch in September, drew ire from House Speaker Roger Hanshaw, R-Clay.

“If the voters of Berkeley County choose to send that attitude to the House of Delegates, it will be a lonely place,” Hansshaw told MetroNews in an interview last month.

If elected, Clagett could be left off House committees, giving him little input in the legislative process.

Early voting is underway across West Virginia and continues through Oct. 31. Clagett faces Democratic challenger David Michaels in the race.

State law prohibits the West Virginia Republican Party from replacing him at this point if Clagett had chosen to resign.

“The West Virginia Republican Party condemns the language used on social media. It is not reflective of the values of our party nor the values of our candidates running for office,” said Josh Holstein, chair of the West Virginia GOP.

The West Virginia Democratic Party called for Clagett to withdraw from the race “because he is unfit to serve the people of this district.”

Clagett did not return an email for this story nor has he responded to previous interview requests about his social media activity. He confirmed he authored the posts during a radio interview with Eastern Panhandle station WRNR about the social media posts.

In January, Clagett posted on X, “Maybe because black women are the most ill-mannered, ill-behaved, loud-mouthed demographics on the face of the Earth. Does that clarify it for you … ?” He responded to a post that said, “They always think saying I’m not doing anything means they’re not resisting arrest.”

He told WRNR radio hosts that, “context is everything,” then later said the post he responded to with the words “ill-mannered” included Black women “behaving in exactly the manner I described.”

Clagett is running to represent the 91st District in the House, which covers mostly southern Berkeley County. He ran unopposed in the May primary election.

The district is heavily Red.

Clagett’s political platform focuses on medical freedom from vaccinations, immigration enforcement and curriculum reform in public schools.

His fundraising activity has been light, with the latest campaign filing showing he has about $2,800 in cash on hand.

Michaels has $10,307 cash on hand with about a week to go until Nov. 3 Election Day. He has focused his campaign on locality pay for teachers and improving infrastructure in Berkeley County during its population increase.

No candidates with the Constitution Party, Libertarian Party or Mountain Party filed to run in the race.

The 91st district has seen a string of controversies involving its Republican House candidates. Previous candidate Joseph de Soto was arrested after making terrorist threats against sitting lawmakers.

House Republicans in January voted to vacate the seat instead of expelling de Soto, saying it was the correct way to deal with the seat since de Soto was on house arrest and never sworn in.

De Soto switched his party affiliation to Democrat before his arrest, prompting an ongoing legal challenge from the state Democratic Party that the seat should have been filled by a Democratic candidate under state law.

Gov. Patrick Morrisey appointed Ian Masters to the House seat after Republican delegate-elect Joseph de Soto, who won the November 2024 election.

Last summer, Masters denied allegations that he was responsible for an antisemitic comment made by a private Instagram account that used his name and is linked to an organization he recently led.

Masters is not seeking reelection.

Jon Stewart loses it over MAGA’s surreal Cheesecake Factory meltdown

Late-night host Jon Stewart returned to the desk of The Daily Show to deconstruct the conservative media’s latest political meltdown, expressing utter bewilderment over a wave of manufactured right-wing outrage surrounding a lighthearted joke made by former President Barack Obama.

According to a report published by The Daily Beast, the sudden controversy kicked off during a campaign rally where Obama was stumping for Democratic candidates. Speaking to an energetic crowd, the former president couldn’t resist taking a swipe at Donald Trump’s highly publicized and characteristically gaudy aesthetic preferences. Specifically, Obama mocked the administration’s interior design modifications to the executive mansion, joking that the extensive White House renovations have “got the White House looking like Saddam Hussein opened a Cheesecake Factory.”

While the punchline was clearly intended as a standard political jab at Trump’s notorious penchant for gold-plated, ostentatious decor, conservative commentators and MAGA pundits immediately launched into a state of full-blown hyperventilation. Stewart noted that as soon as he heard Obama utter the words, he braced himself for the inevitable fallout, expecting partisan media to focus entirely on the comparison to a foreign dictator.

Instead, the outrage took a highly unexpected and surreal turn. Right-wing pundits largely ignored the Saddam Hussein comparison and chose instead to aggressively defend the honor of the casual dining restaurant chain. Commentators across major conservative networks launched into impassioned monologues, treating Obama's offhand remark as a direct, elitist attack on the American working class and the culinary preferences of everyday citizens.

Stewart spent a significant portion of his monologue gleefully tearing apart this line of defense. With mock seriousness, he pointed out the sheer absurdity of conservative networks positioning themselves as the fierce defenders of a corporate restaurant known for its encyclopedic menus and massive portion sizes. He joked about the bizarre optics of media figures treating the Cheesecake Factory as a sacred, localized institution of the American Heartland rather than a highly commercial mall staple.

Connecting the media frenzy to the upcoming midterm elections, Stewart argued that this hyper-fixation on a dining joke is part of a broader, strategic distraction. By hyper-ventilating over fabricated cultural slights, he asserted, right-wing platforms are actively attempting to divert voter attention away from more pressing legislative failures and structural issues facing the country. Stewart concluded the segment by pointing out the deep irony of an administration that campaigned on populist promises spending its time on lavish, gold-plated vanity projects while its media allies pick culture-war battles over fast-casual dining chains.

- YouTube youtu.be

Blistering NYT editorial indicts Congress' greed and ‘culture of corruption’

The New York Times Editorial Board issued a sweeping condemnation of congressional Republican leadership on Tuesday, accusing lawmakers of executing an absolute surrender of checks and balances that directly enabled economic instability, an unauthorized foreign war, and systemic government corruption.

Published ahead of the November 3 midterm elections, the editorial frames the upcoming vote as a crucial referendum on a compliant legislative branch. "Americans should be thinking of the Trump administration as they vote for members of Congress and state officials," the Board writes, urging voters to push back against "the Republican Party’s acquiescence to this abuse of power."

The primary weight of the Board's critique falls on a domestic economy groaning under the weight of unilateral executive overreach. By stepping aside and allowing the administration to enact sweeping global tariffs by executive fiat, Congress effectively abdicated its traditional power of the purse. The economic blowback has been immediate and severe for American families.

"On the economy, his policies have raised the cost of living, contributing to a decline in real wages," the Board states. The editorial details how these sudden disruptions to global supply chains forced domestic manufacturers to absorb escalating costs, triggering a wave of inflation that has squeezed household budgets nationwide. Because legislative leadership chose partisan compliance over fiscal stewardship, they left themselves entirely powerless to stop policies that drove up the costs of basic necessities, even as "interest rates are up" and "economic growth and job growth are down."

The capitulation extends heavily into foreign policy, where the Board sounds an alarm over the administration's decision to bypass the legislature entirely and initiate a direct military conflict with Iran. The editorial sharply criticizes congressional leaders for standing by in silence as the constitutional mandate requiring legislative approval for war was treated as a dead letter. By allowing major military actions to proceed on an executive whim, lawmakers placed American service members at risk and destabilized global energy markets, all while treating their own oversight powers as mere commentary.

Beyond economic and military crises, the Times details a profound institutional rot that has systematically dismantled the guardrails against internal abuse. The Board points to a calculated hollowing out of career expertise across essential federal bodies, including the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Veteran scientists, policy experts, and diplomats were systematically sidelined or replaced by industry lobbyists and political loyalists, transforming public interest agencies into tools for private enrichment.

The editorial reserves its sharpest language for the unprecedented scale of executive self-dealing that occurred under the watchful protection of congressional majorities. The Board explicitly charges that the president "has created a culture of corruption and avarice with no precedent," stating that the executive "has used the levers of power, including regulatory oversight and diplomacy, to bring in billions of dollars of profit for his family business and his closest supporters." Independent watchdogs and inspectors general who attempted to flag this blatant fraud were summarily fired, while congressional committees possessing subpoena power locked their doors and looked the other way.

The Editorial Board concludes with a warning that the institutional damage inflicted by this total capitulation will far outlast any single administration, leaving behind a deeply fractured nation and a permanently weakened legislature.

Donald Trump crossed a boundary — and it will cost the GOP everything

The midterms are eight days from now, and the story of the election is probably going to be about Hispanic voters. They moved toward Donald Trump in record numbers in 2024. They are now swinging back to the Democrats. Gerrymander efforts by the GOP to hold the House could backfire because of Hispanic voters. They could end up deciding control of the Senate.

The conventional wisdom is that they flipped back because of inflation, but it’s clear Trump’s broken promise is about more than that. Many Hispanic voters believed the president would not deport peaceful, law-abiding immigrants. He was lying, but many didn't believe the truth. They believe it now. A new Times poll found that more than a quarter of Hispanic voters personally know someone who has been arrested, detained and deported by ICE.

“The very inhumane way our current administration goes about immigration enforcement is terrible,” a Hispanic voter, a Democrat, told the Times. “People are being treated like hardened criminals, when they hadn’t done anything actually wrong while they’re here.”

This is an important distinction. If the reason for their flipping is inflation, the Republicans can conceivably hope to win them back in time by following through on a future promise of lowering costs. But if the reason is not about anything tangible but instead about trust in the GOP's intentions, Donald Trump may have crossed a line beyond which there is no return.

Time will tell whether I’m right, obviously, but we’ve been here before. In California, prior to 1994, Hispanic voters supported Republican candidates in robust numbers. The party was conservative. It produced Ronald Reagan. It sent Republicans to the Senate. Yet Hispanics found a home there. Many believed it was a means of achieving the American dream.

That changed dramatically after Pete Wilson was elected in 1991. The Republican governor set in motion a series of actions making it clear what his party really thought of the state and the place of Hispanics in it – California was a white man’s republic and they did not belong.

The most notorious of these was Proposition 187. It was a ballot initiative Wilson pushed for while running for reelection. It denied state services to undocumented immigrants, including health care and public education. To their shock, voters approved the measure in 1994.

Beforehand, Hispanics could believe the GOP's party line – if immigrants work hard and play by the rules, the doors of opportunity and freedom would open to them. Afterward, it was no longer possible to believe that. The welcome mat had been pulled. The truth has been revealed. Prop 187 triggered a political backlash that has defined the Golden State since.

California hasn't voted for a Republican presidential nominee since 1988. The last Republican senator, John Seymour, was defeated in 1992. And Pete Wilson was the last Republican governor. (Arnold Schwarzenegger's tenure doesn't really count.) It's widely believed that Wilson permanently enfeebled the state's GOP. He did so with a profound act of betrayal.

Comparing Trump to Wilson is tricky. California isn’t America. But the betrayal is similar, if you’re being charitable, or acutely worse, if you’re just following the facts. Nearly a million immigrants have been deported since Trump returned to power. Most of them are from Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, Colombia and Venezuela. As many as 80 percent of them do not have a criminal record. More than 500 US citizens, most of them Hispanic, have been detained by ICE. Some immigrants have been deported to places they have never known. (Cubans in South Florida, for instance, are being sent to Africa.) Legal immigration has dropped by half, according to Cato. The government is denying virtually all asylum seekers.

That’s not to mention what this president has done to the children of immigrants. Over the summer, The Marshall Project compiled the numbers from January 2025 to August: “8,592 children arrested by ICE; 8,755 children detained by ICE; 562 babies and toddlers detained by ICE; 198 children in ICE custody per day on average; 54 percent of child releases from ICE detention ended with the child being deported; 22,565 deportations of children by the federal government; 1,460 deportations of children taken from the interior of the US.”

It's not that Donald Trump wants to get rid of a few bad apples. It's that he wants to get rid of all apples. The apples have clearly heard the message. And they are now making choices.

Last week, the AP reported that states deciding Senate control are seeing a surge in early voting. “In Texas, early voting is up 74 percent compared with 2022,” the AP said. “In Kansas it’s more than doubled. Maine, North Carolina and Ohio also have seen increases of more than 30 percent in early in-person and mail voting compared with the same point in 2022.”

Pollster Tom Bonier said Saturday early voting in Texas is nearly 3 million. “More Hispanics have voted than did at this point in the 2024 presidential election,” he said. Young voters are driving the surge. “Hispanics under the age of 30 have not only exceeded their total turnout at this point in 2024, they have almost doubled it.” Of the vote totals in Texas so far, Bonier estimated 217,000 were cast by people who did not vote in 2024, half of them being Hispanic.

A common explanation is Hispanic voters are mad about the economy. Prices are too high. Wages are too low. It's harder to get by. But that's almost insulting, as it cheapens the scale of the injustice. Pete Wilson undermined people's material conditions, too, but that's not all he did. He profaned hope. He sabotaged the American dream. His party was punished for it.

To be sure, it's too early to know if Donald Trump's party will face the same or similar fate. However, what we do know is this: no Republican can win the presidency without Texas. If the Republicans are not worried about losing the Hispanic vote there, they should be.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.