Roxanne Cooper

Kristi Noem flip-flop blasted by critics

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is being called out by critics after dramatically shifting her stance on the president's use of the National Guard. The controversy stems from Noem's recent endorsement of President Donald Trump's decision to deploy troops in Los Angeles in response to protests against immigration arrests — a move that stands in stark contrast statements she made previously about such actions.

On Sunday, Noem appeared on CBS's "Face The Nation" to defend Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles. She claimed the action was necessary due to "bad decisions" by California Governor Gavin Newsom and emphasized that the decision was made for "the safety of this community."

Noem said, "And that's one of the reasons why these National Guard soldiers are being federalized: So they can use their special skill set to keep peace."

However, Noem's current position directly contradicts her previous statements on the federalization of National Guard troops.

Just last year, when Joe Biden was president, Noem vehemently opposed such actions, stating they were an assault on states' rights. During a February 2024 interview on Fox News with Sean Hannity, which Noem herself shared on social media, she declared, "We will defend our rights because the last several years, we've seen Democrats take away our freedom of religion, our freedom of assembly, our freedom of speech. We can't let them take away our states' rights too, especially our right to protect ourselves."

This apparent flip-flop has not gone unnoticed. Critics, including Governor Newsom, have been quick to point out the inconsistency in Noem's positions.

More criticisms can be seen here.

Trump unleashes incredibly dubious claim about the cost of air travel

President Donald Trump's repeated claims about $2 airfare between Los Angeles and San Francisco have raised eyebrows and drawn criticism, highlighting the tensions between his administration and California over infrastructure projects and immigration policy.

On Monday, amid ongoing protests in Los Angeles County over Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations, Trump once again made the dubious claim about cheap flights while discussing California's high-speed rail project. This came as the president faced questions about his controversial decision to federalize the California National Guard, a move that has escalated tensions with state officials.

The ongoing situation in Los Angeles stems from recent immigration enforcement actions by ICE, which have sparked widespread demonstrations. In response to the protests, Trump took the extraordinary step of federalizing the California National Guard on Sunday, bypassing Governor Gavin Newsom's authority. This decision immediately drew fierce criticism and legal challenges from state officials.

Governor Newsom, a Democrat and frequent Trump critic, swiftly condemned the president's action as an overreach of federal power. The state of California has since filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, arguing that the president lacks the authority to deploy the National Guard without the governor's consent in this situation.

It was in this tense context that Trump fielded questions from reporters on Monday. When asked about the possibility of deploying Marines to Los Angeles, Trump gave a characteristic meandering response that veered into criticism of California's high-speed rail project.

"We'll see what happens. I mean, I think we have it very well under control," Trump began, before launching into a critique of Governor Newsom and the state's infrastructure projects. "I think it would've been a very bad situation. It was heading in the wrong direction. It's now heading in the right direction, and we hope to have the support of Gavin, because Gavin's the big beneficiary as we straighten out his problems. I mean, his state is a mess."

Trump then made his now-familiar claim about the cost of air travel between Los Angeles and San Francisco: "And I'd like to get somebody involved in the rail because look, personally, it should've never been built because you can fly there for $2. And what are you doing? They're doing that. You could drive, you could do lots of different things."

This statement echoes a similar claim Trump made in February, when he said of the high-speed rail project, "Nobody has ever seen anything like it. The worst overruns that there have ever been in the history of our country. And it wasn't even necessary. I would have said, you don't buy it. You take an airplane – it costs you $2. It costs you nothing. You take an airplane."

The repeated assertion of $2 airfare between major California cities has been widely debunked. In reality, flights between Los Angeles and San Francisco typically cost anywhere from $50 to $250 or more, depending on factors such as timing and demand. Trump's claim appears to be either a gross exaggeration or a fundamental misunderstanding of air travel costs.

The president's focus on California's high-speed rail project is not new. The project, which aims to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco with a bullet train, has been a frequent target of Trump's criticism. In February, the Trump administration threatened to pull $4 billion in federal grants from the project, citing cost overruns and delays.

California's high-speed rail initiative, approved by voters in 2008, has indeed faced significant challenges. The project's estimated cost has ballooned from an initial $33 billion to over $100 billion, and its completion date has been pushed back multiple times. However, supporters argue that the project is crucial for California's long-term transportation needs and environmental goals.

The current standoff over the deployment of the National Guard is just the latest in a series of clashes. California has previously sued the Trump administration over various issues, including the construction of a border wall, environmental rollbacks and attempts to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities.

NOW READ: How this horrid show ends

'You can't just use guns': Maddow raises concern over DOGE's use of weapons

Rachel Maddow expressed concern about what she described as a troubling development in the Trump administration's efforts to reshape the federal government.

On her Monday evening MSNBC show, she highlighted recent actions by DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), a cost-cutting agency led by President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, suggesting it may be evolving into a forceful entity reminiscent of an army.

Maddow's opening monologue focused on reports that DOGE staff, allegedly accompanied by U.S. Marshals, had forcibly entered the U.S. African Development Foundation. This incident followed earlier reports of DOGE breaking into the U.S. Institute of Peace building after failing to gain entry with FBI agents days before.

The MSNBC host criticized these entries into independent agencies' buildings, arguing that these actions represent a dangerous overreach, stating, "There are legitimate legal disputes as to whether this DOGE group has any legal authority over some of these agencies that they're trying to get into, so they can take over their systems and fire their staff and shut them down. Those disputes are legal disputes that need to be sorted out legally."

Maddow emphasized the severity of these incidents, saying, "You can't just use guns to force your way in, in the meantime, as a means of settling that dispute." She went on to characterize these actions as "an armed assault on the U.S. government," warning that if legal disputes are being resolved through force, it crosses into dangerous territory.

The incidents led Maddow to question whether DOGE has transformed into something more menacing than initially thought, especially if U.S. Marshals are now working for them "against other parts of the government."

She raised a chilling question: "Did they have an army?"

Maddow concluded by expressing alarm at the possibility that the president might have granted his top campaign donor the authority to use physical force against other parts of the U.S. government, suggesting this development places the country in uncharted and concerning territory.

“I mean, if the president has given his top campaign donor the ability to use physical force, the ability to use the force of arms against other parts of the U.S. government, we are in a different place than we thought we were.”

Watch the segment below or at this link:

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

'Not exaggerating': Rachel Maddow blasts GOP for 'relinquishing' their power to Trump

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow criticized congressional Republicans for quietly advancing a strategy that effectively surrenders their power to President Donald Trump, allowing him to maintain his tariff policies unchallenged.

On Tuesday night, Maddow focused on a Republican plan to relinquish their authority under the National Emergencies Act to terminate Trump's tariffs, which she argues are causing significant financial harm to American citizens and businesses nationwide.

"Republicans in Congress have the power to halt Trump's tariff actions," Maddow stated. "How will they use this power?"

"They're voluntarily giving up their authority. Relinquishing it. 'We don't want that power,'" Maddow explained, saying that Republican leaders had "inserted language into a procedural measure to prevent any resolution to end the tariffs from being voted on this year."

She continued: "They actually possessed the ability to stop Trump from inflicting daily material harm on the country. They had the power to halt his actions, and what did they choose to do with that power? They opted to surrender it, thereby relinquishing their authority and avoiding the responsibility of deciding how to use it."

"Republicans needed to find an escape route from this predicament," she explained. "The national emergency law stipulates that Congress can terminate the emergency – Trump declared a national emergency to grant himself the authority to impose these tariffs."

"The national emergency law mandates that if a resolution to end the emergency is introduced in Congress, they must consider it. They are required to initiate the voting process within 15 days. Now that we know Democrats are introducing this resolution, the countdown begins. This means Congress will have to vote on this matter within 15 days – the clock is ticking – in order to circumvent this binding legal requirement."

Maddow pointed out that Republicans have "declared that the period from now until the end of this Congress constitutes a single, extended day. Just one day for the entire remainder of the Congress. I'm not exaggerating."

Watch the segment below or at this link:

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web

Right wing unleashes attack on Amy Coney Barrett

Amy Coney Barrett, the conservative Supreme Court justice appointed by Donald Trump, has sparked controversy among right-wing figures after voting to reject Trump's attempt to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid. Barrett, along with Chief Justice John Roberts, sided with a US district judge's ruling that ordered the Trump administration to release the congressionally approved funds for foreign aid work already performed.

The decision prompted swift backlash from pro-Trump commentators and activists.

As the Guardian notes, Mike Cernovich, a right-wing influencer, labeled Barrett a "DEI hire," referencing diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. Fox News host Mark Levin claimed Barrett had "deceived people into thinking she was a reliable constitutionalist." Laura Loomer, a right-wing activist, went as far as posting a picture of Barrett's family, which includes two adopted Black children, and called her a "DEI appointee."

Mike Davis, who was involved in confirming Trump's previous Supreme Court nominees, criticized Barrett on Steve Bannon's podcast, calling her a "rattled law professor" and suggesting that future Supreme Court picks should be "more bold, more fearless, less DEI, and more of a sure bet."

However, Justice Barrett has established a conservative legal legacy since her appointment to the Supreme Court in 2020. As a staunch originalist, she has issued rulings that align with the Republican party's agenda on several high-profile issues.

In the area of abortion, Barrett has been instrumental in the Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, effectively eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion. She has also voted to uphold restrictions on access to abortion services, aligning with the Republican party's goal of limiting reproductive rights.

On gun rights, Barrett has consistently ruled in favor of expanded Second Amendment protections. In the landmark case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, she joined the majority in striking down a New York law that required individuals to demonstrate a specific need to carry a concealed firearm in public.

Barrett's conservative views have also been evident in her rulings on immigration-related issues. She has supported the Trump administration's efforts to limit asylum seekers and has ruled in favor of the government's authority to detain undocumented immigrants without bond hearings.

NOW READ: ‘I miss lynch mobs’: The secretary of retribution's followers are getting impatient

Trump's tariffs spark global trade war as China and Canada retaliate

President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs plan went into effect at midnight US time, despite warnings of a potential escalating trade war, according to a report in the Guardian. The US imposed 25% tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico, its two biggest trading partners, and doubled the levy on Chinese imports to 20%. These duties will affect over $918 billion worth of US imports from Canada and Mexico.

In response, China announced retaliatory measures, including additional 15% tariffs on US agricultural imports such as chicken, wheat, corn, and cotton, and 10% tariffs on sorghum, soybeans, pork, beef, and various other products. These tariffs are set to take effect next week.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced immediate 25% tariffs on C$30 billion worth of US imports, targeting items like beer, wine, bourbon, home appliances, and Florida orange juice. Canada also threatened to impose tariffs on another C$125 billion of US goods if Trump's tariffs remain in place after 21 days. Trudeau emphasized that these tariffs would disrupt a successful trading relationship and violate the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement signed during Trump's first term.

Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum was expected to announce her country's response on Tuesday morning.

The tariffs have already impacted global markets. Asian markets experienced declines, with Japan's Nikkei falling 1.6%, Taiwan's TWII index down 0.5%, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng dropping 0.5%. The Canadian dollar and Mexican peso fell to their lowest levels in a month. European markets also felt the impact, with the FTSE 100 dropping 0.65%, France's CAC 40 falling 0.9%, and Spain's Ibex down 0.8%.

Trump and his allies argue that higher tariffs on US imports will help secure political and economic concessions from global allies and rivals. However, businesses both in the US and worldwide have warned of widespread disruption if this strategy continues.

Trump has threatened to introduce "reciprocal" tariffs on countries that have their own duties on US-made goods, potentially as soon as next month.

China's finance ministry criticized the US move, stating that it damages the multilateral trading system, increases burdens on US companies and consumers, and undermines economic and trade cooperation between China and the US. The Chinese government opposes the tariffs and vows to protect its legitimate interests.

Trump justifies the tariffs on China by citing the government's failure to stop illicit fentanyl from entering the US, which Beijing dismisses as a pretext.

NOW READ: 'He gave the game away': Deep cutbacks in Social Security staff blasted by Senate Democrats

Trump's net worth plummets $1.8 billion as Trump Media shares nosedive: report

According to a new report at Politico, Wall Street is experiencing a significant downturn that's affecting all risky assets, including those associated with President Donald Trump. Since Inauguration Day, publicly traded investments linked to the Trump empire have been in substantial decline. Trump Media & Technology Group's shares have fallen 36%, while the $TRUMP and $MELANIA memecoins have dropped 64% and over 90% respectively.

This decline is part of a broader market selloff in speculative investments. Matthew Tuttle, CEO of Tuttle Capital Management, likens the situation to a bubble that has finally found its pin, suggesting that these investments couldn't defy market gravity indefinitely.

The market shift has affected more than just Trump-related assets. The "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks, including Nvidia, Meta, and Tesla, which previously drove the S&P 500 to record highs, are down 6% this year. Bitcoin has fallen 23% from its all-time high. Wall Street veterans are warning that this selloff could be just the beginning of a larger market correction.

Suggesting there's excess speculation that needs to be addressed, Julian Klymochko of Accelerate Financial Technologies believes a "market-clearing event" is overdue. However, some experts, like Robert Ruggirello of Brave Eagle Wealth Management, view the recent declines as normal market volatility, particularly given February's historical tendency for market fluctuations.

The impact on Trump's personal wealth has been significant. Forbes estimates his net worth at $5.1 billion, with a large portion tied to Trump Media. His stake in the company has fallen from $4.6 billion at inauguration to $2.8 billion due to the share price decline.

Trump Media, which Trump majority owns, has struggled to maintain its value since its peak in March 2024.

The volatility in memecoins has also affected traders. According to Chainalysis, over 885,000 crypto wallets have lost money trading $TRUMP, and 301,000 have lost on $MELANIA. Total losses recorded by these wallets amount to nearly $2.5 billion. However, 1.2 million wallets have profited, with gains exceeding $8 billion. The Trump family and partners have earned about $350 million through trading fees and token sales.

Read the full report in Politico.

'Big balls' Musk fires back at Mike Myers and SNL for mockery in 'far-left propaganda' skit

Saturday Night Live (SNL) opened its latest episode with a satirical sketch mocking the controversial Oval Office meeting between President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The meeting, which took place on Friday, was widely criticized for its chaotic and contentious tone, raising concerns about U.S. support for Ukraine against Russian aggression.

In the cold open, James Austin Johnson portrayed Trump, Bowen Yang played Vance, and Mikey Day took on the role of Zelensky. The sketch humorously exaggerated the real-life tension, with Trump and Vance berating Zelensky for his perceived lack of gratitude for U.S. aid.

The sketch also poked fun at Trump's disdain for Zelensky's casual attire, with Trump sarcastically thanking him for "dressing like casual Star Trek."

In a surprise cameo, Mike Myers appeared as Elon Musk, bursting into the Oval Office dressed in jeans and a T-shirt, wielding a chainsaw. The sketch also mocked the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) alleged budget cuts.

Following the broadcast, the real Elon Musk responded on X (formerly Twitter), dismissing the show as "far-left propaganda" and claiming that DOGE has advocated for hiring more air traffic controllers, not firing them, according to Newsweek.

Watch the video below or at this link.

- YouTubeyoutu.be

'Disastrous': Some voters are 'disgusted' in this deep red Trump enclave — here's why

The president and vice president's meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky sparked mixed reactions, ranging from support to outrage among Ukrainian-Americans, in Brooklyn, according to a report in the New York Times.

Brighton Beach, a Slavic enclave in Brooklyn where Ukrainians outnumber Russians two to one, has historically been a stronghold for President Trump's support. However, following the recent White House meeting where Trump reportedly criticized President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine—signaling a shift in Mr. Trump's support for Ukraine—opinions among Ukrainian New Yorkers have become divided.

Igor Moshchinsky, 61, a Trump voter, expressed mixed feelings at a Brighton Beach Avenue café: "His approach may come across a bit too aggressive," he said of Mr. Trump, "But I don't disagree with the content of Mr. Trump's criticisms of Mr. Zelensky."

Local city councilwoman Inna Vernikov, a Republican and Trump supporter, attempted to navigate the delicate situation, according to the Times. She posted on social media that the meeting's consequences "could be disastrous" for both countries, emphasizing the importance of cooperation: "Working together to end this war and help the people of Ukraine restore their safety and sovereignty is in the best interests of both of our countries and the world."

Inna Kir, 58, a Ukrainian immigrant and lingerie shop owner on Brighton Beach Avenue, strongly supported Mr. Trump's stance. "I absolutely agree with the tough line Mr. Trump has taken against Mr. Zelensky," she stated, echoing Trump's criticism about Zelensky's perceived lack of gratitude for American aid. "I think he should appreciate what people do for him. It's our money," said Ms. Kir, who became a U.S. citizen three decades ago.

However, not all of the approximately 150,000 Ukrainian New Yorkers share this view. In Manhattan's East Village, another Ukrainian enclave, Trump's critics expressed shock at his approach.

Ivan Makar, 52, principal of the Self-Reliance Saturday School of Ukrainian Studies on East Sixth Street, didn't mince words: "I've never been so disgusted with the president of this country." Mr. Makar, whose family fled Ukraine seeking security, found the meeting deeply upsetting. "It was typical bully behavior, and Zelensky stood up to the bullies," he asserted. "As a Ukrainian, I'm proud. As an American, I'm disgusted."

Jason Birchard, 58, owner of the renowned Ukrainian restaurant Veselka in the East Village, demonstrated his support for Zelensky by wearing a T-shirt featuring the tryzub, Ukraine's national symbol. "I've worn this shirt many times over the last three years, and I made sure to dig deep into the closet today and pull it out because I really want to back Zelensky," Mr. Birchard explained as customers lined up outside his restaurant.

NOW READ: Any Democrat who's not fighting right now needs to get the hell out of our way

'Deplorable!' Bill Maher smacks down Trump over Oval Office outburst

On his Friday evening HBO broadcast. comedian Bill Maher strongly criticized President Donald Trump for his extraordinary outburst at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during their Oval Office meeting, describing Trump's behavior as 'deplorable.'

The encounter between Trump and Zelensky took place on Friday, following weeks of escalating tensions and public disagreements between the two leaders. What was intended to be a diplomatic meeting quickly deteriorated into a heated confrontation, with Trump berating Zelensky in an unprecedented display of hostility towards a key ally.

On Friday's broadcast of HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher, the host discussed this incident with a distinguished panel. The guests included the Honorable Chrystia Freeland, former Deputy Prime Minister of Canada and Prime Ministerial candidate; Rahm Emanuel, former U.S. Ambassador to Japan, former Mayor of Chicago, and former Chief of Staff to President Obama; and Fareed Zakaria, acclaimed author, Washington Post columnist, and host of CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS.

Maher began the segment by playing clips from the contentious meeting, declaring, 'We're all agreed this is deplorable!' He went on to criticize Trump's aggressive behavior towards Zelensky, particularly noting the language barrier: 'My first thought is he's having this big browbeating with a guy who speaks English as a second language.'

The host then posed a crucial question to his guests about the potential impact of this incident on Trump's support base: 'Does this move the needle on the people who are that part of the coalition he needs to stay popular?'

Fareed Zakaria responded with a sobering analysis of the situation's implications for America's global standing and moral leadership. He expressed hope that this incident might indeed influence public opinion, stating, 'I hope it does, because I think what we're seeing... it's funny, but it's really tragic.'

Zakaria highlighted the alarming shift in U.S. foreign policy stance, contrasting it with America's historical role: 'Over the last 100 years, the United States... was always clear morally, politically whose side we were on. We were on the side of the victim of aggression. We were on the side of the democracies. We were against the dictators. We were against the aggressors.'

He concluded by pointing out the disturbing reversal in Trump's sympathies: 'To see this bizarre moral reversion... it was absolutely clear in that listening to Trump. He's much more comfortable and sympathetic with Vladimir Putin. And he doesn't like Zelensky.'

Watch the exchange below or at this link.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

Watch the full Trump-Zelenky meeting in the Oval Office

A fiery altercation between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office on Friday has sent shockwaves around the world. The meeting, which was intended to be a step towards peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia, quickly descended into a war of words that has left Ukraine's fate hanging in the balance.

The encounter began cordially, with the two exchanging handshakes and small talk. However, tensions soon boiled over when Trump's Vice President, JD Vance, accused Zelensky of not being "thankful" enough for U.S. support. Zelensky, visibly frustrated, asked Vance if he had ever been to Ukraine, prompting the vice president to angrily accuse the Ukrainian leader of leading "propaganda tours."

As the tensions increased, Trump himself became increasingly agitated, berating Zelensky and accusing him of "gambling with the lives of millions of people" and "gambling with World War III." The U.S. president also expressed solidarity with Russian President Vladimir Putin, saying he "went through a hell of a lot with me" during the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The meeting has left many observers, including traditional conservative foreign policy analysts, deeply concerned. As one conservative commentator warned, "there will be consequences that follow from this, and they will almost certainly be bad for U.S. security and that of our allies."

Watch video of the full meeting below or at this link.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

'Very scary': Maddow warns Trump may 'effectively declare war' on US after SCOTUS ruling

America faces a potential constitutional crisis as President Donald Trump contemplates ignoring a court order related to his administration's foreign aid freeze. This alarming situation could have far-reaching consequences for the nation's democratic institutions, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow warned on her Thursday night broadcast.

Maddow highlighted the gravity of the situation, stating, "They have been joking about this and making, you know, macho sounding bluffs about this for a long time now – particularly from the vice president – J.D. Vance."

She then posed a critical question: "How is the Supreme Court going to deal with it now that it's real?"

The MSNBC host delved into various scenarios that could unfold depending on how the Supreme Court addresses the possibility of Trump openly defying a court order. This situation, which Maddow described as a "very scary issue," has the potential to challenge the foundations of the American justice system and the separation of powers.

At the heart of this controversy is a case set to be heard by the Supreme Court today. The court will consider a request from government attorneys seeking to overturn U.S. District Judge Amir Ali's order to unfreeze funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

The case has become a flashpoint in the ongoing debate over executive power and the role of the judiciary in checking that power.

Maddow speculated on the potential outcomes of the Supreme Court's decision, asking, "Do they try to give him what he wants from the courts so that Trump doesn't break that glass? Doesn't, you know, smash through the brightest bright line that we have and effectively end the Republic?'

She further questioned whether the court might appease Trump out of fear, ensuring that "all court orders go his way."

Maddow then proposed a scenario where the Justices might use this opportunity to reaffirm the limits of presidential power, making it clear that even the President is not above the law. She pondered, "Do they tell him that if he does try to defy the courts, he is effectively declaring war on the United States of America?"

As the nation awaits the Supreme Court's decision, Maddow urged viewers to remain vigilant.

Watch the clip below or at this link:

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

Patel among directors instructing personnel to ignore 'cruel and disrespectful' Musk order

Newly appointed FBI Director Kash Patel has instructed agency employees to refrain from responding to a recent email from the Trump administration. According to The Guardian, the email, sent to hundreds of thousands of federal workers, requested them to list their accomplishments from the previous week as part of tech billionaire Elon Musk's efforts to reduce the size of the federal government.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) gave federal employees a mere 48-hour window to detail their achievements, causing widespread panic across key agencies, including the FBI.

“Please reply to this email with approx. 5 bullets of what you accomplished last week and cc your manager.”

However, Patel — who was confirmed by the Senate on Thursday — countered the request. According to ABC News, Patel's message to FBI personnel stated: "The FBI, through the Office of the Director, is responsible for all our review processes, which will be conducted in accordance with FBI procedures. Please hold off on any responses for now. We will coordinate further information if required."

This directive comes amidst reports that Patel may also be appointed as acting head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Separately, John Durham, the top federal prosecutor in New York's eastern district, has also advised his staff to delay their responses.

Rear Adm. Chad Cary, director of NOAA also directed employees to stand down from responding and said the directive "came as a surprise to all departments, and NOAA leadership is seeking guidance," according to ABC News.

Elon Musk, tasked with cutting government costs during Trump's second term, announced the request on his social media platform X. "Consistent with President @realDonaldTrump's instructions, all federal employees will shortly receive an email requesting to understand what they got done last week," he stated. "Failure to respond will be taken as a resignation."

This unusual directive has caused chaos across various agencies, including the National Weather Service and State Department. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) has strongly criticized the move, calling it "cruel and disrespectful" to federal workers, particularly veterans in civil service.

NOW READ: Trump 'doesn’t believe in much': Historian dissects MAGA 'schism' — and says Musk will win

'Noxious practice': Fox legal analyst blasts Trump and Pam Bondi for weaponizing the DOJ

In a scathing column appearing in the conservative National Review, Andy McCarthy — a Fox News contributor who serves as one of the network's legal analysts — charges Trump AG Pam Bondi with hypocrisy.

In the column, titled, "This Is Not Restoring the Way the Justice Department Is Supposed to Work," McCarthy focuses on the mission of Bondi's “Weaponization Working Group.”

"Under the guise of 'Restoring the Integrity and Credibility of the Department of Justice,' the AG is implementing the Biden DOJ model of conviction first and trial later — if ever. Standing convicted are Trump’s principal prosecutorial nemeses — Biden DOJ special counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and New York Attorney General Letitia James — and therefore guilty by association are any DOJ and FBI personnel who aided and abetted them" McCarthy writes. "In what crimes, we’re not told — only that Bondi will be “provid[ing] quarterly reports to the White House regarding the progress of the review.”

Like many Trump supporters, McCarthy believes the Biden administration was engaged in lawfare — the strategic use of the legal system and legal processes as a weapon to achieve, in this case, the political objective of slowing down Trump.

But McCarthy also argues, "it does not follow that, because the previous Justice Department was politicized, all of the people it targeted were pure as the driven snow. Trump engaged in serious misconduct, regardless of whether it was actionable misconduct."

He goes on to accuse Bondi of "noxious practice she claims to be rooting out.”

"Plainly, the ‘Weaponization Working Group’ exists to settle the president’s scores and rewrite dark chapters of his history — while providing him with quarterly assurances of Attorney General Bondi’s progress on what is now the Justice Department’s core mission.”

You can read McCarthy's full column at National Review here.

NOW READ: Truly dystopian': Critics fear new Trump education directive

From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web

'Cold and cruel': Former federal workers 'shocked, angry and emotionally distraught'

As has been widely reported, the Trump administration has begun implementing mass layoffs across several federal agencies, leaving thousands of workers reeling.

The story of Elena Moseyko, a data scientist at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and was recently interviewed by USA Today, illustrates the impact of these sudden terminations.

"I feel so angry now at the administration because I traumatized my kids," Moseyko said. "I wish I would've never joined the federal government."

Moseyko left a private sector job for what she thought was a secure government position, but now faces an uncertain future. With a mortgage, preschool tuition and car payments looming, her family's financial stability has been abruptly upended.

Various former federal workers shared their stories of USA Today and "said they were shocked, angry and emotionally distraught by the terminations."

Chelsea Milburn, who is also a Navy Reservist, lost her job in public affairs at the Department of Education. She described the termination email she received. "It read like a copy-and-paste letter that did not provide any specifics. It was just very cold and cruel."

"The agency finds, based on your performance, that you have not demonstrated that your further employment at the agency would be in the public interest," her termination letter read, according to USA Today.

State Department employee Constantine Kiriakou, recently interviewed by Reuters, has plans to take the government up on its recently announced buy-out offer. "He wrestled with the decision after his wife lost her job at the US Agency for International Development in recent cuts," according to Reuters.

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by richest man in the world and government contractor Elon Musk, has been at the forefront of aggressive downsizing effort. Thousands of workers have been laid off in recent days, with a focus on newer hires still in their probationary period.

President Trump has shown no signs of backing down from the downsizing effort, despite numerous lawsuits filed by unions representing government workers. "He who saves his country does not violate any law," Trump declared on his social media platform, Truth Social.

NOW READ: The first step in resisting the monsters

Park Service employee fired mid-air on her way home from a work trip

A 23-year-old park guide at Palo Alto Battlefield National Historical Park, Helen Dhue, found out she'd been fired during a layover in Dallas on Friday, on her way home from a National Park Service business trip.

"The department determined that you have failed to demonstrate fitness or qualifications for continued employment because your subject matter knowledge, skills and abilities do not meet the department's current needs," read the email she received, according to the New York Times.

Dhue is one of 1,000 National Park Service employees affected by federal job cuts imposed by the Trump administration. Her firing comes at the same time a former Yosemite National Park official laments a "catastrophic" outcome of Trump's cuts, leading to reduced services and worse.

The executive director of the nonprofit Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Tim Whitehouse, argues the NPS firings make little sense. "It's not going to save the government any money," he said. "It's going to degrade our parks, demoralize people that work very hard for very little money, and make the government a hostile place to be."

During the first weeks of the Trump administration, significant efforts have been made to overhaul the federal workforce. One of the administration's first acts was to summarily fire Justice Department prosecutors who had helped investigate Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 election. These career DOJ officials, who had worked under presidents of both parties, were terminated, it's believed, due to their role in investigating the president's conduct.

The Trump administration has also sought to persuade federal employees into resigning, offering "buyout" packages of around eight months' pay if they voluntarily leave their positions. This move is seen by many as an unconstitutional attempt to purge the "deep state" of officials not aligned with Trump's political agenda.

The administration's actions have extended beyond the DOJ, with a reported plan to target Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) offices across the federal government. Internal documents from the Trump-aligned "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) outlined a multi-phase strategy to identify and terminate DEI-linked employees, even in statutorily mandated civil rights offices.

NOW READ: 'My job was to take care of troops': GA vets 'betrayed' as ex-rep leads 'tough but necessary' VA layoffs

'This isn’t just hippie-dippy stuff': Farmers 'reeling' from Trump spending freezes

According to a new report from the New York Times, a "core constituency" is "reeling" from "a rapid-fire array of directives by the Trump administration."

“This isn’t just hippie-dippy stuff,” said Aaron Pape, a Wisconsin farmer. “This is affecting mainstream farmers."

The Trump administration's recent directives have left farmers and rural communities across the United States grappling with financial uncertainty. A series of executive orders have frozen billions of dollars in federal funding for agricultural programs.

The impact is widespread and has created a ripple effect across rural America, according to the Times.

For example, Skylar Holden, a cattle rancher in Missouri, signed a $240,000 cost-sharing contract for property improvements but is now at risk of losing his farm. He laments, "Whenever my farm payment comes due, there's a good chance that I'm not going to be able to pay it."

In another example, Minnesota seed processor Tom Smude learned that his $530,000 grant for equipment was paused, leaving him unable to pay for ordered machinery. He expressed confusion about the president's priorities: "It's what he wants, growth in industry and keep America going. I feel like I'm doing my part and now you're going against what you said, a little bit."

The uncertainty has affected farmers' ability to plan for the year. Nick Levendofsky, executive director of the Kansas Farmers Union, stated, "Farmers don't need any more uncertainty than they already have."

While some farmers remain supportive of President Trump, many others expressed concern about the long-term consequences of these policy decisions.

Read the full report at the New York Times (subscription required).

NOW READ: How Jeff Bezos' Washington Post is providing cover for Trump — and Musk

'Catastrophic': 'Reckless actions' throw Yosemite into freefall as high season approaches

Yosemite National Park is facing a severe staffing shortage and the threat of chaos as a result of President Donald Trump's hiring freeze across the federal government, according to a report at SFGate.

Since Trump took office, hundreds of job offers for seasonal workers at Yosemite have been rescinded, leaving the park severely understaffed as it heads into its busiest months of the year.

Former Yosemite Superintendent Don Neubacher described the looming staffing situation as "catastrophic," with the park potentially having to "stop specific functions (like no Half Dome cables can be installed) and close park areas."

Beth Pratt, a regional executive director for the National Wildlife Federation, said, "I've never seen anything like this in my 55 years. Just to want to gut the Park Service? I don't understand it."

The trouble began on January 20th when Trump issued an executive order freezing hiring across the federal government. Three days later, thousands of employees in the process of onboarding for federal agencies, including the Park Service, received emails stating that their job offers had been rescinded. This included rangers and fee technicians who were two months into the hiring process, creating chaos at Yosemite.

Adding to the uncertainty, the Trump administration has been collecting the names of all federal employees within their probationary period and warning agency leaders that these newest employees are the easiest to terminate.

One anonymous Yosemite employee said, "There's a lot of fear right now, but nobody even knows who is making these decisions anymore."

Conservationists and nonprofit leaders are also deeply concerned about the long-term effects on Yosemite's ecosystems and visitor experience.

Senator Alex Padilla and 21 other senators sent a letter to the Interior Department, warning that "without seasonal staff during this peak season, visitor centers may close, bathrooms will be filthy, campgrounds may close, guided tours will be cut back or altogether cancelled, emergency response times will drop, and visitor services like safety advice, trail recommendations, and interpretation will be unavailable."

Former Yosemite Superintendent Neubacher is worried that even if federal officials eventually decide to reissue job offers to seasonal workers, it'll be too late, as the park typically onboards 350 to 400 seasonal employees every February and March. He said, "This is one of America's greatest treasures, and these reckless actions jeopardize its future."

US watchdog's election security work halted following Trump executive order on 'censorship'

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has suspended all its election security work and is conducting a comprehensive review of its activities in this area over the past eight years, according to an internal memo review by Wired.

This action is seen as the first major instance of the agency aligning with President Donald Trump's unfounded claims of election fraud and online censorship.

CISA's acting director, Bridget Bean, has ordered "a review and assessment" of all election security-related positions and activities since 2017, when election systems were designated as critical infrastructure. Bean stated, "CISA will pause all elections security activities until the completion of this review," and the agency is also halting funding for related activities at the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing & Analysis Center.

The review, set to conclude on March 6, is being justified under the rubric of Trump's January 20 executive order on "ending federal censorship."

According to Wired, Bean's memo indicates that the review will cover all aspects of CISA's election security work, including employee performance plans, support services, and guidance. The agency will report to the White House on how it plans to "deliver a more focused provision of services for elections security activities," with goals including streamlining services and aligning with its "mandate to refocus" on core missions.

This shift in CISA's operations reflects the growing conservative criticism of the agency's work [PDF] on misinformation and disinformation, with some Republicans labeling it as "the nerve center of the federal government's domestic surveillance and censorship operations on social media." The move has raised concerns about the future of election security efforts and the potential impact on the integrity of future elections.

NOW READ: How Jeff Bezos' Washington Post is providing cover for Trump — and Musk

'Contraception begins at erection': Ohio Dems propose bill Republicans find 'absurd'

In a provocative move aimed at sparking debate on reproductive rights, Ohio Democratic state representatives Anita Somani and Tristan Rader have introduced a bill nicknamed the "Conception Begins at Erection Act." This legislation would make it a felony for men to "discharge semen without the intent to fertilize," effectively criminalizing male ejaculation without the intention of procreation, according to Morgan Trau at News 5 Cleveland.

Dr. Somani, an OBGYN by profession, explained the rationale behind the bill: "If you're going to penalize someone for an unwanted pregnancy, why not penalize the person who is also responsible for the pregnancy?" The proposed law would impose fines of up to $10,000 per violation, with exceptions for protected sex, contraception use, masturbation, sperm donation and LGBTQ+ intercourse.

While both supporters and critics acknowledge the bill's satirical nature, it has ignited a heated discussion on reproductive rights in Ohio.

Republican activist Austin Beigel called the proposal "beyond ridiculous" and "a mockery of the most basic biological concepts." However, Somani countered, "If you think it's absurd to regulate men, then you should think it's equally absurd to regulate women."

The bill comes in the wake of Ohio voters' decision to protect abortion rights in 2023, when Issue 1 passed with 57% support, enshrining reproductive rights in the state constitution. Despite this, anti-abortion advocates like Beigel are pushing for new legislation to criminalize abortion entirely, arguing that "human life begins at conception."

NOW READ: The 'more sinister' reason behind Musk's attack on consumer protection

'Canary in the coal mine': DC insider urges Americans to 'stop worshiping' tech bros

In her commentary piece "Stop Worshiping the American Tech Giants," Lina M. Khan, former head of the Federal Trade Commission, presents a compelling argument against the unquestioned dominance of American technology companies.

Khan begins by addressing the recent breakthrough of Chinese AI firm DeepSeek, which she describes as "the canary in the coal mine," warning of the vulnerability of the U.S. tech industry due to lack of competition.

She then challenges the narrative pushed by America's dominant tech firms that they alone can develop the best AI technology and that this requires enormous investment. She points out that despite these companies being "awash in cash, computing power and data capacity" and enjoying numerous advantages, they are still being "challenged on the cheap" by foreign competitors like DeepSeek.

The author traces this vulnerability to the tech giants' focus on maintaining dominance through acquisitions and building "anticompetitive moats" rather than innovating. She argues that over the last decade, "big tech chief executives have seemed more adept at reinventing themselves to suit the politics of the moment... than on pioneering new pathbreaking innovations and breakthrough technologies."

Warning against treating these companies as "national champions," Khan cites Boeing as a cautionary tale. She contrasts this approach with the government's past enforcement of antitrust laws against companies like AT&T, IBM, and Microsoft, which she credits for creating the competitive environment that fostered Silicon Valley's growth.

ALSO READ: Musk is on an 'authoritarian rampage' — but it isn't just ideological: DC insider

The commentary emphasizes that "breakthrough innovations have historically come from disruptive outsiders," rather than established monopolies. Khan illustrates this point with the example of Google's Transformer architecture, which was only fully realized when researchers left to join or found new companies.

As an antitrust enforcer at the Federal Trade Commission, Khan advocated for more openness in AI development, arguing that developers should "release enough information about their models to allow smaller players and upstarts to bring their ideas to market without being beholden to dominant firms' pricing or access restrictions."

Khan concludes by urging policymakers to be wary of tech giants' requests for special protections. She argues that the recent antitrust lawsuits against these companies during the Trump and Biden administrations were justified, as these firms had "undermined innovation and deprived America of the benefits that free and fair competition delivers." Her final message is clear: "The best way for the United States to stay ahead globally is by promoting competition at home."

NOW READ: Delusion: The mental state that drives Trump's hardcore supporters with scary accuracy

'Kremlin Christmas': Maddow raises alarm on Trump nominee linked to Russian propaganda

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow raised concerns on her Friday show about recent developments involving President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the FBI, Kash Patel. Maddow highlighted reports linking Patel to a Russian filmmaker with Kremlin ties, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.

"The nominee for FBI director taking $25,000 for a pro-Kremlin, anti-FBI smear campaign – a film made by a guy who has made propaganda for the Kremlin – it seems like the kind of story that should maybe break through," Maddow stated, urging viewers and senators to pay attention.

Maddow also discussed other troubling news, including a New York Times report suggesting a Trump executive order may have compromised CIA agents, and concerns about CIA officials being included in a government buyout program pushed by Trump and Elon Musk.

"Can you imagine how excited our foreign adversaries are at the idea of a wholesale purge of all the experienced people in U.S. intelligence and counterintelligence?" Maddow questioned, dubbing the recent weeks "Kremlin Christmas."

The host concluded by emphasizing the critical decision senators face next week regarding Patel's nomination, describing it as "a different kind of red line" given his involvement in Kremlin-linked propaganda against the FBI.

“It has been Kremlin Christmas for going on three weeks now thus far in the new Trump term.”

Watch the clip below or at this link:

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

Protesters take to the streets as Trump takes office


Trump protesters

REUTERS/Marko Djurica

Protesters against U.S. President-elect Donald Trump display a banner at Meridian Hill Park on the inauguration day of Donald Trump's second presidential term in Washington, U.S. January 20, 2025.

Trump protesters

Trump protesters

REUTERS/Leah Millis

A person holds a placard, as people take part in a protest held on day of the inauguration of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, in Washington, U.S., January 20, 2025.

Trump protesters

Trump protesters

REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

People take part in a rally against U.S. president Donald Trump's policies after his inaugural speech in New York City, U.S., January 20, 2025.

Trump protesters

Trump protesters

REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

A woman shouts slogans against U.S. president Donald Trump's policies after his inaugural speech as she takes part in a protest in New York City, U.S., January 20, 2025.

Trump protesters

Trump protesters

REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

People take part in a rally against U.S. president Donald Trump's policies after his inaugural speech in New York City, U.S., January 20, 2025.

Trump protesters

Trump protesters

REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

People shout slogans against U.S. president Donald Trump's policies after his inaugural speech as they take part in a protest in New York City, U.S., January 20, 2025.

Trump protesters

Trump protesters

REUTERS/Leah Millis

People warm their hands by a fire, as they attend a protest held on the day of the inauguration of U.S. President Donald Trump, in Washington, U.S. January 20, 2025.

Trump protesters

Trump protesters

REUTERS/Johanna Geron

A woman holds a placard that reads "UnTrump the World" during a protest, on the day of U.S. President Donald Trump's inauguration, in Brussels, Belgium January 20, 2025.

Donald J. Trump's second inauguration — in pictures


Donald J. Trump

Julia Demaree Nikhinson/Pool via REUTERS

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump is sworn-in as the 47th president of the United States by Chief Justice John Roberts on the inauguration day of his second Presidential term in Washington, U.S. January 20, 2025.

​Elise Stefanik, Vivek Ramaswamy and Kristi Noem​

Elise Stefanik, Vivek Ramaswamy and Kristi Noem

REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik (R-NY), President-elect Trump's nominee to be U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Vivek Ramaswamy and Kristi Noem Ambassador to the United Nations, Vivek Ramaswamy, and South Dakota's Governor Kristi Noem greet guests during the Presidential Inauguration of U.S. President Donald Trump at the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., January 20, 2025.

JD Vance, Usha Vance, Donald Trump

JD Vance, Donald Trump and Usha Vance

SAUL LOEB/Pool via REUTERS

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump and Usha Vance look on as U.S. Vice President-elect JD Vance is sworn-in on the inauguration day of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's second Presidential term in Washington, U.S. January 20, 2025.

Donald Trump, Melania Trump, Joe Biden, Jill Biden, JD Vance and Usha Vance ​

Melania Trump, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Jill Biden, JD Vance, Usha Vance

REUTERS/Carlos Barria

U.S. President Donald Trump, U.S. first lady Melania Trump, former U.S. President Joe Biden, former U.S. first lady Jill Biden, U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance and his wife Usha Vance leave the U.S. Capitol building on the inauguration day of Donald Trump's second presidential term in Washington, U.S. January 20, 2025.

Melania Trump

Melania Trump

REUTERS/Carlos Barria

U.S. first lady Melania Trump leaves the U.S. Capitol building on the inauguration day of U.S. President Donald Trump's second presidential term, in Washington, U.S. January 20, 2025.

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

Melina Mara/Pool via REUTERS

Washington , DC - January 20: President-elect Donald Trump arrives ahead of the 60th inaugural ceremony on January 20, 2025, at the US Capitol in Washington, DC. Trump becomes the 47th president of the United States in a rare indoor inauguration ceremony. The parade was also moved inside Capitol One Arena due to weather.

Former President George H. W. Bush and Former President Barack Obama 

George W Bush, Barack Obama,

Kenny Holston/Pool via REUTERS

Former President George H. W. Bush and Former President Barack Obama listen to President Donald Trump speaking after being sworn in during the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 47th president of the United States takes place inside the Capitol Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C., Monday, January 20, 2025. It is the 60th U.S. presidential inauguration and the second non-consecutive inauguration of Trump as U.S. president.

Doug Emhoff, Vice President Kamala Harris, Former President Bill Clinton, Senator Deb Fischer and Former President George W. Bush

Doug Emhoff, Kamala Harris, Bill Clinton, Deb Fischer and George W. Bush

Kenny Holston/Pool via REUTERS

Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, Vice President Kamala Harris, Former President Bill Clinton, Senator Deb Fischer and Former President George W. Bush listen during the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 47th president of the United States takes place inside the Capitol Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, D.C., Monday, January 20, 2025. It is the 60th U.S. presidential inauguration and the second non-consecutive inauguration of Trump as U.S. president.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., looks on the day of the Presidential Inauguration of U.S. President Donald Trump at the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., January 20, 2025.

Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan

REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan in the Statuary Hall of the U.S. Capitol before the luncheon on the inauguration day of U.S. President Donald Trump's second Presidential term in Washington, U.S., January 20, 2025.

Jimmy Carter dead at 100: report

The 39th president of the United States, James Earl Carter Jr., reportedly died after receiving care at his home in Plains, Georgia, where he resided with his wife, Rosalynn Carter, until she succumbed on Sunday, November 19, 2023. On that day, the former President refused hospital care, saying he wanted to go out holding Rosalynn's hand, according to historian Michael Beschloss

"Number one, this was one of the great marriages in American history, even if they weren't president and first lady," said Beschloss. "Not only the length of this marriage, (77 years) but the closeness of it — that partnership. And you know, everyone who has said this in the last two minutes is absolutely right. They love most of all being with each other. I am told by someone who is very close to both Carters, that last winter, when Jimmy Carter was told that he was very sick and there was not very much that could be done for him, he was told, probably the best thing is for you to go into the hospital where you can get the best care. And I am told that President Carter said, no, I want to get home, and be in bed with Rosalynn, and just sit holding hands, and that's the way I'd like to close my life. And that's really the way it happened."

In May, Jimmy Carter’s grandson said that the former president's life is “coming to the end.

He's "doing OK. He has been in hospice, as you know, for almost a year and a half now, and he really is, I think, coming to the end that, as I’ve said before, there’s a part of this faith journey that is so important to him, and there’s a part of that faith journey that you only can live at the very end and I think he has been there in that space," Jason Carter said.

According to earlier reports, President Joe Biden will deliver Carter's eulogy.

In recent years, Carter had received various hospital treatments, including when he revealed in August 2015 that he had brain cancer and was undergoing radiation treatment — an illness he recovered from, seemingly against the odds.

In addition to being president, the 100-year-old was a U.S. Navy submarine officer, a farmer, a diplomat, a Nobel laureate, a Sunday school teacher and one of the world’s most well-known humanitarians.

Carter won the presidency in 1976, following the Nixon and Ford administrations, at a time of grave political and social tumult not unlike our own. During his tenure, the Democrat prioritized human rights and social justice, enjoying a solid first two years, which included brokering a peace deal between Israel and Egypt dubbed the Camp David Accords.

But his administration hit numerous snags — the most serious being the taking of U.S. hostages in Iran and the disastrous failed attempt to rescue the 52 captive Americans in 1980.

The blowback from the U.S. boycott of the 1980 Summer Olympics, held in the former Soviet Union in response to that country’s invasion of Afghanistan, may have also hurt Carter.

Richard Moe, who served from 1977 to 1981 as chief of staff to Vice President Walter Mondale, offered an alternative view of Carter’s presidency in 2015, citing numerous achievements.

As worthy as Jimmy Carter’s post-presidency has been, it shouldn’t overshadow his time in office, which has been too often overlooked, and which stands in sharp contrast to what we see in the [Trump administration],” Moe said.

In November 1980, Republican challenger Ronald Reagan beat Carter, relegating him to a single term of office on a wave of staunch conservatism.

“We told the truth, we obeyed the law, and we kept the peace,” said Vice President Walter Mondale at the end of Carter’s term.

In the introduction of his 2015 book, A Full Life, Carter repeated the Mondale quote, adding, “We championed human rights.”

As the years passed, a more nuanced image of Carter emerged, taking into account his post-presidential activities and reassessing his achievements.

He founded the Carter Center in 1982 to pursue his vision of world diplomacy and received the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to promote social and economic justice.

Carter said basic Christian tenets such as justice and love served as the bedrock of his presidency, and the ex-president taught Sunday school at Maranatha Baptist, his church in Plains, well into his 90s.

Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia, who is also a senior pastor at Ebenezer Baptist Church where Martin Luther King, Jr. preached, wished the Carter family comfort as the former president entered hospice.

"Across life's seasons, President Jimmy Carter, a man of great faith, has walked with God," Warnock tweeted. "In this tender time of transitioning, God is surely walking with him."

Both Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter made plans to be buried at their family home in Plains, near “a willow tree at the pond’s edge, on a gentle sloping lawn, where they will be buried in graves marked by simple stones.”

The Carters’ property has already been deeded to the National Park Service.

With additional reporting from AFP.

Leaked: Damning Gaetz report details 'substantial evidence' of numerous illegal activities

A House Ethics Committee report on former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) reportedly obtained by CBS News alleges numerous illegal activities by the Florida Republican.

The document, set for release on Monday, states — according to CBS — that there is "substantial evidence" that Gaetz violated House Rules and other conduct standards, including prohibitions on prostitution, statutory rape, illicit drug use, improper gifts and obstruction of Congress.

The report allegedly cites witness testimony, text messages, and Venmo receipts to support claims that Gaetz repeatedly broke the law while serving as a congressman. Among the most serious allegations is that Gaetz paid multiple women for sex — including a 17-year-old girl.

The committee refers to the minor as "Victim A," detailing her direct testimony. According to the report, "Victim A recalled receiving $400 in cash from Representative Gaetz that evening, which she understood to be payment for sex." It adds that she did not inform Gaetz of her age, nor did he inquire.

Gaetz recently denied ever having sexual contact with a minor, though he acknowledged sending funds to women he dated or who requested money. He admitted to past behavior that was "embarrassing, though not criminal," including partying and womanizing, but insists he now lives differently.

The report's release comes after Gaetz's brief consideration as President-elect Donald Trump's pick for U.S. Attorney General, a candidacy he withdrew due to lack of support for confirmation.

NOW READ: 'Sorting through the wreckage': Focus groups reveal 'pretty scathing rebuke' of Dem leadership

Here are 5 of the most frustrating health insurer tactics and why they exist

The U.S. has made great progress in getting more people insured since the Affordable Care Act took effect in 2014. The share of uninsured Americans ages 18 to 64 fell from 18% before the ACA to 9.5% in 2022. And preexisting conditions no longer prevent coverage or lead to an increase in premiums.

Yet even for those with health insurance, coverage does not ensure access to care, much less high-quality and affordable care. Research shows that 1 in 3 Americans seeking care report delaying or forgoing treatment because of the “administrative burdens” of dealing with health insurance and the health care system, creating additional barriers beyond costs.

Some of these are basic tasks, such as scheduling appointments. But others relate to strategies that health insurers use to shape the care that their patients are able to receive – tactics that are often unpopular with both doctors and patients.

In addition, more than 40% of Americans under 65 have high-deductible plans, meaning patients face significant upfront costs to using care. As a result, nearly a quarter are unable to afford care despite being insured.

As scholars of health care quality and policy, we study how the affordability and design of health insurance affects people’s health as well as their out-of-pocket costs.

We’d like to unpack five of the most common strategies used by health insurers to ensure that care is medically necessary, cost-effective or both.

At best, these practices help ensure appropriate care is delivered at the lowest possible cost. At worst, these practices are overly burdensome and can be counterproductive, depriving insured patients of the care they need.

Claim denials

The strategy of denial of claims has gotten a lot of attention in the aftermath of the killing of UnitedHealthcare chief executive officer Brian Thompson, partly because the insurer has higher rates of denials than its peers. Overall, nearly 20% of Americans with coverage through health insurance marketplaces created by the ACA had a claim denied in 2021.

While denial may be warranted in some cases, such as if a particular service isn’t covered by that plan – amounting to 14% of in-network claim denials – more than three-quarters of denials in 2021 did not list a specific reason. This happens after the service has already taken place, meaning that patients are sent a bill for the full amount when claims are denied.

Although the ACA required standardized processes for appealing claims, patients don’t often understand or feel comfortable navigating an appeal. Even if you understand the process, navigating all of the paperwork and logistics of an appeal is time-consuming. Gaps by income and race in pursuing and winning appeals only deepen mistrust among those already struggling to get appropriate care and make ends meet.

Middle-aged couple sits on couch with bills and planner in front of them, a laptop in the foreground.
Patients receive a bill for the full amount after a claim is denied. Ridofranz/iStock via Getty Images Plus


Prior authorization

Prior authorization requires providers to get approval in advance from the insurer before delivering a procedure or medication – under the guise of “medical necessity” as well as improving efficiency and quality of care.

Although being judicious with high-cost procedures and drugs make intuitive sense, in practice these policies can lead to delays in care or even death.

In addition, the growing use of artificial intelligence in recent years to streamline prior authorization has come under scrutiny. This includes a 2023 class action lawsuit filed against UnitedHealthcare for algorithmic denials of rehabilitative care, which prompted the federal government to issue new guidelines.

The American Medical Association found that 95% of physicians report that dealing with prior authorization “somewhat” or “significantly” increases physician burnout, and over 90% believe that the requirement negatively affects patients. The physicians surveyed by the association also reported that over 75% of patients “often” or “sometimes” failed to follow through on recommended care due to challenges with prior authorizations.

Doctors and their staff may deal with dozens of prior authorization requests per week on average, which take time and attention away from patient care. For example, there were nearly two prior-authorization requests per Medicare Advantage enrollee in 2022, or more than 46 million in total.

Prior authorization can be a time-consuming, multistep process that slows down and often blocks patients from receiving care.

Smaller networks

Health insurance plans contract with physicians and hospitals to form their networks, with the ACA requiring them to “ensure a sufficient choice of providers.”

If a plan has too small of a network, patients can have a hard time finding a doctor who takes their insurance, or they may have to wait longer for an appointment.

Despite state oversight and regulation, the breadth of plan networks has significantly narrowed over time. Nearly 15% of HealthCare.gov plans had no in-network physicians for at least one of nine major specialties, and over 15% of physicians listed in Medicaid managed-care provider directories saw no Medicaid patients. Inaccurate provider directories amplify the problem, since patients may choose a plan based on bad information and then have trouble finding care.

Surprise billing

The No Surprises Act went into effect in 2022 to protect consumers against unexpected bills from care received out of network. These bills usually come with a higher deductible and an out-of-pocket maximum that is typically twice as high as in-network care as well as higher coinsurance rates.

Prior to that law, 18% of emergency visits and 16% of in-network hospital stays led to at least one surprise bill.

While the No Surprises Act has helped address some problems, a notable gap is that it does not apply to ambulance services. Nearly 30% of emergency transports and 26% of nonemergency transports may have resulted in a surprise bill between 2014 and 2017.

Pharmacy benefit managers

The largest health insurance companies all have their own pharmacy benefit managers.

Three of them – Aetna’s CVS Caremark, Cigna’s Express Scripts and UnitedHealthcare’s Optum Rx – processed almost 80% of the total prescriptions dispensed by U.S. pharmacies in 2023.

Beyond how market concentration affects competition and prices, insurers’ owning pharmacy benefit managers exploits a loophole in how much insurers are required to spend on patient care.

The ACA requires insurers to maintain a medical loss ratio of 80% to 85%, meaning they should spend 80 to 85 cents of every dollar of premiums for medical care. Pharmaceuticals account for a growing share of health care spending, and plans are able to keep that money within the parent company through the pharmacy benefit managers that they own.

Moreover, pharmacy benefit managers inflate drug costs to overpay their own vertically integrated pharmacies, which in turn means higher out-of-pocket costs based on the inflated prices. Most pharmacy benefit managers also prevent drug manufacturer co-pay assistance programs from counting toward patients’ cost sharing, such as deductibles, which prolongs how long patients have to pay out of pocket.

Policy goals versus reality

Despite how far the U.S. has come in making sure most Americans have access to affordable health insurance, being insured increasingly isn’t enough to guarantee access to the care and medications that they need.

The industry reports that profit margins are only 3% to 6%, yet the billions of dollars in profits they earn every year may feel to many like a direct result of the day-to-day struggles that patients face getting the care they need.

These insurer tactics can adversely affect patients’ health and their trust in the health care system, which leaves patients in unthinkably difficult circumstances. It also undercuts the government’s goal of bringing affordable health care to all.The Conversation

Monica S. Aswani, Assistant Professor of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham and Paul Shafer, Assistant Professor of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Online harassment reaches new heights as 'emboldened manosphere' emerges: report

In the days following Donald Trump's presidential victory, an alarming surge in misogynistic rhetoric and threats against women has emerged online and in real life, according to a report from the Associated Press. Dubbed the 'emboldened manosphere', the trend has left many women feeling unsafe and compelled to take protective measures.

Sadie Perez, a 19-year-old political science student in Wisconsin profiled in AP's report, now carries pepper spray with her on campus. Her mother ordered self-defense kits for her and her sister.

This reaction stems from the rise of right-wing 'manosphere' influencers who have seized on Trump's win to amplify misogynistic content online.

A troubling trend is the appropriation of the pro-choice slogan "My body, my choice" into "Your body, my choice," a phrase that has spread rapidly online. Attributed to a post by far-right figure Nick Fuentes, it garnered 35 million views on its first day on X. The slogan has since appeared in middle schools, college campuses, and even on t-shirts — which were later removed by Amazon.

Online declarations calling to "Repeal the 19th" Amendment (which gave women the right to vote) have gained millions of views.

While Trump himself isn't directly amplifying this rhetoric, his campaign's focus on masculinity and repeated attacks on Kamala Harris's gender and race have contributed to the current climate. Dana Brown from the Pennsylvania Center for Women and Politics suggests that for some men, Trump's victory represents a chance to reclaim traditional gender roles they feel they're losing.

Despite the fear and disgust many women feel, some are fighting back. Perez and her peers are supporting each other, celebrating wins like female majorities in student government, and encouraging women to speak out against the misogynistic rhetoric. As Perez puts it, "I want to encourage my friends and the women in my life to use their voices to call out this rhetoric and to not let fear take over."

Maine Republican turns himself into the police

State Rep. Lucas Lanigan (R-Sanford) turned himself into the York County Jail Monday morning after a warrant was out for his arrest.

The warrant for Lanigan was for one count of domestic violence aggravated assault, which was based on reports given to the Sanford Police Department on Friday. According to information shared by Mark Dyer, major of support services and logistics for the department, Lanigan turned himself in around 9:30 a.m.

Dyer said the investigation is still ongoing.

Sgt. Colton Sweeney of the York County Sheriff’s Office said Lanigan will not be allowed to post bail until he goes before a judge, which is scheduled for Wednesday afternoon.

The Portland Press Herald reported that police searched for Lanigan over the weekend before he turned himself in.

Lanigan, who lives in Springvale and is wrapping up his first term as a state legislator, is up for reelection for his seat in the Maine House of Representatives. He is facing Democrat Patricia Kidder.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

Maine Morning Star is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Maine Morning Star maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Lauren McCauley for questions: info@mainemorningstar.com. Follow Maine Morning Star on Facebook and X.

New: Trump-endorsed Bible nets former president $300,000 in royalties

Donald J. Trump's latest financial disclosure reveals a complex financial picture, balancing significant liabilities with various income sources. The former president faces over $100 million in liabilities from three civil lawsuits he lost in New York, including a $50 million bond for a civil fraud case and a judgment of $83.3 million in the E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse case.

Trump's current financial state was summarized in a new report in the New York Times.

Despite these legal challenges, Trump reports substantial income from various sources. His post-presidential books have been lucrative, with "Letters to Trump" bringing in $4.5 million, "A MAGA Journey" earning $505,763, and a Trump-endorsed Bible generating $300,000 in royalties. He also profits from licensing fees at Trump-branded properties in Dubai and Oman.

Trump's involvement in cryptocurrency and NFTs is notable. He holds over $1 million in cryptocurrency and received $7.15 million from an NFT licensing agreement. His wife, Melania, earned $330,609 from NFT sales and $237,500 for speaking at a Log Cabin Republicans event.

The disclosure also details Trump's holdings in Trump Media and Technology Group, the parent company of Truth Social. He owns nearly 65% of the company, with 114 million shares of common stock subject to a lockup period.

Trump's resorts continue to be significant revenue sources. Mar-a-Lago reported $56.9 million in resort-related revenue, up from $52.3 million the previous year. Trump National Doral in Miami generated $160.1 million in revenue.

Other income sources include a Screen Actors Guild pension worth $90,776 and ongoing royalties from "The Art of the Deal." Trump also received $16.7 million in distributions from his investments in two office buildings managed by Vornado Realty Trust.

While the disclosure provides a broad overview of Trump's finances, it doesn't offer a complete picture of his net worth or the profitability of his businesses. The form often uses broad ranges for asset values and doesn't clearly define terms like "income" for some businesses.

NOW READ: Revealed: Trump deep in debt while foreign money keeps coming

Read the full report in the New York Times.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and a dead bear

In a surprising revelation, independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. disclosed that he dumped a dead bear in New York City's Central Park nearly a decade ago. The admission, highlighted by Politico, came in a video released on social media Sunday afternoon, where Kennedy recounted the incident to actress Roseanne Barr.

Kennedy's decision to share this story appears to be preemptive, as he suggested in the video that he was addressing the incident ahead of a pending story in the New Yorker, which had inquired about it.

According to Kennedy, he did not kill the bear but found it already deceased, hit by another driver, during a falconing expedition in the Hudson Valley.

He initially planned to take the bear home to skin it but ended up driving directly to a dinner at Peter Luger Steak House in New York City. Faced with the dilemma of what to do with the bear carcass before heading to the airport, Kennedy decided to leave it in Central Park alongside an abandoned bicycle.

The story aligns with an incident reported by The New York Times in October 2014, where a dead bear was discovered in Central Park near an abandoned bicycle. At the time, the circumstances surrounding the bear's death and its appearance in the park were not publicly known.

Kennedy claimed he planted the bear with the bicycle to fit a narrative about a series of bike accidents in the city. He admitted to feeling nervous when the story was featured on "every television station," fearing he might be linked to the incident. "Luckily the story died after a while, and it stayed dead for a decade, and the New Yorker somehow found out about it," Kennedy stated in the video.

This unusual revelation comes at a time when Kennedy's presidential campaign has been facing challenges, with his poll numbers declining since President Joe Biden's exit from the race last month. It adds to a series of strange stories surrounding Kennedy, including a previous claim made during divorce proceedings that a worm had eaten part of his brain.

ALSO READ: Trump just entered his 'Fat Elvis' phase

BRAND NEW STORIES
@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.