'Embarrassing spectacle': Retired conservative judge warns Pence’s subpoena fight may severely backfire
Prominent retired conservative judge J. Michael Luttig is publicly warning former Vice President Mike Pence of potential danger in fighting a subpoena from the Department of Justice (DOJ), HuffPost reports.
Per MSNBC, former federal Judge Luttig aided Pence in deciding he "couldn’t throw the 2020 election for Donald Trump."
In an op-ed for The New York Times, Luttig notes Pence promised to take his fight against the grand jury subpoena from DOJ Counsel Jack Smith "all the way to the Supreme Court" if necessary. The judge follows up that sentiment with warning: "A politician should be careful what he wishes for — no more so than when he’s a possible presidential candidate who would have the Supreme Court decide a constitutional case that could undermine his viability in an upcoming campaign."
READ MORE: Mike Pence subpoenaed by special counsel investigating Donald Trump
Luttig's op-ed comes after he took to Twitter, MSNBC reports, to offer a case for why Pence's ploy "to use the Constitution's 'speech or debate' protections" to escape testimony was likely not the best decision.
The judge wrote, "It is an unsettled question of constitutional law whether a Vice President of the United States possesses qualified Speech or Debate Clause privileges and protections when he or she serves, in accordance with the Twelfth Amendment, as President of the Senate." That tweet was followed by a full thread of analysis.
\u201cIt is an unsettled question of constitutional law whether a Vice President of the United States possesses qualified Speech or Debate Clause privileges and protections when he or she serves, in accordance with the Twelfth Amendment, as President of the Senate\u201d— @judgeluttig (@@judgeluttig) 1676593171
Days later, the former corporate lawyer intensified his warning to the former vice president in his op-ed, warning, "The former vice president should not want the embarrassing spectacle of the Supreme Court compelling him to appear before a grand jury in Washington just when he’s starting his campaign for the presidency."
WATCH: Mike Pence willing to take subpoena fight to the Supreme Court
HuffPost notes Luttig highlighted the fact Pence is "'considered by many of us across the political spectrum to be a profile in courage' for choosing democracy over his former boss," suggesting his resistance could jeopardize that reputation.
Mr. Pence may also be under the impression that the legal fight over his claim will confound the courts, consuming months, if not longer, before he receives the verdict — but it’s unclear what he hopes to gain from the delay. One would have thought Mr. Pence would have seized the propitious opportunity afforded him by Mr. Smith, most likely weeks or months before he even decides whether he will run for the presidency.
Ultimately, the judge predicts the former vice president should stop while he's ahead, considering he "doesn’t have a chance in the world of winning his case."
HuffPost's full report is available at this link. MSNBC's report is here. J. Michael Luttig's full New York Times op-ed is here.
READ MORE: Ex-federal prosecutor details 7 words Pence said that 'disqualify him from ever holding public office again'
- Mike Pence subpoena may mean special counsel 'about ready to make a decision' about indicting Donald Trump ›
- Pence will contest subpoena from DOJ special counsel regarding 'post-2020 election activities': report ›
- Special counsel asks judge to compel Mike Pence to comply with Donald Trump probe subpoena ›