Is Biden open to work requirements on food aid? Maybe
It was reported Monday that the president is open to the idea of putting work requirements on federal jobless aid, namely food stamps, while he’s negotiating with the House Republicans over the debt ceiling. However, a close reading of that reporting reveals that it’s more ambiguous than it’s otherwise suggesting.
HuffPost ran Arthur Delaney’s story with this headline:
“Joe Biden Open To Stricter Work Requirements For Federal Aid.”
READ MORE: McCarthy to Wall Street: GOP will hold economy hostage to cut aid programs
Delaney said, “Republicans have proposed cutting health care and food benefits to unemployed adults without dependents as part of a broader legislative deal that would cut federal spending but allow the government to function.”
Delaney said Biden ruled out conditions “for Medicaid, which covers health care costs for more than 85 million Americans. But he didn’t say the same for food assistance, and he noted that as a senator, he voted for the 1996 welfare reform law that cracked down on food and cash aid to unemployed adults.”
Whether Biden is open to this terrible idea will likely be revealed after today’s expected meeting with the House Republicans. Dimes to donuts, though: He was burnishing his anti-welfare fraud bona fides without really being receptive to policies that might deny hungry Americans access to grocery money.
In any event, news of the president being open to something that he may or may not be open to is an occasion for discussing, again, the question of putting work requirements on federal jobless aid during times of unemployment.
READ MORE: GOP debt limit bill could out over 10 million at risk of losing Medicaid: analysis
These discussions tend to focus on policy research that has broken down whether work requirements are productive or counterproductive. Delaney, for instance, cites the president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
On Twitter, Sharon Parrott wrote Monday that the “research is clear: red tape-laden work reporting requirements take help away from people while failing to deliver on the promise of increased employment and lower poverty.”
I think analysis that assesses the outcomes of government assistance programs is important, but I’ve always had a problem when liberals don’t go further.
The question should not be limited to whether work requirements on food aid are productive or counterproductive because such questions center on the Republicans and their white collectivist values. Liberals should ask questions that center on liberal democratic values. Alas, liberals usually don’t do that.
The liberal question should not be whether to put conditions on government assistance but why. Why are we putting conditions on things that citizens are entitled to by virtue of being citizens. Why are we making liberty conditional?
The Republicans know what I’m talking about.
They center liberty, but not the universal equitable kind. Their liberty is about us, not them. If someone who is like them needs help – let’s call them inpeople – conditional aid is tyrannical. But if someone who is not like them needs help – let’s call them outpeople – conditions are needed in the name of “fairness.”
As Republican House Whip Steve Scalise said recently: “That single mom that’s working two or three jobs right now to make ends meet under this tough economy, she doesn’t want to have to pay for somebody who’s sitting at home.”
Liberals should center liberty too, their kind of liberty, the universal equitable kind, but they don’t. I think that’s because they have largely forgotten how. Liberals who can speak from high perches tend to speak in terms of data and research – all the stuff that highly educated white people make a fetish of.
There’s another way. Liberals can and should speak in terms of liberty – of the right to demand that the government protect it. Hunger is a threat to liberty. Food stamps protect it. Why are we putting conditions on rights we are born with? Americans should not have to earn liberties they’re already entitled to.
There are other policy ideas to discuss. But we can’t get to that discussion as long as we center the Republicans and their white collectivist values. Liberals should ask questions that center liberal democratic values. Perhaps, if it turns out the president is not open to work requirements on food aid, we will soon.
READ MORE: Big food raking in massive profits from price hikes while Americans go hungry
- Eric Swalwell slams GOPers’ plan to enforce work requirements for 'cancer patients on food stamps' ›
- 'Godspeed': Senate GOPer’s doubt Kevin McCarthy’s plan to cut food assistance for millions ›
- 'Cowards': GOP pushes bill targeting food aid for the poor ›
- Hakeem Jeffries lambastes Louisiana GOP Rep's 'Reckless Republican rhetoric' on work requirements - Alternet.org ›