Exposé reveals Ginni Thomas’ ties to 'many groups directly involved in controversial cases' before the Supreme Court
A bombshell exposé by an award-winning investigative journalist takes a deep look into lobbyist and far right wing activist and conspiracy theorist Ginni Thomas, and the ties she has to people, groups – and money – that have or may have business before the U.S. Supreme Court, on which her conservative husband sits.
“Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?” The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer asks point-blank. “Behind closed doors, Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife is working with many groups directly involved in controversial cases before the Court.”
Mayer writes that “Ginni Thomas has declared that America is in existential danger because of the ‘deep state’ and the ‘fascist left,’ which includes ‘transsexual fascists.'”
But that’s just a small piece of her massive reporting.
“Ginni Thomas’s political activism has caused controversy for years. For the most part, it has been dismissed as the harmless action of an independent spouse. But now the Court appears likely to secure victories for her allies in a number of highly polarizing cases—on abortion, affirmative action, and gun rights,” Mayer reveals.
How bad and how close are these ties? Thomas, unbeknownst to almost anyone, was “an undisclosed paid consultant at the conservative pressure group the Center for Security Policy, when its founder, Frank Gaffney, submitted an amicus brief to the Court supporting Trump’s Muslim travel ban.”
Did Justice Clarence Thomas know? Did the couple discuss the case, or her financial and political ties? No one knows.
And that’s just one example. Mayer notes that Ginni Thomas “has held leadership positions at conservative pressure groups that have either been involved in cases before the [Supreme] Court or have had members engaged in such cases.”
“In 2019, she announced a political project called Crowdsourcers, and said that one of her four partners would be the founder of Project Veritas, James O’Keefe. Project Veritas tries to embarrass progressives by making secret videos of them, and last year petitioned the Court to enjoin Massachusetts from enforcing a state law that bans the surreptitious taping of public officials. Another partner in Crowdsourcers, Ginni Thomas said in her announcement, was Cleta Mitchell, the chairman of the Public Interest Legal Foundation, a conservative election-law nonprofit. It, too, has had business before the Court, filing amicus briefs in cases centering on the democratic process. Thomas also currently serves on the advisory board of the National Association of Scholars, a group promoting conservative values in academia, which has filed an amicus brief before the Court in a potentially groundbreaking affirmative-action lawsuit against Harvard.”
Should Americans be concerned? Should Justice Thomas? Should Chief Justice John Roberts?
“If Ginni Thomas is intimately involved—financially or ideologically tied to the litigant—that strikes me as slicing the baloney a little thin,” David Luban, a professor of law and philosophy at Georgetown, who specializes in legal ethics, tells Mayer.
Surely Justice Thomas has the ability to separate his work and home life, right?
“Even before” Clarence Thomas’ controversial and contentious confirmation hearing, which included the accusations – labeled “credible” by many – from Anita Hill, “a friend told the Washington Post, the couple was so bonded that ‘the one person [Clarence] really listens to is Virginia.'”
In 2019 then-Congressman Mark Meadows, who because White House Chief of Staff to President Donald Trump and now appears to have been intimately involved in aspects of the January 6 insurrection, told members of a “nonprofit that mobilizes conservative evangelical voters” that “Ginni was talking about how we ‘team up,’ and we actually have teamed up. And I’m going to give you something you won’t hear anywhere else—we worked through the first five days of the impeachment hearings.”
Mayer adds, “Ginni Thomas has her own links to the January 6th insurrection.”
The nearly 7000 word deep dive can be read here.
- Michigan attorney general: 'Absolutely' enough evidence to charge ... ›
- A former aide to Clarence Thomas' wife became a rising GOP star ... ›
- Former top FBI official: 'Concerning' Ginni Thomas signed letter ... ›
- Clarence Thomas' wife spoke at an event featuring Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes: report - Alternet.org ›
- Supreme Court rules allow Clarence Thomas to decide for himself if wife’s activism presents a 'conflict of interest': report - Alternet.org ›
- NYT drops the hammer on Ginni Thomas with scathing report on her political activism - Alternet.org ›
- The troubling role of Clarence Thomas’ wife in Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election - Alternet.org ›
- 'The craziest meeting I've ever been to': Ex-Trump aides on SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas and wife's bizarre WH visit - Alternet.org ›
- Clarence Thomas’ wife says she attended Jan. 6 'Stop-the-Steal' rally before Capitol attack - Alternet.org ›
- Watergate reporter calls Ginni Thomas-Mark Meadows bombshell ‘unprecedented entanglement’ - Alternet.org ›
- Why ‘unhinged conspiracy nut’ Ginni Thomas’ post-election texts are relevant to the Supreme Court’s ‘integrity’ and ‘credibility’: conservative - Alternet.org ›
- Ginni Thomas tormented Trump staffers with her ‘insane’ hiring and firing recommendations: report - Alternet.org ›