Infamous couple who brandished guns at BLM protesters must now turn over their firearms

The infamous St. Louis couple that made headlines last summer after brandishing guns at Black Lives Matter (BLM) protesters must now surrender their guns. Needless to say, they are not pleased with the order.
According to KMOV, Mark and Patricia McCloskey pleaded guilty to a number of charges in connection with their altercation with protesters. Patricia McCloskey entered a guilty plea for misdemeanor harassment and was fined a total of $2,000. Mark McCloskey entered a guilty plea for a misdemeanor fourth-degree assault charge. The two also had to agree to surrender the weapons used during their exchange with protesters.
But despite the guilty pleas and their agreement to turn over their weapons, Mark McCloskey has made it clear that he does not regret his actions. From the steps of the courthouse in St. Louis, Mo., he said, "I'd do it again," later adding, "Any time the mob approaches me, I'll do what I can to put them in imminent threat of physical injury because that's what kept them from destroying my house and my family."
A year ago, the mob came to my door to attack my family\u2014 I backed them down\n\nThe mob came for me, the media attacked me & prosecutors tried to punish me for defending my family\n\nThey dropped all charges, except for a claim I instilled \u201cimminent fear\u201d in the mob\n\nI\u2019d do it again.pic.twitter.com/ECPsSwa2Iw— Mark McCloskey (@Mark McCloskey) 1623960317
As reports began circulating about their case again, McCloskey also took to Twitter with his reaction. "A year ago, the mob came to my door to attack my family— I backed them down," he tweeted. "The mob came for me, the media attacked me & prosecutors tried to punish me for defending my family They dropped all charges, except for a claim I instilled 'imminent fear' in the mob I'd do it again."
Special prosecutor Richard Callahan also weighed in and admitted that he believes the couple's consequences are reasonable.
"But I think that their conduct was a little unreasonable in the end," Callahan said. "I don't think people should view this case as some type of betrayal or assault on the Second Amendment. We still have the Second Amendment rights. It's just that the Second Amendment does not permit unreasonable conduct."
- Welfare for weapons makers doesn't make us safer - Alternet.org ›
- St. Louis Post Dispatch report reveals gun-toting white couple have ... ›
- 'Take this country back': Gun-toting Mark McCloskey announces ... ›
- Critics slam Missouri's GOP governor for pardoning St. Louis couple who waved gun at BLM protesters - Alternet.org ›