‘Crazy’: FOIA’d emails reveal alarm and frustration among top NOAA officials over Trump’s ‘doctored’ Hurricane Dorian map

‘Crazy’: FOIA’d emails reveal alarm and frustration among top NOAA officials over Trump’s ‘doctored’ Hurricane Dorian map
Image via Screengrab.

When President Donald Trump last fall repeatedly — and falsely — claimed Alabama was in the path of Hurricane Dorian, scientists and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) officials responded with disbelief and frustration, newly released documents show.

A trove of internal emails, released Friday through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, reveal senior NOAA officials disavowing an unsigned statement issued by the agency and scrambling to contain the fallout from the president’s false claim.

On September 1, 2019, Trump tweeted that Alabama would be among the states “most likely hit (much) harder than anticipated" by Hurricane Dorian, prompting forecasters at the National Weather Service’s Birmingham, AL office to assure Alabamians they were not in harms way.

“Alabama will NOT see any impacts from Dorian,” National Weather Service Birmingham tweeted, appearing to contradict the president. “We repeat, no impacts from Hurricane Dorian will be felt across Alabama.”

At a Sept. 4 Oval Office presser, Trump displayed a map of Hurricane Dorian’s path that appeared to be altered with a Sharpie. According to the New York Times, in the days following that presser, the White House “pressured NOAA to ‘clarify’ that forecast.” Two days later, on Sept. 6, an unsigned statement from the NOAA disavowed the Birmingham NWS tweet.

"The Birmingham National Weather Service's Sunday morning tweet spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time,” the statement claimed.

That unsigned NOAA statement triggered an influx of inter-agency complaints among NOAA staffers, emails reveal. In an email to the agency’s top officials later that day, Craig McLean, NOAA’s acting chief scientist asked, “What’s next? Climate science is a hoax?” 

“Flabbergasted to leave our forecasters hanging in the political wind,” McLean added.

In a Sept. 7 email to staffers, the acting chief scientist wrote, “What concerns me most is that this Administration is eroding the public trust in NOAA for an apparent political recovery from an ill timed and imprecise comment from the President.” McLean later said he is “pursuing the potential violations” of the NOAA’s science integrity policy, AP reported.

NOAA scientist Gary Shigenaka likewise asked Neil Jacobs, the agency’s acting administrator, to “reassure those of us who serve the public ... that we are not mere pawns in an absurd game.”

“You have no idea how hard I’m fighting to keep politics out of science,” Jacobs replied.

One email even shows agency officials expressing concern over the president’s “doctored” chart of Dorian’s path.

In a Sept. 5 email, Makeda Okolo, a congressional affairs specialist at NOAA, wrote, “Apparently the President is convinced that Alabama was in the path of Dorian and someone altered a NOAA map (with a sharpie) to convince folks.”

“Yep, crazy,” NOAA’s deputy under secretary for operations Benjamin Friedman replied.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.