Army says impeachment witness Alexander Vindman isn't being investigated — despite Trump's urging

Army says impeachment witness Alexander Vindman isn't being investigated — despite Trump's urging
Vindman, CNN Screengrab

On Friday, February 7 — only two days after he was acquitted on two articles of impeachment — President Donald Trump fired Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman from the National Security Council (NSC), which countless Trump critics have described as an act of retaliation because of Vindman’s testimony during House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry. On top of firing Vindman, Trump told reporters that he imagined the military would “take a look at” whether Vindman should face disciplinary action for the “horrible things” he said when testifying. But Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, according to Politico, said on Friday that the U.S. Army isn’t planning any investigation of Vindman.

McCarthy, at a National Press Club luncheon, noted that Vindman would have a “bridging assignment” for a few months in the U.S. Army’s headquarters in Washington, D.C. — adding, “Then he will be heading to a senior service college this summer. There’s no investigation into him.”

Vindman wasn’t the only person Trump fired on February 7: that day, he also fired Vindman’s twin brother, Yevgeny Vindman, from the NSC and fired Gordon Sondland (an impeachment witness during House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry) from his post as U.S. ambassador to the European Union. The firing of the Vindman brothers and Sondland is being described by Trump critics as the Friday Night Massacre, a name obviously inspired by President Richard Nixon’s infamous Saturday Night Massacre of October 20, 1973 — when Nixon, during the Watergate scandal, ordered the firing of Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox and both Attorney General Eliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus resigned in protest.

Former White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly defended Alexander Vindman this week during a speech/Q&A session in New Jersey, asserting that Vindman was acting ethically when he refused to follow an “illegal order” in the form of Trump asking the Ukrainian government for an investigation of former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.