Writer schools Kevin McCarthy on why Ukraine aid isn’t a 'blank check'

Writer schools Kevin McCarthy on why Ukraine aid isn’t a 'blank check'
Kevin McCarthy speaks on day 2 of the 2016 RNC (Image via Voice of America / Wikimedia Commons).
Media

During a mid-October interview with Punchbowl News, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy made it clear that U.S. aid to Ukraine could be in danger if Republicans retake the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2022 midterms.

The California Republican, who may very well be House speaker three months from now, told Punchbowl, “I think people are gonna be sitting in a recession, and they’re not going to write a blank check to Ukraine. They just won’t do it.… And then, there’s the things (the Biden Administration) is not doing domestically. Not doing the border, and people begin to weigh that. Ukraine is important, but at the same time, it can’t be the only thing they do — and it can’t be a blank check.”

In a biting article published by the conservative website The Bulwark on October 20, writer Shay Khatiri is highly critical of McCarthy — comparing him to America First isolationists who “objected to aid to Britain before Pearl Harbor” and offering some reasons why helping Ukraine military is beneficial for the United States.

READ MORE: Watch: Mike Pence torches Kevin McCarthy's threat to end aid to Ukraine if Republicans retake the House

“In light of Kevin McCarthy’s remarks about discontinuing aid, it’s worth setting the record straight about the aid the Biden Administration has sent Ukraine so far,” Khatiri explains. “Americans today are not supplying weapons to a militia taking part in an anarchic civil war. We are materially supporting a democratically elected government that retains civilian control over its military, a professionalized fighting force that has spent decades training with NATO and American forces, including Ukrainian officers studying at American military academies.”

Khatiri views McCarthy’s remarks as an example of the MAGA movement’s isolationist tendencies.

“Given the bipartisan popularity of the Ukrainian cause — nearly three quarters of Americans agree that the United States should continue to materially support Ukraine in spite of (Russian President Vladimir) Putin’s nuclear threats, including two thirds of polled Republicans — why is Kevin McCarthy signaling his intention to reduce aid to Ukraine.?” Khatiri writes. “One explanation: conservative concern about spending. Another explanation: Republicans don’t give their own base enough credit for supporting Ukraine. Yet another explanation: a desire to please Donald Trump, who tends to oppose foreign aid and has, shall we say, a track record of being friendlier to Russia than to Ukraine. And finally, a more cynical explanation: a desire to turn Ukraine into a wedge issue that can help Republicans.”

Khatiri continues, “No matter the explanation, if Republican legislators are losing their nerve and moral clarity about Ukraine, it’s up to Joe Biden to work proactively to clarify what the critics have obscured and once again galvanize public enthusiasm for Ukrainian freedom. Kevin McCarthy and his conference may want to walk away from Ukraine; President Biden, whose leadership on Ukraine has so far been praiseworthy, must make this painful for McCarthy and his conference. It is way overdue for the president to address the nation and make the case for Ukraine. And the good news is that he can rely on the backing of Mitch McConnell, who to his credit, has not wavered in his support of Ukraine.”

READ MORE: Republicans’ 'substance-free' House agenda is motivated by a thirst for 'performative revenge': columnist

Another writer for The Bulwark, Never Trump conservative Charlie Sykes, is equally critical of McCarthy’s Ukraine comments in a column published on October 19. Sykes argues that as House speaker, McCarthy will — in order to appease far-right extremists like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia — pursue “crazy” policies such as abandoning Ukraine and threatening to default on the United States’ debt obligations.

“In signaling the possible abandonment of Ukraine,” Sykes writes, “McCarthy is echoing a common theme in right-wing media circles and among MAGA candidates like J.D. Vance, Blake Masters, et al. And the central dynamic of a McCarthy speakership will be his utter inability to defy the GOP’s new id…. Obviously, that applies not just to the investigations, impeachments, and assorted crazy stuff that the fever swamps will demand, but also, to the likelihood that McCarthy would trigger a debt crisis and cut off Ukraine. So, what we have here is McCarthy telegraphing two possible — and quite plausible — policy disasters.”

READ MORE: How Republicans could trigger a 'global financial catastrophe' if they retake Congress

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}
@2022 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.