'Ridiculous trash': Steve Scalise skewered for claiming 'there wasn't a conversation about banning airplanes' after 9/11

United States Representative Steve Scalise (R-Louisiana) said on Wednesday that he opposes new restrictions on firearms because airplanes were not banned in the wake of the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks.
"Airplanes were used that day as the weapon to kill thousands of people and to inflict terror on our country," the House Minority Whip told reporters at a press conference.
"There wasn't a conversation about banning airplanes," he said. "There was a conversation about connecting the dots. How can we figure out if there are signs we can see to stop the attack from happening? And some people might have thought that wasn't possible. And yet because Congress came together and focused on the root cause of the problem, thank God we have been able to stop other attacks on our homeland."
Watch below via The Recount:
\u201c"Airplanes were used [on 9/11] ... There wasn't a conversation about banning airplanes."\n\n\u2014 House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA)\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654702601
A few minutes earlier, Scalise suggested that school shootings have become more prevalent because of an absence of prayer.
\u201c"We had AR-15s in the 1960s. We didn't have those mass school shootings ... We actually had prayer in school during those days."\n\n\u2014 House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA)\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654701642
\u201cBoebert: When 9/11 happened, we didn\u2019t ban planes\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1653615024
Boebert shared her perspective less than two weeks after ten Black shoppers were murdered in a mass shooting in Buffalo, New York and only two days after 19 students and two teachers were slaughtered in a massacre at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. There have been more than 250 such attacks across the US so far in 2022, according to The New York Times.
But what both GOP lawmakers omitted in their remarks was that access to aircraft and airport terminals was significantly limited after 9/11 and that additional rules extended far beyond merely "securing the cockpits."
For example, all air traffic was grounded on 9/11 and in the days that followed. Yet that was just the start of a total restructuring of how Americans – and citizens from around the world – move about.
Exclusively ticketed passengers – to this day – are permitted past security checkpoints. Carryon items, particularly liquids purchased outside of the facility, can only be in containers of three ounces or less. Sharp implements like knives, scissors, and boxcutters, which were used to murder aircrews on 9/11, are prohibited. Travelers are subjected to body scanners, hand swipes to detect residue from explosives, and personal searches at the discretion of Transportation Security Authority agents. It is also common for plainclothes air marshals to be embedded on domestic and international flights. The federal government even created an entirely new Department of Homeland Security and enacted the still-controversial Patriot Act to prevent future terrorist strikes.
Guns and ammunition, meanwhile, are required to be packed in checked luggage and must be declared before the beginning of a trip. Other measures are listed on the TSA's website.
Thus, social media users were quick to rebut Scalise on four main points.
The first was his rewriting of history.
\u201c@Acyn There also wasn\u2019t zero reaction: Screenings dramatically increased. New safety measures put in place. Watch lists. Identification requirements. Scalise is making the argument for common-sense gun safety.\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
\u201c@1scrummymummy @Acyn Not actually true. We've started to take off our shoes after the shoe bomber a few months after 9/11. But, of course, we've created the TSA, getting the feds involved in airport security, after 9/11. We also beefed up the air marshall programme.\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
\u201c@Acyn Note \n\nWhen 9/11 happened \n\nEvery Airplane was ordered to be grounded \n\nSo yeah..you kind of did\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
\u201c@Acyn @SteveScaliseGOP Air travel was grounded for about two days after 911. Many public spaces across America temporarily closed as a result of 911. Air travel, and freedom to access airports PERMANENTLY changed after 911. Your analogy is flawed.\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
\u201c@Acyn But @SteveScaliseGOP we did immediately ban the real weapon that caused 9/11: boxcutters. And we banned tweezers too, just to be on the safe side. And nobody pushed back.\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
\u201c@Acyn This is obfuscation at it\u2019s worst. There\u2019s no comparison of the two. \n9/11 was a one-time event, how many mass shootings have there been? Nothing\u2019s been done to stop them. Scalia has been shot, for goodness sake. Is NRA money that important? #TruthMatters\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
\u201c@Acyn Air travel absolutely did not change whatsoever following 911.\n\nNow I have to run to the airport. My flight leaves in 12 hours.\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
\u201c@Acyn Someone should tell him how much airport security has changed since then in order to\u2026.wait for it\u2026..mitigate the chances of it happening again.\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
The second was Scalise's false equivalency between airplanes and guns.
\u201c@therecount What a smug, condescending ghoul.\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654701642
\u201c@Acyn Yeah, no one tried to ban airplanes after 9/11. Or knives after the London attack.\n\nAirplanes and knives are necessities.\n\nGuns are not.\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
\u201c@Acyn The correct answer to all these bullshit comparisons is this: we're not talking about that right now; we're talking about guns. We can discuss concerns you have about other issues after we fix the gun problem.\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
\u201c@therecount I'll be generous and ignore how inaccurate this comparison is\n\nBut I have to ask... What are you doing to "stop the next attack from happening?" \n\noh, and If 9/11 scale terror attacks were happening every week, people might think about banning planes.\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654702601
\u201c@Acyn 134 people in plane accidents last year worldwide. Guns however killed over 20,000 people in the US alone during the same time (excluding all self inflicted deaths). But sure, they\u2019re the same type of problem.\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
\u201c@Acyn One is a means of transportation that has implemented A LOT of security measures since 9/11.\n\nThe other is a machine MEANT to harm or kill.\n\nHow are they really going to try to REACH that far?\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
The third was the lack of meaningful action by Scalise and Boebert (both of whom have financial support and respective A/A+ ratings awarded by the Natioal Rifle Association) as well as the GOP to reduce the carnage wrought by guns falling into the wrong hands.
\u201c@therecount Airplanes serve an additional, nonlethal purpose.\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654702601
\u201c@therecount Wow. What a false argument and reason. Really? Airplanes are the same as machine guns? This is where true MAGA movement is making the unreal the real\u2026\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654702601
\u201c@therecount No, we just enacted the most egregious and overreaching violation of privacy and free will in the country\u2019s modern history AND started a 20 years war that would cost hundreds of thousands of lives and cost trillions\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654702601
\u201c@Acyn One is a means of transportation that has implemented A LOT of security measures since 9/11.\n\nThe other is a machine MEANT to harm or kill.\n\nHow are they really going to try to REACH that far?\u201d— Acyn (@Acyn) 1654701197
\u201c@therecount Ah yes because everyone in America can just walk into a Walmart and buy a Boeing 767 with no questions asked\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654702601
The fourth was Scalise's reversion to praying the gun violence away.
\u201c@therecount So far Republicans have blamed the shooting in Texas on the following instead of machine guns\n1. FBI\n2. CRT\n3. Woke mobs\n4. Doors that lock\n5. Doors that don\u2019t lock\n6. Too many doors\n7. Lockdowns\n8. Cops\n9. Not enough cops\n10. Video games\n11. Teachers \n12. Ukraine\n13. Not praying\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654701642
\u201c@therecount The audacity and balls it takes to lie to the American people day after day after day is nauseating. Prayers. Thoughts. Varmints. All the BS they spew daily because the @NRA has them in their back pocket is astounding. No shame. No honor. No compassion. Vote them all out.\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654701642
\u201c@therecount I almost admire \ud83e\udd2e Scalise\u2019s full commitment to being owned by the NRA and opposing sensible gun control even after being shot in a mass shooting.\n\nThat\u2019s some Mike Pence fealty to Tr*mp level commitment there.\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654701642
\u201c@therecount It\u2019s not that complicated:\n\nChildren are being murdered because our political system is being abused by people who can help stop it but won\u2019t\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654701642
\u201c@therecount They don\u2019t really care if they are telling the truth or not. Any BS argument in front of the camera is nothing but to keep the NRA happy so the money can keep flowing in to their pockets.\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654701642
\u201c@therecount @antipandemonium If you won't step up for a safer America, we'll replace you with someone who cares about our rights to life. Nothing is more important.\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654701642
\u201c@therecount Dylan Roof sat in a Bible Study class for an hour, literally had people praying for him, and he shot up the church\u2026 killing 9. \n\nSo hear me when I say, @SteveScalise, shut up.\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654701642
\u201c@therecount Lots of prayers in those churches and synagogues that got shot up. What a ridiculous, trash thing to say.\u201d— The Recount (@The Recount) 1654701642