Jim Jordan's office admits he sent Mark Meadows a plan to overturn the election from Biden

Jim Jordan's office admits he sent Mark Meadows a plan to overturn the election from Biden
Frontpage news and politics

This week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s select committee on the January 6 insurrection revealed that during that period, a “lawmaker” sent a text to then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows saying that then-Vice President Mike Pence shouldn’t honor electoral votes for Joe Biden if he thought they were “unconstitutional.” And that “lawmaker” was Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, his office confirmed to Politico.

In his text to Meadows, the far-right Jordan wrote, “On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all the electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all — in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence. ‘No legislative act,’ wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78, ‘contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.’”

Jordan continued, “The court in Hubbard v. Lowe reinforced this truth: ‘That an unconstitutional statute is not a law at all is a proposition no longer open to discussion.’ 226 F. 135, 137 (SDNY 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 U.S. 654 (1916).”

Jordan’s office, according to Politico’s Kyle Cheney, has “confirmed” that he sent that text to Meadows — who, the U.S. House of Representatives voted, should be held in contempt of Congress for failing to cooperate with the January 6 committee.

READ: Marjorie Taylor Greene demeans Mitch McConnell over his support for raising the debt ceiling

However, Jordan’s office is also claiming that Jordan was merely forwarding to Meadows a legal analysis by former Pentagon Inspector General Joseph Schmitz. Cheney tweeted:

In Politico, Cheney and his colleague Nicholas Wu wrote, “Jordan’s text does not make clear that it was a forward, and the committee has indicated that it would have questioned Meadows about the context of the text message had he appeared for a deposition…. Why did Jordan forward this analysis to Meadows? Was it something the former chief of staff solicited? Or did Jordan send it unprompted? Meadows’ attorney George Terwilliger did not immediately respond to a request for comment.”

READ: Joe Manchin lashes out with profanity at a reporter who asks about his position on Biden's agenda

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}
@2022 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.