US Supreme Court denies Alex Jones appeal to overturn sanctions for threats against Sandy Hook families' lawyer

US Supreme Court denies Alex Jones appeal to overturn sanctions for threats against Sandy Hook families' lawyer
Michael Zimmermann / Wikimedia Commons

Headshot of radio host Alex Jones in December 2017

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down InfoWars conspiracy theorist Alex Jones' attempt to appeal sanctions enforced by the Connecticut Supreme Court for his verbal threats toward a lawyer representing the parents of Sandy Hook victims' families.

According to The Guardian, Jones' appeal was in reference to sanctions he is facing as a result of the defamation lawsuit filed against him on behalf of Sandy Hook victims' family members. The latest rejection is yet another on a growing list of losses for Jones. The conspiracy theorist is currently facing unfavorable rulings in multiple jurisdictions that could ultimately lead to numerous legal liabilities.

Eight families of Sandy Hook victims, along with an FBI agent who was dispatched to the scene of the shooting, filed the lawsuit against Jones.

John Koskoff, the attorney representing the families, released a statement applauding the denial of Jones' appeal as he described the sanctions as "well-deserved."

"The families are eager to resume their case and to hold Mr. Jones and his financial network accountable for their actions," Koskoff wrote in a statement. "From the beginning, our goal has been to prevent future victims of mass shootings from being preyed on by opportunists."

However, Jones' legal counsel had a completely different reaction to the rejection. In a statement to Law & Crime, Norman A. Pattis, an attorney representing Jones, expressed disappointment over the Supreme Court's ruling.

"Judge Bellis, and the Connecticut Supreme Court, asserted frightening and standardless power over the extrajudicial statements of litigants," Pattis told the publication via email. "Mr. Jones never threatened anyone; had he done so, he would have been charged with a crime. We are inching our way case-by-case toward a toothless, politically correct, First Amendment."

Correction: This story has been updated to remove an incorrect reference to a victim of the shooting. We regret the error.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.