The favorite trick Trump could use in new case underscores how broken the US legal system is

trump
upload.wikimedia.org
Veterans rip Trump as a ‘traitor’ for his mask photo-op at Walter Reed Hospital

Former President Donald Trump has been hit with a lot of lawsuits over the years, but one of his favorite legal tricks has managed to help him come out unscathed more than once.

A new MSNBC News op-ed written by Jessica Levinson offers insight into how one of Trump's new legal cases could play out if he is able to turn to one of his most effective defenses.

On Friday, March 5, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) filed a lawsuit with a relatively different legal strategy compared to the approach House impeachment managers took when Trump was charged with inciting the insurrection on the U.S. Capitol.

Although Trump has already been acquitted for his alleged involvement in the deadly Capitol riots, the Democratic lawmaker opted to sue the former president and her personal attorney Rudy Giuliani for "conspiring with the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers to violate civil rights by blocking the counting of electoral college votes." Swalwell's suit also categorizes the alleged offenses as negligence.

But could this approach hold up in Trump? There is a possibility Swalwell could be headed in the right direction but Levinson also lays out Trump's possible defense.

She wrote:

Trump's main defenses here, probably similar to his likely defenses in the Thompson case, will likely be the freedom of speech under the First Amendment and that he is protected from liability because he took all of the actions alleged in the complaint while he was president.

It also highlights the broad spectrum of the First Amendment and how Trump's legal team could use it to his advantage.

The publication notes that the First Amendment typically provides a wide panorama of protection "to engage in speech, particularly political speech, and very certainly even impassioned and nasty speech. But that protection is not unlimited. And given the allegations contained in both complaints, it is difficult to see how the actions Trump engaged in could fall within his official duties and responsibilities as president."

While there is still no way to determine what the likely outcome will be, Levinson notes that there is a strong possibility Trump's legal team case ultimately end up shaping the case as a political argument as opposed to what it should be: a legal argument.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.