Ted Cruz blows up argument that impeaching Trump is unconstitutional

Ted Cruz blows up argument that impeaching Trump is unconstitutional

With former President Donald Trump's second impeachment trial now underway, many Senate Republicans are making the procedural argument that the trial is unconstitutional because Trump is no longer in office — that according to the U.S. Constitution, only a sitting president can face an impeachment trial. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, however, is saying that an impeachment trial for an ex-president is constitutional, but that such a trial isn't warranted in Trump's case. And the conservative National Review's John McCormack has responded that Cruz "reached (a) conclusion" before the trial even started.

In an op-ed for Fox News' website, Cruz wrote, "A former president can be impeached and tried — that is…. the Senate has jurisdiction to hold a trial. However, nothing in the text of the Constitution requires the Senate to choose to exercise jurisdiction. In these particular circumstances, I believe the Senate should decline to exercise jurisdiction — and so, I voted to dismiss this impeachment on jurisdictional grounds…. The present impeachment is an exercise of partisan retribution, not a legitimate exercise of constitutional authority." And during a Fox News appearance on Wednesday, February 10 — the second day of the trial — Cruz dismissed the trial as "political theater" and insisted that the House Democrats who impeached Trump for incitement to insurrection are "obsessed and consumed with hatred for President Trump."

This is the same Ted Cruz who, during the 2016 GOP presidential primary, repeatedly slammed Trump as morally bankrupt and stressed that he was unfit to serve as president — only to do a total flip-flop, not unlike Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina, and go from being a blistering Trump critic to being a devoted Trump sycophant. And when Trump made the debunked and bogus claim that the 2020 election was stolen from him because of widespread voter fraud, Cruz promoted that lie. The Texas senator joined Trump in opposing the certification of Joe Biden's Electoral College victory on January 6, the day a violent mob stormed the U.S. Capitol Building in the hope of preventing that certification.

McCormack, in his February 10 article for the National Review, wrote that Cruz "seems to have skipped to the conclusion of the impeachment trial…. Having reached that conclusion before the impeachment trial began, Cruz works backward to argue that the trial is unconstitutional."

On Tuesday, February 9 — the day the trial commenced — the U.S. Senate held a vote on whether or not it was constitutional for Trump to face an impeachment trial now that he is no longer president. All 50 Democrats in the U.S. Senate voted that yes, the trial is constitutional — and six Senate Republicans voted with them: Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska, Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania and Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana. But Cruz voted "nay," as did Graham and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

McCormack, discussing the Texas senator's vote and his Fox News op-ed, wrote, "Cruz seems to have a very esoteric interpretation of the question before the Senate yesterday."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.