Here's how Ted Cruz inadvertently handed Kamala Harris a massive amount of power

Here's how Ted Cruz inadvertently handed Kamala Harris a massive amount of power
Gage Skidmore.

With Democrats poised to win both Georgia Senate races, Vice President-elect Kamala Harris could become a crucial tie-breaking vote in an evenly divided Senate.

While this would ordinarily put Harris in a powerful position, Bloomberg News reporter Steven Dennis points out that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) in 2017 inadvertently gave Harris even more power with his bid to expand the use of budget reconciliation to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

"In 2017, Ted Cruz invented a way for 2021's Kamala Harris to do, well, an awful lot," Dennis writes. "And all it requires is 50 Senate votes and using the existing Senate rules and budget law."

The Bloomberg reporter then linked to one of his articles from four years ago that explained how Cruz's precedent-setting gambit to repeal Obamacare worked.

In particular, Cruz wanted to "lean on Vice President Mike Pence" in his role as the Senate president to bypass "procedural limits" that would have prevented the GOP from using budget reconciliation to enact a more comprehensive repeal of Obamacare.

"The move relies on a radical interpretation of the vice president's constitutional role as presiding officer of the Senate, where he could step in and effectively overrule the chamber's parliamentarian," the article notes. "It would resemble the so-called nuclear option of ending filibusters and risk fundamentally altering the way Congress works."

However, Dennis also writes that Cruz never got to put this plan into action because he never had 50 votes in the Senate for a full Obamacare repeal.

"The key to the Ted Cruz option is you need 50 votes and VP to go along," he writes. "He didn't have nearly 50 votes to take down all of the ACA, nor skinny repeal, and the Cruz option was effectively stillborn."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.