‘Is Trump trying to lose?’ Political scientist baffled by president's historic blunders

‘Is Trump trying to lose?’ Political scientist baffled by president's historic blunders
President Donald Trump departs the White House for Palm Beach, FL where he will be spending the Christmas holiday, Friday, December 22, 2017. Shutterstock/ Michael Candelori

President Donald Trump in just the last week has delivered a widely panned debate performance, gotten himself infected with the novel coronavirus, and has unilaterally cut off talks to provide economic relief to struggling Americans.

Daniel Drezner, a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, writes in the Washington Post that Trump's actions have been so damaging to his own election prospects that you'd be forgiven for thinking he's intentionally trying to lose.

"[One] hypothesis is that Trump does not want to win reelection," he writes. "Axios's Alayna Treene and Zachary Basu quoted one Trump campaign adviser saying: 'You have to try to be this politically inept. What is going on in the White House?'"

However, given Trump's deep-seated fear of humiliation, he doubts that the president would intentionally try to throw the election.

On the other hand, he does give more credence to the idea that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has already accepted that Trump will lose and is simply trying to make things as bad as possible for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden when he takes over in January.

"Any fiscal stimulus passed now will help the president the most in 2021," he writes. "If Trump and McConnell know that Biden will be the president then, they have less of an incentive to attempt to rescue the U.S. economy. Instead, polarization has left them with one overarching lesson: If they know they are on the way out, best to salt the earth."

Drezner concludes that he's "not completely convinced that this is the best explanation," but adds that "it says something that I cannot dismiss it out of hand, either."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.