Trump might bypass protocol in naming acting intelligence chief because current deputy isn't sufficiently loyal: report

Trump might bypass protocol in naming acting intelligence chief because current deputy isn't sufficiently loyal: report
Image via Wikimedia Commons.

President Donald Trump clearly went for a loyalist when he nominated Rep. John Ratcliffe of Texas to replace National Intelligence Director Dan Coats, who has announced his resignation. But first, Ratcliffe — whose devotion to Trump was painfully evident during his hostile questioning of former special counsel Robert Mueller during a congressional hearing on July 24 — must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. And CNN is reporting that Trump is bypassing traditional protocols while appointing an acting intel chief to hold the position while Ratcliffe awaits a Senate confirmation hearing.


Under a “normal” presidency with traditional protocols honored, Deputy Intelligence Director Sue Gordon would be a logical choice either as a temporary or permanent replacement for Coats. But according to two CNN sources, the problem Trump has with Gordon — even as a temporary intel chief — is that she would not be the type of unquestioning loyalist that Trump is seeking.

The Trump Administration, CNN reports, is “reviewing whether it can legally choose an acting director outside the line of succession.” But those two sources stressed to CNN that no final decision has been made.

North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr, the Republican who heads the Senate Intelligence Committee, told CNN he would be “shocked” if Gordon weren’t selected as acting intel chief. Gordon, Burr asserted, is “more than capable of handling that job.”

But Politico’s Natasha Bertrand is reporting that according to her sources, Gordon has been told that she will not be considered for the position — which Bertrand tweeted, “came as a surprise to” Gordon and “other intel professionals.”

Many Democrats have been lambasting Trump for nominating Ratcliffe, stressing that he is more interested in appointing a yes-man than having the best intel chief for the job. And bypassing Gordon, CNN reports, “could further the criticism” that Trump “is politicizing the intelligence community at the expense of long-serving career professionals.”

Maura Beard, a spokesperson for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, told CNN that ultimately, the decision on whether or not to appoint Gordon as acting intel chief is up to Trump — and that the decision is still up in the air.

#story_page_ below_article

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.