Hillary Clinton writes op-ed arguing Trump impeachment proceedings should follow the Watergate model

Hillary Clinton writes op-ed arguing Trump impeachment proceedings should follow the Watergate model
Gage Skidmore

In a new op-ed for the Washington Post, Hillary Clinton offered her advice for how Democrats should proceed in the light of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report.


Her take? Don't rush to impeachment — follow the Watergate model.

"Then, as now, there was an investigation that found evidence of corruption and a coverup," she wrote. "It was complemented by public hearings conducted by a Senate select committee, which insisted that executive privilege could not be used to shield criminal conduct and compelled White House aides to testify."

She pointed out that the public, televised hearings would be better at convincing the public that Trump needs to be impeached than the 448-page report could be.

She continued:

During Watergate, the House Judiciary Committee also began a formal impeachment inquiry that was led by John Doar, a widely respected former Justice Department official and hero of the civil rights struggle. He was determined to run a process that the public and history would judge as fair and thorough, no matter the outcome. If today’s House proceeds to an impeachment inquiry, I hope it will find someone as distinguished and principled as Doar to lead it.

But the former presidential candidate also noted that the potential obstruction of justice charges are not the only part of the Mueller report that demands attention. She called for a 9/11 Commission-style group to be appointed to address election interference, which would focus on the "ongoing threats to our nation"

And even as she recommends Democrats proceed methodically in their hearings and investigations, she said they also have to "stay focused on the sensible agenda that voters demanded in the midterms, from protecting health care to investing in infrastructure."

Somewhat cheekily, she acknowledges at the start of the piece that some won't care to hear her opinion. But aside from being the direct subject of Putin's attack in 2016, she noted that she dealt with him as secretary of state and experienced impeachment proceedings twice: first, while serving as a lawyer on the House Judiciary Committee during Watergate, and second, as the first lady when Bill Clinton was impeached. So she's more than qualified to make her voice heard.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.