Nancy Pelosi slams Trump official's defense of the shady decision to lift Russian sanctions

Nancy Pelosi slams Trump official's defense of the shady decision to lift Russian sanctions
Image credit: Gage Skidmore / U.S. Department of State

On Thursday, President Donald Trump's Treasury Secretary, Steve Mnuchin, testified in a classified meeting with the House.


And according to a furious House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), the whole thing was basically a farce that gave Congress none of the insight or answers that House Democrats were seeking:

The issue at hand in this hearing, one of the first undertaken with House Democrats' new investigative authorities, was why the Treasury Department decided to lift sanctions against three Russian businesses — energy companies EN+ and JSC EuroSibEnergo, and aluminum company Rusal — owned by oligarch Oleg Deripaska.

The New York Times reports that the Trump administration was oddly wary of implementing these sanctions in the first place:

The Treasury Department delayed the implementation of the sanctions several times amid an aggressive lobbying campaign by Mr. Deripaska's corporate empire. The administration ultimately decided to lift the sanctions in the waning days of the last Congress — timing seen as intended to reduce the likelihood that Congress might block the move.
But the decision has provoked backlash given Mr. Deripaska's close ties to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and the fact that Mr. Trump's campaign remains under investigation for possibly coordinating with Russian efforts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election. Mr. Deripaska had business dealings with Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump's former campaign chairman, who has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to an array of charges stemming from the special counsel's investigation.

The sanctions against Rusal in particular would have been damaging to Russian economic interests, as it is the world's second-largest aluminum producer and does a lot of business in the United States.

With Mnuchin's reported dodge at Thursday's hearing, Congress is left without answers as to why this key decision was reversed.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.