Here's Why People Are So Angry That Billionaire Steve Cohen Is Spending Millions to Help Veterans
At a House hearing last year on post-traumatic stress disorder, a private organization showed up with an ambitious plan to help suffering veterans. The Cohen Veterans Network was opening a chain of free mental health clinics across the country, backed by $275 million from hedge fund billionaire Steve Cohen.
By contrast to the high-profile scandals at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the Cohen Network claimed 96 percent client satisfaction. In a statement for the hearing, the organization said its clinics â€œprovide a desirable alternativeâ€ to the VA â€” a clear echo of President Donald Trumpâ€™s campaign promise to let veterans skip the VA for â€œa private service provider of their own choice.â€
But at that same moment, across the country, the Cohen Network was closing its clinic in Los Angeles less than a year after it opened. The Cohen Networkâ€™s leaders had alienated the staff there, former employees said, by telling them to prioritize healthier patients over homeless veterans. The shutdown was so hasty that former therapists said it left some patients in the lurch.
Privatization has become the defining controversy at the VA under the Trump administration. Conservative billionaires such as the Koch brothers and Ken Langone want veterans to increasingly see private doctors, while traditional veterans organizations want to maintain the government-run health system.
The Cohen Network has become a test case for both sides. It is either proof that the private sector can do the job better than the VA â€”Â or a template for diverting taxpayer dollars to unaccountable private groups.
Steven Cohen is perhaps an unlikely person to find himself in the crossfire of this debate. He is best known as the billionaire hedge fund titan whose investment returns were the envy of Wall Street, until prosecutors busted his firm for insider trading. (Cohen, 62, was not personally charged; he declined to be interviewed for this article.) Since then, Cohen has launched a new hedge fund and opened 10 clinics serving veterans across the country.
A thorough examination of the Cohen Networkâ€™s record â€”Â including internal documents, emails and dozens of interviews with current and former employees â€” reveals a different story from the one the Cohen Network tells about itself. The clinic at the University of Southern California was doomed by the Cohen Networkâ€™s mismanagement and insistence on a narrow focus that helped only a subset of veterans, former employees said. â€œThe model we ended up believing would really serve veterans was different than the model the Cohen Network was proposing all clinics operate under,â€ said Marv Southard, who served as CEO of the Cohen clinic at USC and is now chair of USCâ€™s doctor of social work program. The networkâ€™s original clinic, at New York University, got into a spat over who would own the patent rights from research that Cohen funded. And shortly after the hearing, Cohen mounted an aggressive lobbying campaign to get the government to subsidize the clinics.
The Cohen Network and Cohenâ€™s own spokesman insist theyâ€™re not trying to privatize the VA and their only goal is helping veterans. â€œNo single private person in this country has ever donated more money to save veteransâ€™ lives and treat their mental health needs than Steve Cohen has,â€ Cohenâ€™s spokesman, Mark Herr, said. The organization blames others for the problems in Los Angeles, New York and Washington.
The story of the Cohen Network illustrates what could lie in store for veterans as Trump pursues his campaign pledge to place their care in the hands of the private sector.
When the Cohen Network opened the LA clinic in mid-2016, it attracted talented therapists with what appeared to be a rare opportunity to treat veterans as if money were no object. â€œIt almost seemed too good to be true,â€ one of the clinicians said. â€œAnd, in fact, it was.â€
The disappointment started as soon as the staff showed up. The clinic turned out to consist of a hallway shared with the dermatology department inside a USC facility. There were only three therapy rooms for six therapists; they were supposed to take turns and then walk to a different office several blocks away.
The next problem was the software for the patientsâ€™ medical records. Many of these systems are clunky, but clinicians said this one was the worst theyâ€™d ever used. They would fill out a long form and click submit, only to find their session had timed out and they had to start over. Session notes mysteriously vanished. â€œIt was completely substandard compared to what we would have expected from this organization,â€ said Kathryn Arnett, the clinicâ€™s director.
The Cohen Networkâ€™s CEO, Anthony Hassan, shot down complaints about the software, so staff across the network convened secret conference calls to troubleshoot, according to former employees. In written responses to questions, Hassan said itâ€™s â€œabsurd and untrueâ€ that he lashed out at employees who spoke up about the software. He also denied it ever had problems, saying â€œthere was no bug in the system.â€
But a February 2017 internal review concluded otherwise: â€œThere are ongoing clinical data errors in the system,â€ Cohen Network officials wrote.
Because of these problems, some current and former employees doubt the Cohen Networkâ€™s claims about its results. The client satisfaction survey, for example, was completed by only 6 percent of exiting patients, according to an October 2016 email from the networkâ€™s chief operating officer. The Cohen Network said the response rate has since risen to 59 percent. Still, thatâ€™s lower than typical for published studies and it means the score might not represent all patientsâ€™ views, particularly since thereâ€™s evidence that happier patients are more likely to complete the survey. (â€œWeâ€™re confident in the integrity of our data,â€ Hassan said, but he declined to elaborate on how they inspect and validate the data.)
The Cohen Network wanted more patients and was displeased with low turnout: An internal review found that the LA clinic, in its first six months, saw just 116 clients, which cost the clinic $10,282 each. â€œThe average cost per client is very concerning, as is the low client count,â€ two executives wrote. Some of the clinicians had seen an emphasis on cost and volume at public agencies or cash-strapped nonprofits, but they struggled to understand such scrimping from the well-funded Cohen Network.
The Cohen Networkâ€™s focus on measurable outcomes influenced the care that the clinics would provide. Clinicians were supposed to use a set of six- to 15-week treatment programs that have been shown to help with PTSD, insomnia, depression and anxiety.
But patients often have multiple conditions that donâ€™t fit neatly into 12 weekly sessions. The Cohen Networkâ€™s limited scope led some other organizations that serve veterans to stop referring people there. â€œI didnâ€™t think their model invested enough in engagement and after-care and focused too much on short-term intervention,â€ said Southard, who led the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health for 17 years before becoming CEO of the Cohen clinic at USC. â€œThe biggest disjuncture between USCâ€™s vision and the Cohen networkâ€™s vision,â€ he said, â€œwas we were aiming at people with more serious issues and problems and we needed a model that would serve them.â€
The Cohen Networkâ€™s focus on measurable outcomes for PTSD led the LA clinic to shun some of the neediest patients. Because of the clinicâ€™s location in a gritty part of downtown Los Angeles, many veterans who walked in were homeless. Homeless patients were hard to follow up with, which could be a drag on the clinicâ€™s metrics. In an internal memo, Cohen officials chastised the staff for â€œtargeting inappropriate client populations (e.g., transient/homeless, chronically mentally ill).â€
Clinic staff were devastated. â€œAll of us came here believing we were going to help the people who need us the most, and they said no,â€ said Arnett, the USC clinicâ€™s director. â€œThey weeded out the most compromised veterans.â€ This is exactly what the VAâ€™s defenders have long warned would happen to veterans left to the private sector.
Hassan countered that the clinic simply wasnâ€™t equipped to treat people with chronic mental illness or who needed inpatient treatment for drug addictions. â€œOur network provides short-term outpatient psychotherapeutic care delivered through weekly or biweekly sessions,â€ he said. The Cohen Network, he added, is intended to fill in gaps in the existing system, not to replace it.
Steve Cohen arrived to tour the clinic in October 2016, with a New York Times photographer in tow. A spokesman said Cohen was â€œimpressed by the effort made by USC,â€ but people who were present recall it differently. Cohen didnâ€™t like how small the clinic was, they said. He didnâ€™t like that people needed to be buzzed in (a security measure). He didnâ€™t like the neighborhood. As Arnett recalled it, â€œHe said, â€˜Why canâ€™t we have this?â€™ and â€œWhy isnâ€™t it like that?â€™ He took a few pictures and stayed less than half an hour.â€
In response to Cohenâ€™s dissatisfaction, staff looked into moving the clinic to more affluent Pasadena, which would be more expensive and cater to a different kind of client.
In June 2017, Hassan emailed the staff to say the clinic was closing, with no explanation. The abrupt shutdown cut off some patients in the middle of treatment, according to three former clinicians and three other former employees. Clinicians said they had some patients who had just completed intake or opened up about a traumatic experience for the first time. The therapists had to tell them they couldnâ€™t continue. For his part, Hassan insisted that no patientâ€™s treatment was interrupted and that USC was supposed to tell the Cohen Network about any patients who needed their treatment to be extended.
The therapists tried to find referrals for all the patients to continue treatment elsewhere, but there wasnâ€™t always another provider available. The Cohen Network sent a list of resources, printed on expensive paper, but the therapists said it wasnâ€™t helpful. â€œIt looked like someone had Googled â€˜mental health Los Angelesâ€™ and picked the top three results,â€ a third former clinician said.
The Cohen Network initially said the clinic would reopen, but as the months went by it never did, and eventually Los Angeles disappeared from the map on its website. â€œWe just ghosted,â€ a former employee said. â€œWe just split town, and what about all of these patients? The really bad part is, nobody seemed to care.â€
Cohen got involved in veteransâ€™ health for the most personal of reasons: His son Robert joined the Marines and deployed to Afghanistan in 2010. It was â€œobviously, as a parent, a very scary thing,â€ Cohen has said. â€œNow, he came back, heâ€™s fine, but not every vet is.â€ For Cohen â€” whose interests until that point were limited to trading stocks, collecting art, spending time with his family and rooting for the New York Yankees â€” it was a life-changing experience, according to a person close to him. Cohen established his first veterans clinic at NYU in 2013.
That was the same year his hedge fund, SAC, pleaded guilty to insider trading. Prosecutors circled Cohen for almost a decade, nabbing eight of his lieutenants (although some of those convictions were later overturned). In one case, a trader got a sneak peek at discouraging clinical trial results affecting two pharmaceutical companies. Cohen had $700 million riding on those stocks. The trader called Cohen, who then liquidated his position and bet $260 million that the stocks would fall. When the results of the clinical trial became public, the trade netted SAC about $276 million, the biggest profit from insider trading ever.
The trader, Mathew Martoma, is serving a nine-year sentence, but he refused to testify against Cohen, so prosecutors could not prove whether or not he told Cohen anything about how he got his information. They indicted SAC as a company, but not Cohen personally. The Securities and Exchange Commission sought to ban Cohen from the hedge fund industry for life, but settled on a two-year hiatus. (This cat-and-mouse game loosely inspired the Showtime series â€œBillions.â€)
Cohen opened a firm called Point72, which was initially a family office that managed his own $11 billion fortune, and has since begun to manage money for outside investors. He printed a mission statement and list of core values â€” starting with â€œEthics & Integrityâ€ â€” on a big poster for the staff to sign. He hired a 55-person compliance team that now reads all of his emails and routinely restricts trades, according to Herr, Cohenâ€™s spokesman. â€œWe have the most aggressive compliance and surveillance department on Wall Street,â€ Herr said. â€œIt would be hard to have done more than we have.â€
The staff of the nonprofit Cohen Veterans Network, which was formally launched in 2016, works in the same building, outfitted like the traders in branded fleeces. â€œItâ€™s almost as if Iâ€™m one of the portfolio managers. Iâ€™m just not making money, Iâ€™m spending money,â€ Hassan once told a Bloomberg reporter. â€œWe very much feel part of the firm.â€
Cohen got started at NYU when Ken Langone, the name donor of the universityâ€™s hospital system, connected him with Charlie Marmar, the chair of the psychiatry department. Marmar, whoâ€™d spent 21 years at the San Francisco VA, had an idea not only for a mental health clinic but for research on the biological signs of PTSD. Cohen and Marmar discussed the vision over poached eggs and coffee at Cohenâ€™s Greenwich mansion, where Cohen dazzled Marmar with the Picassos on the walls and the Warhol in the bathroom, two of Marmarâ€™s colleagues recalled.
The mission, as one researcher involved in the project described it, was to find a â€œpregnancy test for PTSDâ€: a blood test or a brain scan that could be used to diagnose PTSD, rather than relying on self-reported symptoms. Better understanding the biology might also lead to more effective treatments.
Some experts were skeptical that a biological test could work for a complex and varied psychiatric condition like PTSD. The Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs had already sunk millions into pursuing PTSD biomarkers, with little to show for it. â€œWe mostly rolled our eyes and said good luck,â€ said Terence Keane, director of the National Center for PTSDâ€™s Behavioral Science Division at the Boston VA. â€œWhy would that be what Steve Cohen wanted to put his money into?â€
In Keaneâ€™s view, there were many more deserving research endeavors in need of funding. Still, a diagnostic test for PTSD, if one could be found, would have a clear market. Nearly a million veterans receive government checks based on a diagnosis of PTSD. So a functional test could decide how the VA distributes billions of dollars â€” and make a lot of money for whoever commercialized it.
Cohen launched a second nonprofit organization, called Cohen Veterans Bioscience, to lead the research. Its CEO, a former pharmaceutical executive named Magali Haas, sent researchers contracts asking them to sign over intellectual property rights, according to three people who reviewed the agreements.
That caused friction with NYU researchers and lawyers, who objected to what they viewed as the Cohen groupâ€™s revenue grab â€” or wanted the university to share in the possible windfall, according to a person present for conversations on this point. NYU declined to comment.
In recent years, foundations have shown increasing interest in possible commercial applications of research they support. Major philanthropies, such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and the MacArthur Foundation sometimes retain a license to use inventions theyâ€™ve funded, much as the federal government does, while working to ensure that the discoveries benefit the public. Others, like the BrightFocus Foundation, have pushed further, seeking royalties from discoveries they fund.
But itâ€™s rare, experts say, for foundations to seek total control over intellectual property developed by the academics whose work they fund. Universities typically object because they consider themselves more qualified to use the IP to advance research and benefit the public. And since foundation grants typically donâ€™t cover universitiesâ€™ full costs including overhead, they donâ€™t want to be in the position of subsidizing commercial research. â€œThere were cases where industry was using this as a ploy to get a lower rate on research costs and get ownership of technology in a sweetheart deal,â€ said Wes Blakeslee, the retired director of the Johns Hopkins University Technology Transfer Office.
The disagreement over intellectual property led Cohen to stop funding Marmarâ€™s research, according to two people involved in the project. Haas disputed that, saying in an interview that NYU didnâ€™t get more money because it mismanaged the original grant. She then followed up with an email, this time saying the study ended because NYU finished recruiting subjects.
Cohen Veterans Bioscience moved on from NYU, scooping up existing biological samples and datasets, and funding top researchers. But some scientists said they turned down Cohen out of discomfort with the IP arrangements. â€œThey have offended many people across the country,â€ said Keane of the National Center for PTSD. â€œThe undercurrent is theyâ€™re trying to get a silver bullet to make money, and thatâ€™s why a lot of groups are not collaborating with them.â€
Haas said Cohen Veterans Bioscience shares intellectual property rights with collaborators, but theyâ€™re still hammering out the details. â€œThe only thing weâ€™re interested in is trying to move the science forward,â€ she said. If the organization did have rights to an invention that it could license to a drug company to develop, she said, all the proceeds would fund future research.
Cohenâ€™s spokesman, Mark Herr, said Cohen wonâ€™t invest in anything that arises from Cohen Veterans Bioscienceâ€™s work. â€œWe maintain a church and state separation between the two, and that will not change in the future,â€ he said in a statement.
When Cohen started his collaboration with NYU, Langone and a fellow NYU trustee, former AIG CEO Maurice â€œHankâ€ Greenberg, told faculty members that the goal of the clinic was to create a private alternative to the VA, according to two people familiar with the discussions. â€œLangone and Greenberg were really into privatizing the VA, and the big motivation behind the Cohen clinic was to be proof of concept,â€ one of the people said. (Greenberg declined to comment. Langoneâ€™s spokeswoman referred questions to NYU, which declined to comment.)
Cohen wasnâ€™t present for those meetings, and his spokesman said he doesnâ€™t support privatizing the VA or envision the Cohen Network as a model for doing so.
Last year, Cohen set out to persuade Congress and the Trump administration to reimburse his clinics for veterans treated there. (Cohen contributed $1 million to Trumpâ€™s inauguration and another $1 million to the House Republicansâ€™ super PAC in April 2017.)
From the beginning, the Cohen clinics were advertised as free to patients, but the plan was always to start seeking reimbursement for their treatment. By their fourth year in operation, clinics are supposed to supply 25 percent of their own funding from insurance reimbursements, local philanthropy and government grants, according to information posted on the Cohen Networkâ€™s website. That figure rises to 50 percent by year six. In some cases, billing insurers also requires charging copays from patients.
Hassan said the clinics never turn away patients who canâ€™t pay. He called collecting reimbursements a common-sense way to extend the reach of Cohenâ€™s gift and make the clinics sustainable; like Haas, he said any revenues would be used to offset costs.
As part of his pursuit of government reimbursements, Cohen contacted fellow billionaire Ike Perlmutter, the enigmatic Marvel Entertainment chairman who has unofficially advised Trump on veterans policy. Cohen had a phone call with Perlmutter late last summer to sell him on the network, according to a person familiar with the call. Perlmutter questioned why Cohen would go to so much trouble to open brick-and-mortar clinics when other nonprofit organizations have leaner models, the person said. According to this person, Perlmutter warned then-VA secretary David Shulkin to be careful with Cohen. (Perlmutterâ€™s representative declined to comment, and Shulkin didnâ€™t answer requests for comment.)
Cohen also sought advice from a person who shaped President Trumpâ€™s position on the VA: Jeff Miller. As chairman of the House veterans committee, Miller had been a harsh critic of the VA and promoter of private alternatives. He was one of the first lawmakers to endorse Trump and became the candidateâ€™s point man on veterans issues. After Miller retired from Congress in January 2017 and joined a big law firm, his first lobbying client was Steve Cohen.
In September 2017, Cohen Veterans Bioscience flew researchers from around the country to a lavish summit in Washington, featuring a speech by Shulkin and a panel moderated by Miller. At a cocktail party at the National Portrait Gallery, Cohen lingered behind bouncers in a roped-off area, summoning people he wanted to talk to, an attendee recalls. A day after the summit, Cohen Veterans Bioscience held a briefing for congressional staff in the House veterans committee hearing room. Cohen Veterans Bioscience also joined a coalition with two pharmaceutical companies to lobby for access to VA datasets and biological samples.
Cohenâ€™s representatives repeatedly complained to government officials that his clinics couldnâ€™t get reimbursements from the VA. In one meeting, the leader of a veterans organization corrected Miller, pointing out that the Cohen Network could, in fact, enroll in a program for buying private-sector care (a program Miller had actually helped create). But that would require each patient to obtain advance approval from the VA. Miller made clear that the Cohen Network wanted to see the veteran first, then send the VA the bill.
Miller set out to change the law to let the clinics do exactly that. His team visited the office of every member of the House veterans committee and drafted a bill to let the VA pay for veterans who walk in to private mental health providers like the Cohen clinics. â€œHere is language to get you started,â€ they wrote in an email to congressional staff.
The lobbyists recruited a freshman lawmaker from each party, both former Marines, to sponsor their bill and tried to rush it through the House on a voice vote in time for Veterans Day.
But the bill raised objections from major veterans organizations. They generally oppose privatizing the VA because the health system remains popular with their members despite recent scandals. A few days later, the VA weighed in with more than a dozen concerns about the bill, including that it carved out a new private-care program conflicting with other laws on eligibility and funding.
Miller called a meeting with the major veterans groups to brief them on the bill. The veterans groups agreed among themselves to present a united front. Meanwhile, they pressured the Democratic cosponsor to drop out and waved other lawmakers off the bill. Miller caught wind of the counterattack, but by the time the veterans organizations showed up at his office overlooking the Capitol in late October 2017, the bill was dead.
Thwarted in Congress, Miller fared better with the Trump administration. He contacted senior VA officials in the hopes of forming a partnership with the Cohen Network. They signed an agreement in October 2017 that didnâ€™t offer much other than to share data that was already publicly available. The VA has scores of similar agreements with other organizations.
But soon after the agreement was in place, Cohenâ€™s representatives raised the issue of getting reimbursements for the clinics. That made VA officials feel tricked, according to a former agency official.
Veterans groups and some lawmakers were suspicious when they found out about the partnership. The Cohen Network â€œmust be transparent about its organization and compliance with federal law,â€ the top Democrats on the House and Senate veterans committees wrote in a March 5 letter to Shulkin demanding more information.
Nevertheless, the Cohen Network succeeded in getting approved to receive reimbursements from the VA. A Cohen Network official downplays the payments, saying theyâ€™ve amounted to $500 so far.
But after Millerâ€™s lobbying campaign, that does little to reassure defenders of the VAâ€™s healthcare system. â€œThe problem is thereâ€™s only so much government money in veteransâ€™ care,â€ another former VA official said. â€œIf you start trying to carve into that to feed things like the Cohen Veterans Network, thatâ€™s actually privatization. Itâ€™s going to be death by a thousand cuts.â€
The resistance to the Cohen clinics is vexing for Cohen, who believes heâ€™s trying to make a positive impact. â€œSteve Cohen is helping repay the debt we owe our veterans,â€ said his spokesman, Herr, â€œand it is shameful that anyone doubts or impugns his generosity.â€
Cohen is undeterred. The network just opened its 10th clinic and plans to have 25 by 2020. Cohen believes the network is succeeding, Herr said, and is considering expanding his support beyond the $275 million heâ€™s already committed.
ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for their newsletter.