Rachel Maddow Thoroughly Dismantles Jeff Sessions' Embarrassing Senate Hearing Testimony

Since FBI director James Comey's firing on May 9, the White House has offered several bizarre explanations for the shocking move. 

"One of their explanations for why FBI director James Comey had to be fired was that... everybody knows FBI is in turmoil, FBI agents, the rank-and-file hated him, he had to go," Rachel Maddow reiterated, hours after Attorney General Jeff Sessions' Senate testimony on Tuesday.

"You know... that is a claim that can be checked... with the current head of the FBI," she continued. "Turns out that claim is not true." 

According to the FBI's acting director Andrew McCabe, President Trump's claim of a Bureau "in turmoil" under Comey was entirely inaccurate. 

"I worked very, very closely with director Comey from the moment he started at the FBI; I was his executive assistant director of national security," McCabe said in his testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee on May 11. 

"I can tell you that I hold director Comey in the absolute highest regard," McCabe added. "And it has been the greatest privilege and honor of my professional life to work with him." 

The two-decade FBI veteran also noted Comey "enjoyed broad support within the FBI and still does to this day." 

However, over a month later, Sessions attempted to resuscitate the debunked claim in his Senate testimony Tuesday. 

"You'd worked with director Comey for some time, did you ever have a conversation as a superior with his failure to perform or some of these accusations that he wasn't running the FBI in a good way, or that somehow the FBI was is in turmoil [before his termination]?" Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) asked Sessions, citing the AG's recommendation to President Trump. 

"I did not," Sessions told him.

"Oh, so only once before in the history of this country have we ever fired an FBI director... this one you say we had to fire him because he was so terrible running the FBI... you're his boss, did you ever speak to him about that?" Maddow asked. "No, never, not once." 


Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.