Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

Defenders Mobilize to Assist Teen Who Aborted

By Juliette Terzieff, Women's eNews. Posted February 19, 2007.


Legal advocates are closely watching the case of a Dominican teen in Massachusetts who faces possible homicide charges for performing a do-it-yourself abortion.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Legal advocates are closely watching the case of a Dominican teen in Massachusetts who faces possible homicide charges for performing a do-it-yourself abortion. Latina representatives say the case dramatizes health care disparities.

Legal and reproductive rights advocates are rushing to the defense of an 18-year-old Dominican immigrant living in Lawrence, Mass., who faces possible murder charges for undertaking a do-it-yourself abortion.

Local lawyers with the American Civil Liberties Union are monitoring the case and have spoken with the family about available services and support.

Susan Yanow, longtime Massachusetts reproductive rights activist and founder of the Cambridge-based Abortion Access Project, has helped the young woman, Amber Abreu, identify medical and legal experts to support her public defender.

"This is a travesty on every level," says Yanow. "When we don't provide access, people are left to make decisions as best they can, which may not be congruent with best health practices."

As of now, the teen faces the charge of procuring an illegal miscarriage -- which carries a maximum sentence of seven years -- based on a relatively obscure 1840s statute. Possible homicide charges mean the teen could face an even higher maximum sentence of life in prison if she is found to have acted with malice aforethought or premeditation. The teen's legal status hinges on the outcome of an autopsy that will determine the length of her pregnancy.

Prosecutors state that Abreu was between 23 and 25 weeks pregnant. Abortion is legal in Massachusetts up to the 24th week, nevertheless, the teen is charged with procuring a miscarriage. If in fact the autopsy indicates she was 24 weeks or more pregnant, prosecutors could decide to bring homicide charges.

Abreu will be back in court Feb. 25 for a pretrial hearing.

Yanow from the state's abortion access project argues that the "procuring the illegal miscarriage" charge is a legal anomaly. "No other medical procedure, aside from assisted suicide, carries criminal charges," she said.

Defense attorneys could challenge any charges against Abreu in a number of ways, says ACLU Massachusetts spokesperson Sarah Wunsch.

Most basic, however, is the argument that Abreu did not understand she was committing a crime and legal due process requires fair notice from the government of what constitutes a criminal act.

"She is a young, scared, poor immigrant who couldn't possibly be reasonably expected to understand the intricacies of the legal system," Wunsch says. "We hope the prosecutor will rethink levying charges and decide against prosecuting her because one possible effect of this case could see women driven away from the public health system out of fear, and that is not beneficial to women or babies."

First Court Appearance in January

Abreu made an initial court appearance on Jan. 24 in the Lawrence District Court on charges of unlawfully procuring a miscarriage that resulted in the death of her premature baby. She had previously admitted to taking three pills of Cytotec, the brand name for misoprostol, an anti-ulcer medicine known to induce abortion.

Abreu gave birth to a 1 and 1/4 pound baby girl named Ashley on Jan. 6 in the Lawrence General Hospital emergency room, two days after taking the medication. She left the hospital almost immediately afterward against the advice of doctors.

The infant was rushed to Tufts-New England Medical Center in Boston where she clung to life for four days before dying on Jan 10. Doctors discovered traces of Cytotec in the baby's urine.

Under police questioning, Abreu -- who speaks some English and has lived in the United States for 18 months -- said the baby's father had abandoned her and she was afraid of burdening her immigrant mother with the unwanted pregnancy.

Abreu is described by family and friends in press reports as a well-behaved, studious teen.

Drug Bought in Dominican Republic

Saying she was unaware of the potential legal implications of her actions or other options for health care services, Abreu told police that she turned to Cytotec, procured by a friend in her native Dominican Republic, where the drug is sold over-the-counter for about $1. In the United States the drug is only available by prescription, but it is not illegal to import it or possess it.

A 2000 study by the New York-based National Latina Institute of Reproductive Health of Dominican immigrants found 37 percent of subjects were familiar with the Cytotec technique.

Abortion is illegal in the Dominican Republic under all circumstances.

Most Latin American countries have extremely rigid rules governing abortions. Often they are only legal in cases of rape, incest, or cases where the mother's life is endangered. In some countries, such as Chile and El Salvador, they are illegal under all circumstances. Colombia liberalized its abortion law in May 2006 by allowing exceptions, including to save the health of the woman.

Authorities prosecute hundreds of women for illegal abortions and an estimated 5,000 women die every year as a result of clandestine abortions, according to the International Planned Parenthood Federation.

In only one other case has a woman's use of Cytotec for an induced abortion in the United States resulted in a criminal prosecution. A South Carolina court sentenced Mexican immigrant Gabriela Flores to four months in prison in 2002 for taking the drug during the 16th week of her pregnancy and miscarrying.

Case Casts Shadow on Latinas

The Abreu case casts a long shadow over other female immigrants from Latin America, says Aishia Glasford, a policy analyst for the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health.

"Here you've got a sizable group facing linguistic and cultural barriers in how reproductive health is dealt with," says Glasford. "In most Latin American countries sex education is not given in the home or in public arenas like schools."

Even for Latinas who speak English the health care system is often difficult to navigate. High costs are one barrier. In 2002, 32 percent of Latinos were without health insurance, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, compared to 20 percent of blacks and 14 percent of whites.

Advocates for Latina health say the Abreu case dramatizes the need for better, more accessible health services.

Screenings for breast and cervical cancer, treatments for sexually transmitted diseases and access to contraception are among their priorities. Bilingual counselors are also high on their list.

Breast cancer is the No. 1 cause of cancer deaths among the Latina population; only 38 percent of Hispanic women age 40 and older have regular screening mammograms. Hispanics suffer the highest invasive cervical cancer incidence rates (16.2 per 100,000) of any group other than Vietnamese, and twice the incidence rates of non-Hispanic white women, the American Cancer Institute reports. Also, incidences of cervical cancers are twice as high for Latinas than non-Latina white women and Latinas tend to be diagnosed later than other women.

"We need a culturally and linguistically competent way to address the issue and help jump start meaningful dialogue within immigrant communities," says Glasford.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: abortion, immigrants, aclu, massachusetts, illegal abortion

Juliette Terzieff is a freelance journalist currently based in Buffalo, New York who has worked for the San Francisco Chronicle, Newsweek, CNN International, and the London Sunday Times during time spent in the Balkans, the Middle East, and South Asia.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Right to life
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Feb 19, 2007 3:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So let me get this straight: The mother and the foetus couldn't get health care, but now that it's dead, they want to ruin the mother's life in order to protect the foetus' right to life?

I think our legal system is rather like the Roman Colosseum. It's less about justice and more about the entertainment value of feeding some poor sap to the lions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's see
Posted by: karyse on Feb 19, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if I get the larger message here, sent by the "powers that be" through their mouthpiece, the media, it would be "If you are poor, alien, or both, don't go to a medical facility, even if you may be about to die, because we'll find a way to punish you for it." The young women clearly made a few mistakes, she registered in the hospital in her own name, went to a local hospital instead of one in another state, and didn't pretend she was devastated at the "loss."

The thing that is missing in this article is WHO in the hospital found it necessary to call the authorities and WHY. Personally, I am interested in these things. We need to stop thinking that these things just happen without human agency and start pointing fingers. The prosecutor has a name. The arresting officers have names. The doctor has a name.

Also, there is no mention of the ramifications for would be mothers who experience a miscarriage due to, say, drinking coffee, or playing a strenuous game of tennis.

The least surprising thing about this is that it occured in Massechuesettes. Do you know how many innocent people that state prosecuted and convicted?

Bah! It's time to get out of Dodge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let's see Posted by: LMNOP
The greatest lie ever told.
Posted by: LMNOP on Feb 19, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America calls itself the greatest and freest country in the world, but it's getting to be like Iran around here, even in a relatively liberal enclave like Massachusetts. Remember, it wasn't all that long ago that they were burning Goody Proctor at the stake in Massachusetts for similar holy reasons.

The born-agains are demonstrating once again how unsafe it is to live among them. America alone among Western nations seems to suffer from this degree of infestation of the commonwealth with religiosity and its attendant hatred, misogyny and irrationality masquerading as love and charity.

Religion is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on mankind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The greatest lie ever told. Posted by: blitzmesser
The father?
Posted by: SayBlade on Feb 19, 2007 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Under police questioning, Abreu -- who speaks some English and has lived in the United States for 18 months -- said the baby's father had abandoned her and she was afraid of burdening her immigrant mother with the unwanted pregnancy."

If they are so diligent about nailing the woman for aborting the feotus, why are they not equally diligent about tracking down and nailing the father for criminal responsibility in creating the feotus and abandoning it and exposing it to the possibility of abortion?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The father? Posted by: makeadifference
» RE: The father? Posted by: SayBlade
RE: What a Bunch of Sick Bitches!!!!!
Posted by: cmaciain on Feb 19, 2007 9:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're crazy to blame feminists for this. What this girl do is perfectly reasonable considering her choices. And where is the man in all this? It takes two to make a basby. If she faces charges, so should he for abandonment and accessory. A fetus is not the same as a human being. She was desperate. maybe if we offered birth control, education, and health care, this problem wouldn't have happened.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who's the real sicko?
Posted by: makeadifference on Feb 19, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay faultroy...I hope you are a wealthy elite, who can stand in front of the abortion clinics and sign contracts with the women who are pregnant and committ to supporting, educating, providing health care, food, clothing and shelter and day care for all the unwanted fetuses. Untill you PRO-Lifers stop all the killing in unjust wars, stop capital punishment and provide fair trials, and begin to care for the living, those already born, you had better shut up about abortion rights!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: What a Bunch of Sick Bitches!!!!!
Posted by: morticia on Feb 19, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheer up, faultroy. The baby was a girl. Chances are she'd have grown up to be a damned peanut-brained bra-burning low-life feminist bitch!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» P.S. to latecomers.... Posted by: morticia
Better get used to stuff like this
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver on Feb 19, 2007 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ultra-right wing hasn't gone away just because they are currently outnumbered by a small handful of Democrats in either House, and the fundamentalist fanatics in society are still pushing their anti-human rights agendas. There is still every chance that incidents like this one will become a common occurance in the U.S.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Justice tempered with mercy!
Posted by: ccluelessfl60 on Feb 19, 2007 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Justice tempered with mercy. If was a concept in the past. Was the girl wrong to abort her fetus, yes .What led her to do it. Not an issue. She is guilty so she must pay. Even if the truth of the matter is that some prosecutor wants to make a name for himself, so she is fair game. Do not give her aid and or comfort. She made too many mistakes. Put her in prison where she can learn the consequences of her mistakes.That is jurisprudence of today. Get justice and forget the mercy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Problem of the Latino community
Posted by: erichoffer on Feb 19, 2007 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So let me get this straight. This woman became pregnant with a boyfriend who left her and then decided she didn't want to take care of it herself so she aborted it with a drug that 37% of the Latino community is aware of. The baby lives for four days. The doctors find Cytotec in the baby urine and a case is made for murder.

So where was her mother? Where was her friend who gave her the drugs? Where were other friends at the time? I'll tell you where, right by her side. She had plenty of counsel about this. This article wants to imply that at no time did anyone around her say, hey theres adoption or we'll help you out. There was no instance when she could have gone to a Spanish speaking web site on the subject? No church, no Latino center? Come on. She is to blame. It was a premeditated action. Some post that the boyfriend should be held responsible as well. In that case so should everyone who knew she was pregnant. That's silly. If anyone else is responsible besides her it would be those who knew of her intended actions and helped her follow through with it. This is a problem for the Latino community to deal with and she should be made an example of so others will know the consequences. If an immigrant committed a hit and run accident that killed a person could they claim innocence because they didn't know the law? If a couple broke up and the man killed his ex the next day could he claim it was her fault because of the emotional or financial stress? According to many of the posts they could. Also there is something mildly racist about assuming that this woman and her support group couldn't understand what they were doing. That really it's the governments responsibility for not putting a sign on every corner in Spanish stating her choices. If these people can hold down jobs, pay bills, and carry on complex social networks they can think through these choices as well. And they did think through their her choices. Her decision was infanticide.

Now she doesn't want to go to prison so she has accepted the help of a socio-political movement. She's willing to say to the world that she is a victim of the patriarchy just so she can escape hard time. She's willing to say she and everyone involved in the decision were too dumb to figure it out. Sounds to me like her first decision is just as selfish as her second. I could be wrong but I don't believe the Latino community is that stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

She knows ALL about legal abortion and health care
Posted by: fibrowitch on Feb 19, 2007 5:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, local Boston person here. The article misses a few things about this woman. When she was first interviewed she told the interviewer she had an abortion in 2006, and did not want her mother to know she was pregnant again, and by a different man so quickly.

We have free health care in Mass. She knew that also. And as far as her being a 'good student' She is not being reported as a student in the local news. The local health care system, especally the free care system is designed for people who need assistance. There are medical outreach workers at every emergency room and health clinic in the state.

She could have gotten lots of help, she understood the system, she made a choice, now she has to live with it. And learn to use birth control.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

question whether abortion is murder
Posted by: luzmejor on Feb 22, 2007 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question is not when but if. Clearly abortion is not and never has been murder. It doesn't matter what all those special pleaders say. There are absolutely no humans on earth who believe that abortion is murder. The whole idea is a monstrously sick joke.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Abortion can be murder
Posted by: erichoffer on Feb 23, 2007 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a reason abortions are illegal by the third trimester. A premature baby can survive after six months (24 weeks). Recently a show on National Public Radio highlighted this fact and even interviewed people who were born this premature.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You people are idiots!!!
Posted by: EagleMB on Feb 23, 2007 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The alternet community seems so rapped up in arguing, that you ignore both long standing precident, as well as simple logic. Let's look at a few argumenst being made.

1) Most basic, however, is the argument that Abreu did not understand she was committing a crime and legal due process requires fair notice from the government of what constitutes a criminal act.

This was obviously a legal conclusion by a layperson attempting to interpret the constitution. Ignorance of the law is never a defense. It is presumed that if a law has been enacted (by a legislature or by judicial action), the people have been informed of that law. It is true that if a law is written in such a fashion that it is truly unclear as to what it means, then it may be used as a defense. In this case, the 24 week requirement is clearly established. It does not matter that she did not know the law, or even that she is new to the country and may not speak english.

2) When does human life begin?

If a woman is pregnant with my child, and I punch her in the stomach causing a miscarriage, did I commit murder? Historically, the answer is no. Every state in the union had laws that stated a child must be born alive, and then die, to constitute a homicide. This, of course, has been changed in every state. The reason was because medical science has advanced to the point that it was reasonably certain that an unborn child of a certain age could survive if delivered early. In California, a hospital is legally obligated to attempt to save a fetus at 24 weeks or more (even if the mother objects) because the child is capable of surviving without the mother. Therefore, there is no doubt that a 24 week fetus is a person, and thus has the same rights as any other American.

Certainly there is much debate about when an unborn fetus becomes an individual person, and most people decide based on there personal religious or cultural beliefs. But that is not what this case is about.

Let me illustrate with a hypthetical. Imagine that you are a conjoined twin. Your twins body is almost completely normal with all required organs. Your body has most major organs, but relies on some of your twins organs for some basic human functions. Doctors can seperate the two of you, but due to your missing organs, there is 95% chance that you won't survive, but a 100% chance that your twin will survive. You, of course, refuse to to have the operation because you will probably die. Your twin says do the surgery. What should the doctor do?

Well, a pro-choicer would say that the decision is up to your twin. Sure, you have most major organs, but your are dependent on some of your twins organs (just as a fetus is reliant on the mothers organs, albeit temporarily). A pro-lifer recognizes that you are a person, and gives you rights like every other American.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement