SmartNews

DC insiders torch Trump official's new scandal as 'how to lose a presidential election'

A top official for President Donald Trump has found himself embroiled in an embarrassing new scandal about their abuse of tax-funded privileges, with the D.C. insiders at Pod Save America exposing how the situation is the perfect example of "how to lose a presidential election."

Last week, MS NOW reported that Secret Service members were becoming "fed up" with the trips demanded of them by Vice President JD Vance, which some agents considered "inappropriate" and an "unprecedented use of government resources." This growing issue was typified by a recent request to use Marine Two, the vice president's military helicopter, as a means to take his son to a golf lesson in Washington, D.C.

"But the Secret Service staff’s complaints about a planned chopper ride for an elementary school student reflects a building morale problem inside the team of agents assigned to shield Vance and his young family, according to the two people and another person familiar with the agents’ frustration," the report detailed, later adding, "The agents pulled in to protect Vance and his family have also become 'fed up' with the last-minute travel demands that Vance and his wife, second lady Usha Vance, frequently place on the security team, according to the two people and an additional source with knowledge of their travel who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals."

Reacting to this news in their latest episode, the former Obama administration officials at Pod Save America lambasted Vance for his flagrant abuse of his taxpayer-funded perks, suggesting that such wasteful indulgences could spell trouble for his 2028 prospects. Co-host Dan Pfeiffer, the former senior strategy and communications adviser for Barack Obama, said that the situation reminded him of another screw-up he heard about earlier in his career, which a colleague summed up as an "A-plus answer to the policy 101 question of how to lose a presidential election."

"This is that," Pfeiffer said.

He also added: "You were getting taxpayer-funded helicopter rides for your son's golf lessons? Not even, like, baseball game, boy scouts, charity work, it's f——king golf lessons?"

"Boy, are we a long way away from Hillbilly Elegy," co-host Jon Favreau responded.

Psychologist exposes Trump's signs of 'sundowning' in big new speech

President Donald Trump's big primetime speech last week was littered with mental "glitches" and "challenges" for him, according to one forensic psychologist, with the relatively short speech showing signs of "legitimate neurological changes" even compared to a year ago, suggesting that he could be showing signs of "sundowning."

On Thursday evening, Trump gave a primetime speech largely dedicated to his long-debunked claims about widespread voter fraud, featuring new claims about recently uncovered documents that he argued would prove that his loss in the 2020 election was illegitimate. Instead, efforts to dissect the actual materials showed no real proof of anything he claimed, while his meager energy and incoherence during the speech reignited the concerns about his fading mental and physical health.

Dr. John Pail Garrison is a licensed clinical and forensic psychologist who also moonlights as a content creator, often sharing professional medical insights into Trump's signs of decline and struggle in public appearances and speeches. In a video digging into the Thursday speech, Garrison said that it was evident from his verbal difficulties and lack of energy that Trump had undergone considerable changes, suggesting that it was unlikely that he would have struggled in this way even just one year ago.

Early on in the video, Garrison already noted that Trump showed signs of agitation and frustration, including his frequent habit of bearing or gritting his teeth while speaking. He also noted that the president appeared much less energized and animated than usual, with a lack of his typical hand gestures and a slumped-over posture.

He singled out an instance where Trump jerked his elbow up while saying the word "evidence," suggesting that it "looked involuntary" and arguing that he has been showing more and more involuntary movements lately when experiencing strong emotions. Later on, he appeared to tense his shoulders during certain remarks, showing a level of anxiety that is uncommon for him, a development Garrison called "concerning."

Trump appeared to struggle to find the words he wanted to say, Garrison added, noting his atypical use of filler words such as "like" while going off of his prepared remarks, as he is known to do. This would suggest that he is starting to struggle with the improvisational aspects of his public speaking habits.

As the speech wore on later into the evening, Trump also appeared to have difficulty with pronouncing certain words, even some relatively simple ones like "alarm" and "disclose."

"It's not just one word here and there," Garrison said. "He's doing this a lot."

He added later: "So, what is it that we are possibly seeing? Now, there is always the possibility that we are seeing something like sundowning... For people with neurological conditions like dementia, late afternoon, early evening into the night, people with these issues can become more confused, more agitated. They can be more anxious, there's more emotional distress. Speaking becomes more difficult, there are more word-finding issues... What we're seeing [from Trump] is so dramatically different than just exhaustion that I don't think that adequately explains all the behaviors we're seeing."

Trump biographer exposes real scheme behind new Pentagon stunt

The bizarre recent announcement from President Donald Trump's defense chief is actually part of a long-term scheme, with his one-time biographer revealing the 2028 ambitions behind it.

Last week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth prompted confusion and mockery when he announced that, going forward, all military officers over the age of 30 would be subject to mandatory tests for testosterone deficiency and given hormone replacement therapy if their results are lacking. The move comes amid the Pentagon chief's longstanding insistence that the armed forces are suffering from a lack of masculine energy.

That might not be all there is behind the announcement, however. Michael Wolff — a veteran reporter and author best known for his insider coverage of Trump's political machine — claimed in the latest episode of his Daily Beast podcast, "Inside Trump's Head," that Hegseth is using this announcement to lay the foundation for his own 2028 presidential run.

"I think, actually, the Heggers is running for president,” Wolff said. “There’s sort of a fundamental political strategy or view in the MAGAsphere, or in the Trump... world, which is that culture is politics. And it is always better to hit the cultural note rather than the political or the policy note."

He added: "So he is speaking with this directly to the ‘Trump bro’ base, because if he wants to run for president, that’s where he has to begin. He has to... appeal in some kind of identity, charismatic fashion to those kinds of people."

Wolff explained further that, in order to reach voters within the so-called "manosphere," one has to abandon "traditional politics" and begin viewing public statements and legislative pushes as "cultural markers." This, he argued, is precisely what Hegseth's latest move is all about.

“I mean, how are people gonna respond? I mean... certainly... he is the bottom of the pack of the obvious list that you might make at this point,” Wolff said. “But if this begins to catch on, then... he’s got himself a race.”

Wolff has asserted in the past that Hegseth is among those in Trump's orbit positioning themselves as potential 2028 successors, even though he has not generated significant media coverage for his ambitions, like Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. In a podcast from April, he suggested that the defense chief's chances largely hinge on those two names flaming out of the 2028 race.

"Is Pete Hegseth somehow, because he’s a performer, because he seems shameless, because he’s pro-military in some comical way, does this make him someone who can be a number two or three, and then number one and two fall, and he rises?" Wolff said. "Unlikely, but not impossible."

Trump ally accused of leaking insider info in betting market scheme: report

One of President Donald Trump's MAGA allies in Congress now finds herself embroiled in a betting market corruption scandal, with a new Wall Street Journal report alleging that she leaked insider information to a top influencer looking to bet on prediction markets.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida Republican, was among the names included in a new report from the Journal, detailing how prediction market betting has emerged as "the new Washington temptation." Trump's White House, in particular, has come under intense fire for allegations that administration members have been using undisclosed information about impending Trump decisions or speeches to make winning bets on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. Most recently, Trump's top teleprompter operator was suspended for placing bets on things that Trump would say in speeches, something he had both direct access to and control over.

Luna, meanwhile, was accused by the outlet's sources of bragging about tipping off a prominent MAGA influencer about Trump's running mate pick during the 2024 presidential campaign.

"Over lunch at the Stovall House, a popular members-only social club in Tampa, U.S. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida told associates in the summer of 2024 that she knew Trump would choose Vance to be his vice president, according to a person familiar with the conversation. She said she had tipped off Rogan O’Handley, a popular MAGA influencer known as 'DC Draino,' about Trump’s pending decision so that he could use the information to place a winning bet on Polymarket, the person said. The congresswoman teased O’Handley, the person said, for not placing a bigger wager."

The report added: "O’Handley separately told associates that he was behind a long-shot attempt, mostly via social media, to get Trump to consider Luna as his running mate, according to a second person who heard O’Handley discuss the matter. When the congresswoman told O’Handley that Vance would get the nod instead, he placed a winning bet on Polymarket, the person said."

When asked about the allegation, Luna dismissed it and insisted that she would "continue to champion the fight against insider trading."

"I am honored the WSJ thinks I am telepathic but unfortunately I am not," Luna told the Journal in a statement.

O'Handley also forcefully denied the allegations, telling the outlet, "Any suggestion that I traded on confidential information or discussed doing so is inaccurate."

Trump’s latest endorsement busted for humiliating oversight

President Donald Trump's latest big endorsement has raised more than a few eyebrows, and now the situation has worsened after the candidate was caught making an embarrassing oversight, per The Daily Beast.

Last week, Trump officially endorsed Mike Lindell in the Minnesota gubernatorial race, potentially clearing the way for him to secure the GOP's nomination. Best known as the founder of the MyPillow company, Lindell has emerged as one of Trump's closest and most outspoken political allies over the last several years, particularly for his relentless championing of his debunked election fraud conspiracies. This commitment has made him the subject of mockery for his repeated claims about finding proof of fraud in the 2020 election.

The ridicule that follows him made him an alarming candidate for the GOP to deal with in the 2026 midterms in terms of viability. If he successfully wins the nomination, current polling indicates that he will most likely face Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar in November.

For the time being, however, it remains an open question whether or not Lindell will even be able to vote for himself, with The Minnesota Star Tribune confirming a glaring oversight in his personal voter registration. Despite being a native of the state, Lindell is not currently registered to vote there, with his only active registration being in Texas.

"Before he can vote for himself in next month’s primary, Mike Lindell needs to register to vote in the state he wants to lead as governor," the Tribune reported. "The Minnesota Secretary of State’s office said Lindell, President Donald Trump’s preferred candidate, 'does not have an active record,' said Cassondra Knudson, spokesperson for the Minnesota Secretary of State, when asked if Lindell is a registered voter."

It added: "A Minnesota Star Tribune review of voter records shows Lindell has an active voter registration in Texas. Lindell acknowledged last year he had been living in Texas and that he’d have to re-establish residency in Minnesota to run for governor, something he says he has now done. But Lindell has not signed up to cast a ballot for himself since his return to Minnesota, and Texas lists an active voter registration record for the MyPillow CEO."

In its own report, The Daily Beast noted that Lindell referred to himself as a "Texas citizen" in a lawsuit as recently as last year. In order to support himself in the GOP primary, he would need to get his registration sorted out by Aug. 11.

The Tribune report called this oversight a notable gaffe for someone like Lindell, "who has called for strict scrutiny of voter rolls and made election integrity the central pillar of his campaign and political life."

Experts sound alarm: Trump is the one poisoning elections

President Donald Trump has continued to perpetuate debunked claims about U.S. elections, and now, experts are sounding the alarm to Politico, warning that the president's rhetoric is the real danger, injecting poison into the electoral process.

In a piece published Saturday, Politico cited conversations with various experts about American elections, in which they warned that Trump's rhetoric about voting machines being unsafe was doing real damage by potentially sowing distrust in the minds of the public. While noting that there are issues with the systems that ought to be talked about and fixed, they stressed that none of these issues have ever come close to being enough to flip an election, as Trump has claimed for the better part of a decade now.

"Flaws in electronic voting machines have been well-documented for more than a decade by researchers, and states have poured money into bolstering security," Politico explained. "Still, none have ever been exploited by malicious actors to successfully change the outcome of an election. Now officials are worried that Trump’s latest comments — when he claimed that 'Americans were blatantly lied to about the security of our election infrastructure, including the security of electronic voting machines' — could undermine the electorate’s fundamental faith in voting. Without confidence in the system, the entire process could be called into question, as voters choose not to cast ballots or refuse to accept election results."

“There’s nothing wrong with pointing out vulnerabilities and therefore doing audits or therefore upgrading to a more modern system that uses a paper record,” Gowri Ramachandran, director of elections and security at the Brennan Center for Justice’s Elections and Government Program, told the outlet. “What’s wrong is trying to use those vulnerabilities to spread distrust in elections.”

"I’m not aware of an incident in which a vote has been changed through a hack,” Scott Algeier, executive director of the Information Technology Information Sharing and Analysis Center, also added. “There’s lots of opportunity for that to happen because we have lots of elections, and I think the fact that it hasn’t happened is an indication of how secure the overall election process is.”

Despite the claims of Trump and his MAGA backers, Politico noted that there has been "no evidence" over the years that any malicious actors, foreign or domestic, have been able to hack into electronic systems and change votes. The latest files released by Trump only revealed that "Russian hackers successfully accessed the voter registration databases of a few U.S. states ahead of the 2016 elections," though they did not alter any votes. China was also able to access certain registration databases, though reports have noted that many states make such records available to the public.

Vulnerabilities in electronic systems have been known about within the industry for years, with efforts underway to spread the word about them and implement fixes. Concerns about Russian interference in 2016 led many states to move away from entirely electronic systems and "towards either using paper ballots or electronic machines with paper trails."

"As a result, only around 4 percent of registered voters currently live in regions where only direct recording electronic systems are used for voting, ensuring that there is a paper trail documenting how the vast majority of Americans voted," Politico noted.

"These are machines that very few Americans actually vote on anymore, where they would pick their selections on a touchscreen, and then the computer would record the selection in its internal system and not actually provide any kind of paper record," Ramachandran added.

Trump crammed a 'devil’s deal' down Republicans’ throats: conservative

Conservative columnist Bret Stephens says he dreads the bind that President Donald Trump has put the GOP in as Republicans stagger off into their uncertain future.

Stephens was speaking with the New York Times "Opinions” politics round table on Saturday when the panel landed on the self-dealing involved in Trump’s derailed slush fund settlement and the gobs of cash the Trump family raked in as a result of their occupation of the White House — within the span of little more than a year.

“Talking to Republicans or Republican-leaning figures who occasionally speak to the president himself — not politicians, but well-off people. The two things that have really hurt Trump in their eyes are the slush fund and the reporting by The Times that Trump or his family enriched themselves by $2.2 billion last year. That sits very ill, even among people who are his voters, and in some ways, his peers, because it reeks of a form of corruption.”

“Kleptocracy,” offered retired broadcast host Robert Siegel.

“And that reminds me a little bit of my youth in Mexico, when José López Portillo was president, and the corruption was so very much nakedly on display,” said Stephens … Because the rule of law [was] something that even most Republicans value. And I don’t think that they objected so much during election years, when they could tell themselves the alternative is that much worse. But what you have with Trump is really putting into the shade whatever might have been said against Hunter Biden and his own dealings — which, remember, were Topic A of discussion on some of the Fox News shows just three years ago … but this is something else.

Political pundit and author Molly Jong-Fast pointed out that the slush deal was particularly egregious with interim AG (And Trump’s former personal attorney) Todd Blanche scheming to give the Trump family immunity from audits. Still, she said this is the corruption that now defines the new Republican Party, and Stephens said party members now have no choice but to embrace the dirt or walk into the horizon. He used former South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham and former GOP US Rep. Liz Cheney as examples.

“When Graham flipped [to Trump] … I took it really bitterly. Maybe because I sort of set my teeth, as a conservative, against Trump, and that he had betrayed everything that I thought were his principles to curry favor with power,” Stephens told the panel. “After he died, it actually hit me harder than I thought it would. And in part because — say what you will about Graham’s choices — in the last week of his life, he accomplished consequential things — like a sanctions bill on Russia that the president is willing to sign … and probably saving NATO from Trump’s de facto destruction of the organization. And I remember asking myself, after he died: Well, if that’s what he was able to do by sucking up to the president as nakedly as he did, maybe I shouldn’t scorn him or hold him in such contempt, as I had for years, after he had, as I thought, gone over to the dark side.”

“I mean, I know everyone says ‘well, it was a devil’s bargain.’ But some devil’s bargains, you might say, are worth the price,” Stephens insisted. “Would Ukraine be safer today if Lindsey had gone up against Trump, gotten himself primaried six years ago and were blabbing from a seat on a CNN panel today? I’m not sure that’d be the case.”

Lindsey, he argued, didn’t do what Liz Cheney did — which is essentially get himself evicted from the party.

“I have great respect for Liz Cheney, but she’s not an influential person anymore,” said Stephens. “She’s a person who sacrificed herself on an altar of truth. And that’s great, but the world, sadly, moves on.”

Republican pundit’s hypocrisy lands with a thud on CNN panel

A Republican panelist’s attempt to square President Donald Trump’s crusade for “election integrity” flopped hard against Trump’s own attempts to undermine it during a CNN Saturday morning discussion.

Seattle Red Radio host and author Jason Rantz’ found himself siding with Trump’s Thursday night indictment of mail-in voting — despite Trump himself voting by mail on numerous occasions.

“Republicans have been more concerned about voting because they believe that elections are stolen. And I come from a state, Washington state, where it's 100 percent mail in voting. And I hear from people who say they're not going to vote because they don't trust the system. That kills me,” said Rantz. “… [Trump is] going to make sure that if people are registered illegally, they're not actually voting.”

“I think that that's a good thing,” added Rantz. “That should actually give [everyone] a little bit more trust in the system. What gives people a lack of trust is that you had a couple hundred thousand that we know of, potentially who have been registered to vote, and they're ineligible to vote. That should not happen. And it should be apolitical to look at that and simply say, ‘we should come up with some bipartisan solutions to ensure it's working.”

But Vox host and editorial director Astead Herndon could not hide his laughter.

“It’s Just wild to pretend that this isn't the same president who got on the phone with Brad Raffensperger and said ‘find people to help me win.’ Like, it's literally the same guy. It's too wild to see those things, because that’s two totally disconnected events. And that’s not going to be something I take seriously because of that.”

“Is it fair, though?” insisted Rantz. “I don't care about that. But my point is, do you not see that there's a problem if someone is getting registered to vote illegally? You don't think that's a problem?”

“I'm going to just watch you because I'm not going to play that game because I’m talking about Donald Trump’s actions from the White House, which were not an equivalent action,” said Herndon, staring at him.

“Because you don't think that's a problem. I know you don't want to talk about that because you don't want to talk about the actual issue. And it is a fair question that you don't take seriously,” said Rantz.

“I think Democrats would come to the table and work with Donald Trump if he had credibility when it came to voting, but he doesn't,” said former DNC spokesperson Xochitl Hinjosa. “The problem is that he only cares about the elections that he loses or his party loses, and one of those is coming up. And all of a sudden, just a few months before the election, he wants to implement rules that would end up decreasing the number of people that can vote.”

“… If Donald Trump had never tried to stop the certification of elections and committed crimes — as a grand jury believe that he did — if that stuff had have never happened and he was about election security and wanted to work with Democrats with it, I think they would be willing to do that,” Hinjosa said.

- YouTube youtu.be

Trump’s endless obsessions have reduced him to a ‘pathetic’ state

President Donald Trump might need to ask his Pentagon about their new testosterone treatments, according to a new column from The New York Times, as his endless parade of political obsessions has left him in a "pathetic" state, typified by his flop primetime address last week.

Trump's second term in the White House has become overwhelmingly defined by Trump's fixations, which he has lavished with attention to the detriment of other things that might help his party win over midterm voters. Chief among these fixations has been his long-debunked claims about voter fraud, which have led him to push for the doomed SAVE America Act over anything else. He also claimed in his Thursday night address to have declassified newly uncovered documents that would prove his claims about fraud in the 2020 election, but closer inspection by the media found that they were largely a bust.

Writing for the Times on Saturday, columnist Maureen Dowd wrote that Trump "has reduced the grandeur of obsession to something pathetic."

"When you commandeer prime time, or try to, you’d better have something prime to say. Trump didn’t," Dowd wrote. "His speech on Thursday was a dud — a batty stew of whiny complaints stemming from an election that he claims was stolen that wasn’t, during a period when he was running the country. If something was wrong, dude, why didn’t you fix it? He still has no proof, and he muddied matters by releasing documents containing information already known and warning about 'vulnerabilities' his administration has made worse."

She added later: "There was barely a peep from Republicans on Capitol Hill about the speech. No organized effort to polish his tirade. You could almost hear the fervent wish of Republican lawmakers watching the president: Please, Donald, move on! But he can’t. His father’s admonition that there are only 'killers' and 'losers' plays in a loop in his head, reducing him to jelly."

Dowd noted further that Trump has typically been able to "whip up some Poseidon-level winds of conspiracy" in order to push his claims forward and leave critics befuddled, but this time, "he seemed impotent, raving about nonsense," and "struggled to wield his superpower: creating a fake alternate universe for his supporters."

"If Trump wants to continue to be 'the world’s most famous sore loser,' as Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia calls him, he’s going to need to be more high-T," Dowd concluded. "But can that hormone be prescribed to babies?"

Republican voters are losing their fight — and their enemy is surging

The Washington Post reports undemocratic Republican gerrymandering efforts have indeed put a whack on Democrats’ fight this year. According to analysts, Democrats now need to win by three to four percentage points overall to gain a majority in the House due to partisan redistricting favoring Republicans.

But that doesn’t appear to matter this year. This year, Republicans are cooked — and it all comes down to passion.

“Americans prefer Democrats to Republicans in the congressional midterm elections by only a slim margin, but Democratic supporters are far more motivated to vote,” reports the Post, citing a Washington Post-Ipsos poll. “The blue advantage grows to eight points among those ‘absolutely certain to vote,’ with 53 percent of highly motivated voters supporting Democrats and 45 percent supporting Republicans.”

Republicans are not losing by a wide margin among the broader electorate despite President Donald Trump’s deep unpopularity and broad concerns about the economy, the war with Iran and immigration issues, according to the Post’s surveys. But their supporters just aren’t as energized to turn up at the polls, the Post-Ipsos poll suggests.

The Post claims if Trump is able to mitigate some top concerns by Election Day, by bringing down the price of gasoline he caused by starting his unilateral war with Iran, his mid-decade gerrymandering scheme might actually pay off and he could potentially retain a House majority.

But Democrats are riding high a more enthusiastic base, which is evident in the poll and in the party’s strong turnout in recent primaries and special elections. The enthusiasm gap between the two parties is greater now than in 2018, when Democrats gained 40 House seats in a blue wave.

“Democrats are 10 points more likely to be certain to vote this year than Republicans, larger than their two-point edge in 2018. And more than 7 in 10 Democrats say it is “more important” to vote in 2026 than in previous midterm elections, compared with just over half of Republicans,” reports the Post.

Meanwhile, Americans are struggling. And they’re more worried about their finances than they were eight years ago, the Post added. This year, 40 percent of registered voters say they’re “not as well off” as when Trump took office, compared with 13 percent who said the same in November 2018.

Additionally, the Post survey revealed voters give Trump “clearly negative” marks for their three top midterm issues, with more than 6 in 10 disapproving of his handling of the economy and Iran and 56 percent disapproving of his handling of immigration.

“Republicans who love Trump and Democrats who loathe him are the most likely to vote, but the latter group is much bigger,” reports the Post.

'Invisible to the public': Baptist minister exposes new Trump con game

Salon guest writer Andrew Daugherty says President Donald Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission aims to turn churches into political action committee moneybags.

“The most efficient campaign finance vehicle in American history is tax-exempt, requires no donor disclosure and is available in virtually every zip code in the country. For 70 years, it has operated under one rule: It cannot endorse a political candidate,” said Daugherty. “The Religious Liberty Commission, which delivered its report to President Donald Trump on June 26, would like to remove that rule. They’re calling it religious freedom.”

But Daugherty, a Christian minister of an American Baptist congregation for more than 20 years, says he knows the difference between protecting a church and conscripting one: “A government that wants to free the church, to borrow Trump’s language, is usually trying to use it.”

The 1954 Johnson Amendment restricts churches, religious organizations and other tax-exempt nonprofits from endorsing political candidates or funneling tax-deductible donations into partisan campaigns. Church leaders can preach hard and heavy on moral and social issue, but the tax-exempt status line stops at candidate endorsements.

“In other words, the amendment is the last structural barrier between the American church and full absorption into the machinery of partisan politics,” said Daugherty. “The claim that this constitutes religious suppression is the oldest con in the game. Every American pastor has the same First Amendment rights as any other citizen. What the Johnson Amendment restricts is tax-exempt dollars in partisan politics. Churches pay no federal taxes. In exchange, they stay out of the candidate-endorsement business. Void it, and that deal ends — and every church in America becomes a PAC with better branding and transparency requirements and endorsed by a divine mandate.”

Imagine a donor writing a federal tax-deductible check to their congregation. Then the church endorses the candidate of their choice, bundles those contributions and runs voter registration drives for one party. Plus, it does it all without a political action committees’ disclosure requirement.

“This is tax-exempt political spending, passed through the offering plate and invisible to the public record,” said Daugherty, and this is a mistake that could further destroy the American church.

“Church attendance has collapsed at a pace that would have seemed impossible just a generation ago,” he argued. “According to a 2024 Pew Research study, the fastest-growing religious identity in America is ‘none.’ The research on why people leave does not point to boredom or busyness. It points to disgust at what organized religion has become. The Christian right has spent five decades getting closer to power and losing the one thing it cannot buy back: The credibility to speak to anyone outside its own coalition.”

But Trump’s commission doesn’t appear discouraged by this information. And Daugherty said their plans go beyond just ending the Johnson Amendment. They propose putting an end to the separation of church and state.

“The separation has existed because both institutions require protection from each other. When such safeguards are removed, the bridge comes with a toll booth, and the commission is waving one side through,” said Daughtry. “This is state power reinforcing evangelical Christianity, and evangelical Christianity legitimizing state power. The commission calls it ‘partnership.’ History calls it a state church.”

The book that accidentally created monster Alex Jones — and the author's deep regret

Jon Ronson’s book Them: Adventures with Extremists launched him to worldwide fame – and more dubiously, launched conspiracy theorist Alex Jones. Though Jones has been deplatformed, his influence lingers: just this week, it was reported that Australia’s far-right One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts praised Jones in 2024 as “a beacon of hope around the world”.

Researched and written in the years preceding September 11, and published in April 2001, Them – which Ronson described in a preface to its second edition as “a snapshot of life in the Western world on 10 September 2001” – is turning 25.

Ronson’s original plan was to spend time with people who’d been described as “the extremist monsters of the Western world” as they went about their everyday lives. They included neo-Nazis, militias and Omar Bakri, a UK Islamic fundamentalist who called himself “Osama Bin Laden’s man in London”, and whom Ronson shadowed for a year in 1996 for a documentary.

Among other things, Ronson recorded the “clownish” Bakri watching the Lion King with a baby on his knee, and asking him to guard the money he’d been collecting for Hamas in giant Coca Cola bottles, while he retrieved a coat – which he agonised over as a Jewish person, but did (seemingly to avoid awkwardness).

Bakri, who told the Daily Mail the September 11 attacks were “exciting”, was barred from the United Kingdom after leaving in 2005. In 2010, he was arrested in Lebanon and sentenced to life in prison after a terrorism trial. Released pending retrial, he was sentenced again in 2015 to six years hard labour.

“I thought that perhaps an interesting way to look at our world would be to move into theirs and stand alongside them while they glared back at ours,” Ronson writes. But what started as a series of profiles of extremist leaders “quickly became something stranger”, when he realised the very different people he was following all shared a belief in the New World Order: a conspiracy theory that imagines “a tiny elite rules the world from inside a secret room”.

This tyrannical, shadowy elite, Ronson soon discovered, was said to launch wars and wield almost unimaginable power. It has the ability to, among other things, “select and cast out the heads of state, control Hollywood and the markets and the flow of capital, operate a harem of under-age kidnapped sex slaves”.

If there was any truth to the theory, Ronson reasoned, there must be an actual secret room, and it had to be located somewhere. So he resolved to find it.

At various points, he found himself chased by men in dark glasses and surveilled from behind trees. He also managed to witness robed international chief executives participate in a bizarre effigy-burning ritual in the forests of northern California – an experience he shared with Jones, then a harmless-seeming regional radio crank, based in Texas.

Now, 25 years on, that worldview has arguably become easier to sustain than Ronson could have imagined. Revelations surrounding figures such as Jeffrey Epstein – who did operate a network of underage girls he coerced into sexually servicing powerful men – have shown the wealthy and powerful can and do conceal serious and shocking crimes through networks of influence and privilege.

But rather than confirming the existence of a secret cabal directing world events, such scandals have often been absorbed into far broader conspiracy narratives – from QAnon to claims about bloodthirsty global elites harvesting adrenochrome from children – further blurring sometimes porous lines between fact and fiction.

Genuine curiosity and refusing caricature

The book helped to establish Ronson’s distinctive investigative approach: an interest in the fringe and the unusual, approached with a genuine sense of curiosity and a refusal of easy caricature.

This sensibility has run through his work since, from The Men Who Stared at Goats (looking at bizarre, fringe tactics adopted by the US army) and You’ve Been Publicly Shamed (an early critique of social media shaming) to his culture war conspiracy theories podcast series, Things Fell Apart.

But Them also propelled Jones into the mainstream – which Ronson has publicly regretted. When Ronson got to know him, “Alex was hollering his powerful apocalyptic vision down an ISDN line from a child’s bedroom in his house, with choo-choo train wallpaper and an Empire Strikes Back poster pinned on the wall”.

Since then, Jones has been “successfully sued” and has filed for bankruptcy after being found liable for defamation for his claims that the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was staged and “no one died”.

Sadly, what once seemed extreme and marginal – the circulation of conspiracy theories and the associated peddling of prejudice and hate – now feels depressingly routine.

Just as it inadvertently captured the historical moment about to erupt with the September 11 attacks and their aftermath, Them anticipated the mainstreaming of conspiratorial thinking, which would become a defining feature of our misinformation-ridden historical moment.

Paranoia as the new common sense

“Paranoia was the new common sense,” writes columnist John Ganz in When the Clock Broke: Con Men, Conspiracists, and How America Cracked Up in the Early 1990s. “The country seemed to be seeking something new, a break with the exhausted possibilities of the past but also a restoration, a way to recover what had been lost.”

At the end of the 1980s, the Berlin Wall had been reduced to rubble and the communist bloc was crumbling. Excitable liberals were wittering on about the end of history. America stood triumphant, seemingly without rival. And yet something felt off.

Ganz argues appearances were deceptive. “America felt itself to be losing out: losing its dominant place in the world, losing the basis of its security and wealth, and losing its sense of itself.”

There had to be an explanation. And there had to be someone to blame.

This bled through in the culture of the early 1990s. “Just because you’re paranoid, don’t mean they’re not after you,” sang Kurt Cobain, capturing the zeitgeist on Nevermind (1991). It was the time of Oliver Stone’s JFK (1991) and The X-Files (1993). The truth, we were told, was out there. Trust no one – especially anyone in a position of authority.

Ruby Ridge: ground zero?

This atmosphere permeates Them’s second chapter, on the bloody Ruby Ridge standoff in regional Idaho in August 1992. Also permeating the chapter – and the book – are Ronson’s stated aims of painting people “as complicated grey areas, rather than magnificent heroes or sickening villains” and sticking “to the nuanced truth, rather than flattening it to make ideological points”.

Randy and Vicki Weaver were among the first Americans to articulate fears about the New World Order. In the 1980s, they moved from Iowa to a plywood cabin without electricity, high in the Idaho ranges. There, they home-schooled their children, living among bears and mountain lions.

Randy felt the need, Ronson tells us, to socialise from time to time. He made friends within the nearby Aryan Nations community and attended their summer camps with his children four times – though he told Ronson he wasn’t personally a white supremacist, but a “separatist”.

One such friend was an undercover agent, who asked Randy to sell him two illegal sawn-off shotguns. Once arrested, Randy was offered a choice: spy on Aryan Nations for the government or face time behind bars for illicit gun running. He went with the second option. Warned they could lose their house and convinced the New World Order was monitoring them (which was not untrue now), the Weavers stopped showing up to court.

In August 1992, US marshals hiding in the bushes shot the Weavers’ barking family dog as it came too close. Ronson reports that Weaver’s teenage son Sammy fired random shots in response, and was shot and killed. A marshal was killed too. Hundreds of federal agents descended, martial law was declared, and residents emerged from their homes bearing placards denouncing the New World Order. Vicki was shot and killed while holding her infant daughter.

Media coverage recast the human tragedy as a national psychodrama about extremism, government overreach and the collapse of public trust.

In the following months, militia movements expanded rapidly across the US. The infamous siege in Waco, Texas, where David Koresh’s Branch Davidians clashed with federal agents, ending with 75 members dead, unfolded in Texas less than a year later.

For many in the American far right, the ruined Weaver cabin became a symbol of resistance and martyrdom, assuming a quasi-mythic status. One pilgrim who visited was Timothy McVeigh, later responsible for the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, which killed 168 people and injured close to 700.

Bilderberg: a secret society running the world?

Ronson soon realised the same name was on the lips of the various militia members and anti-government activists he spoke to: the Bilderberg Group. These are the people who actually run the world, they believed. Bilderberg was described as “the Roman Senate” or “a pyramid”.

Jones explained: “They’re way up there. Below them you’ve the IMF, the World Bank, the United Nations, then you’ve got us down here, the cattle, the human resources.” At the time, he was funding efforts to rebuild the Branch Davidian church.

Ronson first encountered Jones while interviewing Randy Weaver, who considered the then regional radio host “a true and tirelesss warrior”. Jones explained the Bilderbergers were orchestrating world decline from the behind the scenes. As with many conspiracy theories, the line between fantasy and reality was not always easy to discern.

The Bilderberg Group is real. It even has its own website. Established in the wake of World War II, it consists of annual private meetings attended by political and industrial leaders, financiers, media executives and royalty. It is, without doubt, a highly secretive organisation – which has intensified the suspicion around it.

Interestingly, UK politician Peter Mandelson, former US ambassador and friend of Epstein even after his conviction, is named in the book as a Bilderberg attendee.

This explains how Ronson eventually found himself sneaking into Bohemian Grove, the annual retreat (since 1878) of a secretive, elite club whose attendees “read much like a Bilderberg roll-call”, alongside Jones.

There, hidden among the redwoods of northern California, wealthy and politically connected men, many of them drunk, gathered for an elaborate ceremony centred on burning an effigy before a giant owl statue. Harmless elite play-acting, or dastardly occult ritual conducted by the secret rulers of the world? Ronson saw the former, Jones the latter.

In his short book on Donald Trump’s first presidential campaign, The Elephant in the Room (2026), Ronson describes watching the alt-right move steadily closer to political power, propelled in part by “leading voice” Jones – who reportedly received a swift call from a newly elected Trump, thanking him for his support.

Despite a lingering “personal” fondness for his fellow Bohemian Grove crasher, Ronson calls him “basically the most irresponsible man I have ever met”, who “uses his powers to inflame paranoia” and “boldly makes stuff up to suit his weird agenda”.

Lizard people

I first became aware of David Icke, former semi-professional footballer and respected sports journalist, now a believer in giant lizards, in April 1991. I was at home, watching TV, not yet ten years old.

Icke was being interviewed live on a prime-time UK talk show, wearing an eye-wateringly lurid turquoise tracksuit. He had recently started to refer to himself as the “Son of the Godhead”. On air, he made a series of predictions about imminent and devastating natural catastrophes. The audience, not knowing what to make of it all, laughed.

Ronson describes the moment:

He said this with such ferocity, such conviction, that the audience stopped laughing for a moment […] You could feel it sweep across the television studio, sweep across the land, a stirring of some primordial paranoia. Could David Icke actually be a soothsayer?

But in fact, ridicule and opprobrium followed the segment. In the period after his very public shaming, Ronson records, Icke came to believe his mockery had been orchestrated by shadowy elites. He immersed himself in conspiracy literature, including on the Bilderberg Group.

Icke became convinced the global elite were not merely corrupt politicians or financiers, but something much stranger: shape-shifting reptilian beings manipulating humans across millennia. Ancient civilisations, occult rituals and modern political institutions were all folded into a single explanatory system.

The reptilian invaders, he concluded, were the secret rulers of the world.

Critics have long argued his talk of secret reptilian elites functions as a coded form of antisemitism, echoing older conspiratorial myths – including ideas traceable to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Yet Ronson suggests Icke genuinely believes the world is controlled by interdimensional lizard people.

The promise of hidden forces

This creates a puzzle. If someone claims giant lizards secretly control the planet, are we dealing with metaphor, coded prejudice, mental instability, opportunity or sincere belief? Increasingly, it seems the answer may be some unstable combination of them all.

Part of what makes Them feel so relevant now is that Ronson rejects the reassuring assumption that extremist or conspiratorial thinking falls outside the bounds of ordinary life.

Long before social media turned paranoia into a viable business model, he grasped that bizarre ideas do not emerge from nowhere. Rather, they are shaped by spectacle, distrust, insecurity and the seductive promise that hidden forces can explain an increasingly bewildering world – often with disastrous consequences.

Given Ronson’s record of books on topics just hitting (or about to explode into) the mainstream, the topic of his forthcoming one, to be published in August, is unsurprising: the masculinity crisis.The Conversation

Alexander Howard, Senior Lecturer, Discipline of English and Writing, University of Sydney

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Republicans in control of Congress are quietly sabotaging Trump's signature bill

President Donald Trump’s obsession with unfounded claims of election fraud has defined his second term in office. But in recent months his fixation has moved from executive nominee litmus tests and executive orders reinforcing proof of citizenship to vote into legislation – dragging Congress into the fray.

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or the SAVE America Act, featured heavily in Trump’s primetime speech on July 16, 2026.

It’s become the focus of the administration in recent months, eclipsing prior legislative efforts by proposing stringent and widespread voting changes. The proposed law, which would federalize elections, require additional documentation in order to vote and curtail mail-in registration and ballots in all states, faces major logistical, legal and political hurdles.

The act, which is stuck in limbo between the U.S. House and Senate, has dominated and derailed the summer’s legislative calendar. In the House, Republican members delayed votes on major legislation in an effort to pressure the Senate to take the bill up for a vote, and it has become a sticking point in other unrelated legislation.

The controversial act has also soured the relationship between Trump and members of his party, leading him to refuse to sign a bipartisan housing bill passed by Congress. Although the bill became law without his signature, Trump’s preoccupation with the SAVE America Act ultimately denied congressional Republicans an opportunity to tout a bipartisan, popular policy win.

Yet, despite mounting political pressure, Congress hasn’t budged.

This tension between Trump’s priorities and congressional inaction is noteworthy because Republicans control both chambers. But as a political scientist who studies the evolving power of congressional leadership, I find inaction on the SAVE America Act to be more than a reflection of Trump’s waning popularity among Republican lawmakers. Rather, congressional hesitation on what would be the largest election reform in decades reflects an awareness of constituent needs and lawmakers’ own reelection risks.

What’s the latest?

House Republicans have been quick to blame the Senate – and the 60-vote filibuster threshold the legislation must overcome to receive a vote on the Senate floor – for the inaction.

House Speaker Mike Johnson has brought the legislation to the floor for at least three votes in an effort to pressure the Senate to take up the legislation. In July 2026, Johnson took a more creative approach, relenting to conservative lawmakers by including portions of the SAVE America Act in a House-passed bill to fund the State Department.

These actions are largely theatrical. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has said since February 2026 that there aren’t enough votes to move the SAVE America Act through the Senate, telling Fox News in June that “the votes currently aren’t there.” Although Senate Republicans could vote to remove the filibuster, which Trump has also requested, they have not.

Even in the House, the slim margins of Republican control have made it challenging for Johnson to keep the party together on the controversial issue. And Johnson’s gambit to attach the SAVE America Act to important legislation risks not only derailing bipartisan policy but another government shutdown, too.

If Republicans were serious about electoral reform, including moderate reforms that the majority of Americans do support, their approach would be like that used for other major legislation: bipartisan. Instead, partisan passage of a controversial bill, with a known Senate blockade, presents half-hearted strategy that avoids true responsibility.

Legal and logistical hurdles

The SAVE America Act would be confusing, time-consuming and expensive, and it would not provide funding to help states implement changes.

Changing election processes warrants precision and time, too. As Republican Sen. Thom Tillis noted, “Do you honestly believe that we can have this thing up in 50 states? There’s no funding. There’s no specific implementation instructions.”

Beyond logistics, the legality of federalizing election processes is murky.

Congress does have the power to mandate election requirements. But under Article 1, Section 4, of the Constitution, while Congress can outline parameters, states are responsible for election administration.

For example, the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 reinforced citizenship as a requirement, but states maintained responsibility for creating their own form and enrollment process. The SAVE America Act attempts to circumvent this by requiring federal possession of voter rolls.

Uncertainty for American citizens

Beyond legal challenges, the SAVE America Act introduces very real implications for American voters – and the members of Congress who represent them.

While the act’s stated goal is to ensure only citizens vote, citizenship requirements for voting are already federal law. In practice, many scholars believe the bill would make it more difficult for eligible voters to engage in the democratic process.

For rural Americans, most of whom are represented by Republican members of Congress, the act would sharply restrict mail-in registration and mail-in voting. More than 5 million Americans would need to drive an hour or more to register to vote, with some voters facing drives as long as eight hours.

For women who changed their name after marriage, a trait more likely to be associated with Republican women, voting would require marriage certificates in addition to birth certificates.

First-time voters, young voters on college campuses and voters who have recently moved could also face the hurdle of finding and presenting this documentation in person.

Members of Congress, particularly those who represent rural areas, are likely aware of this reality. Disenfranchising or, at best, confusing their voters risks their own electoral success, too.

Safety and security of upcoming elections

One of Trump’s first acts following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. Slaughter in June 2026, which allowed the president to remove executive branch officials without cause, was to fire the remaining members of the bipartisan, Senate-confirmed Election Assistance Commission.

The agency is the point of contact for states regarding election administration processes, offering resources, guidance and expertise on voting logistics. If the SAVE America Act were to pass, this office would be integral to ensuring changes are unbiased and fair across all 50 states.

Coupled with warnings that Trump may invoke emergency powers over election administration, aggressive actions by the Department of Justice to control voter rolls, partisan redistricting, and now a vacated election commission, the SAVE America Act risks further disrupting elections. All while these elections have already been secure and overwhelmingly free of fraud.

As Tillis noted to reporters, “They’re being disingenuous to suggest to the American people they could possibly be operational by this election. And so then it begins to make me wonder … if we’re just beginning to undermine the underlying integrity of any of our elections. And I think that’s dangerous, and I think it’s wrong.”

Trump’s grip on Republicans

Does Congress’ hesitation to pass the SAVE America Act reflect a weakened Trump grip on the Republican party? Possibly. The president is more unpopular than he has been at any point during his second term. Ignoring Trump on the SAVE America Act may be a risk worth taking to some members.

But for most Republican members of Congress, appeasing Trump remains key to primary and electoral success. The president’s record on primary endorsements – even for Senate incumbents – remains strong, as he continues to define the party. Among constituents, some provisions of the SAVE America Act are popular among MAGA-aligned voters, making it an important electoral issue for members representing deep-red districts.

By publicly supporting the act, but relying on the Senate to serve as a doorstop to House-passed legislation, Congress falls into a familiar pattern that allows conservative members to appeal to the president while using procedure to block legislation that would make major changes to voting, mere months from Election Day.

Congress’ hesitance to pass the SAVE America Act is more than a test of its relationship with Trump. It’s an example of Congress doing what it was intended to do: represent its constituents.The Conversation

SoRelle Wyckoff Gaynor, Assistant Professor of Public Policy and Politics, University of Virginia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The staggering corruption behind Todd Blanche's multi-million scheme

In May of this year, Todd Blanche signed a one-page order under seal of the U.S. Department of Justice, declaring that the U.S. government hereby “FOREVER DISCHARGES” Donald Trump and his family from pending and viable federal tax claims, and that the federal government is “FOREVER BARRED AND PRECLUDED” from pursuing those claims. Blanche’s order, if a federal judge hadn’t just voided it, would likely have cost taxpayers up to $650 million in lost penalties and back payments.

Although Blanche’s order would have allowed a sitting president to defraud the U.S. treasury with impunity, the outrage quickly passed. It’s just another episode of corruption under the most corrupt administration our country has ever seen, what’s another few hundred million between friends?

But the legal contortions behind Blanche’s order, the unethical legal jujitsu that brought it into existence, are lasting. By orchestrating this deal, Blanche acted in his former client's personal interest, at great cost to his current client—the American public. What Blanche tried to rig up for Trump was a major ethical violation under any legal code of ethics. Even during his confirmation hearings on Wednesday, Blanche seemed confused about who his client was, explaining that, as part of the Executive branch, he serves the president. The U.S. Attorney General, for the record, serves the people, and was created to do so by the Judiciary Act of 1789. Blanche’s confusion over this most fundamental aspect of his role as AG could not be more corrosive to the rule of law Blanche has vowed to uphold.

Blanche’s brazen attempt to hijack the justice system

In overseeing the Department of Justice, any US Attorney General is legally entrusted to enforce our laws in a fair and evenhanded manner, and to use its “investigatory and prosecutorial powers” in a manner that is “free from partisan consideration.” This duty requires, above all else, an Attorney General’s commitment to honor and protect the law above both his personal interests and those of the President who nominated him.

Blanche, after blatantly protecting Trump’s personal, illegal interests over the public’s legal interests, perjured himself when he testified Wednesday in his Senate confirmation hearing. When directly asked if he would resign rather than carry out an illegal or unethical order from Trump, Blanche answered ambiguously, "I'm not going to violate my oath to the Constitution." But he already has, and not just by trying to gift Trump $650 million in waived tax penalties, along with $1.8 billion to reward J6 rioters.

Far worse than the amount of the attempted theft was the way Blanche tried to go about it: by contriving a completely fake federal lawsuit, then trying to hoodwink a federal judge by dismissing the suit after she questioned how one party could be on both sides, then defrauding the American public by claiming there had been a “settlement” of a case that never existed. On July 13, U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued a scathing order concluding that the whole scheme was an attempt to “manipulate the judicial process” in an effort to lend the “court’s legitimacy” to collusion between Blanche, the IRS, and Trump to enrich the Trumps. She slammed Blanche for abdicating his responsibility to the public, and referred him for formal sanctions by the commission holding his law license.

The New York Bar Association’s warning

Blanche was admitted to practice law before the Attorney Grievance Committee of the State of New York. That means New York— not the federal government, not Trump— holds his law license. If he loses his license, he loses the ability to practice law anywhere in the country, and he could not supervise the work of other DOJ attorneys without engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.

On July 13, 2026, the New York Bar Association submitted a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee holding hearings on Blanche’s nomination to become AG. They vehemently oppose his confirmation, stressing the systemic damage Blanche has already inflicted on the legal system. They point out five distinct areas where Blanche has already violated his oath of office by elevating Trump over the rule of law, and by engaging in conduct contrary to the Rules of Professional Conduct and the DOJ’s own Justice Manual.

The NY Bar Association letter came after 101 former judges filed an official complaint with the New York Commission to “initiate an investigation into Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche (Registration No. 4192456) for violation of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct.” In addition to the same ethical breaches identified by the NY Bar Association in its letter to U.S. Senate, the judges’ formal complaint strongly encourages disciplinary action against Blanche for his blanket abuse of authority in using the DOJ to pursue politically motivated investigations and lawsuits against Trump’s personal and political enemies.

The judges also questioned Blanche’s “personal involvement in overseeing the Department of Justice’s botched and incomplete release” of Epstein documents under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and raised “serious concerns” about Blanche’s interview of Ghislaine Maxwell. The judges point out the obvious: that Blanche remains “burdened” by his conflicts of interest, which “reflect adversely on his fitness as an attorney.”

Republican Senators, fearful of Trump’s promised retribution, are likely to confirm; Senator Cornyn will likely cave and vote with his party. But the Attorney Grievance Committee of New York is equally likely to disbar him, which will make Blanche only the 2nd U.S. AG to be disbarred.

Etched into the limestone exterior of the DOJ headquarters are the words, “Where law ends tyranny begins.” It is not possible to write a more apt warning about what lies ahead.

Sabrina Haake is a political analyst and 25+ year federal trial attorney specializing in 1st and 14th A defense. She writes the free Substack, The Haake Take.

Trump is richer than he’s ever been and loving the presidency — Americans not so much

While Americans are dealing with higher gas prices, high grocery prices and less healthcare, President Donald Trump is living his best life, says Jonathan Swan, co-author of the new book Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump, with fellow New York Times writer Maggie Haberman.

“[In his first term], there was always a feeling he felt under siege,” Swan told John Dickerson, host of Slate’s Political Gabfest podcast. “He was under investigation. He was reactive. He was surrounded by people who — whatever you think about Donald Trump, he’s not stupid when it comes to reading people — he understood that many of them had contempt for him and thought that he was dangerous and whatever. So I think it was just generally a stressful, unpleasant experience. This time around, he comes in with a sweeping immunity decision from the Supreme Court and with, especially last year, total command over his own party.”

Swan pointed out that never has he seen a president command his own party and force them to do things they don’t want to do like Trump did last year.

“We haven’t seen that before,” said Swan. “He’s richer than he’s ever been. His family’s making just inordinate sums of money from the presidency. He’s using power in the ways that he wants to without much pushback. He’s entirely surrounded by flatterers. He’s basically housebound. He doesn’t really travel around. He’s not really doing events. He goes from people flattering him in the Oval Office to people on the Mar-a-Lago patio.”

This, said Swan, leaves an extremely wealthy narcissist sitting very comfortably in his Mar-a-Lago home while the rest of America pays out an extra $600 on expenses due to Trump-induced inflation in the grocery stores and at the pump.

“He’s sitting there with his iPad playing Pavarotti and James Brown and having people come up to the table telling him he’s the greatest president ever, a world historic figure, all the rest of it. What’s not to like?” Swan told Dickerson. “He’s got a new jet from the Qataris. Now it’s never enough for Donald Trump, so I don’t think he’s in a state of constant bliss. He’s still frustrated and gets angry about stuff and whatever. But I think generally speaking, for someone who’s completely addicted to both power and attention, this is as close to a dose of pure crack as you can get. The highest purity crack that could possibly be on offer in the US system.”

But while Trump is getting richer many middle-class voters are not. American voters are facing a looming financial crisis as food and fuel prices continue to rise and wages remain stagnant. And they’re increasingly turning to high-interest-rate credit cards and payday loans with blazingly-high interest rates just to pay for family food.

This likely explains Trump's disastrous poll numbers in almost every dynamic, including sometime and occasional voters, Latinos and even working-class white voters, his prime base.

'Peacemaker' president Trump has botched an awful lot of peace: conservative

How many times has President Donald Trump blundered a path for peace. Let conservative Dispatch writer Kevin D. Williamson count the ways.

“Campaigning for the White House in 2024, retired game show host Donald Trump insisted that he would end the Russia-Ukraine war on his first day in office — maybe before. He repeated that boast more than 50 times — it clearly was not a one-off remark,” said Williamson. “[But] the war rages on, of course, and we have a pretty good idea of who is going to put a stop to that war: the Ukrainians.”

“How are the great peacemaker’s other projects going?” Williamson then asked before whacking Trump’s “ceasefire” in the U.S.-Iran-Israel-Lebanon-Hezbollah conflict.

It’s “a funny kind of ceasefire, in which the firing never ceases,” Williamson explained. “Those are the two big ones. Nothing you would call an unqualified success. We did wreck the Iranian navy, much of which might as well have been ordered from a 1972 Montgomery Ward catalog.”

Last year, Trump claimed he negotiated a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. But there were two parties who disputed Trump’s description, notably India and Pakistan. India, in fact, rejected the Trump administration’s offer to act as a mediator in the Kashmir dispute, Williamson reminded.

Trump also claims to have negotiated a truce in the Thai-Cambodian dispute, although neither the Thais nor the Cambodians seem to have got the word, said Williamson. Within a few weeks of the alleged ceasefire, a half million residents of the border area were forced to flee fighting and Thai flags were being raised on invaded territory.

Trump also brags that he negotiated a “historic” peace deal in the conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. But fighting has, in fact, intensified since the “peace deal” got announced.

“In the months since Trump’s announced intention to intervene in the Egypt-Ethiopia dispute, there has been no fighting,” concedes Williamson. “Also, there was no fighting before, no war per se to be resolved. Trump did cause some head-scratching in the Arab world when he talked about his first encounter with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, who ‘was in a hotel, and I met him, and we fell deeply in love.’ A strange thing to say, but, then, Trump has for years been losing ground in what evidently is a hopeless war with his frontal lobe.”

Trump wants himself a Nobel Peace Prize, said Williamson. It’s shiny and Barack Obama got one that Williamson said he did not deserve, so why shouldn’t Trump?

“Unhappily for the president, the only peace prize he has secured for himself so far is the one invented for him by a corrupt soccer organization seeking to curry favor with his administration,” said Williamson.

Ronald Reagan wanted to be a peacemaker, said Williamson, but Reagan was a serious man surrounded by serious men.

“Donald Trump, in contrast, is a social media addict who watches cable news all day and is surrounded by sycophants, grifters, and incompetents,” said Williamson. “It is remarkable to note that even as the U.S. military has depleted its weapons reserves to dangerous levels, the priority for the strutting, preening secretary of defense is … testosterone screening for U.S. troops. It is as though these goofs wish to advertise their insecurities.”

“As a peacemaking team, the Trump administration has an almost unblemished record of failure. That being the case, they might wish to change the subject,” Williamson suggested. “Should we talk about inflation?”

Civil war erupts as red state GOP leader blisters Trump: report

KUTV reports Utah Lt. Governor Deidre Henderson has apparently had enough of President Donald Trump and his threats. On Friday, Henderson demanded the Trump administration "stop threatening states and filing frivolous lawsuits."

The order comes one a day after Trump slammed the US election system as worse than that of “third-world” nations, and also heavily hacked by China, without evidence.

“It's Republican vs. Republican in the election drama,” reports KUTV.

"We call on the federal government to restore the election security resources that have been cut over the past several years, and to rescind all currently proposed cuts," said Henderson in a statement. "In the meantime, Utah election officials will continue to deliver secure, free, and fair elections for the voters of our state."

KUTV reports Trump’s politicized U.S. Department of Justice Henderson has sued her and other states for refusing to surrender voters' Social Security numbers and drivers' licenses.

For months, Trump’s administration has demanded states provide copies of their voter lists, calling the information necessary for election integrity efforts. While some red states have turned over lists that withhold sensitive personal data, most states have declined to offer all the information on their lists. Utah, for example, is one of the red states that did not.

Earlier in July, the Justice Department menaced state election officials with threatening letters, asserting that they could “face criminal prosecution over noncitizen voting.” According to NBC, the letters are the latest move in President Donald Trump’s effort to promote his false claims of widespread noncitizen voting and “assert more federal control over state elections.”

Trump claimed more recently, on Thursday, that there are 278,000 non-citizens registered to vote in federal elections, and he argued — again without evidence — that there are serious threats to election security from China.

Republican Utah political activist and former local school board member Michael Clara may have complicated Trump’s claims by accusing Utah leaders of withholding information concerning signers of petitions that won Gov. Spencer Cox the Republican primary ballot two years ago. The resulting audit from Clara’s accusation revealed signatures for Cox and two other then-candidates only found "some errors," and the audit declared that "verification standards would benefit from further clarification and transparency."

But KUTV reports the audit also determined that "candidates fulfilled the requirements that were given to them."

Henderson herself has said in a recent audit that only 27 people — out of more than two million registered voters — should not have been on state voter rolls.

Science hints at Trump and MAGA’s insidious threat to truth – and it is ugly

PsyPost reports that casual disregard for reality poses a "uniquely potent threat" to public knowledge and belief.

People are more likely to believe false information when it comes from someone who ignores the truth altogether rather than a liar “who actively tries to deceive.” This is because repeating statements made by someone who is completely indifferent to facts “heavily increases how truthful those statements feel” to an audience.

Additionally, casual Trump-style disregard for reality appears to pose a deadly threat to community knowledge. According to researchers, the divide sits between a simple “liar,” — someone who knows the truth and intentionally tries to mislead an audience — and a “bulls——er,” who “communicates with little to no regard for the truth, evidence, or established facts.”

A statement made by a “bulls——er” might happen to be true, or it might be false, but the defining characteristic is the speaker’s absolute indifference to reality. Because they do not actively try to hide a specific truth, people often judge them less harshly than they judge outright liars.

In a 2023 study, Wake Forest University psychology professor and author John V. Petrocelli explored how untrustworthy sources influence consumer attitudes over time. Participants read an advertisement for a fictitious gluten-free pizza and then learned the advertiser was either a simple “liar” or “a known bulls——er.” Astoundingly, after a two-week delay, participants who had been “warned about the bulls——er” actually reported more positive attitudes toward the pizza than those warned about the liar. This, said Petrocelli, demonstrated a “sleeper effect,” where the deceptive influence of the “bulls——er” actually grew stronger over time. The researchers also found that people possess a higher “dismissal readiness” for lies, meaning they find it easier to entirely reject a known lie than a statement from the consummate liar.

“But the harder question … raised, and one almost nobody had tested empirically, was whether “bulls—— actually does more damage to what people believe, precisely because it doesn’t trigger the same skepticism a known lie does,” said Petrocelli.

The “illusory truth effect” is a psychological phenomenon where people tend to believe nonsense as true after hearing it multiple times. When the human brain encounters a repeated statement, it processes that information more easily, and people often mistake this mental ease for actual truth.

But Petrocelli wanted to see if knowing the source of a claim changes this effect. “If a person knows a statement comes from a bulls——er rather than a liar, they might not filter the repeated information as strictly,” he said.

Study participants were given 42 different statements. Half of them factual and half completely false. And it turned out that even after study participants were told whether the source of the info was a liar or a “bulls——er,” the exact same statements made by the “bulls——er,” was trusted significantly more than the liar. And in two other tests the repetition of the bulls—— claims successfully tricked their minds into believing the statements.

“A known liar’s claims get flagged and rejected; a bulls——er’s claims, because they’re not certainly false, slide by with much less resistance, and repetition alone makes them feel truer over time,” Petrocelli said.

“If anything, the practical takeaway is: don’t just ask ‘is this person lying to me,’ ask ‘does this person actually know or care whether this is true,’” said Petrocelli.

Canadian PM ignites MAGA fury with science lesson

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney incited a MAGA meltdown after pointing out that the United States shared responsibility for the climate change currently dumping wildfire smoke all over the upper U.S.

Nearly 900 wildfires were burning without control in the north, as of Friday, in the wake of an abnormally dry and hot summer. This led to air quality alerts throughout the northeast and the Midwest, with Chicago and Detroit having the worst air of any major cities in the world — and more US cities due for pollution further east over the next few days.

But Republicans, who are loathe to admit that climate change is real and regularly jumps borders, prefer to blame whatever nation is currently suffering out-of-control fires, whether they are blue US states or neighboring ally nations.

However, Carney, while speaking of the disaster to Canadian citizens, pointed out in French that “We need a contribution from the Americans in the fight against climate change ... climate change is everyone's responsibility, including the US.”

This sent MAGA into even more of a fury.

“Canada is a doomed state. Can’t wait until their total economic collapse, and have to ask the US to buy them,” ranted one critic on X.

“Nice deflection while hiding behind the con that is ‘climate change,’ railed another MAGA heckler — while ignoring the vanishing US glaciers in Glacier National Park. “Dude is inept as hell and has no clue about forest management.”

“This climate change is a hoax,” blasted another critic on X, in contradiction to the majority of science. “Even Bill Gates had to admit that we are not dying from climate change. Now that they need extra energy that renewables can't produce for their data centers … [C]limate change doesn't start over 100 separate fires.”

President Donald Trump himself blasted the PM later on Friday, while denying the fact that the US has regularly been plagued by raging fires as well as temperatures rise and regions get less, more sporadic rainfall.

“We are holding Canada responsible for the fact that they are not properly maintaining their Forests, and Brush therein, and the United States is being unnecessarily invaded by filthy, polluted, and unhealthy air, the quality of which is dangerous, and totally unacceptable!” Trump posted on Truth Social. “I will call the Prime Minister during the day to find out what they are going to do about it. The cost is incalculable! Canada has refused to engage in basic Forest Management and Debris Removal, knowing that such refusal will lead to exactly this result.”

Last year, Trump lobbed many of the same accusations at California as that state burned under historic flames, accusing state leaders of not raking forests of debris and not maxing out the Colorado River to wet its dry areas — despite competition with other thirsty western states for the same water source.

A few months previous, in 2024, Trump had threatened to withhold federal aid for fighting California wildfires at a California rally.

Outrage: Blanche demands Epstein victims 'do the legwork' for prosecution

Epstein survivor Jess Michaels says Trump’s nominated attorney general Todd Blanche is still utterly committed to representing President Donald Trump over justice for victims of convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

“The short answer is [‘m] disappointed,” Michaels told MS NOW anchor Nicole Wallace on Friday, while describing a meeting with the acting attorney general at the Department of Justice. “This seems par for the course. The way we were treated yesterday was no different than any other time. We were hoping it would be something different, and it was not.”

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) demanded Blanche meet with victims earlier this week as Blanche seeks Senate confirmation as the permanent U.S. attorney general. But Michaels said Blanche delivered the very minimum in the meeting, and even told victims that they were back on square one in terms of prosecuting Epstein’s cohorts involved with his sex-trafficking network.

“He was patronizing. It felt very much like the attempt to appear empathetic, and it came off as condescending and patronizing,” said Michaels. “It did not come off as ‘you are victims of a crime, and I can assure you we would never want harm like this to happen to anyone. And we're on top of it.’ No, that's not what happened. He very clearly stated that there was nothing to see in the files. And if there was going to be anything investigated, we were going to have to do the legwork. We're going to have to go back to the FBI, share our stories again.”

According to Michaels, Blanche advised victims to bring the files and ‘point out to FBI agents’ where they should start. She added that Blanche expressed no remorse for refusing to meet with victims prior to Tillis’ requirement.

“There was no remorse for any of the damage that was done. There was no remorse when we brought up that ‘we've been trying to talk to you for … nine months to tell you there are important files that should be looked at. There are plenty of investigative leads. Even when Annie [Farmer] said, ‘hey, I know that my sister's report is missing part of the pages. Will you do an investigation?’ He said, ‘no,’ there was not going to be any further investigations and we had to go through proper channels, that now we had to go back to the FBI, or we could talk to this other specialist. But basically, he wanted us to start all over again.”

It was only recently that US District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan forced Blanche to open the files by siding with former MS NOW show host Katie Phang in her lawsuit demanding the Trump administration adhere to the word of the Epstein Transparency Act. Up until then, Blanche — who served as Trump’s private defense attorney before Trump appointed him over the DOJ — had refused without explanation to release names redacted from emails and documents that reference potentially damning videos and allegations of abuse of minors.

- YouTube youtu.be

MAGA’s gone toxic — and Trump’s agony has just begun

The Independent reports a majority of Americans now say they’re less likely to support a candidate who espouses MAGA sentiment or follows the lead of President Donald Trump -- which spells disaster for the Republican Party in November.

“With just over 100 days until the midterm elections, a new poll finds Americans feeling as badly about the U.S. economy and feeling less enthused than candidates with MAGA as part of their campaign,” said Independent reporter Andrew Feinberg, citing a recent CNBC All-America Economic Survey.

According to surveys, 57 percent of respondents said they’re unlikely to support self-identified MAGA candidates this year. Worse, the poll delivered a smack-down of Republicans' tactics of demonizing Democratic socialists to knock Dem candidates off balance: Only 32 percent or respondents said they are “unlikely” to support a democratic socialist.

“The findings could be bad news for Trump and the Republicans come November, when voters will decide control of the two houses of Congress. Republicans currently hold a slim majority in both, so anger toward the MAGA candidates, who have won many primaries, could turn the tide and allow the Democrats to control Congress for the rest of President Donald Trump’s term.”

That same survey identified a whopping 61 percent of respondents feel pessimistic about the current American economy and their future outlook for the same.

“That’s the highest number of people feeling pessimistic about the economy since December 2023 when post-pandemic inflation was only starting to fade,” reports Feinberg. “By contrast, the same survey found just a quarter of Americans — 25 percent — reported feeling optimistic about the economy and its future.”

A similar supermajority of voters, 60 percent, said they disapproved of Trump’s handling of the economy, and only 3 percent of respondents said they’d rank the economy as “excellent.”

This puts Republicans in a bind as they fight for their political lives in the November midterms with an enormously unpopular president. Additionally, Republicans have nailed themselves so firmly to the MAGA moniker that even those who would rather eschew the title in swing states are unable to break free of it for the general elections.

The Independent notes that Trump is trying to avoid any discussion of his administration’s economic record “in favor of attacking the credibility of the American electoral system,” just as he did in the days before and after his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden. Rather than discuss nagging economic issues Trump spent Thursday night spinning unproven tales of Chinese efforts to interfere in the election he lost nearly six years ago.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.