Search results for "barack Obama"

Trump's ego created a crisis he can't escape — and the world is paying the price

Iran's fighting for survival, Israel's fighting for vengeance and Donald Trump is fighting for narcissistic supply. It all started when the president tore up the Iran nuclear deal during his first term, because it was a signature achievement of Barack Obama.

We’re not speculating about Trump’s motives. “[T]he administration is set upon an act of diplomatic vandalism, seemingly for ideological and personality reasons - it was Obama's deal,” British ambassador Kim Darroch wrote in a diplomatic cable to the UK prime minister in 2018.

As you might expect, America’s withdrawal from the Iran deal freed up Iran to enrich a great deal of uranium. When Trump returned to office, he decided that Iran had way too much uranium and he needed to take heroic action to fix this problem of his own creation. His narcissism demanded that he get a better deal than Obama, but his inept real-estate negotiators couldn’t get him there. It’s doubtful that even the most skilled negotiators could have persuaded Iran to do more, but all hope was lost after Trump virtually abolished the State Department and sent his flunkies in lieu of professional diplomats.

In February, Trump decapitated the Iranian regime in the hopes of accomplishing what his predecessor could not. Trump demanded Iran’s unconditional surrender. Iran mocked him with AI-generated videos of Lego President Trump cavorting with Lego Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and Lego Pete Hegseth swilling booze and committing rape. More consequentially, Iran picked off key oil infrastructure of America’s allies in the Persian Gulf. So far, none of Trump’s shopworn tactics have forced Iran to capitulate on nuclear enrichment, ballistic missiles, regional proxy forces or anything else.

The first round of peace talks in Islamabad disintegrated after Trump promised to negotiate based on Iran’s framework but reverted to maximalist demands as soon as he got the stock market-soothing headline that peace talks were underway. When Trump claimed last week that Iran had agreed to another round of talks, Tehran said they’d agreed to no such thing. Trump was trying to manifest talks by claiming Iran had agreed when it hadn’t. However, Iran is fighting an asymmetrical economic war against the US and it has no interest in helping Trump juice the market. On Sunday, the US fired on the Touska, a 900-foot Iranian cargo ship that allegedly tried to run the American blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has vowed to retaliate. Peace has never seemed further away.

The Strait of Hormuz is another self-made crisis for Trump. On February 27, the strait was wide open. Ships laden with oil and natural gas steamed safely through the narrow entry to the Persian Gulf without paying a cent. The next day, the US and Israel attacked. The day after that, the conduit for 20 percent of the world’s fossil fuel slammed shut. Iran soon imposed a system of tolls that the government moved to make permanent. Iranian lawmaker Mohammadreza Rezaei Kouchi said parliament was pursuing “a plan to formally codify Iran’s sovereignty, control and oversight over the Strait of Hormuz, while also creating a source of revenue through the collection of fees.” This newfound leverage “must continue to be used,” Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei decreed. When asked when Iran might cede control of the strait, senior lawmaker Ebrahim Azizi answered, “never.”

Trump’s advisors had warned him that Iran would close the strait if attacked, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu assured him that he needn’t worry about it. The regime would collapse so fast it wouldn’t have time to close the strait, Netanyahu claimed during a February meeting in the Situation Room. “Sounds good to me,” Trump said. His advisors warned that Netanyahu was selling strategic snake oil, but Trump’s mind was made up.

Before the US blockade began on April 13, the hardline Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps was extracting about $2 million per friendly ship, payable in crypto or Chinese yuan. This so-called “Tehran Tollbooth” could generate over $200 billion a year for Iran when normal traffic resumes. That’s money Iran could use to rebuild its shattered navy and accelerate its nuclear program. Moreover, being the toll booth operator would give Iran greater global influence than it would with nuclear weapons. Lots of countries have nukes, but only Iran has Hormuz. All this thanks to the hubris of Trump and Netanyahu.

Experts expect Iran to keep charging tolls after the war ends. “You can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube,” strategic energy analyst Clayton Seigle told the Times.

Trump saw dollar signs. He suggested the US and Iran might team up to extort the world. “We’re thinking of doing it as a joint venture,” Trump said in a greed-fuelled reverie. “It’s a beautiful thing.” Trump soon reversed course and threatened to destroy Iranian civilization if they didn’t reopen the strait immediately. Despite the genocidal threat, Iran kept right on blocking the strait. Trump offered a two-week ceasefire anyway. Unable to force the strait open, Trump’s next move was to seal it even tighter. The US Navy began blockading Iranian ports last Monday. On Friday, Iran opened the strait with the tollbooth intact, after Israel and Lebanon agreed to a ceasefire, only to shut it again because the US refused to call off its blockade.

Early in the war, the US was careful to blunt rising oil prices. It actually removed sanctions on Iranian oil on the grounds that it was more important to maintain global supply than to deny Iran the revenue. Now, Trump is taking the opposite tack, depriving the world of oil to put pressure on Iran. Trump wants a quick end to the war, but a blockade is at best a slow-acting poison that takes effect over weeks or months.

In the meantime, Americans face rising gas prices and accelerating inflation. The US Energy Information Agency forecasts that gas will average $3.70 a gallon for the rest of the year, as cracks widen in the global economy.

“In the past there was a group called Dire Straits,” Fatih Birol, the head of the International Energy Agency warned. “It’s a dire strait now, and it is going to have major implications for the global economy."

The International Monetary Fund warned last week that the conflict could cause a global recession. Ireland’s government may face a no-confidence vote after it called in the army to quell fuel protests. Europe is facing a catastrophic jet fuel shortage. Gas stations in Australia are running dry. Indonesia and Malaysia have ordered civil servants to work from home to conserve energy. “Just from a magnitude perspective, [the war’s impact on Asia] is really very, very, very large,” energy scholar Phillip Cornell told the New York Times.

Machiavelli wrote that "wars begin when you will, but they do not end when you please." Trump is desperate for an off-ramp, but Iran is in no hurry to give him one. The regime knows that now is Iran’s best chance to inflict pain on the west and thereby deter future attacks. The United States and Israel are running low on critical weapons that they lack the industrial capacity to replenish quickly. If Iran agrees to end war before inflicting major pain and securing significant concessions, it knows the United States and Israel will eventually replenish their missile supplies and come back at them later.

Trump’s war in Iran is a strategic disaster. His ego got him into this mess and his ego is preventing him from leaving. The world is at this madman’s mercy.

Lindsay Beyerstein is an award-winning documentary filmmaker, investigative journalist and judge for the Sidney Hillman Foundation, which honors excellence in journalism in service of the common good. Her forthcoming book, about conspiracy theories as a political rejection of the Enlightenment, is tentatively titled Against the Light: The Deep State Myth from the Illuminati to QAnon.

Trump's obsession with past presidents may reveal deeper mental fitness concerns

Over the weekend, President Donald Trump blasted a torrent of AI-slop across social media, much of which was intended to portray him as “the badass that he isn’t and will never be.” According to Boston Globe columnist Renee Graham, however, rather than making him look great, the president’s “cringe-worthy nonsense” exposed his own version of “derangement syndrome.” In Trump’s case, his derangement involves Barack Obama.

“Among the many asinine AI-generated images that President Trump posted on his social media site on Saturday, anything pertaining to the solemn 82d anniversary of World War II’s D-Day invasion was not among them,” noted Graham. “Instead there was an AI slop music video of Trump skydiving; carrying a pizza with tomato sauce fashioned into a self-portrait; riding a lion and a motorcycle; and being the badass that he isn’t and will never be. There was also a lot of other cringe-worthy nonsense unlikely to quell growing alarm about his mental fitness.”

At some point, Trump turned the aim of his social media slop on Obama.

“For the second time in recent days, Trump depicted the soon-to-open Obama Presidential Center in Chicago as a dumpster topped with a garbage bag, this time surrounded by a squalid tent city,” Graham explained. “Of the four living former presidents — Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Joe Biden, and Obama — Trump is most obsessed with the man whose presidency preceded his own first term.”

Why? According to Graham, “He hates him because he ain’t him.”As an example, she said one needs look no further than Monday’s Knicks game.

“Remember that time Obama attended a sporting event and got mercilessly booed? You probably don’t because it has never happened. In any arena he’s visited, Obama has been greeted warmly,” wrote Graham. “But when Trump appeared on the Jumbotron at Game 3 of the NBA Finals between the New York Knicks and San Antonio Spurs at Madison Square Garden on Monday night, he was ferociously booed.”

Afterward, Trump tried to spin the humiliating scene, telling reporters, “It was, I think, mostly cheers. It was loud, and it was very enthusiastic.” But according to Graham, “What millions heard was the sound of a nation’s deepening dissatisfaction with Trump. Yet instead of trying to salvage his presidency with policies that work for a majority of Americans instead of only his wealthy pals, Trump is dissing Obama’s library and the man himself.”

While Trump and his allies have spent years claiming that anyone who criticized him had “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” Graham asserts that “as usual with Trump, every accusation is a confession. It’s Trump who is completely deranged when it comes to Obama.”

She pointed out that even before entering politics, Trump attempted to delegitimize Obama’s presidency with lies regarding his birthplace, claiming he was born in Kenya. Later as president, Trump claimed that Obama had committed “treason” and had tried to “steal” the 2016 election for Hilary Clinton. More recently, he posted an AI-generated video portraying both Barack and Michelle Obama as apes, which prompted so much outrage that he took the rare step of deleting the post.

And according to Graham, while much of it may seem like “infantile” nonsense, in the real world, “the ramifications of Trump’s Obama derangement syndrome are far more grim.”

In 2018, Trump withdrew from his predecessor’s peace deal with Iran, and leaks later revealed that he did it “to spite Obama.” Now, as Trump’s war with Iran drags on with no end in sight, “Trump, according to a recent report in The Atlantic, is desperate to make a deal that doesn’t fall short of Obama’s.”

Graham’s assessment of why Trump is so bothered by Obama would likely rankle the former’s syndrome regarding the latter.

“It should go without saying that Trump’s disdain for Obama is driven by racism — the heartbeat of MAGA,” Graham explained. “Trump can’t fathom how a Black man was twice elected president, led this nation for eight years without a major scandal, has an admired marriage to an accomplished woman, and is arguably one of the most revered former presidents in American history. At a time when Trump’s administration is diminishing, if not outright erasing, the achievements of anyone who isn’t a straight white man, Obama’s star remains undimmable. In every way, Obama is the anti-Trump, and it drives Trump crazy.”

I blame Barack Obama for this

Up until inside the past decade or so, I always fancied myself a fairly affable guy. Growing up in New Jersey and working in newspapers as an adult demanded a certain degree of tolerance and a wicked sense of humor.

Everybody had their flaws, but we were all in this mess together, so I figured let’s go for the laughs and make the most of it. I was willing to give anybody a chance.

Not anymore.

These days, if I even whiff the foul scent of Republican on you, I’m either going the other way, or right through you.

Lately, I hate Republicans. I mean I really HATE them. I don’t necessarily like that I really hate Republicans, but there is nothing to recommend them. They are just flat mean, morally busted, and are actively trying to kill us. Worse, many of them are doing it with a smile on their face.

How many more hundreds of thousands of Americans would still be alive if we all simply listened to the science, wore masks and got vaccinated? How much more stable would our democracy be if a defeat at the polls was accepted through gritted teeth and graciousness, instead of threats and insurrection?

Instead, Republicans have doubled down on their heinousness and placed an anti-vax ghoul in charge of the Department of Health and Human Services. They have made scientists the enemy, instead of our friends tirelessly searching for answers.

Rather than defend and replenish the lifeblood of any democracy, our vote, Republicans are doing everything in their power to kill it. It’s not a matter of IF Trump deploys the Insurrection Act but WHEN, to put down people who don’t like him or disagree with him, which we know from last weekend alone is an astronomical number.

It really is hard to see how we survive this without an all-out war. More than 7 million patriots were in our streets last Saturday peacefully sending the message that they’ve had enough of this dangerous, abhorrent Republican fascism.

The grotesque, orange would-be king responded by posting an AI video of himself literally s------g on those protesters. Republicans, as always, were just fine with this. Completely normal. Nothing to see here.

The corporate press, which has gone out of its way to enable this madness, barely gave it a mention.

Like I said, this is not sustainable.

It was quite a surprise then, that when I rolled out of the rack today, I resolved to find a better way to talk to Republicans. I’m sure it had something to do with a recent epiphany, but more on that below.

Something has to change …

I didn’t always hate Republicans. Hell, I used to vote for ’em every now and then.

Are you still there …?

A number of my oldest friends are Republicans. We’ve been around several blocks together. These are the people I grew up with; got in trouble with; fought for; whose pockets were stuffed with my secrets … the people I loved.

I know where my old friends came from; how they were raised; whether their mother or father was an ass; where the skeletons were buried … Nobody knows more about you than an old, trusted friend.

Lately, I don’t much recognize too many of my old friends anymore. I reckon I look pretty hazy to them, too. I see the stuff they load up on their Facebook page, and wonder how it is we ended up living on different planets when we used to share the same bed.

This all started with Trump, of course. The guy brought out the worst in all of us. It’s his singular talent. Everybody around him is miserable and angry.

I realize I’m not splattering you with any big revelations here. We’ve all gone through this. Not a one of us hasn’t been touched by this negative, soul-crushing force.

Used to be we could trade political insults. Poke fun at each other. In the event it got too heated we could turn the flame down by simply agreeing too many of our politicians were full of crap. They were just going to screw us all in the end no matter what. There was money to be made.

Much better to believe in a friendship that had stood the test of time, than some political party that would test your patience.

Those were the days ...

Today was going to be different, though. Today, I was going to be the bigger man. I was going to reengage. Bridge the gap. Start anew. Find some reason amid the ashes of these torched relationships …

I blame Barack Obama for this.

I don’t know about you, but I do most of my above-average thinking while lying in bed. There’s not a more honest place than safely underneath the covers, head nestled in a pillow.

Just before I closed my eyes Sunday night, I remembered something the two-term, scandal-free president said on a campaign trail way back when while stumping for Joe Biden. I’ll paraphrase, and guarantee you it was even smarter than I’ll type it. But it stuck, and here it goes:

“Look,” Obama said in his ascending tone, “If I tell your Republican friends they should consider voting for something or doing something, they’ll look at me and laugh. They don’t like me! But if YOU tell your Republican friends they should consider voting for something or doing something, they’ll listen! And they’ll listen, because-they-like-you! They might even LOVE you! So sit down. Talk with them!”

See what I mean? If FDR deserved four terms, this guy should have got at least that many. Imagine how much better off we’d be for it.

Except we don’t allows kings in the country …

Now, here I was this morning, refreshed and ready to bring it. There were holes to patch and old friendships to cement. I would be the better man, and cautiously extend a hand. Maybe, just maybe … I could reconnect with a few of these lost souls.

I figured there was nothing to lose, because everything has already been lost. If nothing else it might add perspective, and make for a half-decent column.

I poured a cup of coffee, plugged into a comfy chair, cracked open the local paper, and said this out loud: “Awwwwwwwww fuuuuuuuck …”

HEADLINE: “GOP Tries to Weaken Law Shielding Whales, Seals and Polar Bears”

Whales, seals and polar bears????? Holy hell, are there three more lovable and majestic creatures on this earth?

Whales, seals and polar bears?????

Is there ANYTHING these detestable Republicans won’t put their filthy hands on and strangle to death?

Here’s the lede of this important story:

BOOTHBAY HARBOR, Maine (AP) — Republican lawmakers are targeting one of the U.S.’s longest standing pieces of environmental legislation, credited with helping save rare whales from extinction.Conservative leaders feel they now have the political will to remove key pieces of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, enacted in 1972 to protect whales, seals, polar bears and other sea animals.

Turns out this story was filed last week and got very little damn attention, because Republicans are coming at us with both barrels. They intend to end America as we’ve known it since the last Civil War.

It’s impossible to keep up with it all, and process this madness, which is all part of their destructive design.

The Republican Party is anti-life, anti-American, and anti-good.

The party that said boogeymen were coming for our cats and dogs, are literally coming after our whales, seals and polar bears.

How damn much more of this are we supposed to take?

So, hands shaking, I put the paper down, and raged to the point of tears.

I decided talking to my Republican friends could wait for a bit, and until I could do it without wanting ’em all dead.

D. Earl Stephens is the author of Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters and finished up a 30-year career in journalism as the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes. You can find all his work here.

GOP strategist reveals 'the greatest irony' to Trump's Iran surrender

As information emerges about President Donald Trump’s peace deal to end his war with Iran, there has been no shortage of criticism about the many concessions it offers from the American side. According to longtime Republican strategist Steve Schmidt, Trump’s surrender has not only been a major loss for the U.S., but its greatest irony may be that it validated the actions of one of the president's predecessors and top adversaries: Barack Obama.

On Wednesday, Schmidt explained what he asserts are the three looming ironies to Trump’s failed “excursion” to Iran.

First was the very fact that “the president who thundered that there would be nothing less than ‘UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!’ now appears prepared to conclude his war by accepting an agreement that bears an uncomfortable resemblance to the diplomacy he once condemned as treasonous. If the reported Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is signed this week, the United States will have spent months at war, exhausted enormous military resources, suffered American casualties, destabilized the global economy, and emerged not with the destruction of the Iranian regime, but with another negotiated framework. That’s not ‘unconditional surrender.’ It’s negotiation. It’s compromise. It’s the very thing Donald Trump spent a decade telling the American people was weakness. The irony is staggering.”

Then Schmidt raised Trump’s assertions regarding Obama’s previous deal with Iran.

“There is another irony that deserves attention because history has a wicked sense of humor,” wrote Schmidt. “Donald Trump built much of his foreign policy identity around destroying Barack Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran. He called it ‘the worst deal ever negotiated.’ Republicans spent years portraying the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action as an act of appeasement. The accusation was simple. Obama negotiated with terrorists. Obama rewarded aggression. Obama was weak.”

Now in the aftermath of Trump’s war, says Schmidt, it is clear which president had the wiser approach.

“Barack Obama negotiated before there was a war,” writes Schmidt. “Donald Trump fought the war first — then he negotiated. Obama’s critics promised that strength would produce a dramatically better outcome. Instead, America appears poised to arrive at another agreement centered on sanctions, inspections, nuclear limitations, implementation timelines and economic incentives — the very architecture that Republicans spent years condemning.”

And according to Schmidt, “The road between those two agreements is measured not simply in dollars, but in blood. The cost and destruction have been immense. Entire regions have been destabilized. American military stockpiles have been depleted. Strategic deterrence has been tested. Global markets have been shaken. The prestige of American power has been diminished because maximalist promises created expectations that reality could never satisfy.”

Finally, according to Schmidt, “The greatest irony of all may be this: Barack Obama was vilified for negotiating with Iran. Donald Trump may ultimately be remembered for fighting a costly war only to negotiate over many of the same questions. History has a cruel way of exposing the distance between rhetoric and reality. That distance is measured in lives, treasure and broken promises — and it is measured by the judgment of history, which has never accepted slogans as substitutes for success.”

Trump’s 'Obama envy' remains an 'enduring feature' of collapsing presidency

On Thursday, June 18, media coverage in the United States was dominated by President Donald Trump's Iran ceasefire deal and the opening celebration of the Barack Obama Presidential Center in Chicago. Journalist Jill Lawrence, writing for the conservative website The Bulwark, argues that between the two, Trump's "Obama envy" has been inescapable.

The Chicago event featured a long list of major musicians, including Bruce Springsteen,

U2 leader Bono, John Legend, rapper Common, Christina Aguilera (who performed the Louis Armsrong-associated "What a Wonderful World"), Pearl Jam's Eddie Vedder, and Stevie Wonder — who, now 76, sang favorites like "Higher Ground" and "Signed, Sealed, Delivered, I'm Yours." All the focus on former President Obama infuriated Trump, who, Lawrence observes, has been mentioning him repeatedly.

"Whether by fate, a devious Iranian conspiracy or a major miscalculation by Donald Trump, the U.S. surrender in his failed 112-day 'excursion' is coinciding with the triumphal opening of the Barack Obama Presidential Center in Chicago," Lawrence explains. "The split-screen contrast is telling, from Iran to presidential libraries. Trump's 'memorandum of understanding' to end his doomed war of choice on Iran does not fare well compared with the 2015 Obama deal that was constraining Iran's nuclear program when Trump tossed it out in 2018."

Lawrence emphasizes that "Trump's Obama envy" has "been an enduring psychopolitical feature of the national landscape for what seems like forever."

"He mentioned Obama's name nearly two dozen times during the three-day G7 Summit, by the New York Times' count, and repeatedly insisted that his deal was better than Obama's, despite glaring evidence to the contrary," Lawrence observes. "Cartoonist Patrick Chappatte nailed the dynamic eight years ago. 'What was so bad in that Iran deal?' asks an annoyed European Union representative. Trump's reply: 'Obama's signature.' Trump's preoccupation with his predecessor has long centered on challenging Obama's citizenship and his eligibility to even be president."

Lawrence continues, "He started raising questions about Obama's birth certificate in early 2011, and his promotion of this 'birther' conspiracy theory escalated after a famous incident that year at a White House Correspondents Dinner. It was Saturday night, April 30, at the Washington Hilton."

The "birther" claim that Obama wasn't really born in the U.S. is easily disproved, as his birth certificate clearly states that he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961.

"Obama released a long-form copy of his birth certificate in 2016, and Trump, as president in 2017, speculated that it had been faked," Lawrence notes. "He has moved on to much grander conspiracies and lies since then, topped by his imaginary win in 2020. But he has never stopped trying to top Obama."

'This is a coup': MAGA melts down as Obama visits Canada amid Trump takeover talk

On Thursday, a seemingly innocuous social media post by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney touched off an unexpected MAGA meltdown. “Welcome back to Canada, President [Barack Obama]” Carney tweeted along with a video showing the former president’s arrival in Toronto. While Obama was visiting Canada to deliver a keynote speech to a think tank, the followers of President Donald Trump decided there was something more nefarious going on, accusing him of breaking federal laws.

“Why is Barack Hussein Obama meeting with world leaders while President Trump is in office?” posted far-right influencer and prominent Trump ally Laura Loomer. “This is a coup.”

She and others, like conservative influencer Nick Sortor, proceeded to suggest that Obama should face consequences for allegedly violating the Logan Act, which, as the Daily Beast reports, “prohibits private citizens from engaging in unauthorized negotiations with foreign governments.”

“Obama needs to sit down and figure out his freaking place before his a-ss ends up in prison for violating the Logan Act,” Sortor declared. “Trump is our President. You’ve been sidelined, Hussein.”

Numerous comments on and re-shares of Carney’s original post expressed similarly accusatory sentiments, with more than a few bringing back Trump’s old tagline, “Lock him up!”

Others took issue with Carney referring to Obama as the “president.”

“It’s FORMER President zero,” said one commenter. “If he’s claiming to act on behalf of the American people in your ‘talks,’ he’s in violation of the Logan Act.”

“[Mark Carney] so do you mean Barack Obama is still president since you just called him President Barack Obama?” said another. “This should worry the U.S. a little.”

There are several problems with all this MAGA outrage. First, it is common practice for former commanders-in-chief to be referred to as “president.” Second, Obama wasn’t in Canada to negotiate anything, and former presidents frequently deliver keynote speeches and other addresses to organizations around the world.

But third, these angry MAGA followers ignore the fact that Trump himself met with foreign leaders during the Biden administration. In July 2024, he met with then-Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. Then that October, it was revealed that Trump had held a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Later that month, Trump held a similar phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Trump’s 'mountain of degeneracy' driving America’s 'dignity crisis': ex-GOP strategist

Political strategist Steve Schmidt is scorching President Donald Trump, contrasting him with President Barack Obama amid Thursday’s opening of the Obama Presidential Center.

“America has a dignity crisis, and it begins at the top,” Schmidt writes of Trump on his Substack, The Warning.

Schmidt calls Trump “an amalgam of vice piled so high it has become a mountain of degeneracy. He’s arrogant without accomplishment, ignorant without curiosity, cruel without purpose, corrupt without shame, erratic without discipline and emotional without restraint.”

He described Trump as someone who lacks self-control, emotional intelligence, and integrity — all while being a “chronic liar,” a “convicted felon,” and a “loser.”

“The greatest danger,” Schmidt explained, “is that millions looked at him and concluded he was worthy of the office Washington held, Lincoln ennobled and Roosevelt transformed into an engine of democratic purpose.”

But Thursday, on “Chicago’s South Side, beneath an American flag surrounded by living presidents from both political parties, something rare happened,” said Schmidt: “America remembered itself.”

He called the opening of the Obama Presidential Center “an act of national memory” and “a reminder that character once mattered, that dignity once occupied the center of American public life, and that there remains an American tradition worth defending.”

Schmidt praised former First Lady Michelle Obama’s speech as “the finest speech of the day because it was not fundamentally about politics” but “about character.”

“She spoke movingly of the love, support and shared journey that carried their family through extraordinary years of public life,” said Schmidt. “It was a tribute rooted not in power, but in decency.”

“Then,” Schmidt continued, “Barack Obama stood before the country and spoke of something that once seemed ordinary because it was: respect.”

Obama said that the exhibits in his presidential center “focus not just on policies, but on the shared values that make democracy possible, a belief in the intrinsic dignity and worth of all people, and that no one is above the law or beneath its protection, a belief in checks and balances in our government and an accountability that comes with an independent judiciary and a robust, free press.”

Donald Trump, Schmidt said, by contrast, “stands outside that American circle.”

“He isn’t merely controversial. He’s profoundly un-American,” and “embodies precisely the type of man the founders feared — a man who mistakes appetite for strength, personal grievance for public purpose and power for virtue.”

But he also delivered a warning — and a roadmap.

“America’s revival will never begin with a stronger man,” Schmidt said. “It will begin with better citizens. It will begin when dignity is once again admired instead of mocked. It will begin when character once again outweighs celebrity. It will begin when Americans decide that virtue is not quaint — it is essential.”

'Let it go': CNN panel dismantles Trump’s seething obsession with Obama

MS NOW anchor Katy Tur and contributor Peter Baker took a stab at the mania-grade obsession President Donald Trump suffers over former President Barack Obama, as judged by Trump’s never-ending crusade to try to top the more popular president in speeches, claims and boasts.

“He's really focused and he keeps being focused on this, and he's doing it with Iran too. He's got to be better than Obama," said Tur on her show "The Moment" on Tuesday. "So he brings this up, Peter. He declares that he's going to change [things], he's going to fix it, it's going to be wonderful and he keeps going on about it. … But then he also has to try to top Obama. What is the obsession with trying to top Obama? Why can't he just let it go? The Presidency is over.”

“He's trying to top Obama, because Obama is more popular than him,” said Baker. “He had had a presidency, according to polls, that more Americans supported — then and now Obama, according to those polls, is one of the most popular figures in American life, and I think he just has always fixated on Obama. Why did he talk about the birther lie, why did he sit there and talk about how Obama supposedly wasn't born in this country? And then, of course he was. He's trying to undercut him, trying to undermine him.”

“When he is sitting at that White House Correspondent Association dinner in the audience while Obama is on stage making fun of him, he's was seething,” Baker added. “You can see from the clips, if you haven't been there yourself, you can see the television clips how he was furious at being mocked by Obama and ever since he blamed Obama for all manner of. You know things that have hurt his administration. The Russia investigation is all Obama's fault. Somehow, he's accused Obama of treason. He suggested Obama should be arrested. And yes, as you say on anything, whether it be the reflecting pool or the Iran deal, he has to say he's doing better than Obama when in fact, at the moment it doesn't look like that.”

Other critics say Trump’s fury lies in the fact that Black man continues to top him in both popularity and deed. Trump has even re-posted videos describing Trump as the "King of the Jungle" while depicting the former President and his wife as apes, a frequently used racist trope.

Trump eventually removed the post after Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.), Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) and even Mississippi Republican Sen. Roger Wicker spoke publicly against his post.

But Trump has his own massive popularity problem independent of Obama’s surpassing appeal.

“Well, Katy, the metaphors are so perfect for his adversaries,” said former George Bush and John McCain speech writer Mark McKinnon, referring to Trump’s ick-filled Reflecting Pool. “Metaphors [and the storytelling] are so important, and I'm reminded as I watch the ballroom and the reflecting pool, and just how obvious a metaphor that is for what's going on with the Trump administration, where his priorities are right now. The day that I saw the video of John Kerry windsurfing in 2004 was a perfect metaphor for John Kerry and the flip flop. And we wrote that windsurfing ad in 30 seconds because it made itself, because that perfectly illustrated John Kerry. Well, the reflecting pool and the ball room are perfect metaphors for Donald Trump and the fact that his priorities are not with the American people right now.”

“They want to outdo Obama, but the fact is that, no matter how you draw this up, it doesn't look like there's any possible route to a conclusion [to the war in Iran] in which it is any better and likely much worse than the Obama agreement that was put in place years ago.”

- YouTube youtu.be

Hypocrisy: Trump resorts to 'book cooking' Republicans accused Obama of doing

President Donald Trump is reportedly using the same “book cooking” to count immigrant deportations that he and Republicans denounced in his predecessor, President Barack Obama.

“The White House plans to start counting people who were quickly removed after crossing the border in its deportation statistics, a change that will put it closer to its goal of one million deportations a year,” reported Brittany Gibson from Axios. Even though Trump and his Republican supporters claimed that Obama was guilty of distorting his record when he used this method, White House Border Czar Tom Homan told the Washington Examiner Trump plans on counting deportations by combining ICE’s work in America’s interior with Customs and Border Protection’s returning people who were caught crossing the borders.

"Deportations are over 800,000, counting the Border Patrol too. We're trying to do the same thing we did during the Obama administration, looking at the numbers, pull the numbers together," Homan told the Washington Examiner. Yet as Axios noted, then-House Judiciary Chair Lamar Smith (R-Texas) slammed the tactic in a 2012 press release as “dishonest to count illegal immigrants apprehended by the Border Patrol along the border as ICE removals.”

At the time, the committee demanded Obama provide internal agency documents to determine the truth about the forced removals.

"It seems like President Obama is trying to trick the American people into thinking he is enforcing our immigration laws,” Smith claimed at the time. “But no amount of spin can cover up the facts.”

Greg Bovino, who previously served as commander-at-large for Customs and Border Protection, has publicly accused Homan of not being up to his new job.

“He sounds super tough,” Bovino wrote in a post to X. “But zoom in. All he’s actually promising is rounding up the ones who already have known criminal records.” Homan, he argued, “is denying reality.”

Bovino then argued"100 million" other undocumented immigrants "laughing at us” because of Homan’s approach "staying right where they are… until they rob or kill you," adding that mass deportations are necessary and “anything less is just political theater.”

While Bovino did not offer any data to back up his assertions, there are others who argue Trump’s immigration policies are failing. Further suggesting that Trump has not managed to meet his immigration goals.

Trump officials encouraging his most dangerous ideas: ex-NSC official

During their years in the White House, former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush sometimes drew criticism from supporters for being overly deferential to their policy advisors — Obama with Wall Street insiders on economic policy, Bush with hawkish neoconservatives on foreign policy. But President Donald Trump, on the other hand, is known for surrounding himself with staunch MAGA loyalists during his second presidency — a pattern that, according to former National Security Council (NSC) and ex-U.S. State Department official Emily Horne, poses a major threat to the United States from a military/foreign policy standpoint.

Appearing on The New Republic's podcast, "The Daily Blast," Horne warned that no one in the Trump White House is going to stand up to the president when he's making a really bad decision.

Horne told host Greg Sargent — a former Washington Post columnist — "Who actually gets the president's ear is always a real issue of power and access in any administration, but especially in this one. We all know that Trump is a president who listens a lot to the last person who he talked to. And so, whoever gets to talk to him, whoever shapes his opinion, is often just the person that he heard from most recently. And so, I have no doubt that the national security workforce — who are civilian, who serve apolitically, who are military, who serve apolitically — are doing what they always do. They're collecting the intelligence, they're preparing the assessments, they're preparing the battlefield scenarios and the plans, and they're bringing them up. The question is, is any of it getting through?"

The former NSC/State Department official continued, "And one of the things that's really clear is that Trump has weeded out anyone who has access to him who is capable of telling him, 'Sir, that's not a good idea.' Or, 'Sir, if you do that, here are the five bad things that could happen because of that.' He does not want to hear it. And to survive in Trump's royal court, you have to be a yes man or a sycophant. There is no one who can speak truth to power left in this White House."

Horne lamented that although the Iran war "is wildly unpopular across the political spectrum," Trump's loyalists in the White House are afraid to challenge or question his policies.

"As costs continue to rise, as diplomacy continues to falter, and as the chaos continues to reign across the Middle East — not just in the Strait of Hormuz — with no end in sight," Horne told Sargent, "this is a war that is entirely of Trump’s making."

Why Trump’s Iran deal is 'worst in American diplomatic history': ex-MAGA insider

On her new morning show, "Money Power Politics" — which debated Monday morning, June 15 following the popular "Morning Joe" program — MS NOW's Stephanie Ruhle brought on former Homeland Security Chief of Staff Miles Taylor for a reaction to President Donald Trump's new Iran agreement. And the Never Trump conservative was downright scathing in his assessment.

Taylor told Ruhle, "I'm going to go out there on a limb, Steph, and say I think that this is on track to be the worst deal in American diplomatic history. And look, I say that, recognizing…. that we don't have the text yet. But it's very, very hard to imagine there is a deal here that's any better than the deal we already had. In fact, if the initial reporting is to be believed, the Iranians think they're on a pathway to get $24 billion in assets unfrozen. That would be more than ten times what the Obama administration helped unlock for the Iranians."

The former U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official added, "So, put it another way: We're paying ten times — potentially ten times — what we did before to get the same promise from the Iranians. And in international law, there's nothing that you can say about their commitment to not pursue nuclear weapons that's stronger than a promise. There's no global police force to require the Iranians to not pursue a bomb."

Trump has been highly critical of the Iran deal that former President Barack Obama agreed to during his second term. But Taylor noted that when he was serving in DHS during Trump's first presidency, the president "threw out" the Obama administration's agreement without having "any plan to replace the Obama deal with."

Taylor told Ruhle, "Again, the devil will be in the details, but I have a feeling we're going to see the devil."

Taylor was serving as DHS chief of staff during Trump's first presidency when he anonymously wrote a widely read New York Times op-ed headlined, "I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration." The op-ed detailed Taylor's efforts to dissuade Trump from following through on his worst ideas.

The conservative Taylor subsequently came out as the author of that op-ed and became openly critical of Trump, supporting Kamala Harris in 2024.

Ruhle formerly hosted MS NOW's late-night show "The Final Hour," and "Money Power Politics" — which now airs after "Morning Joe," hosted by conservative Joe Scarborough and liberal Mika Brzezinski — marks her debut as a morning host on the liberal-leaning cable news channel.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.