Carl Gibson

Epstein cellmate says Trump wanted his longtime friend dead

Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was left alone and unprotected in his cell "on purpose" in hopes that he wouldn't survive until his trial date, according to his former cellmate.

The Daily Beast reported Friday that Nicholas Tartaglione — a former police officer-turned quadruple murderer — claimed in a pardon/commutation document filed last year that Epstein was intentionally put in harm's way. In the 21-page document the Beast obtained, Tartaglione insisted Trump wanted his former friend "dead."

Part of that alleged plan may have included selecting Tartaglione to be Epstein's cellmate at New York City's Metropolitan Corrections Center (MCC). The Beast reported that Tartaglione has "a self-confessed hatred of child sex offenders." In a September 2019 letter to the New York Daily News, Tartaglione argued it was suspicious for MCC to put him in the same cell as Epstein.

"The staff here at MCC had hundreds of inmates to choose from yet I was their first choice," he wrote. "... It is no coincidence that prior to trial I was transferred to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan and deliberately placed in the same cell as Jeffrey Epstein."

Tartaglione's recently unearthed petition comes on the heels of Miami Herald reporter Julie K. Brown — who initially broke the news that led to Epstein's first indictment — finding that Tartaglione had once extorted Epstein and threatened his life. According to Brown, Epstein was found on the floor of his cell "with a piece of fabric around his neck," and the convicted sex trafficker initially claimed that Tartaglione attempted to kill him. But Tartaglione wrote in his 2019 letter that both he and Epstein were targeted for assassination, and claimed that several attempts were made on his own life while at MCC.

"I clearly was not protected on purpose, nor was Epstein," he wrote. "I truly believe that the government wanted both Epstein and me dead."

Epstein later changed his story to say that he couldn't remember the details of the attack. Eventually, the incident was described as an act of "self-mutilation." Brown reported that details of the attack were later "expunged." Epstein's brother, Mark, continues to insist that his brother didn't take his own life, and that his death was the result of foul play.

The real reason Trump's attempt to meddle with the midterms is already doomed

Even though it's only February, President Donald Trump's attempts to gum up the works ahead of this fall's midterm elections are virtually guaranteed to fail.

That's according to MS NOW's Ryan Teague Beckwith, who wrote in a Thursday essay that all of Trump's efforts to change the way the 2026 midterms will be conducted will likely all be for naught for one simple reason: He's too late. Beckwith wrote that even with nine months to go before Americans head to the polls, all of the preparations for the voting process are already being handled behind the scenes, meaning any sudden changes from the federal government are likely to be shot down in court.

"Right now, in local elections offices from Seattle to Miami and everywhere in between, election administrators are busy checking thousands of signatures submitted by candidates to get on the ballot, putting the finishing touches on training manuals for election judges and poll workers and sending out postcards to verify addresses of voters who haven’t cast a ballot recently," Beckwith wrote.

"They’ve already started recruiting the part-time staffers and volunteers who will help them run the election," he continued. "In fact, the national “Help America Vote Day” recruiting drive already happened in late January."

The MS NOW columnist explained that one common rule with elections is abiding by the "even-numbered year rule," in which no changes to elections can be made in a year when Americans are voting in a major election. He wrote that if Trump and Republicans hoped to make major changes to the voting process, they should have done so before December 31, 2025. Likewise, any attempt to pass election-related laws in time for the 2028 presidential election should happen before the end of 2027.

"Judges have long followed a similar principle when deciding cases that would change election rules too close to an election, following the logic that it is better to move forward with an imperfect system than try to change it drastically at the eleventh hour," he wrote.

Republicans have recently rolled out legislation to impose severe new restrictions on voting, and two GOP lawmakers entertained the idea of a "standing filibuster" in an attempt to include the controversial SAVE Act — which would require voters prove their citizenship before casting a ballot — during the recent government funding negotiations. The Trump administration's FBI is also organizing a conference call with state election officials and federal agencies, which Nevada's secretary of state described as "beyond crazy." Beckwith said these and other attempts to impose last-minute changes to elections are still little more than bluster giving their timing.

"With these proposals to dramatically change how Americans vote just months before a major election, Trump and congressional Republicans would all but guarantee chaos at polling places around the country," he wrote. "They would disenfranchise potentially millions of voters and create a massive headache for candidates, state parties, elections officials and the judges called in to clean up the mess. And that would undermine public confidence in elections."

"America’s voting laws aren’t perfect, and we can always have a debate over how to fix them," he added. "But in terms of this November’s elections, that time has passed."

'Beyond crazy': Election official sounds alarm over mysterious message from Trump's FBI

President Donald Trump's administration is now inviting election officials from all 50 states to a conference call later this month, where they will reportedly briefed on plans for this fall's midterm elections.

Crooked Media correspondent Matt Berg reported Thursday on an email sent to state officials overseeing elections from an FBI agent identifying themselves as an "FBI election executive." The email invites states to participate in a February 25 conference call with "your election partners at the FBI, DOJ, DHS, USPIS [U.S. Postal Inspection Service] and the EAC [Election Assistance Commission]" where agencies will discuss "preparations" for the 2026 midterm elections. The email also mentioned a separate March 4 call "for members of the EAC's Local Leadership Council."

Berg noted that the purpose of the call "remains unclear," though noted the email was sent after Trump repeatedly called for the federal government to "nationalize the voting" in a podcast interview with former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino. Berg wrote that he obtained the email via a public records request.

"I asked the FBI for an explanation, but a spokesperson wouldn’t give me one, writing: 'Thank you for reaching out. The FBI has no comment,'" Berg tweeted.

Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar told Berg that in his three years overseeing Nevada's elections, he had never heard of the FBI organizing a call between state election officials and federal agencies. He felt so unnerved by the message that he replied and asked: "Is this real?"

"I was just like, ‘what is this?’ It’s the strangest thing in the world that the FBI is reaching out to us and trying to coordinate election security," Aguilar said. "It's never happened in the past. The casualness which they did ... it was just beyond crazy."

"They’re just sowing this confusion and chaos to try to intimidate us into compliance," he added.

The Nevada elections chief said he is "constantly preparing and strategizing" for potential interference in the Silver State's 2026 election, and that he is taking Trump's threats seriously.

"ne. “We have to prepare for that litigation at a moment's notice, and we will be prepared in Nevada to push back," he said.

Trump demands airport be named after him in exchange for federal funding

President Donald Trump is now saying he'll allow several billion dollars to flow to New York on one condition — that he be able to add his name to major landmarks.

CNN reported Thursday that Trump communicated to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) that he would be willing to lift his hold on $16 billion for a long-planned railway project connecting New York and New Jersey underneath the Hudson River. However, the president said he would only release the money if Washington Dulles International Airport (which is in Virginia) and Penn Station in New York were renamed for him.

Two unnamed sources told CNN that Schumer "swiftly rejected" Trump's demand, and reminded the White House that he lacked the power to unilaterally change the names of both locations. The two reportedly discussed the proposition last month, per CNN's reporting.

"Trump’s offer to Schumer would have represented perhaps his most audacious move yet," CNN's Manu Raju and Adam Cancryn reported. "While some conservative lawmakers have already introduced legislation to rename Dulles as the “Donald J. Trump International Airport,” it’s so far gained little traction."

Both New Jersey and New York are suing the Trump administration over the holdup in funding, which is part of the administration's pattern of withholding Congressionally appropriated money to states that didn't vote for Trump in the 2024 election. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russell Vought announced in October the administration was holding up another $8 billion in clean energy projects in 18 blue states.

Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution specifically grants Congress — not the president — the power to appropriate tax dollars. The Trump administration's blockade of federal funding is specifically in violation of the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which Congress passed during the Nixon administration to re-assert its constitutional role over the appropriations process.

'I can clear that up!' CNN's Jake Tapper torches Trump in scathing monologue

While addressing the annual National Prayer Breakfast, President Donald Trump once again doubled down on the disproven claim that he won the 2020 election — particularly in Georgia. CNN host Jake Tapper spent part of his latest show taking apart the president's argument piece by piece.

In a Thursday segment, Tapper noted that Trump remained "laser-focused on rewriting his 2020 election loss" in spite of overwhelming evidence that he lost both the popular vote and the Electoral College. He then observed that Trump used his captive audience at the National Prayer Breakfast — which is typically a non-partisan event — to defend his controversial FBI raid of an election facility in Fulton County, Georgia and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's presence at the raid.

"Georgia was central to Trump's false, debunked claim that the 2020 election was rigged, which it was not," Tapper said. "... Why send Gabbard? It's a question that is baffling. Many senior intelligence officials and election election law experts who say that Gabbard's job as Director of National Intelligence gives her no legal authority over an FBI search."

The CNN host pointed out that Trump recently told NBC News that Gabbard was in Georgia because "we have to have honest elections."

"There should be nothing wrong with the fact that they went in, got ballots from a while ago, and they're going to look at them, and now they're going to find out the true winner of that state," Trump told NBC News' Tony Llamas.

"Oh, you want to know the true winner of the state of Georgia in 2020, President Trump? I can clear that up," Tapper said after playing the clip of Trump's NBC interview. "It was President Biden. No matter how badly you wish that were not true."

"The idea that Trump won Georgia has been thoroughly debunked by Republicans and multiple recounts and audits and top officials in Trump's first administration," Tapper continued. "... But the truth is not what this is apparently about for President Trump. It's about his ego. But that's not my interpretation of this. That's what he said today."

Tapper then aired a clip of Trump telling the National Prayer Breakfast that he needed to win the 2020 election "for my own ego."

"I would have had a bad ego for the rest of my life," Trump said. "Now I really have a big ego, though. Beating these lunatics was incredible ... The first time, you know, they said I didn't win the popular vote. I did."

"President Trump, again, did not win the popular vote in 2020," Tapper said. "The real issues here, though, when it comes to whatever investigation the administration is cooking up when it comes to these ballots, is, A: The Trump administration and President Trump regularly lies to the public about even things that we can see with our own eyes and hear with our own ears, and. B: We already know what happens when President Trump requires a pre-ordained outcome in law enforcement activities related to his political desires. Just look up FBI Director James Comey, or New York Attorney General Letitia James."


- YouTube www.youtube.com

Trump caught in trap after top Republican's Epstein 'blunder': analysis

An upcoming televised hearing featuring testimony from former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has major implications for President Donald Trump, according to a recent analysis by the Bulwark's Joe Perticone.

In a Thursday article, Perticone observed that House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) was successful in forcing the Clintons to testify, despite the former First Couple initially stiff-arming his subpoenas. However, after a bipartisan vote to threaten the Clintons with contempt, both Bill and Hillary Clinton agreed to come before the committee to discuss their connections to convicted child predator Jeffrey Epstein.

But according to Perticone, Comer may have inadvertently given Democrats a huge gift, should they retake the majority in the House of Representatives in 2027. As the Bulwark writer explained, Comer established a precedent that even former presidents can be compelled to testify before Congress and be threatened with criminal charges and potential jail time for not appearing.

Democrats could feasibly use the same tactics against Trump and members of his administration if they win back the House in the midterms. But Comer insisted that the prior criminal investigations of Trump's alleged election interference and mishandling of classified documents meant that the precedent had already been set.

"This has nothing to do with how they treated Trump,” Comer told the Bulwark. “But going after a former president, they’ve already set that precedent. So according to the Democrats, nobody’s above the law.”

Perticone disputed Comer's point, arguing that when Democrats on the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack subpoenaed Trump in 2022, he never showed, and members didn't attempt to hold him in contempt. He noted that now, new rules apply to both sitting and former presidents thanks to Comer's actions.

"Under Donald Trump’s second term in the White House, Comer has laid low, as is customary for the head of a committee whose primary function (when the president belongs to the majority’s party) is to act as the administration’s public relations arm," Perticone wrote. "But Comer may have just made another blunder, and unlike his past blunders as Oversight chair, this one might make it impossible for him to simply pivot away."

Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), who sits on the Oversight Committee, voted for the contempt measure, arguing that Congress' constitutional powers should be respected and upheld. She added that Trump may have to look over his shoulder under a potential future Democratic-controlled House.

“I mean, listen, if you are subpoenaed to Congress and you don’t show, you’re going to be held in contempt,” Stansbury said. “And I know that there were legal arguments being made about a president or former president not having to show, but part of why I voted ‘yes’ in committee is because it feels extraordinarily important to preserve the subpoena of Congress, especially as we have the most corrupt president in American history in office.”


Trump orders more prayer in schools — after mocking GOP leader for praying

At the 2026 National Prayer Breakfast, President Donald Trump imposed new directives regarding prayer in public schools. And he did so after making fun of a top Republican for praying.

The Daily Beast reported Thursday that Trump rolled out elements of his "Make America Pray Again" agenda at the event, which has taken place on the first day of every February since 1953 and features members of both political parties and various faith leaders. The Beast reported that Trump conditioned federal money on schools allowing students "to pray privately and quietly by themselves, whether in class, at an athletic event or before a meal," all of which is currently religious expression openly permitted by the First Amendment.

The "Make America Pray Again" plan also encourages students to "pray in groups," and to "pray in a speaking voice on the same terms as any other student might engage in non-religious speech." While it's illegal for schools to force students to partake in prayer, public schools must now certify in writing that they are protecting students' right to pray, and state education officials are required to report any violations to federal authorities.

Trump's new rules regarding school prayer came at the same event where he attacked the small number of Democrats who were in attendance. He also openly mocked House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) for his propensity to pray before meals.

"Mike Johnson's a very religious person and he does not hide it," Trump said. "He'll say to me sometimes at lunch, 'sir, may we pray?' I say, 'excuse me? We're having lunch!'"

The 79 year-old president also used part of his speech to wonder about his own mortality, asking the audience if they felt he would get into heaven.

"I really think I probably should make it,” Trump said. "I mean I’m not a perfect candidate, but I did a hell of a lot of good for perfect people. That’s for sure."

CNN calls out NBC for letting Trump get away with 'rapid-fire dishonesty'

Earlier this week, President Donald Trump sat down with NBC News reporter Tony Llamas for a wide-ranging interview on multiple subjects. However, Llamas often let the president lie without pushing back. Now, CNN is taking Llamas to task for not doing his job — while debunking Trump's lies.

In a Thursday article, CNN's Daniel Dale did a point-by-point fact-check of Trump's biggest lies, and admonished Llamas for doing little to counter what he called Trump's "rapid-fire dishonesty." The CNN fact-checker observed that while NBC published a fact-check of Trump's claims after the interview, Llamas himself frequently responded to Trump's outright falsehoods with "right" or "yeah," and sometimes "didn’t acknowledge them at all."

"Llamas’ hands-off approach to the president’s falsehoods left people watching the interview on television and through social media clips without immediate corrective information on a variety of pressing subjects," Dale wrote. "An exchange about inflation, for example, was littered with a bunch of inaccurate Trump figures and assertions that Llamas let pass by with the word 'right.' And in one case, when Trump claimed it’s only 'very few' product prices that have stubbornly refused to fall during this presidency, Llamas initially responded with a comment that made it sound like he was endorsing the false claim: 'Yeah, very few. I get it.'"

When it came to Trump's insistence about presiding over an increase in prices of consumer goods, Trump insisted to Llamas that the increases are limited to "very few" items. But Dale wrote that the Consumer Price Index was actually 2.7 percent higher in December 2025 compared to December 2024, and many more products have become more expensive since Trump's second term began than have become cheaper.

Dale also disputed Trump's claim to Llamas that he "inherited the worst inflation in the history of our country." The all-time highest inflation rate of 23.7 percent was actually set in 1920. And while former President Joe Biden saw the inflation rate jump as high as 9.1 percent under his watch in 2022, that was a 48-year high. Dale credited Llamas for telling Trump that Biden had to contend with the Covid-19 pandemic, which was the chief cause of high inflation rates.

Trump also told the NBC reporter that gas prices were "$1.99 a gallon" in 2026, though Dale found that the average price for a gallon of gas was $2.89 per gallon according to data published by AAA. GasBuddy head of petroleum analysis Patrick De Haan told CNN that out of more than 150,000 gas stations, only 18 to 34 offered gas prices under $2 per gallon. Dale reminded readers that Llamas' only response to Trump's claim was "yeah."

"An average over those dates would be 28 stations over the course of the week, or 0.018% of all U.S. stations. I think I’d rather find the needle in the haystack at that point," De Haan said.

Trump's attempt to weaken the US dollar spells 'real trouble': analysis

For decades, President Donald Trump has been laser-focused on lowering the value of the U.S. dollar. And as president, he's doubled down on that goal. But one columnist is warning that weakening the dollar may prove hazardous in more ways than one.

In a Wednesday essay, The Atlantic's Will Gottsegen explained that Trump's crusade against the dollar has gone on since long before he was elected to the White House. Trump's anti-dollar campaign began in earnest in 1987, when he took out full-page ads in the New York Times, Washington Post and Boston Globe complaining that the dollar was too strong compared to the "brilliantly managed" Japanese yen.

According to Trump's argument, the comparatively low value of the Chinese yuan and the Japanese yen makes it possible for those countries to manufacture goods on the cheap in international markets. Gottsegen noted that Trump has somewhat succeeded, with the dollar recently losing 1.3 percent of its value in foreign exchange markets compared to other currencies around the globe.

Data from Trading Economics shows that as of February 2026, the dollar index is at 97.741, which is the lowest mark of Trump's second presidency. The dollar hasn't been valued that low since March of 2022, when then-President Joe Biden was still contending with a global supply chain that had been decimated in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, Russia's escalating war in Ukraine and the resulting decades-high inflation that those events helped create.

In order to explain how Trump's actions were contributing to a weaker currency, former International Monetary Fund (IMF) chief economist Kenneth Rogoff told Gottsegen that Trump was effectively "doing a rain dance" in wishing for the devaluation of the U.S. dollar. Rogoff said there were numerous factors at play typically beyond a president's control — like interest rates set by the Federal Reserve – that influence the dollar's value far more than any executive action.

Gottsegen explained that the dollar has long been the world's reserve currency dating back to the post-World War II economic boom. And despite Trump's actions, the dollar is not in jeopardy of losing its status anytime soon, meaning the U.S. can still borrow money for a relatively low cost, effectively impose economic sanctions on adversaries and continue running deficits. However, as the dollar weakens, so does the United States' influence abroad. Gottsegen cautioned that should the dollar continue its slide, it could result in a dramatic shift of the global order — and not in the United States' favor.

"The real trouble, in other words, is not that the dollar’s value is getting weaker," he wrote. "It’s the possibility that America’s allies and trading partners may one day cease to respect it."

Republicans are 'very concerned about Texas' turning blue: GOP senator

While Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives have a razor-thin with just a four-seat advantage, their six-seat advantage in the U.S. Senate is seen as more likely to hold in November. However, that could change if the GOP loses the traditional Republican stronghold of Texas.

Semafor reported Wednesday that the contentious Republican U.S. Senate primary in Texas is making some Republican senators nervous. Incumbent Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) – who is running for a fifth term — is hoping to fend off challenges from both Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) and Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas). Cornyn and Paxton recently exchanged barbs on social media, with Cornyn's campaign pointing out that Paxton has been accused of infidelity following the collapse of his 38-year marriage to Texas Republican state senator Angela Paxton.

The GOP primary in the Lone Star State could get expensive. The New York Times reported that Cornyn has been bringing in tens of millions of dollars from across the country — meaning Republican donors may be tapped out early as the GOP braces for costly fights elsewhere in November including Georgia, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, North Carolina and elsewhere. The top two vote-getters on March 3 will advance to a primary runoff election on May 26, and the three Republicans are accumulating significant sums of money to compete in both rounds.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told Semafor he was worried about the "business argument" of an expensive Republican primary race in Texas, saying: "You know, if we’re spending $100 or $200 million in Texas in the general election, that’s $100 to $200 million we can’t be spending in other places in races we have a chance to win."

Thune is encouraging President Donald Trump to throw his weight behind Cornyn, and said it would be "enormously helpful" for keeping Texas' Senate seat in Republican hands. Thune added that while he made the case to Trump, "ultimately, the decision is up to him."

The contentious Texas Republican Senate primary is particularly worrisome to Republicans in the wake of Democrat Taylor Rehmet's upset victory in a deep-red Texas state senate district last weekend. Rehmet prevailed over Trump-endorsed Leigh Wambsganss, who also out-raised Rehmet in the special election. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), who is the #4 Senate Republican, told Semafor that Democrats are "really motivated" in 2026 and that seats like Texas' shouldn't be taken for granted.

"We need the candidate that can win in the general," Capito said, adding that Republicans are "very concerned about Texas" given the "money coming out" of donors' pockets that could be spent elsewhere.

'He's not well': Former Trump WH lawyer says president has become 'insane' and 'extreme'

President Donald Trump has become increasingly unhinged in his second term, and one of his former White House attorneys is warning that his unbridled second term could potentially be attributed to declining mental health.

In a Wednesday interview with Substack host Jim Acosta, Ty Cobb — who was a White House counsel in Trump's first administration — accused Trump of tarnishing "everything that was once dignified and sacred about America." He also suggested that the 79 year-old president was being allowed to run wild in a White House staffed almost entirely by sycophantic enablers.

"He's not well ... You cannot do the screeds he did for the G7, or the things that he had said about Greenland, the things he says about Venezuela, the things he says about his predecessors — Obama, Biden — it's just insane, the things he says," Cobb said. "And I think the story needs to be how extreme this is."

Cobb observed that during Trump's first presidency, he was frequently restrained by more experienced officials like former White House chief of staff John Kelly. He then expressed fear that Trump's second-term advisors like White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought were encouraging the president to act on his worst impulses.

"This is so far out of bounds. People have to deal with it. It's dangerous, very dangerous," he said. "And look at the damage. We have allies that have been our allies for 100 years, through wars, blood and treasure, who will not share intelligence with us because of the war crimes that Trump has committed. They won't share intelligence with us because they're afraid that it goes from Trump to Putin."

"We are in a place we have never seen before and we need to navigate out of it as quickly as possible or we're going down," he added.

According to Cobb, Trump believes he is "all-powerful" and beyond the reach of traditional checks and balances. He also heaped blame on the Republican-controlled Congress for ceding its constitutional powers to Trump, and lamented that the federal judiciary was not designed to be fast enough to check a rogue administration.

"Between Miller and Vought, they have, through Project 2025 and other designs, sort of handed him a list of instructions and he's executing on it. It's now a situation where he just does what he wants," he said.

Expert Trump hired to prove voter fraud says every single claim was 'false'

President Donald Trump has called on the federal government to "nationalize the voting" across the United States, baselessly claiming that major cities in swing states are conducting fraudulent elections. But one expert who Trump once hired to find proof of voter fraud says it's almost nonexistent.

In a Wednesday interview on CNN, data specialist Ken Block said Trump's rationale to have the federal government assume control of elections didn't hold water. He also said the Trump administration's recent raid of an election facility in Fulton County, Georgia harkened back to his prior work with the Trump 2020 campaign.

"The Trump campaign in 2020 hired me to look for evidence of voter fraud. And they asked me to review about 20 different claims of voter fraud that came into the campaign from everywhere around the world," Block said. "Apparently, every one of the 20 claims they asked me to evaluate, I was able to show that they were false. And we did find small amounts of voter fraud, but never did we find enough voter fraud to have been able to change the outcome of any of the swing state elections in 2020."

Block went on to say that despite Trump's insistence that there was election fraud in Georgia in 2020, no evidence has ever surfaced proving him correct. He reminded viewers that some Trump associates – like former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani — were never able to substantiate any of their claims in court when asked to prove supposed fraud in the Peach State.

"We've had individuals do data analytics claiming to have found fraud. And in legislative hearings, they were humiliated when legislators asked questions and were able to show that the analyses were false," he said. "There's been nothing but allegations that I've been able to see so far, and nothing that's borne any fruit. I wonder when we're going to move on from this."

CNN host Boris Sanchez noted that in Block's new book, "Disproven," he recounted that he reported his findings debunking Trump's election fraud claims to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. Block said he was never able to confirm if Meadows actually told Trump that his claims were proven wrong by his own hired expert.

"I don't know if Meadows communicated my findings into the Oval Office. A second company was also hired at the same time. Mine was to look for evidence of voter fraud. They had the misfortune of going into the oval office to communicate their findings directly," he said. "And those findings were that they could not find any evidence of voter fraud."

- YouTube www.youtube.com

GOP senator corners Ken Paxton on alleged cheating scandal in scathing attack

The Texas Republican U.S. Senate primary is rapidly heating up, after incumbent Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) aired his primary opponent's dirty laundry on social media.

In a Wednesday post to X, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R), who is challenging Cornyn to be on the general election ballot in November, highlighted a recent report about Cornyn raising tens of millions of dollars from donors across the country to keep his seat. Paxton accused Cornyn of "stealing $50+ million from races in NC, ME, MI, and GA," referring to hotly contested Senate seats Republicans are hoping to hold ahead of what's expected to be a Democratic wave election.

"He's stuck in the mid-20s, doesn't even know if he'll make the runoff, and is set to lose by huge margins even if he does," Paxton tweeted.

Cornyn's official campaign account fired back at Paxton, and reminded Texans of the attorney general's divorce from his wife, Angela Paxton, after he was accused of having an affair with a Louisiana-based author. The Daily Mail reported in September that Paxton allegedly had secret trysts with writer Angela Duhon, who herself was married.

"Ken, when this over, you will have nothing. Which turns out to be the same thing you offered to give Angela in divorce proceedings," Cornyn's campaign account posted. "This after you cheated on her multiple times."

Ken and Angela Paxton officially split after 38 years of marriage in July of 2025. Angela Paxton – a Republican state senator in Texas — announced she was filing for divorce in a tweet referencing "recent discoveries."

"I believe marriage is a sacred covenant and I have earnestly pursued reconciliation," she wrote at the time. "But in light of recent discoveries, I do not believe that it honors God or is loving to myself, my children, or Ken to remain in the marriage."

President Donald Trump has not yet made an endorsement in the Texas Senate Republican primary. On the Democratic side, Texas state representative James Talarico is running against Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). That race was shaken up earlier this week after former Texas Democratic Senate nominee Colin Allred accused Talarico of calling him "mediocre." Talarico said his comments were misconstrued.

Trump no longer 'comfortable' with how 'far' top advisor has gone: report

President Donald Trump has frequently had to answer for one of his top advisors, who has angered everyone from ordinary Americans, to Republican senators and even CEOs of public traded corporations. However, the president has yet to take any concrete action to limit his influence and power.

The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller – who has been a key member of Trump's inner circle since his first administration – is an increasingly divisive figure in the president's second term. Trump's hardline immigration enforcement tactics seen in Minneapolis and Chicago are the brainchild of Miller, who convinced the president to center his 2024 campaign on immigration rather than the economy.

However, the Trump administration's actions in Minneapolis – which include the fatal shootings of U.S. citizens Renee Good and Alex Pretti — have put Miller in the spotlight. After Pretti was killed, the deputy White House chief of staff asserted that Pretti was an "assassin" wanted to do "maximum damage to law enforcement." This is despite ample video evidence showing the 37 year-old ICU nurse never reached for his gun, let alone threatened federal agents.

The Journal's Josh Dawsey and Tarini Parti wrote in their report that "cracks have appeared" in the Oval Office, as the administration faces mounting pressure over its heavy-handed tactics.

"The president, aware of polls showing that much of his immigration agenda isn’t popular, has told advisers he wasn’t comfortable with how far Miller has gone on some fronts, according to people who have spoken with Trump," the Journal reported. "The president has said that business officials are calling and complaining to him about longtime workers being thrown out of the country."

Miller has also attracted the ire of Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who has called on both Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to be fired. The retiring Republican senator accused both Miller and Noem of taking Trump's strongest issue and turning it into a liability for Republicans ahead of the midterms.

"That is amateur hour at its worst,” Tillis said, adding, “Stephen Miller never fails to live up to my expectations of incompetence.”

Mike Johnson tries to give Bible lesson to Pope Leo XIV

Despite Pope Leo XIV repeatedly calling on Christians to honor the Bible's multiple instructions to care for and welcome immigrants and refugees, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is insisting that the scripture says otherwise.

The Daily Beast reported Tuesday that Johnson was confronted in a Capitol Hill hallway by a reporter who asked him about the pontiff's words on providing a safe haven to immigrants fleeing oppression. Pablo Manriquez — a reporter with liberal outlet MeidasTouch — asked the speaker: "Pope Leo has cited Matthew 25:35 to critique Donald Trump’s mass deportation agenda. How would you respond to Pope Leo in scripture?"

"So you want me to give you a theological dissertation? All right. I tell you what. I’ll post it on my website later today, but let me give you a quick summary," Johnson said. "When someone comes into your country, comes into your nation, they do not have the right to change its laws or to change a society. They’re expected to assimilate. We haven’t had a lot of that going on."

Johnson later posted a lengthy screed to his official Facebook page laying out what he called "the Christian case for border security." He argued that Leviticus 19:34 — which decrees that "the foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born" — is often quoted without appropriate "context."

"It is, of course, a central premise of Judeo-Christian teaching that strangers should be treated with kindness and hospitality," Johnson wrote. "However, that 'Greatest Commandment' was never directed to the government, but to INDIVIDUAL believers."

Pope Leo XIV – the first American-born pope in history — has urged Catholics to consider "deep reflection" about how immigrants are treated in the United States. The pontiff cited the Gospel of Matthew — specifically Jesus' parable of the sheep and the goats — to argue that Christians have a responsibility to welcome those from other nations seeking safety. He has also called on American bishops to be "more forceful" in pushing back against President Donald Trump's administration in how it treats immigrants.

"Jesus says very clearly at the end of the world, we’re going to be asked, you know, how did you receive the foreigner? Did you receive him and welcome him or not? And I think that there’s a deep reflection that needs to be made in terms of what’s happening," the pope said in November.

Trump skipping Super Bowl because he's afraid of getting booed: report

President Donald Trump won't be in attendance at the biggest sporting event in the United States this year. And according to a new report, he's skipping out over fears that he may be booed by tens of thousands of people.

On Tuesday, Zeteo's Asawin Suebsaeng and Andrew Perez reported that one unnamed White House official feared Trump would get booed "big league" at Super Bowl LX in Santa Clara, California (the home stadium of the San Francisco 49ers). Suebsaeng and Perez wrote that Trump's advisors feared a wave of boos at the Super Bowl "would instantly create a wealth of viral video clips and media coverage that administration officials would prefer to avoid."

"[Booing is] another thing we don’t want right now," one Trump advisor anonymously confided to Zeteo.

The president has also reportedly complained that this year's Super Bowl is too "woke." He is particularly upset about Grammy-winning artist Bad Bunny headlining this year's halftime show, and rock band Green Day (whose frontman, Billie Joe Armstrong, is an outspoken critic of Trump) also performing.

"There was a time when the Super Bowl was neutral territory for presidents. That line has blurred – even disappeared," former Fox News host Eric Bolling told Zeteo. "In today’s politically polarized America, location can matter more than the event itself. This looks like a strategic decision, not a snub or a controversy."

Suebsaeng and Perez noted that Trump's polling has slid noticeably downward since his mixed reception of cheers and boos at last year's Super Bowl in New Orleans, Louisiana. The president was also met with both applause and jeers last month in Miami, Florida when he attended the College Football Playoff championship game between the University of Indiana and the University of Miami. And when Trump attended a regular season NFL game between the Detroit Lions and the Washington Commanders, the crowd could be heard viciously booing him for several minutes.

Trump reportedly being sensitive about negative crowd response may also stem from an appearance last year at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. In June of 2025, both the president and First Lady Melania Trump were booed loudly after they made an appearance on opening night of the musical "Les Miserables," which is about a populist rebellion against a tyrannical king.

Federal judge suggests he'll block Trump admin's attempt to punish Mark Kelly

After Sen. Mark Kelly (R-Ariz.) called on troops to remember their oath to disobey illegal orders, President Donald Trump's Department of Defense (DoD) made moves to cut his military pension. Now, a judge is likely to rule that move illegal.

That's according to a Tuesday article in CNN, which reported that U.S. District judge Richard Leon (an appointee of former President George W. Bush) scoffed at the DoD's argument for punishing the Arizona senator and retired U.S. Navy captain. According to CNN, Leon took issue with Pentagon lawyers' justification of including military retirees in its loophole to circumvent First Amendment protections for active-duty personnel.

"You’re asking me to do something the Supreme Court or the DC Circuit has never done," Leon said. "That's a bit of a stretch."

Tuesday's hearing came after Kelly sued the Trump administration, alleging its retaliatory measure was a violation of the U.S. Constitution's Speech and Debate Clause. That clause allows for sitting members of Congress to not be held liable for statements made in their capacity as lawmakers from institutions outside of Congress itself.

Kelly and several other Democratic lawmakers urged service members to refuse illegal orders in a video message posted to social media. Like Kelly, the other members of Congress in the video are veterans of the U.S. military and of intelligence agencies. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth previously pushed for Kelly to face a court-martial over his remarks, though later revised the call for a court-martial to a demotion in rank (which would reduce his pension) and a censure letter.

"When viewed in totality, your pattern of conduct demonstrates specific intent to counsel servicemembers to refuse lawful orders," Hegseth's censure letter read. "This pattern demonstrates that you were not providing abstract legal education about the duty to refuse patently illegal orders. You were specifically counseling servicemembers to refuse particular operations that you have characterized as illegal."

Judge Leon signaled at the hearing that he would issue a ruling on Kelly's motion to block the Pentagon's move by Februrary 11.

'You are the worst': Trump erupts at female reporter who asked him about Epstein

President Donald Trump spent part of a recent press conference in the Oval Office admonishing a female reporter who asked him about convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

During a Tuesday bill-signing event in the Oval Office, Trump took questions from journalists in an impromptu press conference. At one point, CNN host Kaitlan Collins asked Trump about two of his associates – Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Tesla CEO Elon Musk – being mentioned in the latest batch of Epstein files. Trump shrugged off those two names, saying "I'm sure they're fine. Otherwise there would have been major headlines."

Collins then followed up that question with another about Epstein's victims, noting that many were "unhappy with those redactions that came out," referring to multiple victims' names and identifying information appearing without redactions in the latest release. Trump also dismissed that premise, assering some victims thought the Department of Justice "released too much."

"I think it's really time for the country to get on to something else," Trump said. "You know, now that nothing came out about meother than it was a conspiracy against me, literally, by Epstein and other people. But I think it's time now for the country to maybe get on to something else, like healthcare or something that people care about."

Collins interjected, asking what the president would say to survivors who felt the Justice Department didn't protect them. At that point, Trump launched into a tirade against both Collins and her employer, and chided her for "not smiling" enough.

"You are so bad. You are the worst reporter," Trump said. "CNN has no ratings because of people like you. You know, she's a young woman. I don't think I've ever seen you smile. I've known you for ten years. I don't think I've ever seen a smile on your face. You know why? You know why you're not smiling? Because you know you're not telling the truth. And you're a very dishonest organization. And they should be ashamed of you."


- YouTube www.youtube.com

CNN demolishes 7 of Trump's most 'unfathomable' lies about his second term

President Donald Trump recently penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal entitled "My Tariffs Have Brought America Back." A team of CNN fact-checkers are now alleging that many of the president's claims in the op-ed don't measure up to scrutiny.

In a Tuesday article, CNN's Daniel Dale, Alicia Wallace and Tami Luhby zeroed in on nine specific claims Trump made about his second term agenda, noting that they were "based in part on figures that are plain false or highly misleading, using cherry-picked beginning and ending points for various calculations to serve the president’s argument." They also wrote that some of Trump's "qualitative claims" were false.

1. Foreign investment in the US

CNN pointed out that Trump's claim of $18 trillion in foreign investment in the United States was "not only unfathomable but factually incorrect." The network observed that even the White House website quotes a $9.6 trillion figure, though that included "trillions of dollars in vague investment pledges, pledges that were about 'bilateral trade' or 'economic exchange' rather than investment in the US, and vague statements that didn’t even rise to the level of pledges."

2. High GDP growth estimates

The Trump administration has frequently touted a 4.4 percent GDP growth rate from the third quarter of 2025, and has claimed that the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta is projecting fourth-quarter growth in excess of five percent.

"While the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model was estimating fourth-quarter 2025 growth of more than 5 percent just over a week ago, the latest update from the model, released four days before Trump’s op-ed was published, was down to 4.2 percent," the fact-checkers wrote. "Also, some other estimates suggest fourth-quarter growth was lower than 4.2 percent."

3. Lowering the trade deficit

Trump claimed in his op-ed to have lowered the trade deficit by 77 percent, and that he did so "with virtually no inflation." CNN noted that Trump got that figure from "a one-time decline in October that quickly reversed in November." The 77 percent October decline was reportedly after fluctuations in the trade of gold and pharmaceutical products, which jumped 95 percent higher the following month.

"The November figure was still 56 percent lower than the January 2025 figure, but 56 percent is not 77 percent," CNN wrote.

The network further reported that Trump's starting point of January 2025 for measuring the trade deficit is misleading, as many companies went on a buying spree in expectations of the massive tariffs Trump ran on. In fact, CNN found "the overall trade deficit has been higher in 2025 than it was in 2024."

4. Stock prices since Trump's"Liberation Day" tariffs

In April of 2025, Trump announced sweeping tariffs on virtually all of the United States' trading partners. He claimed in his op-ed that since then, the stock market has "skyrocketed," with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 17 percent since April of last year. CNN reported that while that figure is accurate, Trump omitted the fact that many foreign stock exchanges have significantly out-performed the Dow in that same time frame.

"For example, Japan’s Nikkei 225 was up about 47 percent, China’s SSE Composite up about 20 percent, South Korea’s Kospi Composite up about 98 percent, Canada’s S&P/TSX Composite up about 27 percent, and the United Kingdom’s FTSE 100 [is] up about 20 percent," CNN wrote.

5. New factory construction in the U.S.

The president argued that factory construction in the U.S. has increased by 42 percent since 2022, which CNN found curious, as the premise of his op-ed was about the tariffs he imposed last April. By the time Trump announced the "Liberation Day" tariffs, factory construction had actually gone down. And as the network reported, the bulk of that 42 percent increase happened in 2023, when former President Joe Biden was still in office. Many of those new factories were due to both the Inflation Reduction Act and the CHIPS and Science Act.

"It’s interesting (Trump) would take credit for something that transpired during the Biden administration," Associated Builders and Contractors chief economist Anirban Basu told CNN. "... That boom ends in 2025.

6. "Real wealth" during the Biden administration

Trump asserted that under Biden's presidency, the "typical" American household lost an average of "$33,000 in real wealth." But one leading economist said that figure is only accurate during one brief moment of Biden's time in office. In actuality, "real wealth increased significantly for the middle class, as well as all other groups, if you look at Biden’s presidency from beginning to end," per CNN.

"There was a dip in 2022-2023 but a clear rebound in 2024," said Nobel-winning economist Emmanuel Saez.

7. Inflation under Trump

The president wrote in his op-ed that he lowered the trade deficit with "virtually no inflation," which CNN observed was untrue, though the network said Trump's use of the word "virtually" gave him some wiggle room. Between December of 2024 and December of 2025, average consumer prices increased by roughly 2.7 percent. Trump also hammered Biden on overseeing an inflation rate of 9.1 percent, which was the highest in 40 years. However, CNN wrote that Trump's attribution of that rate to "trillions of dollars in wasteful spending" and an "extremist green energy agenda" was inaccurate.

"Inflation’s rapid ascent, which began in early 2021, was the result of a confluence of factors. Those included effects of the Covid-19 pandemic, such as snarled supply chains, and geopolitical issues, notably including Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, that caused shocks in energy and food prices," CNN wrote. "Heightened consumer demand boosted in part by pandemic-era fiscal stimulus from both the Trump and Biden administrations also led to higher prices."

Many Americans have not bought Trump's explanation for higher prices. A January CBS/YouGov poll found that 74 percent of Americans believe Trump is not focused enough on inflation, while 76 percent of respondents said their income has not kept up with the pace of inflation.


Two Republicans plan to blow up Trump's plan to avoid shutdown

President Donald Trump has previously demanded the pending bill to keep the government funded be sent to his desk promptly, without changes. Two Republicans have a different idea.

On Monday, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) tweeted that she is prepared to mount a "standing filibuster" of the bill the Republican-controlled Senate sent to the House of Representatives. Luna is insisting that the SAVE Act – which would require voters provide proof of citizenship before being able to cast a ballot — be included in the House version of the bill. Luna insisted in her post that Trump supports including the SAVE Act in the final legislation.

"Just left the White House. POTUS wants the SAVE America Act passed! Voter ID is number one," Luna tweeted.

Luna's claim that Trump wants to add the controversial bill to a must-pass government funding package has not yet been corroborated by the president. Trump's latest position — which he posted to Truth Social Monday evening — was that he was "working hard with Speaker Johnson to get the current funding deal, which passed in the Senate last week, through the House and to my desk, where I will sign it into Law, IMMEDIATELY!"

"We need to get the Government open, and I hope all Republicans and Democrats will join me in supporting this Bill, and send it to my desk WITHOUT DELAY. There can be NO CHANGES at this time," Trump wrote. "We will work together in good faith to address the issues that have been raised, but we cannot have another long, pointless, and destructive Shutdown that will hurt our Country so badly — One that will not benefit Republicans or Democrats. I hope everyone will vote, YES!"

According to Semafor reporter Eleanor Mueller, Luna has found an ally in her goal to pass the SAVE Act in the form of Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), who is a member of the far-right House Freedom Caucus. Luna told Mueller that both she and Burchett "feel very comfortable" insisting on the SAVE Act's inclusion.

If the SAVE Act were included in the final legislation, it would likely fail to meet the required 60-vote threshold in the U.S. Senate needed to send legislation to Trump's desk. Republicans have only a 53-seat majority, meaning seven Democrats would need to break ranks to fund the government while passing the SAVE Act. This is unlikely, given the legislation's onerous requirements on voters needing to bring citizenship documents to the polls. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, roughly 21.3 million Americans don't have citizenship documents readily available. And of that group, 3.8 million people don't have those documents at all due to them being lost, stolen or destroyed.

Expert explains how Trump can keep some Epstein files secret

Even though President Donald Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) has released millions of documents pertaining to convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein's two federal investigations, there are plenty of documents that still may never see the light of day.

According to former Florida state attorney Dave Aronberg (also a former Democratic state senator), the DOJ has taken advantage of a glaring loophole in the Epstein Files Transparency Act to keep "millions" of pages of documents hidden from the public. On Monday, Aronberg told Substack host Jim Acosta – a former CNN anchor – that there are several tools the DOJ is deploying to shield the full Epstein files from American eyes.

"They produced millions of pages, but there are still millions that they're keeping under their watch," he said. "And the reason why they're not producing it is because they're saying, 'well, it involves an ongoing criminal investigation.' Of course, there's no proof that there really is one."

Aronberg said the Trump DOJ is also claiming "deliberative process privilege" to keep certain documents under wraps, explaining that this was essentially the DOJ arguing that disclosing certain documents would be akin to sharing their internal work notes. He added, however, that this was illegal under the legislation passed by Congress and signed into law in November.

"That's not allowed under the Epstein Files Transparency Act," Aronberg said. "... The problem is that there really is no mechanism that is easy to enforce the Epstein Files Transparency Act, because the act itself contains no enforcement mechanism."

"Because of that, we're all trying to figure out what's next," he continued. "How do we get the act enforced? And this was, I think, a mistake by the drafters of the act. They really should have put more teeth in it."

According to the New York Times, Trump is mentioned more than 38,000 times in approximately 5,300 files. Many of those mentions accuse Trump of committing crimes alongside Epstein. In addition to accusations called into the FBI's tip line, Trump is also accused of crimes in "302 files," which is the FBI classification for witness interviews.

- YouTube www.youtube.com


Top Trump DOJ official forced out after MAGA civil war: report

A battle between two high-ranking officials within President Donald Trump's Department of Justice (DOJ) is now ending with one of them headed for the exits.

That's according to a Monday article in CNN, which reported that Ed Martin – who was once tapped as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia — is preparing to leave the DOJ in the coming weeks. This is apparently the doing of Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who CNN said "made moves to significantly limit Martin’s ability to wield power."

Martin is currently the DOJ's pardon attorney, whose motto when screening potential candidates for pardons has reportedly been "no MAGA left behind." He has also led the Trump DOJ's "Weaponization Working Group," though one of CNN's unnamed sources told the network that Martin's efforts have been underwhelming to his superiors.

"The fact is that Ed was given all opportunity to lead this group and deliver on its mission, but he did nothing," the source said. "Others across the Department have since been making great progress and doing the work that should have been happening under Ed’s leadership."

Martin was seen as a particularly divisive figure, given his past history leading the "Stop the Steal" campaign after the 2020 election, and his work representing defendants charged in connection with the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. After Trump nominated him to be the DOJ's top prosecutor in Washington D.C., he failed to convince enough Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee to support his confirmation.

Judiciary Committee member Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said he was "not comfortable" voting to move Martin out of the committee to the full Senate due to his work representing January 6 defendants. Martin also hosted Nazi sympathizer Timothy Hale-Cusanelli on five different occasions after his ideology became publicly known.

"Tim Hale is an extraordinary guy. I’ve gotten to know him really well. I’d say we’re friends over the last few years, and especially in the last month since he’s been out of jail," Martin said of Hale-Cusanelli in July of 2024.

Trump’s gold smartphone company just hit another roadblock

Supporters of President Donald Trump eager to buy one of his branded smartphones will now have to wait a little longer.

The Daily Beast reported Monday that the official release of Trump's gold smartphone — dubbed the T1 — has now been pushed back to March. This marks the third delay that customers have had to endure since the phones were first announced in June of 2025.

Initially, customers were told that the $499 smartphone (which required a $100 down payment to pre-order) would be ready by August of 2025. Then, Trump Mobile announced that the phones would be released before the end of 2025. But in December, the T1 phones had been delayed once again, with the company blaming a slowdown in shipping due to the government shutdown last fall.

The T1 phone has been accused of marketing to customers using "deceptive practices," according to a complaint filed with the Federal Trade Commission by Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) last month. The Democratic lawmakers took issue with Trump's company claiming that the phones would be made in the United States — a claim the company's website deleted within days of the first T1 announcement.

“To claim that a product is ‘Made in USA,’ marketers must meet a very specific set of FTC standards, violations of which come with civil penalties," read the letter from the two lawmakers.

Trump Mobile is renting its network coverage from T-Mobile, which requires specific certification. According to the Beast, the certification process "involves a consultation, a series of compatibility and functionality tests, and a final review."

Todd Weaver, who is the founder and CEO of phone company Purism (which is the United States' sole smartphone manufacturer), told NBC News last year that it is effectively impossible to not source at least some parts from China. Weaver said a certain crystal that powers a smartphone's motherboard is only available in China.

"There just isn’t a company yet providing that single crystal," Weaver said.

MAGA hurls racist attacks at Trump official

One high-ranking member of President Donald Trump's administration is now being subjected to a fusillade of racist insults from Trump supporters.

MS NOW columnist Ja'han Jones wrote Friday that Madhu Gottumukkala — who is Trump's acting head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) — is the latest target of far-right rage after he was caught in a scandal. According to Politico, Gottumukkala uploaded sensitive government documents to a public version of ChatGPT. None of the documents were classified, but they were reportedly classified as "for official use only."

in the summer of 2025. CISA employees reportedly administered a polygraph test to Gottumukkala after he requested "highly sensitive cyber intelligence." Gottumukkala failed that test, and the six employees who administered it were put on paid leave. In response to the news about Gottumukkala uploading the documents to ChatGPT, Andrew Torba — a prominent MAGA influencer who also founded far-right website Gab — wrote: "You could pick any random midwestern White guy from a corn field and he would be an infinitely more qualified candidate for this job."

"Foreign born immigrants are in charge of America's cyber defense and leaking sensitive documents," the official account for anti-immigration group Providence Society tweeted. "Americans deserve better."

Other X users responded to the news by accusing Gottumukkala's "demographic" of "fraudulent and dishonest scheming," making crude references to the Indian American business owner on The Simpsons and even responding to Gottumukkala's name with an image of Adolf Hitler. One X user who described themselves in their bio as a "Heritage American" posted an image of the signing of the Declaration of Independence while commenting: "No one in this picture was named Madhu Gottumukkala."

Jones observed that the racist criticism of Gottumukkala comes in sharp contrast to other Trump administration scandals committed by predominantly white men. The MS NOW columnist pointed out that when Trump Cabinet officials were caught accidentally sharing secret war plans with a journalist, none of them were insulted based on their ethnicity.

"So continues a trend that I and some of my MS NOW colleagues have written about previously: MAGA influencers attacking prominent Indian Americans who support Trump for unmistakably racist reasons," Jones wrote. "FBI Director Kash Patel has faced such fury. Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has, too. And now we can add Madhu Gottumukkala to this list as well."

Conservative Hollywood media mogul slams Trump's 'dictator-like' move

The recent arrest of journalist Don Lemon has set off alarm bells within the media world – including from one prominent media executive with ties to President Donald Trump.

In a Friday segment on his gossip site TMZ, founder Harvey Levin lamented the Trump administration's indictment of Lemon – a former CNN anchor — and suggested Trump was taking a page from the authoritarian playbook.

"So the Trump administration wonders why people are saying that they are trying to form a dictatorship. Well, look at the landscape – arresting Don Lemon, who covered a protest in Minneapolis, is just insane, ridiculous, dictator-like," Levin said. "This is the playbook that dictators use to destroy democracies and take the will of the people away. It is as simple as that."

Levin asserted that arresting Lemon was the administration sending the message that it viewed the free press as hostile, which Levin said was a threat to democracy. He went on to argue that the administration's argument that Lemon was impeding the expression of religious rights by covering a protest in a church was "stupid."

"A church invites everybody in. Have you ever seen a church with a no trespassing sign saying no journalists allowed? Have you ever seen any house of worship that says that?" Levin said. "It is insane, insane, that they’re making this stupid argument transparent."

Levin – whose staff has previously called out his ties to Trump as "gross" — said the Trump administration "should be ashamed of itself" for its "ridiculous assault on democracy."

"They will continue to do this. And they are going after journalists. They’re getting search warrants for their homes," he said. "It is obvious what’s happening in this country, people. Look at what is happening. You’re gonna look back in two years, if somebody doesn’t stand up to them, and I know people are now, but you’re gonna back in to years and say, ‘Wow, we didn’t see that coming!’"

The real reason Donald Trump didn't fire Kristi Noem

President Donald Trump may have fired Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem if she ran the agency during his first term. But his second term is different — possibly due to the first high-profile appointee Trump fired.

In a Friday article for The Independent, correspondent Andrew Feinberg wrote that Noem may have to give thanks to Gen. Michael Flynn (Ret.), who served as Trump's first White House National Security Advisor. Flynn's tenure was short-lived, and he was let go after just 22 days on the job after he was found to have had back-channel communications with Russia's ambassador to the United States and lied about it to the FBI.

Flynn's firing as just one of many in Trump's tumultuous first-term, which had the highest turnover rate of any presidential Cabinet in U.S. history. Some of the more high-profile firings included Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin, while others were forced to resign, like Attorney General Jeff Sessions, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt and DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.

Feinberg wrote that one source "close to Trump" told him that the president "decided that he’d been 'weak' to so easily fire advisers in response to pressure from media reporting." Now, in his second term, he has a "no-scalps policy" in which he has agreed to never fire anyone he has appointed.

Feinberg wrote this may be why former National Security Advisor Mike Waltz was instead named United Nations ambassador following the Signalgate controversy. And it may be why former Border Patrol commander-at-large Greg Bovino was sent back to his El Centro, California office until his pending retirement, despite previously being the face of Trump's immigration agenda.

While Trump has publicly praised Noem's performance as DHS secretary, he notably did not call on her once during his latest Cabinet meeting. Feinberg wrote that while this doesn't amount to a firing, it is "what Italians might call Il bacio della morte — the “kiss of death” — to the ex-South Dakota governor."

"That’s a fate possibly worse than firing in Trumpworld, where one’s ability to publicly praise the president and attack the press (and Democrats) in various public forums is often the coin of the realm," he wrote. "And while she’s still firmly ensconced in her office ... Noem may well be the first Trump cabinet secretary to get the hook this year."

'Do the math': GOP senator vows to sink Trump's Fed chair pick

President Donald Trump has nominated former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh to succeed Jerome Powell as chairman of the Fed. But one Republican senator is threatening to make sure Warsh never gets confirmed out of his committee.

Semafor reported Friday that outgoing Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) – who is not running for another term in November – is signaling he will vote against Warsh's confirmation in the Senate Banking Committee, where he is one of 13 Republican members on the 25-member body. Tillis maintains that he won't vote to confirm any of Trump's nominees to the Federal Reserve until the Department of Justice calls off its investigation into Powell.

"I actually sent a note to the president saying, ‘It’s a great pick,'" Tillis told Semafor. "But I'm not changing."

Assuming all 12 Democrats on the committee vote no, Warsh would be unable to advance to the full Senate for a majority vote. The rules of the Senate allow for the full body to vote on a presidential appointee's confirmation with 60 votes, though that would require eight Democrats (assuming TIllis' opposition remains in place) to cross the partisan aisle.

While Vice President JD Vance can cast a tie-breaking vote if the body is tied at a 50-50 split, Tillis suggested some of his Republican colleagues "understand the profound importance of Fed independence" and privately disagree with Trump's brow-beating of Powell. He told the outlet: "I’m pretty sure that they wouldn’t get 51 [votes]."

"This could have been frictionless," the two-term North Carolina Republican said. "But if they choose friction, what else can I do except create more friction?"

Tillis quipped that when Republicans asked about the holdup on Trump's nominees, he flatly responded: "I'm not running for reelection." And he said his hold could last until "the next Congress," hinting that Republicans may no longer have the numbers to advance Trump's nominees after 2027.

"[T]hat Congress may or may not be with the Senate Republican majority," the retiring senator said. "Do the math."

Trump official traveled to Epstein's island years after claiming he cut ties: NYT

One member of President Donald Trump's Cabinet apparently sought to travel to convicted child predator Jeffrey Epstein's private island, according to a newly released document.

The New York Times reported Friday that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick sent an email to Epstein in 2012, telling him that he and his family were going to be in the Caribbean and asking if they could meet for lunch. Epstein responded through an assistant, who gave Lutnick information about Epstein's "Little Saint James Island" in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Lutnick told the Times he "spent zero time with [Epstein]" and hung up on reporters when contacted, though according to the outlet, Lutnick and Epstein eventually ended up meeting on December 23, 2012. Lutnick's visit to Little Saint James Island had not been previously reported.

The eventual commerce secretary's meeting with the convicted sex trafficker took place despite Lutnick claiming that he cut off all ties with Epstein in 2005. While speaking to the New York Post's Miranda Devine last year, Lutnick recalled meeting with Epstein at his New York City town house in 2005, and called him "the greatest blackmailer ever." He claimed that he and his wife were so repulsed by Epstein that they both vowed to banish him from their lives.

"[I]n the six to eight steps it takes to get from his house to my house, my wife and I decided that I will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again," Lutnick said in October.

According to the Times, Epstein re-initiated contact with Lutnick through an assistant in November 2012, who reached out via email and wrote: "Jeffrey requested I please pass along some phone numbers to you so the two of you can possibly get together." Lutnick's wife, Allison, reportedly told the assistant they would be arriving to Little Saint James Island on board a 188-foot yacht called "Excellence."

Lutnick and Epstein remained in touch after the 2012 meeting. The Times reported that Epstein contributed to a charity dinner honoring Lutnick in 2017, and the two emailed back and forth in 2018 discussing ways to halt a proposed construction project for a museum located in proximity to their Manhattan homes.

'As weak as it gets': Attorneys laugh at Trump DOJ's indictment of Don Lemon

The indictment of journalist Don Lemon was recently unsealed, and many legal experts are largely in agreement that the charging document is flimsy at best.

On Friday, CNN host Jake Tapper posted the unsealed 12-page indictment of his former colleague to his official X account. Lemon has been charged with one count of conspiracy against right of religious freedom at place of worship and one count of impeding access to the exercise of religious freedom at a place of worship. The charges stem from Lemon documenting a protest at a church in St. Paul, Minnesota where one of the pastors is reportedly in a leadership position within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The indictment was immediately met with mockery by various attorneys, journalists and legal commentators. New York Times Justice Department correspondent Glenn Thrush observed that one of the allegations against Lemon "is that he and [a] protester -- 2 people -- 'largely surrounded' the pastor, and then Lemon asked the pastor 'questions.'" Washington D.C. based attorney John Aravosis wrote on social media that the indictment "basically accuses [Lemon] of journalism."

"He asked the pastor and congregants questions. Yeah, that’s literally journalism," Aravosis wrote. "There’s no proof, or even substantive allegation, of Lemon partaking in any conspiracy. They’re claiming that his presence is proof that he conspired with them. And that’s not true. It’s proof of journalism."

"If this is the case against Don Lemon, it's about as weak as it gets," tweeted criminal defense attorney Scott Greenfield.

"[A]s far as I can tell, the 'crime' that Lemon is being charged with is knowing that this group was about to go protest and not telling anyone on his livestream where they were going?" Attorney Randy Herman asked his Bluesky followers.

"I give it eight weeks for the indictment of Don Lemon to be thrown out," attorney Bradley P. Moss wrote on Bluesky.

"This is one of the shakiest indictments ever," podcaster Vince Wilson wrote on X. "All I see from this is a journalist doing what journalists do."


FBI inundated with 'salacious allegations' of Trump assaulting women in Epstein files: CNN

President Donald Trump's administration has apparently been aware of allegations he assaulted a woman, according to one reporter reviewing the latest batch of Epstein files.

CNN correspondent MJ Lee reported Friday on the contents of some of the "302 documents" that are included in the most recent tranche of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents the Department of Justice (DOJ) recently released. 302 forms are official FBI files for documenting witness interviews and summarizing victim statements.

"When you go through the files that were released today, there are multiple 302s, and they are significant because for many of these survivors, they've been wondering for years, sometimes decades — 'is there a a record of what I once told the FBI about Epstein's wrongdoings? Everything I know about him and his actions?'" Lee said.

"But the important thing is that they may not actually get the answers to whether the FBI actually did anything to follow up on these complaints," she continued. "But I do know for a fact that there are survivors who are currently poring through these documents, trying to see if they can see that their 302, the information they gave the FBI, are included in these documents."

Lee noted that many of Epstein's victims have said that despite the DOJ being more than a month past the statutory deadline imposed by the Epstein Files Transparency Act — which was presumably so the Justice Department could make all appropriate redactions to protect victims — some of their names and identifying information remain unredacted. This is despite Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche saying during a Friday press conference that names and faces of all women in the files were redacted.

"Todd Blanche, you heard him saying that he very much cares about protecting the identity of the victims. But even some Jane Does that I've spoken with, they say that their names are all throughout the file," Lee said. "So there is, to say the least, a lot of anger coming from the survivors and the victims about how the redactions have been botched once again."

CNN host Brianna Keilar then asked about the DOJ reportedly pulling a link containing damning allegations about President Donald Trump, before restoring access once journalists noticed the omission. Lee noted that despite Blanche saying the DOJ did not try to protect Trump in the latest release, Justice Department leaders apparently discussed the allegations amongst themselves.

"There is a document in the files that were released today that does show that there were at least internal discussions within Trump's DOJ about allegations of sexual assault that were made against Donald Trump that were received through an FBI tip line," she said. "And officials here appear to be discussing a list of these tips that came in. We are not going to detail them because many of them are unverified tips, but the FBI officials even went as far as to color-code the various tips, saying yellow is going to be used for the more salacious allegations against Donald Trump. Some of them we can see in the document, were followed up on, others were not, and some were deemed not credible."


- YouTube www.youtube.com

Kennedy Center fires high-ranking staffer who worked there for a decade

Washington D.C.'s Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts — which is chaired by President Donald Trump and led by a board he personally selected – recently fired one of its most experienced staffers despite her 10-year history with the institution.

The Daily Beast reported Thursday that Sarah Kramer, who was the Kennedy Center's senior director of artistic operations, has been fired as of Wednesday night. The auto-reply to messages sent to her professional email address reads: "Sarah Kramer is no longer an employee of the Kennedy Center."

Kramer was terminated after first starting at the Kennedy Center as an assistant manager for special programming in 2016. She worked her way up the organization's ranks and attained the titles of assistant manager, manager for programming and eventually became senior director of artistic operations. She did not provide a reason for her firing, and the Kennedy Center has not yet responded to requests for comment.

"Sarah is a member of the Programming team, working across both the curatorial and production teams and across all genres," an archived version of her staff bio reads. "Her heart and career started with dance and she aspires to actually put on a pair of tap shoes instead of shuffling around her kitchen with a stray 'Shuffle Off to Buffalo.'"

Kramer's firing comes just one day after another high-profile Kennedy Center hire quit after less than two weeks on the job. Kevin Couch had been hired as senior vice president of artistic programming on January 16, though he resigned from the role just 12 days later. Prior to being hired at the Kennedy Center, Couch ran his branding firm CBC Creative, and previously worked as a manager of various musical acts including 1990's R&B group Color Me Badd.

BRAND NEW STORIES
@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.