'Vindicated': Trump-targeted law firms are fighting back — and winning
U.S. President Donald Trump holds an executive order, at the White House, in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 25, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
Federal judges — appointed by both Republican and Democratic presidents — have delivered major setbacks to the legal push behind President Donald Trump’s efforts to penalize certain law firms, The Hill reported Sunday.
In recent rulings, three judges invalidated executive actions designed to restrict government work for prominent firms including Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, and Jenner & Block.
"The early wins underscore the legal system’s ability to withstand the Trump administration’s pressure test, and have led some in the legal community to take shots at other elite firms that struck deals with Trump to avoid punishments," the report noted.
READ MORE: Outrage grows over a single paragraph buried deep in Republicans' 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Harold Hongju Koh, a Yale Law School professor, told The Hill: “This is a moment for courage, not capitulation."
“The firms that showed courage are being vindicated, and the ones who have capitulated have another chance to show courage,” he added.
Several major law firms have become targets of Trump’s backlash, largely due to their ties to figures and investigations he considers hostile.
Perkins Coie has been in Trump’s crosshairs for years, primarily because of its legal support for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and its connection to the opposition research that produced the widely discredited Steele dossier.
READ MORE: Signs the tide is turning on Trump
WilmerHale drew scrutiny from Trump for employing Robert Mueller both before and after he led the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Similarly, Jenner & Block came under fire for its past association with Andrew Weissmann, a former prosecutor involved in Mueller’s team and a frequent Trump critic.
In a sharply worded decision issued Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon — appointed by President George W. Bush — ruled in favor of WilmerHale, denouncing Trump’s actions as an attack on the foundational principles of the American legal system.
Leon argued that targeting major law firms with executive orders undermines the independence of both the judiciary and the legal profession, which he described as essential pillars of the nation’s justice system.
Meanwhile, in a piece published last week, Democracy Docket, a platform supporting voting rights, highlighted analysis by Stanford political science professor Adam Bonica which indicates that federal district courts have ruled against the Trump administration in 96% of cases in May.
"Bonica’s findings suggest that judges from both political leanings are consistently ruling against Trump, with 72% of Republican-appointed judges and 80% of Democratic-appointed judges issuing unfavorable decisions.Trump’s cross-ideological loss rate is likely due to several factors," the article said.
READ MORE: 'Almost cartoonish': Expert says 'Trumpy style' of MAGA women about 'signaling allegiance'
