What JD Vance really thinks of women and children — in his own words
In a comprehensive analysis of Republican vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance's views on women and children, several controversial statements and policy positions have come to light. Vance, who was recently named as former President Donald Trump's running mate, has faced renewed scrutiny over his past comments and beliefs. A recent analysis by journalist Judd Legum details Vance's views.
Vance has repeatedly criticized childless politicians, most notably referring to Vice President Kamala Harris as a "childless cat lady" who "doesn't really have a stake" in the country's future. He has extended this criticism to other Democratic leaders, suggesting that those without children should be excluded from leadership positions. However, it's worth noting that Harris is a stepmother to two children, a fact that contradicts Vance's characterization.
The Ohio senator's views on family structure are equally contentious. In a 2021 speech, Vance argued against women leaving violent marriages, suggesting that the sexual revolution's emphasis on personal happiness had negative consequences for children. When questioned about this stance, Vance deflected, citing higher rates of domestic violence among non-married couples.
Vance has also proposed controversial voting policies, suggesting that parents should have more electoral power than non-parents. He has advocated for giving votes to children, with parents controlling those votes, effectively giving families with children more influence in elections.
Despite his professed support for families, Vance has criticized efforts to make childcare more affordable. He labeled universal daycare as a "class war against normal people," implying that parents who use daycare value their jobs more than their children. This stance is at odds with the reality many American families face, with childcare costs often exceeding typical mortgage payments.
On reproductive rights, Vance has taken a hardline stance. He opposed a Department of Health and Human Services rule protecting the privacy of women seeking reproductive healthcare, arguing that abortion records should be available to law enforcement. Vance has also called for federal action to prevent women from traveling out of state for abortions, citing concerns about disproportionate impacts on Black women.
As Vance's views come under increased scrutiny, they raise questions about the potential impact on policy should the Trump-Vance ticket prevail in the upcoming election.
NOW READ: Residents symbolically cleanse Michigan town after white supremacist march
