Trump schooled by judge in overnight denial of attempt to block National Archives docs
A judge wasted no time in swatting down an emergency request from Donald Trump to block the National Archives from sending over sensitive documents to the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection.
The twice-impeached one-term president filed the emergency request late Monday night, and Judge Tanya Chutkan responded just after midnight and gave Trump's attorneys a brief lesson in basic courtroom procedures.
"Federal Rule of Civil Procedure allows temporary injunctive relief "[w]hile an appeal is pending from an interlocutory order of final judgment,'" the judge responded. "This court has not yet entered any such interlocutory order of final judgment and thus a request for relief under Rule 62(d), which plainly requires an interlocutory order of final judgment before considering such motions, is premature."
Trump's attorney, Jesse Binnall, had asked Chutkan to approve the "administrative stay" of her own ruling before she issued it so the former president could appeal the decision before the Archives started turning over documents, and he also warned the judge that he would ask an appeals court to step in if she didn't rule by Wednesday.
JUST IN: Trump tells Judge Chutkan that if she doesn't rule on his effort to block the Jan. 6 committee by Wednesday, he's going to immediately ask the Appeals Court to intervene.pic.twitter.com/AjCyLiwIen— Kyle Cheney (@Kyle Cheney) 1636430042
Tanya Chutkan to Trump: You can't have an emergency stay until I rule.pic.twitter.com/2dD3YdxA4A— emptywheel (@emptywheel) 1636452502
- Trump pleads with judge to 'slow down' Jan. 6 probe — falsely ... ›
- Trump to file a lawsuit against Biden White House to keep a lid ... ›
- 'Unique and extraordinary circumstances': Biden WH counsel blocks ... ›
- Trump's archives scandal gets worse: More than a dozen boxes retrieved -- and there are more missing - Alternet.org ›
- Trump committed crimes when he took 'top secret' files: If prosecution is 'politicizing the law' -- then he’s above it - Alternet.org ›