Legal jeopardy is far from over for Kyle Rittenhouse — here's why
Appearing on MSNBC on Saturday morning, less than 24 hours after a jury in Wisconsin found Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty after shooting and killing two Black Lives Matter protesters, a former New York prosecutor suggested that families of the victims could file civil suits with an expectation of success.
Speaking with host Kendis Gibson, Charles Coleman said it would be up to the families if they want to pursue Rittenhouse further.
"Charles, the criminal case is over, but could Rittenhouse still face anything civilly, any civil penalties?" host Gibson asked.
"He could," the attorney conceded. "I don't know how likely it is, but it is very possible. I think that the outcome of this criminal case certainly gives the chance of a civil case some degree of difficulty in terms of being able to get a liability verdict in civil court but it's important that viewers understand that the standard for a civil case is much lower in terms of the standard of proof than it is for a criminal case."
"A criminal case requires that it is beyond a reasonable doubt," he elaborated. "Whereas a civil case requires that it is beyond a preponderance of the evidence, which is basically 50.0001% of being able to prove or establish liability. With a lower bar perhaps it may be that plaintiffs decide that they want to try to sue for wrongful death, or some other sort of injury, and make Kyle Rittenhouse responsible -- that remains to be seen at this point."
MSNBCBACK 11 20 2021 07 09 04 youtu.be
- Rittenhouse verdict championed on right-wing social media as green light for killing protesters - Alternet.org ›
- After the Rittenhouse: Will 'white freedom' spell the ruin of America? - Alternet.org ›
- Conservative brutally mocks MAGA 'soy boys' who want to make Kyle Rittenhouse and his 'a hero' - Alternet.org ›