Utility companies want everyone to believe the climate crisis caught them completely by surprise
There needs to be a word. A word that combines frustrating, terrifying, and infuriating. A word for a story that contains information that lets you know that the people who are not just riding on the bus, but steering it toward a cliff, have absolutely no plans for what comes next even as the front wheels leave the ground.
This article from The New York Times starts off describing a specific incident that's frightening enough, but also strangely heartening. Homeowners in Oregon have been calling their local utility, not to complain about their power being down, but to ask that their power be turned off. That's because they were concerned that a coming storm might knock down their lines and trigger more fires in what's already one of the worst fire seasons. Truthfully, being willing to sit at home in the dark, even with the miserable weather that's swept over much of the Northwest this summer, in order to protect forests and neighbors, seems like the mark of pretty good citizens.
But behind that incident is an astounding admission—utility companies are utterly unprepared for situations like the one behind the fires in Oregon.
In fact, it's far worse.
Nationwide, electric utilities, grid operators and regulators have struggled to adequately prepare for the hazards of global warming, like storm surges that can knock out substations and heat waves that can cause power plants to falter, with many expecting that the biggest threats will not materialize for decades to come.
As the nation roasts under one set of record highs after another, the West watches water supplies evaporate in the Megadrought, and air conditioners everywhere spin up to levels that trigger blackouts and brownouts, the people who are among those most to blame for the situation now say they are utterly unprepared. Utility companies saying they are still "expecting that the biggest threats will not materialize for decades to come" may be a bigger example of cognitive dissonance than Rep. Elise Stefanik vowing to protect Medicare and Medicaid from "socialist healthcare."
TheTimes quotes an energy expert from Texas as saying, "It's fair to say there was this widespread assumption that the impacts of climate change and extreme weather would unfold more gradually, and there would be more time to prepare."
On the one hand, it's exasperating that the people who are right in the middle of this issue would claim that they didn't know what was going on, and behave as though they could just sit back for decades before taking steps to address the climate crisis. When I worked at the world's largest coal company, you can bet they knew what was happening, all the way back into the 1980s. They certainly took steps. They took steps to start dozens of fake "institutes" denying climate change. They took steps to fund anyone they could find who would author a paper claiming manmade climate change wasn't happening. They took steps to print "Plants need CO2!" banners and "America Digs Coal" bumper stickers. They took steps to fund tea party events, where they could prop up speakers against any form of environmental regulation. They took steps to stuff the campaign coffers of Republican candidates full of cash, so they could stand in front of the nation and make jokes about the climate.
They weren't ignorant. Just evil. So it's hard to believe that any electric utility in the nation didn't know this was coming.
However, that's not to deny that the climate crisis has a messaging problem. How many times have you read an article that includes the phrase "by the end of this century" when describing some effect of the warming planet? By the end of the century, the oceans will rise X amount. By the end of the century, global temperatures will be up by Y degrees. By the end of the century, Z amount of rainforest will be lost. It's understandable that many people see the climate crisis as something decades away, because that's how it's so often written about.
When governments and industries are working to negotiate the details of a climate agreement, it's understandable that they work against goals, and plan for situations that are genuinely decades in the future. It has to be that way. It's only by looking at longterm events that the full danger of the climate crisis is visible.
But when reporting on the crisis, every use of "over the next 50 years" becomes a soft, soft pillow telling readers to relax: This is all far away. Nothing to concern you at the moment. And now, let's turn to sports.
The climate crisis is happening over the next century. In the sense that it's happening every single day of the current century, including today. And a failure to deliver the message that things are going to be hotter, drier, colder, wetter, less predictable, more extreme, and increasingly more difficult every day is failing the public. American forests are burning now. The rainforests of the Amazon Basin are going away now. The western United States is in a water crisis now. Oceans are rising now. Storms are worse now. Arctic ice is vanishing now. The climate crisis is creating whole new forms of weather right now.
It's not coming soon. It's not imminent. It's not even inevitable. It's already here. What happens every day from here on is that we decide how bad it's going to get.
And one things that's really clear: This is unacceptable.
With rare exceptions, most electricity providers nationwide still don't conduct detailed climate studies that would help them understand all the ways that increased heat, drought, wildfires or flooding can ravage their power grids, researchers have found.
Why not? Because no one makes them do it. No one punishes them for failure. In fact, as Texas's recent grid failure vividly illustrates, being unprepared and leaving Americans without energy can be extremely lucrative. While 170 Texans were dying in a blackout over the winter, this is how the utilities described it.
This week is like hitting the jackpot with some of these incredible prices," [Comstock Resources chief financial officer Roland Burns] said. "Frankly, we were able to sell at super premium prices for a material amount of production."
That has to end. People need to understand that the climate crisis isn't something far away. Media needs to stop reporting it as if it's something far away. And everyone needs to understand that when utilities claim they thought it was something far away … they're just spewing dangerous bullshit.
- This is climate change: Burnt parts of Pacific forests are landing on ... ›
- Clear sign of climate change: Western fires are burning higher in the ... ›
- The real environmental crisis for humanity goes far beyond climate ... ›
- What's this Texas Republican’s answer to the climate crisis? 'Turn the damn air conditioner up' - Alternet.org ›
- 'Tinkering around the edges of the climate crisis': Central banks accused of 'dawdling' as world burns - Alternet.org ›