Fox News promoted a study warning about kids wearing masks — but it just got retracted by a medical journal
Although the COVID-19 pandemic has killed more than 4 million people worldwide and over 608,000 people in the United States (according to researchers at Baltimore's Johns Hopkins University), the right-wing media continue to promote a variety of anti-vaccine and anti-mask views. Fox News' website, on July 2, published an article by health reporter Kayla Rivas promoting a claim that wearing protective face masks is potentially dangerous for children. This But a medical journal has since retracted that claim.
The research letter that Rivas' article linked to was published on the JAMA Network's website on June 30. It suggested that kids wearing masks inhaled unhealthy levels of carbon dioxide. Host Tucker Carlson also promoted the study's claims on his primetime show.
Promoting a claim that wearing masks is potentially dangerous for children is the type of red meat that Fox News' audience devours, and being scientific often takes a back seat to "owning the liberals." But this week, JAMA retracted the letter that Rivas promoted.
The retraction reads, "Following publication, numerous scientific issues were raised regarding the study methodology, including concerns about the applicability of the device used for assessment of carbon dioxide levels in this study setting, and whether the measurements obtained accurately represented carbon dioxide content in inhaled air, as well as issues related to the validity of the study conclusions. In their invited responses to these and other concerns, the authors did not provide sufficiently convincing evidence to resolve these issues, as determined by editorial evaluation and additional scientific review. Given fundamental concerns about the study methodology, uncertainty regarding the validity of the findings and conclusions, and the potential public health implications, the editors have retracted this Research Letter."
Dr. Megan Ranney, a doctor at Brown Emergency in Providence, Rhode Island, saw the retraction and tweeted:
RETRACTED!!!! (But should never have been published. This was poor science, to say the least.) To be super clear:… https://t.co/QwfCFD7Y0H— Megan Ranney MD MPH 🗽 (@Megan Ranney MD MPH 🗽) 1626450143.0
Here are some Twitter responses to the retraction:
@meganranney @trishgreenhalgh @kprather88 Absolutely appalling that this was published in the first instance. Quite… https://t.co/bNpzEwFwXn— Dylan Wyn Jones (@Dylan Wyn Jones) 1626451119.0
@meganranney @ddiamond @trishgreenhalgh @kprather88 Good. I worked in an N95 mask for most of my workday for a lot… https://t.co/LwTrNfzlPp— AnnHedonia (@AnnHedonia) 1626451496.0
@lucyem4 @meganranney @capeannsky @trishgreenhalgh @kprather88 Same! Seven hours a day through cloth & KN95, usuall… https://t.co/AnsKheLg5A— Chris Carman (@Chris Carman) 1626457709.0
@meganranney @trishgreenhalgh @kprather88 What has happened to thorough Pre-publication peer review? Even if an art… https://t.co/0tY3qzghpl— Robert Tuchler MD (@Robert Tuchler MD) 1626453911.0
@meganranney @trishgreenhalgh @kprather88 so many parents in my natural parenting circles were convinced masks GAVE you COVID :(— Marie Myung-Ok 명옥 Lee (@Marie Myung-Ok 명옥 Lee) 1626450938.0
- This columnist pulls the mask off far-right Sen. Josh Hawley as he ... ›
- 'Unquenchable thirst for Fox News appearances': Josh Hawley's ... ›
- Staffers beg Fox News to fire Tucker Carlson — but there's a 'dirty ... ›
- Watch: Testimony from an anti-vaxxer goes 'off the rails' - Alternet.org ›
- Anti-mask Arkansas senator who called coronavirus a 'hoax' gets ... ›
- BUSTED: 7 'charlatans' -- from anti-vaxxers to anti-maskers -- who ... ›
- CNN's John Berman Responds To Tucker Carlson's Anti-Mask ... ›
- Researchers reject Fox News host Laura Ingraham's misuse of their ... ›
- Fox News still wants you to wear a mask. Some on the network ... ›
- To end COVID, Californians can't ignore anti-maskers forever - Los ... ›
- Coronavirus: Why are Americans so angry about masks? - BBC News ›
- Anti-mask protesters explain why they refuse to cover their faces ... ›