Economist Paul Krugman explains why Trump's corporate tax cuts were a 'dismal failure'

Economist Paul Krugman explains why Trump's corporate tax cuts were a 'dismal failure'
Image via Sreengrab.

President Joe Biden has proposed a corporate tax hike as a way to pay for his ambitious infrastructure plan, and some Republicans are objecting vehemently — insisting that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was a raging success. But liberal economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman disagrees, slamming the Trump-era GOP tax cuts as a "dismal failure" in a Twitter thread posted on April 5.

Passed when Donald Trump was president and Republicans controlled both branches of Congress, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act lowered the United States' corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% — and Biden has proposed increasing it to 28%. Many Democrats have emphasized that the Republican tax cuts of late 2017 did precious little for the American middle class and greatly increased the federal deficit.

Krugman, in his Twitter thread, writes, "I've been a bit surprised to see some Republicans opposing Biden's plans by claiming that the Trump tax cut for corporations was a big success. I thought they'd gone into hiding given its dismal failure."

The economist goes on to lay out some reasons why the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was hardly the major success Republicans claimed it would be. Americans, he recalls, were "promised a huge surge in business investment" by Republicans — and he posts a chart that uses U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis data to show that the "surge" never materialized.

Krugman adds that Republicans who are still defending the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act "have a long history of denying plain facts that conflict with their agenda "— for example, being in denial when there was a "surge in Obamacare enrollment" in 2014 during President Barack Obama's second term.

The liberal economist wraps up his thread by predicting that if the U.S. economy "booms" under Biden's watch, Republicans will claim that Trump deserves the credit.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.