Texas energy supplier is covering up key records on its recent weather disaster: report

Texas energy supplier is covering up key records on its recent weather disaster: report



Millions of Texans will remember February as the month in which they found themselves without electricity, heat and running water during freezing temperatures. The Electric Reliability Council of Texas, the nonprofit corporation that supplies power to most residents of the state, has come under scrutiny because of February's power debacle — and now, ERCOT is refusing to turn over records pertaining to its preparation for the severe weather.

In a March 1 letter to Justin Gordon — who is an assistant general counsel in the Texas Attorney General's Office and reports to Texas AG Ken Paxton — ERCOT representative Jay B. Stewart said that ERCOT is not subject to Texas' open records law and asked Paxton to rule accordingly. According to Houston-based attorney Joe Larsen, ERCOT's refusal to hand over those records could result in a legal battle and possibly end up at the Texas Supreme Court.

Larsen told the Texas Observer that "there are going to be a bunch of people out there" seeking information from ERCOT. And the Observer itself is one of them.

Texas Observer reporter Christopher Collins explains, "In late February, the Observer submitted two public information requests to ERCOT related to the storm. One asked for e-mails and text messages from select ERCOT board members and top staffers before, during and after the polar vortex hit Texas. The second requested ERCOT's communications with Vistra Energy, a Texas-based energy corporation company that claims it warned the grid operator of the impending danger days before the storm."

Collins adds, "The requests were intended to help answer questions about the disastrous power outage: How much warning did ERCOT have in advance of the storm and how did they prepare? How did ERCOT implement 'rolling' blackouts across the state? And, ultimately, who's to blame for the biggest power failure in the state's history?"

Collins points out that ERCOT, in its letter to Paxton's office, "claims that it isn't subject to state open records law because it already has a separate system for disseminating records that was set up by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). The PUC is the state agency that oversees ERCOT."

Adrian Shelley, director of the consumer rights group Public Citizen, told the Observer, "These kinds of crazy structures are just not in the public interest. And if ERCOT is in part to blame for the recent disasters, then one would think that additional public oversight is in the public interest."

According to Larsen, the separate set of public records laws that the PUC set up for ERCOT is not consistent with the Texas Public Information Act.

Larsen told the Observer, "This just can't possibly fly where the PUC gets to set up its own parallel to the Public Information Act and gets to decide what its own exceptions are."

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}
@2022 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.