CNBC's Rick Santelli loses it in fight over the benefits of COVID restrictions: ‘It’s not science!’

CNBC's Rick Santelli loses it in fight over the benefits of COVID restrictions: ‘It’s not science!’

Andrew Ross Sorkin, co-host of CNBC's "Squawk Box," and far-right financial pundit Rick Santelli have radically different views on the coronavirus pandemic — and Santelli has, more than once, drawn criticism for attacking social distancing measures. The two of them had another heated exchange on Friday morning, when an angry Santelli once again railed against COVID-19 restrictions.

"You can't tell me that shutting down, which is the easiest answer, is necessarily the only answer," the 64-year-old Santelli, a former bond trader, yelled.

Sorkin noted the benefits of wearing a protective face mask in public places during the pandemic, pointing out that dining indoors in a restaurant — where customers are removing their masks in order to eat and drink — is more dangerous than wearing a mask consistently while shopping in a big box store.

"It's science," Sorkin said — to which Santelli angrily responded, "It's not science! Five hundred people in a Lowe's aren't any safer than 150 people in a restaurant that holds 600. I don't believe it. Sorry. Don't believe it."

Sorkin, however, maintained that he was merely stating what many medical experts have said, telling Santelli, "OK, you don't have to believe it, but let me just say this: You're doing a disservice to the viewer because the viewers need to understand it."

The "Squawk Box" co-host went on to tell Santelli, "I would like to keep our viewers as healthy as humanly possible. The idea of packing people into restaurants and packing people into a Best Buy are completely different things."

Back in March, Santelli drew criticism from medical experts when he made a "herd immunity" argument and claimed that infecting more people with COVID-19 would neutralize the novel coronavirus — which is the same type of argument that Dr. Scott Atlas, who recently left President Donald Trump's coronavirus task force, has been making. Trump himself has seemed to favor letting the virus spread widely and vehemently opposed coronavirus restrictions, such as shutting down restaurants and schools.

Santelli, nine months ago, said, "Maybe we'd be just better off if we gave (the virus) to everybody, and then in a month, it would be over because the mortality rate of (COVID-19) probably isn't going to be any different if we did it that way than (in) the long-term picture, but the difference is we're wreaking havoc on global and domestic economies."

The pandemic has escalated in recent months, reaching news highs in hospitalizations, cases, and deaths from the virus this week. The total number of recorded deaths from COVID in the U.S. is swiftly approaching 300,000, and more than 100,000 people are currently hospitalized for the illness. Daily deaths from the virus could soon reach or surpass a record 3,000 a day.

Santelli has been described as a catalyst for the Tea Party movement. While broadcasting from the floor of the Chicago Mercantile exchange in February 2009, he accused the federal government of "promoting bad behavior" and said it was time for a "Chicago Tea Party."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.