Trump's own administration just brutally debunked his claim about deleted votes

Trump's own administration just brutally debunked his claim about deleted votes
President Donald J. Trump is joined by Department of Homeland Security Acting Secretary Chad Wolf; U.S. Customs and Border Protection Acting Commissioner Mark Morgan; Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers LTG Todd Semonite and MG Scott Spellmon, Special Assistant to Commanding General LTG Semonite, left, as President Trump participates at an update on border wall construction operations Tuesday, Aug. 18, 2020, in the Joe Foss Hanger, in Yuma, Ariz. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

President Donald Trump has a problem. His disinformation campaign intended to cast doubt on the 2020 election he lost to President-elect Joe Biden is being debunked, in part, by the very government he runs.

On Thursday evening, a statement from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, a part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, along other officials explained that there is no reason to believe the election's vote count has been altered or tampered with.

"When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary," it said. "This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised." [emphasis original]

This stood in contrast to Trump's own efforts to insist the election was rigged against him, a claim that has been furthered by his allies, including Rudy Giuliani and White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany. Other Republicans have continued to express doubt about the results of the presidential election, despite no serious evidence of malfeasance or error in the conclusion that Biden has won.

Earlier in the day, Trump shared a bogus claim alleging that millions of votes in the election were deleted, which was promptly flagged by Twitter:

It's not clear if the statement from CISA was a direct response to Trump's sharing of the conspiracy itself or was simply meant to address the claims that had been floating around before they were elevated by the president. But either way, it stood as a clear refutation of the president's lies.

"While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too," the statement said. "When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."

It also noted: "The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history."

PolitiFact, too, rated the president's claim as a "Pants on Fire."

"The president's tweet traces back to an unsubstantiated claim on a pro-Trump website that cited Edison Research," the site explained. "But Edison Research told us they have found no evidence of voter fraud. Dominion, state election officials and federal officials say there's no evidence that millions of votes were miscounted. Trump's claim is inaccurate and ridiculous."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.