Justice Clarence Thomas takes shot at 'chilling' mask mandates during SCOTUS Obamacare hearing

Justice Clarence Thomas takes shot at 'chilling' mask mandates during SCOTUS Obamacare hearing
US Supreme Court.

Justice Clarence Thomas, who once went for an entire decade without asking a single question during Supreme Court oral arguments, weighed in on Tuesday's landmark review of the Affordable Care Act by taking a potshot at coronavirus mask mandates.

Central to today's hearing is if the now-defunct "individual mandate" being found unconstitutional in a lower court means the entire ObamaCare law must be struck down.

Despite coronavirus cases surging out of control – more than 10 million Americans have contracted the virus and the U.S. is rapidly approaching a quarter-million deaths – Justice Thomas decided to attack "mask mandates," which are proven to save thousands of lives.

"I assume that in most places there is no penalty for wearing a face mask, or a mask during COVID," Justice said Thomas, who was the most far-right jurist on the Supreme Court until Amy Coney Barrett's recent swearing in.

"But there is some degree of opprobrium if one does not wear it in certain settings. What if someone violates that command, let's say it's in similar terms to the mandate here but no penalty. Would they have standing to challenge the mandate to wear a mask?" he asked.

Thomas then went on to say that "even without a penalty" either to not buy insurance or to not wear a mask, "you could have a chilling effect."

Thomas' question is not by accident.

It comes just one day after President-elect Joe Biden announced his coronavirus task force and that he would try to get a nationwide mask mandate "by working with governors and mayors."

Thomas' wife, Ginni Thomas, is a far right wing activist and lobbyist who has been spreading lies about Joe Biden.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.