Barrett slammed for use of ‘sexual preference’: She lives 'in a very enclosed — and homophobic — bubble'

Barrett slammed for use of ‘sexual preference’: She lives 'in a very enclosed — and homophobic — bubble'
Image via the White House.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett's responses during the first day of questioning in her Supreme Court confirmation hearing are being thoroughly criticized. In just the first hour of questioning, Coney Barrett refused to tell Senators if she would overturn the Affordable Care Act, a woman's right to abortion, or same-sex marriage.

But it was her responses to a question about discrimination that led many to express outrage.

Coney Barrett insisted she has never discriminated against LGBTQ people based on "sexual preference."

The phrase itself is offensive to LGBTQ people. Aside from being outdated, and demonstrating Judge Coney Barrett's views are antiquated, it is a term that makes clear those who use it believe being LGBTQ is a choice.

"The term 'sexual preference' is typically used to suggest that being lesbian, gay or bisexual is a choice and therefore can and should be 'cured,'" according to GLAAD. "Sexual orientation is the accurate description of an individual's enduring physical, romantic and/or emotional attraction to members of the same and/or opposite sex and is inclusive of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, as well as straight men and women."

And as attorney and author Jill Filipovic notes, Judge Coney Barrett indeed has discriminated based on "sexual preference."


Attorneys Mark Joseph Stern and Sasha Samberg-Champion both link Judge Coney Barrett's use of the offensive term to her ties to the anti-LGBTQ hate group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).


Journalist Michelangelo Signorile sums up the case perfectly:



Here's how many are responding to Coney Barrett's offensive remarks:






















Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.