Democracy advocates sounded immediate alarms Thursday morning after President Donald Trump floated the idea of delaying the November elections, citing mail-in voting and the unfounded threat of voter fraud.
“This is a coup in the making,” warned Robert Weisman, president of Public Citizen, in response to Trump.
“Voting by mail will not create a risk of fraud,” Weisman said. “In fact, voting by mail is an absolute necessity to ensure Americans can exercise their franchise amid a pandemic—which Trump has made dramatically worse through his utter incompetence and callous indifference to human life.”
The president of the United States is broadcasting that he is considering a coup to hold on to power. Make no mistake: We are teetering on the edge of autocracy. https://t.co/OXXgpWtIDC
— Public Citizen (@Public_Citizen) July 30, 2020
Groups like Common Cause noted that the president does not have the power to postpone the election date.
Reminder: President Trump doesn’t have the constitutional authority to delay the election.
If he tries, we will see him in court.
— Common Cause (@CommonCause) July 30, 2020
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison pushed back on Trump’s tweet, responding, “This is how democracy dies in the USA. Don’t let it happen.”
“These messages from Trump are intended to promote chaos and confusion, and undermine confidence in our elections. We REJECT all of it,” tweeted Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
According to Stand Up America founder and president Sean Eldridge, the president’s tweets shouldn’t be brushed aside.
“As his latest comments show, Trump poses an existential threat to our democracy. While he has no authority to delay the election, we cannot ignore his escalating lies and attacks on our democracy,” Eldridge said in a statement.
“Americans need to be ready to mobilize if Trump contests the results or refuses to concede—and ‘Protect the Results‘ is building a network of millions of Americans to meet the moment if we need to take to the streets in protest,” he added.
Some critical observers wondered whether Trump’s tweet was an effort to stir up controversy or distract the media on the same day that data released from the Commerce Department showed the U.S. economy suffered its largest contraction in the country’s history last quarter.
This seems like the correct take. https://t.co/XKk0CYtGN9
— Krystal Ball (@krystalball) July 30, 2020
“If Trump truly cared about our elections,” said Public Citizen’s Weisman, “he would demand Congress provide the $3.6 billion in funding that states and localities need to properly and safely administer them amid the pandemic. The real issue for Trump, of course, is Trump. The economy is in free-fall and Trump is worried about what that means for his electoral prospects.”
The president’s tweet Thursday comes less than two weeks after Trump—who’s trailing presumptive Democratic Party nominee Joe Biden in the polls—refused to commit to accepting the results of the 2020 presidential election if he is defeated.
Asked by Fox News‘ Chris Wallace whether he intends to accept the election results, the president responded, “No, I’m not gonna just say yes. I’m not gonna say it, and I didn’t last time either.”
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.
It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.