alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.

Susan Collins defends Brett Kavanaugh's precedent-shattering anti-choice vote: 'Gave no indication that he supports overturning Roe'

Susan Collins image via MSNBC.

Embattled Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said in a statement Monday that she agreed with the Supreme Court decision striking down Louisiana's draconian abortion law, adding that while conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh sided with the minority, his opinion "gave no indication" that he would overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion nationwide.


"Some have tried to suggest that this opinion is an indication of now certain justices would vote on the question of whether abortion remains legal. That is reading too much into this specific decision," said Collins, almost the last nominally pro-choice Republican in national politics.

"As Justice Gorsuch noted, 'In truth Roe v. Wade is not even at issue here,'" Collins continued. "And while Justice Kavanaugh called for additional fact finding in the case, he gave no indication in his dissenting opinion that he supports overturning Roe."

Collins, who has won four consecutive Senate races in Maine, finds herself trailing Democratic challenger Sara Gideon in a campaign haunted by her 2018 vote to confirm Kavanaugh, despite credible allegations of sexual assault and a common understanding that he would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade — and indeed was chosen specifically for that purpose.

Ahead of that vote, Collins famously claimed to believe that Kavanaugh would respect the precedent of Roe, and would not erode women's reproductive rights.

At the time, Collins argued that she "could not vote for a judge who had demonstrated hostility to Roe v Wade because it would indicate a lack of respect for precedent. He views precedent … as rooted in our Constitution."

The decision appears to have cost her politically, particularly among women, which Gideon was quick to exploit Monday.

"Do you still think Brett Kavanaugh believes Roe v. Wade is settled law, @SenSusanCollins?" Gideon tweeted Monday.

Indeed, the infamous mugwump was predictably dragged on social media after news of the decision broke.

"Everyone who voted wrong, we're coming for you," tweeted Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, naming Collins among four other Republican senators seen as particularly vulnerable: Cory Gardner of Colorado, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

In a matter of hours, NARAL had released a compilation of Collins' claims that Kavanaugh would uphold the precedent established in Roe.

But it was Kavanaugh who broke with precedent in the Louisiana decision, deviating from the court's 2016 ruling in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.

The 5-4 ruling Monday rejected a new Louisiana law that required abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. Two Louisiana doctors and a medical clinic had sued to overturn the law, arguing that only one doctor at one clinic would be able to provide abortion services for nearly 10,000 women per year.

"This is a victory for the people of Louisiana and the rule of law, but this case never should have gotten this far," said Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which represented the medical clinic in the case.

"We won an identical case four years ago in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, and the fact that we had to fight so hard again goes to show that nothing should be taken for granted when it comes to protecting abortion rights," she said.

Collins has found herself increasingly targeted by attacks from outside groups who sense that she is vulnerabl, such as the Lincoln Project, a PAC of never-Trump Republican operatives who have run ads in recent months excoriating Collins for betraying her electorate.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close