New report demolishes the fake Michael Flynn 'unmasking' scandal

New report demolishes the fake Michael Flynn 'unmasking' scandal
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio -- U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency and U.S. Congressman; Rep. Michael Turner spoke at a press conference at the Hope Hotel here Feb. 4. The point of the visit was to provide a general mission overview of the National Air and Space Intelligence Center and tour of the center’s capability. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class James Jacobs)

Another right wing conspiracy theory down the drain.


For days if not weeks the right has insisted various Obama administration officials had targeted former Lt. General Mike Flynn, trying to “unmask” his name from transcripts on intercepted calls with Russian officials.

That was a ludicrous assertion, since “masked” names are masked and no one knows who they are until they are unmasked.

But now, as The Washington Post reports, Flynn’s name actually wasn’t even masked.

“A Republican effort to determine who may have leaked the name of Michael Flynn in connection to his 2016 contact with the Russian ambassador has centered on the question of which Obama administration officials requested his identity be ‘unmasked’ in intelligence documents,” The Post reports.

“But in the FBI report about the communications between the two men, Flynn’s name was never redacted, former U.S. officials said.”

“When the FBI circulated [the report], they included Flynn’s name from the beginning” because it was essential to understanding its significance, said a former senior U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive intelligence. “There were therefore no requests for the unmasking of that information.”

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close