‘He ain't bright’: Trump brutally mocked for 'nonsensically' insisting there are ‘many per capitas’

‘He ain't bright’: Trump brutally mocked for 'nonsensically' insisting there are ‘many per capitas’
President Donald J. Trump, joined by Vice President Mike Pence, participates in a roundtable discussion on the Governors’ Initiative on Regulatory Innovation Monday, Dec. 16, 2019, in the Cabinet Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour)

This week, President Donald Trump defended his response to the coronavirus pandemic by asserting that that the number of COVID-19 deaths in the United States isn’t so bad when analyzed on a per capita basis. But when Trump expanded on that line of thinking, his statement led to brutal mockery on social media.

“And you know, when you say ‘per capita,’ there’s many per capitas,” Trump asserted. “It’s like, per capita relative to what? But you can look at just about any category, and we’re really at the top, meaning positive, on a per capita basis too.”

On MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski slammed and fact-checked Trump on Thursday morning, May 21 — noting that according to researchers at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, the U.S. has the ninth highest coronavirus death rate, per capita, in the world (and the highest numbers of coronavirus deaths period). But Scarborough and Brzezinski’s comments, as biting as they were, weren’t as brutal as some of the things that Twitter users have been saying about Trump’s “there’s many per capitas” statement. Trump, some of those Twitter users stressed, sounded like he didn’t understand what per capita means.

@Nicoxw1 asked, “How did this guy made it through elementary school?” And @kingsrush, responding to Trump’s “there’s many per capitas” statement, wrote, “This is news to everyone ever.”

Louisiana Democrat Rob Anderson, @RobAnderson2018, explained, “For the cheap seats, ‘per capita’ means ‘for each person,’ literally ‘by heads.’ It means ‘per person.’ There aren’t ‘many per capitas,’ that’s a nonsensical thing to say.”

@JRehling, similarly, posted, “There is one per capita. There is not any other one. For each person; in relation to people taken individually. ‘The state had fewer banks per capita than elsewhere.’”

@Medwoman1 posted, “Ok, I would like any Trump supporter to listen to this statement and then explain to me how this individual has any business being in the WH. What is that I hear? A stomping hoard of crickets?”

@_ReaalAmerican_ was short and to the point, posting, “He ain't bright.” And @eag_72 wrote, “The US has the dumbest president per capita.”

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.