Trump and Fox News abruptly stop hyping hydroxychloroquine as NIH warns against using it to treat COVID-19

Trump and Fox News abruptly stop hyping hydroxychloroquine as NIH warns against using it to treat COVID-19
President Donald J. Trump listens to a question from the audience during a live Fox News Channel town hall event with moderators Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum on Thursday, March 5, 2020, at the Scranton Cultural Center in Scranton, Pa. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

As experts warned against using the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine as a possible treatment for COVID-19, President Donald Trump and Fox News have stopped hyping it.

Trump has not mentioned hydroxychloroquine at his coronavirus news briefings since last Tuesday, according to Politico. The president was asked about a study which found more deaths among COVID-19 patients at Veterans Health Administration medical centers who took the drug than those who did not on Tuesday. The study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed and was not a "rigorous experiment," found that 28% of patients who received the drug and routine care died, compared to 11% who died after only receiving routine care.

"I don't know of the report," Trump said at Tuesday's briefing. "Obviously, there've been some very good reports, and perhaps this one's not a good report. But be looking at it, we'll have a comment on it . . . I'm always willing to take a look."

Trump previously touted a small French study which claimed to have a 100% success rate in treating coronavirus patients with the drug. The study has since been discredited by its publisher after it was discovered that researchers removed several patients who died or were moved into an intensive care unit from their results.

CNN host Don Lemon criticized Trump for shrugging off the potentially fatal side effects of a drug he has promoted for weeks.

"Now the president just says that he's going to take a look. That's not good enough. He's got a responsibility to take this seriously," Lemon said. "He promoted a totally unproven drug again and again, telling Americans desperate to do something, anything to save their lives, what have you got to lose, he said. Now he's doing the 'I barely know the guy' routine with the drug that he said would be the game-changer and a gift from heaven."

Fox News, which turned Trump on to the drug in the first place, has also backed off the hype by a lot. The network's hosts mentioned the drug at least 194 times in the first week of April and 138 times in the second week of April. But mentions of the drug declined to just 51 times for the week of April 15, The Daily Beast reported.

Primetime host Laura Ingraham frequently touted the drug on her show but "barely mentioned it last week and has done so only once since last Wednesday," according to the report. Host Tucker Carlson, who first brought the drug to Trump's attention, "has only mentioned the drug once in passing over the past 10 days." Host Sean Hannity, who repeatedly pushed the drug, has not mentioned it in nearly a week.

Dr. Mehmet Oz, who has regularly promoted the drug on Fox News, urged viewers Wednesday to wait until clinical trials have been completed before rushing to judgment.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently removed guidelines for doctors using the drug to treat coronavirus patients.

A panel convened by the National Institutes of Health issued new guidelines Tuesday warning doctors against using hydroxychloroquine, especially in combination with the antibiotic azithromycin, which the president has pushed.

The panel warned that the combination was associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death, plus additional side effects.

"There are insufficient clinical data to recommend either for or against using chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19," the panel said. "If chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine is used, clinicians should monitor the patient for adverse effects."

"Will anyone who breathlessly pitched hydroxychloroquine as a miracle drug show a modicum of regret or even self-awareness over this?" The Daily Beast's Sam Stein asked on Twitter. "Doubtful."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.